Latest
Royce Blake: Why Benefits Beat Features in Every Pitch You MakeJoe Rockey: The Psychology of Getting People to Be Honest and to BuyBen the Automator: How to Automate the Work That Wastes Your DayPaul Barry: Making Habit Change Conversational So Nobody Feels HopelessJoe Rockey: The Coming Recession Is About People, Not EconomicsDiana Lee: Using AI as a Thought Partner That Amplifies What Makes You HumanRutherford Pascal: What New Coke, Microsoft, and 32 Years in Pharma Teach About LeadershipAnthony Markey: Why Podcasting Beats Pitch-Slapping as a Way to NetworkBen the Automator: Why Digital Transformation Starts With People, Not SoftwareDeanna Farnell: How a Corporate CPA Rebuilt Her Life Around Healing Stress at the RootDaniel Holguin: Leadership Lessons From a Cancer Survivor and Former Police OfficerDoug Hohulin: How AI Could Save a Billion Lives and Prevent Avoidable DeathsRalph Brown: Four World Records and a Race Around the Entire PlanetMichael O’Brien: Why Startups Fail and What VCs Actually Look ForShawn Abeling: What Bad Leadership Looks Like From the Ground UpRhonda Bowen: Why Great Leaders Are Really Great CommunicatorsNikhil Raval: How to Actually Understand and Lead Gen ZDan Shinder: The Power of Forgiveness and Choosing What You Expose Yourself ToVladimir Ingerman: A Soviet Engineer’s Journey Through Oil, Gas, and InnovationRob Fenstermaker: The Warrior Spirit and What It Means to Lead as a ManDoris Walsh: Coaching High Achievers Torn Between Success and FulfillmentJoe Rockey: Why Your Pricing Fails Before You Ever Set a NumberWhat AI Does Well, and What It Cannot DoThe Most Dangerous Thing You OwnThe Story That Made Me Cry at My KeyboardWhat a Belly dancer Taught Me About WritingGood Security Policy Names NamesWriting Fairy Tales: Techniques That Make Stories WorkMaster Superhero Fiction: Top 10 Writing TechniquesRhythm in Writing: How to Give Your Prose a PulseI’ll Write It Myself SomedayALLi Author Self-Publishing Success StoryEmotional Writing: 8 Inspiring Techniques for Deeper ConnectionsLiterature Related Holidays: Over 100 Festive Dates for BookwormsUsing an Animal’s POV: 7 Tips for Unique StorytellingThematic Writing: 7 Techniques That Hold a Book TogetherSoftware Testing: 10 Things Most Teams Get WrongUncanny Valley in Writing: What It Is and How to Use ItWhy YouTube Sucks: A Love-Hate Account (With the Numbers)Facing Hurricane Irma: 7 Lessons in Storm SurvivalWhy TikTok Sucks: The Criticism, Backed by the NumbersEcho Chambers: Why You Are in More Than You ThinkTales from the Digital Trenches: War Stories from the Early Days of ComputingSearch Engine Echo Chambers – Why Google Shows You What You Want to HearMainstream Media Echo Chambers: When the News Becomes a Team SportEcho Chambers in Fiction – How to Write Characters Trapped in Their Own CertaintyWhy Yelp Sucks: 7 Reasons, An Unfiltered ReviewWhat Makes a LinkedIn Post Go ViralCharacter Development: An 8-Step GuideDifferent Writing Styles: A Field Guide to 9 Forms

The Mummy (2017)

TL;DR: The Mummy (2017) rates 3 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. 2017 Alex Kurtzman action horror with Tom Cruise unleashing an ancient Egyptian princess. Universal’s failed Dark Universe launch.
The Mummy (2017)
3 / 10

The Mummy is Alex Kurtzman’s 2017 American action horror film and the failed launch of Universal Pictures’ Dark Universe shared monster cinematic franchise. Tom Cruise plays Nick Morton, an Army sergeant turned antiquities looter who awakens ancient Egyptian princess Ahmanet. Sofia Boutella plays Ahmanet. Russell Crowe plays Dr. Henry Jekyll, who was supposed to anchor the broader Dark Universe franchise. Annabelle Wallis plays archaeologist Jenny Halsey. The screenplay was written by David Koepp, Christopher McQuarrie, and Dylan Kussman.

The film was produced by Universal Pictures on a budget of approximately 195 million dollars and grossed approximately 410 million dollars worldwide.

The work is the rare Cruise film that fails on most measures. The screenplay attempts to launch a shared cinematic universe while telling a single story and accomplishes neither. The horror elements operate at insufficient intensity. The action elements operate at conventional register. The Tom Cruise star vehicle elements conflict with the franchise launcher elements. The Russell Crowe Dr. Jekyll subplot exists almost entirely to advertise potential future Dark Universe films that the work’s commercial failure prevented from being made. The result is incoherent commercial product that satisfies no audience.

The Franchise Launcher Problem

Universal Pictures intended The Mummy as the launching production for a shared cinematic universe modeled on Marvel Studios’ approach. The Dark Universe was to include Dracula, Frankenstein, the Wolfman, the Bride of Frankenstein, and other Universal monster properties developed through interconnected films. The Mummy required substantial franchise foundation work that competed with its single-film storytelling requirements.

The franchise foundation work damages the film’s specific story. The Russell Crowe Dr. Jekyll character occupies substantial runtime without contributing to the immediate Mummy narrative. The character’s scenes establish Dark Universe institutional framework instead of serving the depicted Mummy story. The screenplay can support either the single film or the franchise launcher but not both. The completed film attempts both and accomplishes neither. The Dark Universe was abandoned after The Mummy’s commercial underperformance.

For Writers

Franchise foundation work and single-work storytelling require different structural priorities that single productions struggle to satisfy at once. Apply this to creative work broadly. Consider whether your work serves immediate story or builds broader infrastructure. Both functions are legitimate but often conflict within single productions.

The Cruise Vehicle Problem

Tom Cruise’s star vehicle requirements conflict with the franchise launcher requirements that the production also demanded. Cruise productions typically center the star’s specific character through accumulated dramatic situations. The franchise launcher requirements demanded that other characters receive substantial development to support potential continuing productions. The completed film cannot serve both functions.

The Cruise performance maintains the actor’s typical commitment despite the screenplay problems. The depicted action sequences, the underwater zero-gravity moments, and the supernatural confrontations all reflect substantial actor preparation. The performance isn’t the problem. The screenplay doesn’t support the actor’s typical strength because the work’s structural requirements pull in multiple directions.

For Writers

Strong individual contributions cannot save work whose structural requirements pull in conflicting directions. Apply this to creative work broadly. Consider whether your work’s structural requirements align or conflict with each other.

The Boutella Performance

Sofia Boutella’s performance as Princess Ahmanet operates at the highest register of the surrounding work. The character requires sustained physical performance, specific atmospheric authority, and committed supernatural presence. Boutella delivers all three despite the screenplay’s failure to develop the character’s specific motivations beyond generic villain template. The performance suggests what the work could have been with stronger structural foundation.

The performance engages with substantial practical effects and physical preparation. Boutella performed substantial creature movements personally including the gravity-defying sequences. The committed practical approach distinguishes the performance from purely CGI-enhanced alternatives. The film shows how committed individual performance can survive surrounding structural problems but cannot redeem the film.

For Writers

Committed individual performances can survive surrounding structural problems but cannot redeem film. Apply this to creative work broadly. Consider whether your work’s specific strengths can carry it past structural problems or whether the structural problems will overwhelm the strengths.

Craft Note

Kurtzman’s structural decision to launch the Dark Universe through the Mummy production required preparation that the completed film doesn’t adequately support. Franchise launchers typically work better when they tell single complete stories that incidentally support future possibilities instead of when they explicitly build franchise infrastructure at the cost of immediate storytelling.

Should you skip The Mummy?

The Mummy is a failed franchise launcher and one of the rare Cruise films that fails on most measures. The franchise launcher problem damages the immediate story. The Cruise vehicle problem conflicts with the franchise launcher requirements. The Boutella performance suggests what the work could have been with stronger foundation. Watch it only for completion of Cruise’s filmography or for understanding the Dark Universe collapse. Audiences seeking effective mummy cinema should engage with the 1932 Karloff original or the 1999 Brendan Fraser adventure version.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the Dark Universe fail?
The Dark Universe failed primarily because The Mummy didn’t generate sufficient commercial momentum to launch the broader franchise. The film’s mixed critical reception, the modest commercial returns, and the structural problems with the launcher approach all contributed.
How does the 2017 Mummy compare to the 1999 Brendan Fraser version?
The 1999 Stephen Sommers Mummy operates as effective adventure film with comedic register. The 2017 version operates as failed action horror with franchise launcher requirements. The 1999 film is the substantially stronger work.
How does The Mummy handle its horror content?
The horror content operates at insufficient intensity to satisfy genre expectations. The PG-13 rating and the franchise launcher requirements both constrained the depicted horror.
How does The Mummy fit Cruise’s filmography?
The Mummy represents one of the rare Cruise commercial failures. Cruise’s franchise judgment, while generally strong, isn’t infallible.
How does the runtime function?
The film runs approximately one hundred ten minutes. The compressed runtime exacerbates the structural problems by giving insufficient development time to either the single story or the franchise foundation.
What is the cultural impact of The Mummy?
Limited cultural impact except as record of failed franchise launcher. Nobody has gone back to reassess it.

Writing in This Genre

This film appears on 2 of my film lists