Latest
Billions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesThe Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.When to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends OnWriting Your Worst Moments in a Memoir: Show the Evidence, Skip the VerdictHow to Register a Copyright for Your Book (and What Doesn’t Count)Your AI Chats Aren’t Private: Deleted ChatGPT Logs in CourtThe Board Seat Scam: A 419 Letter in a Business SuitI Joined the Science Fiction Book Club 30 TimesCitations in a Memoir: Endnotes, Footnotes and Fair UseThe Stores That Still Care: Publix, Walmart, Aldi, Best Buy and the RestThe Grocery Store Plan: Why Every Store Starts With FlowersWinnie-the-Pooh’s 100th Birthday: A Century in the Hundred Acre WoodFree With a Fill-Up: How America Stopped Giving Things AwayAI’s Black Box Is Getting a Window. Somebody Still Has to Look Through It“It Stars C. Thomas Howell. No.” Why AI Gets Stuck in a LoopShould You Query or Self-Publish Your Memoir If You’re Not Famous?Judge the Writing, Not the Tool: What the AI Pile-Ons Get WrongThiago Ferreira: Thinkers, Not DoersYana Semova: Let AI Do the AdminLisa Hamilton-Smith: Unstoppable, AI AssistedRobert E. Howard Day: The Texan Who Built ConanElmore Leonard Day: Leave Out the Part Readers SkipRoald Dahl Day: Six Pencils and a Grudge Against Grown-UpsEncourage a Young Writer Day: The Adult Who Read the PagesStephen King Day: The Daily Two ThousandZora Neale Hurston Day: The Ear She TrainedTell a Fairy Tale Day: The Stories Everybody EditedAlice’s Day: The Story Told on a Rowing BoatSuperman Day: The $130 Contract Behind the CapeNational Podcast Day: The Interview Is the Raw MaterialRaymond Chandler Day: The Novelist Who Started at Fifty

Behind the Book: Complications

TL;DR: Every book I had written leaned hard into what reads as a man’s book: military, hard science fiction, thrillers. Complications was a deliberate turn the other way. I set out to write a book women would enjoy. To do it I took on the persona of a woman writer, researched what that meant, and built a quiet contemporary drama around mostly women. It’s a book I wouldn’t pick off a shelf myself, and writing it well anyway was the point.

If you’ve read any of my other books, you know the shelf they sit on. Military conflict. Hard science fiction. Thrillers with bombs and fleets and the end of the world. Whatever their differences, they are, broadly, men’s books. That’s the register I reach for by instinct, and for a long time it was the only register I wrote in.

Complications was a deliberate turn in the opposite direction. I wanted to soften. I wanted to write a book that women would enjoy, a book aimed at a reader I’d never been writing for, in a tone I’d never worked in. No apocalypse to fall back on. No technology to carry a scene. Just people in rooms, and what happens between them.

How do you write a book for a reader who isn’t you?

You stop writing as yourself. What I did was take on the persona of a woman writer. I wrote the book as if I were a woman, and I did a lot of research into what that meant. How a woman writer sees these rooms. How she renders these interior calculations. How she builds these relationships and lets them breathe. The main characters are mostly women. Vivienne Holloway is at the center, and her mother, Christine, is the force that shaped her. It’s, I think, kind of a romance, and I’d never written one of those either.

That’s a different and riskier thing than writing a woman character inside my usual voice. It’s one thing to put a woman in a scene and write her well from the outside. It’s another to shift the whole authorial sensibility, to try to write from a woman’s way of seeing instead of about women from a distance.

That’s why the prose came out the way it did. It’s in the fast automatic inventory Vivienne takes of another woman in three seconds. In decision-making and observation instead of event. That style is me writing deliberately in a voice that isn’t my own, one I had to research my way into.

The book on this: Complications is a contemporary drama set in a Manhattan law firm, and the first book I set out to write for a reader who isn’t me.

What research went into Complications?

Reading. I read other books by women, books written to be read by women, and I studied what they were doing that mine weren’t. The biggest thing I learned is that women often want a very different kind of literature than men do. This was a different set of instincts about what fiction is for. What a scene should carry. What a reader wants to linger on. What counts as something happening.

The pleasures are different, and if you don’t understand that, you’ll write a book that a woman puts down after ten pages because it’s built for someone else.

I think a lot of men who write women get this wrong and never find out, because nobody tells them. They write a man’s appetites into a woman’s body and call it a character, and the women who pick up the book put it back. I didn’t want to be that writer.

So the research was really a study of a different reader.

I think a lot of men who write women get this wrong and never find out, because nobody tells them.

What holds her attention. What she trusts. What she finds satisfying that I’d have skipped, and what I’d have leaned on that she’d find hollow. I had to learn to build a scene around a look across a conference room, a key in a hallway, the thing a character chooses not to say, and to trust that those things matter as much as a fleet or a bomb does in my other books.

What makes a book hard for its own author to read?

Complications is a book I probably wouldn’t read if I hadn’t written it. It isn’t something I’d pull off a shelf or buy at Barnes and Noble. It wouldn’t catch my eye. And that was the challenge, and, I think, the point.

It’s easy to write the book you’d want to read, because your own taste is a reliable compass. You know when a scene is working because it’s working on you. Writing well in a tone you don’t personally reach for, for a reader whose pleasures aren’t your pleasures, takes that compass away.

My own instincts stopped being a dependable guide. I couldn’t feel my way to the right choice, because the right choice was often the one my own taste would have argued against.

I had to write toward a target I couldn’t find by feel, and check the work against what I’d learned instead of against what I’d enjoy. That’s an unusual discipline, and not a comfortable one. Most writers, most of the time, write toward their own taste. I set out to write away from mine, on purpose, to reach someone who isn’t me.

I think every novelist should try it at least once. Writing only toward your own taste is comfortable, and a writer who never leaves that comfort ends up producing the same book over and over with different covers.

How do you judge a novel outside your usual genre?

I judged it the only way I could, by whether it held me, and it did. It’s still not a book I’d have bought. But reading it back, it landed. It was interesting enough that it left me thinking maybe I’m missing something by not reading this kind of book. That’s the version of success available to you in a tone that isn’t your own. It’s real, it works, and it’s shown me something I had been walking past, even if love is too strong a word for it.

And the exercise gave me more than the book. Writing as a woman, studying what women’s fiction values, building the story around women’s minds, opened a viewpoint into how a different reader thinks and what a different kind of literature is doing.

It was an interesting exercise, a way of learning to see through eyes that weren’t mine. It won’t be the last time I do it, either.

There are a couple of other books where I set myself the same kind of problem, deliberately writing outside my own taste and into someone else’s.

My take

Every novelist should write one book away from their own taste, and Complications was mine. I’d never pick it off a shelf, and it still held me when I read it back. A writer who only follows what they enjoy gets the same book with different covers. Pick a genre you’d skip in the store, study what its readers value and write it well anyway. You’ll learn to see through eyes that aren’t yours.

How does Complications fit with Richard Lowe’s other books?

Why Complications was the hardest targetOn the surface it does not fit: no spaceships, no bombs, no immortal admirals, and next to a galaxy that murders its sister or a nuclear war spanning the planet, a quiet drama about law interns looks like a different writer entirely. It comes from the same instinct though, which is reaching for minds and sensibilities that are not the author own default. A cat narrates Buttercup. A galaxy thinks across seventeen million years in Collision with Andromeda. An artificial mind shares a woman head in Peacekeeper. Complications points that instinct at the hardest target, not an invented consciousness that can be built however the writer likes, but a real readership with real informed expectations that cannot be faked.Why this was the hardest oneAn invented mind cannot correct you. A real readership can.1A cat narrates ButtercupBound by what a cat can want2A galaxy thinks in AndromedaAcross seventeen million years3An artificial mind in PeacekeeperSharing a woman’s head4Then a real readershipWith informed expectationsthat cannot be invented aroundAn invented consciousness can be built however I like. This one already knew what it wanted.
Why Complications was the hardest targetOn the surface it does not fit: no spaceships, no bombs, no immortal admirals, and next to a galaxy that murders its sister or a nuclear war spanning the planet, a quiet drama about law interns looks like a different writer entirely. It comes from the same instinct though, which is reaching for minds and sensibilities that are not the author own default. A cat narrates Buttercup. A galaxy thinks across seventeen million years in Collision with Andromeda. An artificial mind shares a woman head in Peacekeeper. Complications points that instinct at the hardest target, not an invented consciousness that can be built however the writer likes, but a real readership with real informed expectations that cannot be faked.Why this was the hardest oneAn invented mind cannot correct you. A realreadership can.1A cat narrates ButtercupBound by what a cat can want2A galaxy thinks in AndromedaAcross seventeen million years3An artificial mind in PeacekeeperSharing a woman’s head4Then a real readershipWith informed expectationsthat cannot be invented aroundAn invented consciousness can be built however Ilike. This one already knew what it wanted.

On the surface it doesn’t fit at all. It has no spaceships, no bombs, no immortal admirals. Next to a galaxy that murders its sister or a nuclear war that spans the planet, a quiet drama about law interns looks like a different writer entirely.

But it comes from the same instinct that runs through everything I write. I keep reaching for minds and sensibilities that aren’t my own default. A cat narrates Buttercup. A galaxy thinks across seventeen million years in Collision with Andromeda. An artificial mind shares a woman’s head in Peacekeeper. Complications points that same instinct at the hardest target of all, not an invented consciousness I can build however I like, but a real readership with real, informed expectations I can’t fake my way past.

A galaxy won’t tell me I got it wrong. A woman reader will. Writing for her, in her tone, was the most exposed version of the thing I’m always trying to do.

Writing for her, in her tone, was the most exposed version of the thing I’m always trying to do.
Share on X

Frequently Asked Questions

How does a military science fiction writer write for women readers?
It’s a contemporary drama set in a high-end Manhattan law firm, where four interns compete for a permanent position. It centers on Vivienne Holloway, a sharply observant young woman, and the complication created by her connection to one of the firm’s partners and by her manipulative mother, Christine.
Why did Richard Lowe write Complications?
Because his other books lean heavily into military, hard science fiction, and thriller territory, and he wanted to write something women would enjoy. Complications was a deliberate turn toward interior, relationship-driven fiction and a reader he hadn’t been writing for.
How does a writer switch tones between books?
He took on the persona of a woman writer, wrote the book as if he were a woman, and researched what that meant by reading fiction written by and for women. The main characters are mostly women, and the book leans toward romance, both firsts for him.
Is Complications a romance?
Broadly, yes. Richard describes it as kind of a romance, though it’s a restrained, psychologically driven one, more concerned with observation, control, and what people choose not to say than with conventional romantic beats.
How does Complications connect to Richard Lowe’s other books?
It shares the instinct that runs through his fiction, writing from a mind or sensibility that isn’t his own default. Where Buttercup inhabits a cat and Collision with Andromeda a galaxy, Complications reaches for a woman’s sensibility and a woman reader.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

11 comments
Was this useful?

Leave a comment