Latest
He Banned AI From His Writing Group. His Own Cover Got Called AI Slop.Who Writes the Fake Fan Mail Authors Get? Inside the Scam CompoundsSMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookFree BooksHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeI Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.AI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a Fee

Chicago (2002)

TL;DR: Chicago (2002) rates 8 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Rob Marshall’s 2002 jazz-age murder musical. Zellweger, Zeta-Jones, Gere.
Chicago (2002)
8 / 10

Official trailer

Chicago is Rob Marshall’s 2002 American musical adapting the 1975 John Kander, Fred Ebb, and Bob Fosse stage musical, which itself adapted the 1926 Maurine Dallas Watkins play. The film depicts murderess Roxie Hart and her rivalry with vaudeville performer Velma Kelly while both await trial for separate killings in 1920s Chicago. Renée Zellweger plays Roxie Hart.

Catherine Zeta-Jones plays Velma Kelly. Richard Gere plays defense attorney Billy Flynn. Queen Latifah plays prison matron Mama Morton. John C. Reilly plays Roxie’s husband Amos Hart. Christine Baranski plays reporter Mary Sunshine.

Lucy Liu plays Kitty Baxter. Bill Condon wrote the screenplay. Miramax produced the film on a budget of approximately 45 million dollars, and it grossed approximately 307 million dollars worldwide. The work won six Academy Awards including Best Picture.

From its first number to its last, Chicago is a blast. It’s sexy, mean and funny, and it treats its audience like adults who can enjoy a murderess singing her way through her own trial. My reservation is the stretches between the numbers, which feel like the film catching its breath. Whenever the music stops I start counting down to the next song.

The film is the principal commercial success of the early 2000s American musical revival and the film that showed the genre could function as serious adult entertainment after decades of marginalization. The Marshall direction employs the Fosse-derived approach of separating the musical numbers from the dramatic scenes by setting them in Roxie’s imagination.

The cast performed all their own singing. Zeta-Jones won Best Supporting Actress. The work proved commercially viable in a way that prevailing wisdom had said American musicals couldn’t be after the 1970s.

The result is the rare modern American musical that succeeded with both critics and mass audiences.

The Imagination Frame

Marshall set every musical number inside Roxie Hart’s imagination instead of in the diegetic reality of the film. This borrowed from Fosse’s Cabaret approach while modifying it for the source. Roxie imagines herself on a vaudeville stage every time the story would conventionally call for a musical number. This solved the modern musical’s central problem. Contemporary audiences had grown resistant to characters breaking into song. Setting numbers inside imagination resolved the resistance.

The imagination frame also served the film’s satire about celebrity.

Roxie pursues fame through her trial. She imagines herself as a vaudeville star. The framing technique reinforces the film’s argument that her notion of justice is entirely about whether the trial produces fame. The structural choice supports the thematic argument. Each musical number is also evidence that Roxie’s mental life consists primarily of fantasies of celebrity.

This is the choice that sells me on the whole film. Characters bursting into song on a street corner usually wear thin fast, and Marshall’s fix lets me enjoy every number without rolling my eyes.

For Writers

Structural choices can serve thematic arguments. The same applies to fiction. The form of your work should support the content. Decisions about how you tell the story carry meaning the story itself can’t deliver.

The Cell Block Tango

The Cell Block Tango number runs approximately seven minutes and depicts six imprisoned women explaining their murders. The choreography references Fosse trademark movements including angular hand positions, controlled breaks, and isolated body parts. The lyrics combine confession with rhythmic chant. The visual design uses red lighting and prison bars. The number became the film’s defining sequence.

Zeta-Jones leads the number while playing Velma Kelly in the immediate frame. The other prisoners include actresses who wouldn’t otherwise have been cast in major American musicals. The number gives each woman her own monologue about her crime.

The film allows the ensemble work to develop individual characters instead of treating chorus members as anonymous. The choreography reinforces the principle that each woman’s story matters even when she occupies background position.

Cell Block Tango is the best seven minutes in the film and the number I’d show anyone who doubts this movie. Zeta-Jones owns it, the red light and the bars make it look like a nightmare cabaret, and every woman gets to be funny and terrifying in turn.

For Writers

Ensemble work succeeds when individual contributors receive their own moments. The result carries over to fiction. Background characters whose specifics emerge clearly serve this film better than anonymous functional figures.

The Razzle Dazzle

Gere’s performance as Billy Flynn culminates in the Razzle Dazzle number where he explains his courtroom strategy as theatrical performance. The lyrics directly state that legal procedure is entertainment and that trials are productions that lawyers stage for jury audiences. The argument the film develops without subtext is that the American legal system reads as theater instead of justice mechanism.

Gere is a lot of fun in this number. He sells the con with so much oily charm that I’d hire him myself, and the song’s cynicism about courtrooms as theater still stings.

The satire applies equally today. The film was released in 2002 while major American attention focused on celebrity trials including the recently concluded O.J. Simpson and Robert Blake cases.

The 1920s setting allowed the satire to work without seeming to target particular current cases. The work showed that period material can comment on contemporary conditions more effectively than direct contemporary engagement. The audience receives the argument without feeling lectured.

For Writers

Period settings can deliver contemporary arguments that direct contemporary settings can’t. The same applies to fiction. The historical frame gives readers space to receive criticism they’d resist in present-tense form.

Craft Note

Marshall had been a Broadway choreographer before directing Chicago. The film was his directorial debut. The combination of Broadway musical experience and limited film direction history produced a result that experienced film directors hadn’t been able to deliver during the previous two decades of musical revival attempts. The decision to cast actors who could sing instead of singers who could act paid off through performances that engaged dramatic content as well as musical content.

Is Chicago worth watching?

The early 2000s musical revival had its big commercial success in Chicago, the film that proved the genre could still work for adults.

The imagination frame solved the modern musical’s central problem, the Cell Block Tango is a knockout, and Razzle Dazzle skewers celebrity justice in ways later films haven’t matched. It’s an 8 because the talky scenes between songs sag. I’d recommend it to anyone with a taste for musicals, and to a few people who think they don’t have one.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did the actors in Chicago (2002) do their own singing?
Yes. Zellweger, Zeta-Jones, Gere, Reilly, and Queen Latifah all sang their own parts. The casting prioritized actors who could carry vocal performances instead of singers who needed acting coaching.
How does Chicago compare to the stage musical?
The film follows the stage musical’s structure closely. The imagination frame is the principal addition. The stage musical occurs on a single performance stage. The film moves between Roxie’s imagination and the realistic settings.
Why did Chicago revive the movie musical?
The combination of imagination framing, strong source material, and acting-first casting addressed problems that prior revival attempts hadn’t solved. Chicago showed the approach. Later films could follow the model.
How long is Chicago (2002)?
The film runs approximately one hour fifty-three minutes. The compressed runtime supports the satirical content while allowing the musical numbers to develop.
What is the cultural impact of Chicago?
Real sustained impact through musical revival, Broadway-to-film adaptation practice, and ongoing work with the celebrity-trial subject.
Is Chicago a remake of Roxie Hart?
No, but Roxie Hart, William Wellman’s 1942 film, adapts the same source play without the musical numbers. Watching it provides context for what the musical adaptation added. Both films justify engagement.

Sources

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.