Latest
He Banned AI From His Writing Group. His Own Cover Got Called AI Slop.Who Writes the Fake Fan Mail Authors Get? Inside the Scam CompoundsSMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookFree BooksHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeI Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.AI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a Fee

Legend (1985) Review

Legend (1985) Review

TL;DR: Legend (1985) rates 7 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Ridley Scott built a forest inside a Bond stage at Pinewood, burned it to the ground, and produced the most beautiful fantasy film nobody watched. Tim Curry under three-foot horns is the best thing in it and among the best villains ever put on screen.
Legend (1985)
7/10

Official trailer

Darkness wants the last unicorns killed so that night can be permanent. A boy who lives in the forest takes a girl to see them, she touches one, and the world freezes over by morning.

I’m a sucker for how this film looks, and the 7 is for a picture that’s pure atmosphere and knows it. There’s almost no plot here and the script isn’t trying to supply one. What it’s trying to do is build a fairy tale as a physical place, and on that measure it succeeds completely. I could stare at that forest for hours. Staring is about all the script lets me do, though.

The three points come off for a hollow middle. The characters are archetypes with nothing underneath, Tom Cruise is a forest boy with no interior life, and once the visual argument is made in the first act the film has to fill an hour before Curry can appear.

Scott Built the Forest and Then It Burned

Scott wanted an enchanted forest and decided location shooting couldn’t give him control over it. So he built one on the 007 Stage at Pinewood, the largest soundstage in Europe, with fourteen weeks of construction.

The trees were sixty feet high with trunks thirty feet across, sculpted from polystyrene over tubular scaffolding, with five further soundstages carrying the other sets. Scott was reportedly still worried it wouldn’t read as real days before shooting began. Then, near the end of the forest shoot, the stage burned down. It went while the crew were at lunch. That’s the only reason nobody was killed, and it took with it a set of planned overhead and fly-through shots that were never filmed. The crew moved to the other stages, and the needed section of the forest was rebuilt at Elstree for the final sequences.

What survives on screen is a forest that looks like an illustration. Constant shafts of light through dust, floating pollen, water in the air, petals moving on no wind. It’s not a real place and was never meant to be one, and it’s the most convincing invented environment in eighties fantasy.

Alex Thomson photographed it and the technique is simple and relentless. Light comes from behind and above in visible beams, every interior is filled with something for the beams to catch, and nothing is lit flatly at any point. The air is doing as much work as the sets.

For Writers

A built world gives you total control and takes away all accident. Everything in a constructed frame is deliberate. That means every element has to be worth the deliberation.

The test for whether a built world is working is whether it’s a weather. This forest has humidity, drifting particles and shifting light, and those are what convince, far more than the scale of the trees. For prose the same principle applies at the level of sensory detail. A world that’s a temperature, a smell and a quality of light reads as a place. A world described by its geography and its politics reads as a map.

Tim Curry Is Working Under Enormous Constraints

Rob Bottin designed Darkness, and the result is red skin, cloven hooves and three-foot horns that were hollow and still heavy enough to strain Curry’s neck and back across a long shoot.

The application took hours and the removal took over an hour of sitting in a bath while adhesive was dissolved. Curry has described losing patience once and tearing his own skin removing it too fast.

Through all of that he gives a performance of real subtlety. Darkness is seductive instead of raging, amused, courteous, and persuasive when he argues to Lili that he’s only the necessary half of the world. The voice is doing almost all of it, because the face can barely move.

Curry is the reason I’ll put up with the whole middle stretch. Watching him purr and reason from under all that latex is a pleasure, and I think he makes the best case in eighties fantasy for casting a voice first and worrying about the face later.

Scott found him by rewatching The Rocky Horror Picture Show while considering Richard O’Brien for a different part. That’s the casting decision people remember the film for, and it’s the reason anyone remembers the film at all. There’s a lesson in the design as well. Darkness looks exactly like the traditional Christian devil, which most fantasy avoids as too obvious, and the obviousness is why he works. The audience needs no explanation of what he is, so every second of screen time can go to what he wants.

The Two Scores Are Two Different Films

Jerry Goldsmith wrote a full orchestral score for the European release. Universal, worried the picture wouldn’t reach American teenagers, replaced it for the domestic version with electronic music by Tangerine Dream, along with contributions from Jon Anderson and Bryan Ferry.

The two versions are different films. Goldsmith gives it the weight and grandeur of a fairy tale being told seriously. Tangerine Dream gives it a floating, synthetic, dreamlike quality that pushes the film toward the eighties and away from timelessness.

I prefer Goldsmith, and the preference is about what the images are doing. Scott shot this as a Grimm story, and orchestral scoring matches that intent. The electronic version isn’t bad, and it’s a different argument laid over pictures that weren’t built for it.

Both are now available. The director’s cut restores Goldsmith and runs a hundred and fourteen minutes against the eighty-nine of the American release, and it’s the version worth seeking out.

For Writers

A score is an argument about genre, and changing it changes what the work is claiming to be. The same images with different music are making different promises to the audience.

That’s why the studio’s reasoning here is coherent even though I disagree with it. They weren’t attacking the film, they were repositioning it for a different buyer, and repositioning is exactly what a score can accomplish. The lesson for any creative work is to know what your surrounding presentation is claiming. Cover, title, blurb and opening paragraph all set genre expectations, and an expectation the work then fails to meet costs more than an unfashionable one stated outright.

The Hollow Middle

After the freeze, the film settles into a rescue. Jack assembles a party of elves and dwarves, they travel, they’re captured, they reach the lair. It’s the least interesting stretch and it takes up most of the running time.

The problem is that nobody wants anything complicated. Jack wants Lili back, Lili wants to undo her mistake, the fairies want to help, and Darkness wants the dark. There’s no conflicting motive anywhere in the film except inside Lili for about four minutes.

The middle is where my attention drifts. Once the party sets out, I’m admiring the set dressing and waiting for Darkness to come back, and a fairy tale shouldn’t leave me checking on the villain like an absent friend.

That four minutes is the best writing in the picture. Darkness dresses her, dances with her, and she considers it. Mia Sara plays real temptation, and for a moment the film has a character making a decision instead of executing a plan.

Tom Cruise is the casualty. He was twenty-two and about to become the biggest star in the world, and Jack is written with no flaw, no doubt and no history, so there’s nothing for him to play. Johnny Depp, Jim Carrey and Robert Downey Jr. were all considered and none of them could have solved it either.

Mia Sara was sixteen when filming started and turned eighteen before it finished. That tells you how long this production ran. She’s the only performer in the film given anything resembling a contradiction, and she’s the one nobody talks about.

Why It Failed and Why It Lasted

Twenty-five million dollars, twenty-three and a half back, and a domestic take around fifteen and a half million. It was a commercial failure in a year when Scott was coming off Alien and Blade Runner. Part of that is the release history. Venice in August 1985, Europe shortly after, and the United States not until April 1986 after the recut and the new score, by which point there was no momentum to inherit.

What preserved it is the design. This film sits on a list of pictures the critics got wrong because the initial reviews were about the story, which is thin, and the durable value is in the images, which nothing has surpassed. I side with those critics on the story and against them on everything else.

Every fantasy film that came after with a practical creature and a built environment is drawing on this and on The Dark Crystal. Bottin’s Darkness in particular has outlived a thousand digital demons, because a real object in a real light does something a rendered one still cannot.

For Writers

Work that fails on story and succeeds on execution has its own kind of afterlife. Practitioners rediscover it instead of audiences, and its influence shows up in other people’s work before its reputation recovers.

That’s worth knowing when you assess your own projects. A book with a weak plot and extraordinary prose isn’t a failure in the same way as a book with neither, and the two need different responses.

The practical version: fix the thing that’s weakest, and don’t let a strong element convince you the weak one is acceptable. Legend needed one character who wanted two things at once, and it would have been a masterpiece.

Should you watch Legend?

Yes, and watch the director’s cut with the Goldsmith score. The story won’t hold you and it’s not meant to, and that thin middle is what keeps it at a 7 for me. What you’re there for is a constructed forest, a red demon under three feet of horn arguing his case, and a fairy tale that commits entirely to being one. For those things alone I’d put it on ahead of most of the decade’s fantasy.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Legend about?
Darkness wants the last unicorns killed so that night can be permanent. A forest boy takes a girl to see them, she touches one, and the world freezes. He then has to recover her and undo it.
Did the set of Legend really burn down?
Yes. Scott built a forest on the 007 Stage at Pinewood after fourteen weeks of construction, with sixty-foot trees sculpted from polystyrene over scaffolding. It burned to the ground while the crew were at lunch. That’s why nobody was killed, and the last forest scenes were shot on a section of the set rebuilt at Elstree.
Why does Legend have two different scores?
Jerry Goldsmith wrote an orchestral score for the European release. Universal, worried the film wouldn’t reach American teenagers, replaced it for the domestic version with Tangerine Dream, plus contributions from Jon Anderson and Bryan Ferry.
Which version of Legend (1985) should I watch?
The director’s cut. That restores Goldsmith and runs a hundred and fourteen minutes against the eighty-nine of the American theatrical release.
How difficult was Tim Curry’s makeup?
The horns were three feet tall, hollow and still heavy enough to strain his neck and back. Application took hours and removal took over an hour in a bath while the adhesive dissolved. He’s described tearing his own skin once by rushing it.
Was Legend a hit?
No. Twenty-five million dollars against twenty-three and a half worldwide, with about fifteen and a half million domestically. The staggered release didn’t help, since America didn’t see it until April 1986, months after Europe.
What is wrong with Legend (1985)?
Nobody in it wants anything complicated. Jack, Lili, the fairies and Darkness all want exactly one thing, so the middle hour is a rescue with no friction. The exception is four minutes where Lili is tempted, and that’s the best writing in the film.

Sources

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.