Latest
SMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableFree BooksJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeAI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.I Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends On

Toy Story 1-3 (1995, 1999, 2010)

TL;DR: Toy Story rates 10 out of 10, Toy Story 2 a 9 and Toy Story 3 an 8. The first fully computer-animated feature ever made is still the best of the three, and the series is one of the few that stayed good across fifteen years.
Toy Story 1-3 (1995, 1999, 2010)
10 / 10

Toy Story is a 10. The 1995 original is the first feature film animated entirely on computers, and the surprise is that the technology is the least interesting thing about it. It’s a buddy comedy about jealousy, obsolescence and what a toy is for.

Toy Story 2 in 1999 is a 9, and it’s close. Toy Story 3 in 2010 is an 8, a darker film that most people remember for one sequence near the end.

Woody and Buzz are my favorite pairing in any animated film, and the first Toy Story is as close to flawless as a comedy gets for me. What I like most is how petty it lets Woody be, and how much it trusts kids to follow a story about jealousy. The sequels come in a little lower, and the first film is the one I’d hand anyone who thinks animation is just for children.

John Lasseter directed the first two and Lee Unkrich the third. Tom Hanks and Tim Allen carry all three. Between them the films made well over $1.9 billion and turned Pixar from a hardware company into a studio.

Toy Story (1995): 10/10

Woody is Andy’s favorite toy and runs the bedroom. Buzz Lightyear arrives as a birthday present, doesn’t know he’s a toy, and takes the top spot without trying. Woody’s attempt to get rid of him strands them both in the outside world. The script is tighter than most live-action comedies. Every joke pays off, every character has a want, and the two leads have a real argument at the center of the film: Woody knows what he is and resents it, Buzz doesn’t know and is happier for it.

It cost about $30 million and made roughly $394 million. It’s a 10 because nothing in it is wasted, the animation still reads clearly thirty years on, and the story would work as well in live action, and that’s the test.

Buzz and Woody

Tim Allen plays Buzz as completely sincere, and that’s why the character is funny instead of smug. He believes he’s a space ranger on a mission, and the scene where he finally watches a television commercial for himself and tries to fly off the upstairs landing is the most painful thing in any Pixar film until the third act of Toy Story 3.

Tom Hanks makes Woody thoroughly unlikable for a stretch, and that’s the brave choice. Woody lies, he’s jealous, and he pushes Buzz out a window. The film makes him work his way back. That stretch where Woody is the bad guy is the bravest thing in the film to me. Most family movies would have softened him within ten minutes, and this one lets him stay petty long enough that his turnaround means something.

The two of them together are the reason the series lasted. Most animated pairings are a straight man and a clown. These two swap the role depending on the scene.

For Writers

The first film makes its hero jealous, petty and a liar for most of its running time, then makes him work his way back. Readers forgive a protagonist almost anything if the story treats the fault seriously. When you write, give your lead a flaw that costs somebody else something, and don’t excuse it. Find the worst thing your protagonist does in your draft. If the narrative apologizes for it, take the apology out and let them make amends through action instead. Readers believe what characters do, not what the narrator says about them.

Toy Story 2 (1999): 9/10

The sequel was originally planned as a direct-to-video release, then rebuilt almost from scratch in about nine months when Pixar decided it wasn’t good enough. What came out is nearly as good as the first film. A collector steals Woody, who discovers he was the star of a 1950s television show, with a horse, a prospector and a cowgirl waiting to be shipped to a museum in Japan. The film’s question is whether being loved and worn out beats being preserved and never played with.

Jessie’s song, When She Loved Me, is two minutes of a toy being outgrown, and it’s as sad as anything in family film. It’s a 9: a shade broader than the first, with one sequence that outdoes anything in it.

That song wrecks me, and it’s the reason the second film comes so close to the first. The rest of it is busier and a little broader than I’d like, but those two minutes are as good as anything Pixar has made.

Toy Story 3 (2010): 8/10

Andy is leaving for college and the toys end up at Sunnyside Daycare, run by a strawberry-scented bear who turns out to be a prison warden. The middle section is a proper prison-break film, complete with a reconnaissance sequence and a night escape.

The last twenty minutes are the reason the film is remembered. The toys end up on a conveyor belt heading into an incinerator, they stop struggling, and they take each other’s hands. It’s the most frightening thing Pixar has filmed, and the rescue that follows doesn’t undo it.

It won the Academy Award for best animated feature and made over a billion dollars. It’s an 8 for me: the darkest of the three, and it ends the story properly, but it has more machinery than the first two, and during the prison-break stretch I find myself wanting to get back to Andy.

For Writers

The incinerator scene works because the toys stop fighting and accept it, something no family film of that scale had risked before. A moment of real acceptance hits harder than any amount of struggle. When you write your bleakest scene, consider letting your characters stop resisting for a beat before rescue arrives. Write the version where they give up. If it frightens you to read it back, keep it. That fear is the reader’s too, and it’s what they’ll remember.

The Technology

The 1995 film was made when no one knew whether an audience would sit through ninety minutes of computer animation. Pixar solved the problem by choosing subjects the technology could handle: plastic, smooth surfaces, hard edges. Toys, not people. That constraint is why it still looks fine. The humans in the first film have aged badly and the toys haven’t, because the toys were what the tools could do well. By the third film Pixar could render anything, and the animation is technically far beyond the original without being more expressive. The first film’s limits pushed it toward better choices.

The first film holds my eye better today than the third does, for all the extra horsepower, because every shot in it was designed around what the tools did well.

For Writers

Pixar picked toys because plastic was what their tools could render convincingly, and the constraint produced the better film. Working inside your limits often beats fighting them. When you write, identify what you do well and build the story around those strengths, instead of forcing scenes you’ll struggle to execute. List three things you write better than most people. Then check your outline gives each of them at least one major scene. A book built on your strengths reads as confidence, and readers feel it.

As a Trilogy

Fifteen years, three films, no weak entry. That’s rarer than the Toy Story name makes it sound, and it comes from each film asking a different question: who am I for, what happens when I’m outgrown, and what happens when it’s over.

There’s a fourth film from 2019 and a fifth from 2026, and the trilogy ends cleanly at three. Andy hands the toys to a younger child and drives away, the ending the story had been building toward from the first scene.

Ratings again: the original is a 10, the second a 9, the third an 8. All three are worth watching, and the first one is a great film that happens to be animated.

Craft Note

Craft Note

Each Toy Story film asks a different question about the same characters: what am I for, what happens when I’m outgrown, what happens when it ends. That’s why the series never repeats itself. When you plan a sequel, change the question instead of raising the stakes.

Is the Toy Story trilogy worth watching?

Yes, all three. The first is a 10, among the best-structured comedies of the 1990s in any medium. The second is a 9 and nearly matches it. The third is an 8 and closes the story with more darkness than anyone expected from a family film.

Start at the beginning, watch them in order, and stop at three. The trilogy gets a 10 from me because the first film has nothing wasted in it and the other two keep asking new questions instead of repeating the old ones. The later films can do what they like. The story I care about ends with Andy driving away.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was Toy Story the first computer-animated film?
It was the first feature film animated entirely on computers, released in 1995 by Pixar and Disney. Earlier films used computer imagery in places, and Toy Story was the first to do everything that way. Pixar chose toys as subjects because plastic and hard surfaces were what the technology rendered convincingly.
Which Toy Story film is the best?
The first, rated a 10 here. It has the tightest script, the clearest character conflict and nothing wasted in eighty-one minutes. Toy Story 2 rates a 9 and Toy Story 3 an 8, making this one of the few trilogies without a weak entry.
Was Toy Story 2 nearly a direct-to-video release?
Yes. It was originally planned as a straight-to-video sequel, and Pixar decided the result wasn’t good enough and rebuilt it almost from scratch in about nine months. The finished film is widely considered among the best animated sequels ever made.
Why is the Toy Story 3 incinerator scene famous?
Because the toys stop struggling. Trapped on a conveyor belt heading into a furnace, they take each other’s hands and accept it, and the film holds on that before the rescue arrives. It’s the darkest moment in any Pixar film and the one most viewers remember.
Should I watch Toy Story 4?
The trilogy ends cleanly at three, with Andy handing the toys to a younger child, and that’s the ending the story was built toward. Toy Story 4 arrived in 2019 and a fifth film followed in 2026. Neither is needed to complete the story the first three tell.
How much money did the Toy Story films make?
The first made about $394 million on a $30 million budget, the second roughly $497 million, and Toy Story 3 passed a billion dollars worldwide and won the Academy Award for best animated feature. Together the trilogy earned well over $1.9 billion.

On my film lists

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.