Latest
How Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidStranger in a Strange LandProfiles in CourageDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirFlorida RoadkillTeam of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex WorldMy Share of the Task: A MemoirWe Were Soldiers Once… and Young: Ia Drang, the Battle That Changed the War in VietnamThe Columbia Restaurant: Celebrating a Century of History, Culture, and CuisineA Tiger among Us: A Story of Valor in Vietnam’s A Shau ValleyTop Sergeant: The Life and Times of Sergeant Major of the Army William G. BainbridgeSailing True North: Ten Admirals and the Voyage of CharacterPodkayne of MarsMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the WorldSam Walton: Made in America: My StoryI, RobotOpen: An AutobiographyShattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of MidwayA World at Arms: A Global History of World War IIL.L. Bean: The Making of an American IconA Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from America’s First Female Four-Star GeneralLife21 Days to Success Through Networking: The Life and Times of Gnik RowtenCampus BattlefieldThe Bell JarRight Wing RevolutionThe Sage of SagittariusTime for a Turning PointDesigning Casinos to Dominate the CompetitionLove’s Executioner and Other Tales of PsychotherapyBeneath a Scarlet SkyThe Library BookThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsTrump: The Art of the DealThe MAGA DoctrineThe College ScamSea Stories: My Life in Special OperationsPa’anNetworking Your Way to SuccessMasters of NetworkingRadioSoldier for Life: Leader Lessons from the 12th Sergeant Major of the ArmyThe Melting Point: High Command and War in the 21st CenturyAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroStop, in the Name of GodDoes Explicit Sex Sell Books? An Answer to The Absolute Degeneracy of Modern WritingThe Mary Sue: How a 1973 Star Trek Parody Became a Writing TermWhat the AI Writing Survey Says About Jobs, Freelancers and Fiction AuthorsHow Long Does Google Take? Crawling, Indexing and Recovery Times

Mortal Kombat (1995)

TL;DR: Mortal Kombat (1995) rates 7 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Mortal Kombat is the rare video game adaptation that understood what it was. Anderson directed in what amounted to a launching pad for his.
Mortal Kombat (1995)
7 / 10

Official trailer

Mortal Kombat is the rare video game adaptation that understood what it was. Paul W. S. Anderson directed in what amounted to a launching pad for his later career in genre cinema. Robin Shou plays Liu Kang. Linden Ashby plays Johnny Cage. Bridgette Wilson plays Sonya Blade. Christopher Lambert plays Lord Rayden. Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa plays Shang Tsung. Talisa Soto plays Princess Kitana. The plot is a tournament. Earthrealm has lost ten consecutive Mortal Kombat tournaments to Outworld. Losing one more will allow Outworld to invade and conquer Earthrealm.

Three Earth fighters have been recruited to participate. The film is what happens next.

Mortal Kombat is a blast for me, more fun than a 1995 video game adaptation has any right to be. It knows it’s a tournament movie with a thunder god and a techno soundtrack, and it plays that straight. My reservation is the PG-13 rating, which leaves the film with no fatalities and a slightly defanged feel.

The film made approximately one hundred and twenty-three million dollars worldwide on an eighteen million dollar budget. It was the highest-grossing video game adaptation up to that point and helped establish the template for the genre’s mediocre commercial success and consistent critical dismissal that would define video game movies for the next twenty-five years.

What Works

The film commits to the source material. The plot is the plot of the games. The characters are the characters of the games. The fatalities are largely absent because Paul W. S. Anderson and the producers correctly determined that an R-rated Mortal Kombat film would have made less money than a PG-13 one. The film’s PG-13 violence is the major creative compromise but the compromise is the only reason the film exists in releasable form.

Christopher Lambert as Lord Rayden is the film’s best performance. Lambert had been a star since Highlander (1986), and his Rayden is a thunder god with the weariness of an immortal who has been doing this job for a long time. The performance is small and quiet, the closest thing the film has to a moral center, and I think it’s what keeps the enterprise from floating away. Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa as Shang Tsung is the second-best performance. He plays the villain as a man enjoying himself, and I enjoy him right back.

For Writers

A film based on existing intellectual property succeeds when the writers respect what the audience came for. Mortal Kombat fans wanted to see Liu Kang fight Shang Tsung in a tournament. The film delivered exactly this. The script doesn’t try to expand the universe in ways the source didn’t establish. The lesson is that adaptation requires understanding what the audience is buying. If your readers loved a specific thing in the source material, deliver that thing. Innovation in adaptation should serve the existing material.

The Choreography

The fight choreography is the film’s main selling point.

Robin Shou had been a Hong Kong action film veteran before this production. The film borrows the visual grammar of Hong Kong action cinema and applies it to a Western fantasy structure. The fights are long, varied, and shot in long takes that let the audience see the choreography instead of fragmenting it through fast cuts.

The Liu Kang versus Reptile sequence is the choreographic high point. The Liu Kang versus Shang Tsung climax is the dramatic high point. Both fights respect the audience’s intelligence enough to show what’s happening instead of hiding the choreography behind editing tricks.

The Reptile fight is the one I’d show anybody who thinks this movie is just nostalgia. Shou and Cooke move at full speed, the camera stays back and lets them work, and it still looks better than most American fight scenes from that decade.

For Writers

Action sequences benefit from being shown instead of implied. Mortal Kombat shoots its fights in long takes that let the audience follow the moves. Most American action cinema of the period was cutting fights into incomprehensible flurries. The lesson is that audience confusion is rarely an asset. If you’ve done the work of staging an action sequence well, show the work. Hiding choreography behind editing suggests the choreography wasn’t strong enough to survive being seen.

The Soundtrack

The techno soundtrack is the third reason the film worked. The Immortals’ “Techno Syndrome (Mortal Kombat)” is the film’s signature track and became a widely recognized piece of mid-90s electronic music. The score by George S. Clinton supports the techno elements instead of competing with them. The combination of synth-heavy electronic music with martial arts action created a 1995 energy that the film captured at exactly the right moment.

That theme is my favorite thing in the film. The second that “MORTAL KOMBAT” shout hits I’m grinning, and the movie knows exactly how much energy it gets from the music. The soundtrack was also a major commercial success on its own merits. The album sold over two million copies in the United States. The music drove the film’s marketing in ways that the film’s plot or cast couldn’t. The “MORTAL KOMBAT” vocal sting became one of the more recognized audio brands of the decade.

For Writers

A musical identity can become as important to a property as the characters or plot. Mortal Kombat 1995 is remembered partly for its theme song. The film and the song reinforce each other across thirty years of cultural memory. The lesson is that the audio identity of your work is part of the work. If you’re producing in a medium where you control the sound, treat the sound as a primary creative element. The strongest properties usually have distinctive audio signatures.

Craft Note

The Liu Kang vs. Reptile fight is the film’s strongest action choreography. Robin Shou and stunt-performer Keith Cooke work through a sequence that balances arcade-game move recreation with workable cinematic action. The fight shows that video game adaptation can preserve source material identity when the production commits to performers who can execute the physical vocabulary the source games established.

Is Mortal Kombat worth watching?

7/10. For me this is the best mainstream video game adaptation of the 1990s. Lambert and Tagawa are doing real work, the choreography is competent, and the soundtrack still gets my blood moving. The PG-13 rating is what holds it at a 7, since the film pulls its punches where a Mortal Kombat movie should land them. The 1997 sequel Mortal Kombat: Annihilation is much worse, and so is the 2021 reboot. Watch the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Mortal Kombat gory like the games?
No. The film is PG-13. The fatalities are largely absent. This was a creative compromise to broaden the audience.
Are the Mortal Kombat sequels worth watching?
Mortal Kombat: Annihilation (1997) is significantly worse. The 2021 reboot is more violent but less coherent. Stick with the original.
Is Christopher Lambert really in this?
Yes. He plays Lord Rayden. The performance is the film’s most committed.
How is the Techno Syndrome theme?
It’s among the most recognizable pieces of mid-90s electronic music. Still gets played at sports events thirty years later.
Who is Paul W. S. Anderson?
British director who specialized in video game adaptations and genre action films. The Resident Evil franchise is his major later work. Mortal Kombat was his career launching pad.
Did Robin Shou become a star?
No. He continued working in Hong Kong action cinema and in supporting roles in Hollywood films. The Mortal Kombat sequel was his last major Hollywood leading role.
Is Mortal Kombat worth watching?
Yes, if you have an interest in 1990s action cinema or in the early history of video game adaptations. Otherwise, it’s competent but not essential.

Writing in This Genre

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.