Latest
Who Writes the Fake Fan Mail Authors Get? Inside the Scam CompoundsSMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookFree BooksHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeI Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.AI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free Clone

Birds of Prey (2020)

TL;DR: Birds of Prey (2020) rates 5 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Birds of Prey, formally titled Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn), is the Harley Quinn solo film between Suicide Squad. Cathy Yan directed in her major studio debut.
Birds of Prey (2020)
5 / 10

Official trailer

Birds of Prey, formally titled Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn), is the Harley Quinn solo film between Suicide Squad (2016) and The Suicide Squad (2021). Cathy Yan directed in her major studio debut. Christina Hodson wrote. Margot Robbie returns as Harley Quinn. Ewan McGregor plays Roman Sionis. Jurnee Smollett plays Black Canary. Mary Elizabeth Winstead plays the Huntress. Rosie Perez plays Detective Renee Montoya. Ella Jay Basco plays Cassandra Cain, a young pickpocket.

The plot involves Harley’s post-Joker independence, a stolen diamond, and the loose coalition of women who come together to defeat Sionis.

I come away from Birds of Prey split down the middle. There’s a sharp, nasty little action film buried in here, with McGregor chewing through every scene and a funhouse brawl I’d happily watch again, and it keeps getting smothered by a script that can’t decide whose movie it is. I enjoy about a third of it and shrug at the rest, and a 5 feels about right.

The film made approximately two hundred and one million dollars worldwide on a one hundred million dollar budget. The studio considered the commercial performance disappointing. The post-release re-titling to Harley Quinn: Birds of Prey was an admission that the original title had failed in the market.

The film has fans and serious craft criticism. It’s on the Woke Disasters list because its framing and several specific creative choices made it the clearest 2020 case of a DC film built around feminist branding instead of around the property’s traditional audience.

What Made It a Woke Disaster

The “Emancipation” in the title is the film’s thesis.

Harley has left the Joker. The film’s argument is that her time with the Joker was an abusive relationship and the rest of the film is her recovery and self-actualization. The framing treats Joker fans as people who have romanticized abuse. The audience that loved the Harley-Joker comic book dynamic was being told the dynamic was the problem and the film was the corrective.

The film’s male characters reinforce the framing. Roman Sionis (Ewan McGregor) is the antagonist, and the script codes him as an effeminate menace. His relationship with Zsasz (Chris Messina) is staged with romantic undertones the film treats as villain-coded. The script’s male characters are otherwise henchmen or victims. The single male law enforcement officer Montoya works with is dismissive. There’s no male character in the film the script treats as morally serious or capable. The male presence in Gotham is uniformly bad.

The female characters have to band together because the male world has nothing to offer them.

The Cassandra Cain race-swap is the comic-fan controversy. In DC comics, Cassandra Cain is among the most prominent Asian-American characters and a fan-favorite Batgirl in her own right.

The film cast Ella Jay Basco, who’s half-Filipino, but rewrote the character as a Latina pickpocket with no martial arts background. It stripped the comic character of her defining traits (Asian identity, elite fighting skill, complex assassin backstory) and replaced them with a generic street kid role. The change was framed as making the character “accessible.”

Comic readers read it as the property discarding its most distinctive Asian-American superhero in favor of a forgettable supporting child.

I’m with them. Cassandra Cain’s whole appeal is a kid with an assassin’s past who can out-fight anyone in the room, and the film turned her into a generic pickpocket. That’s a waste of a great character and the film’s worst decision.

For Writers

A film that markets itself as diverse representation while erasing one of its source material’s most prominent diverse characters has structured a contradiction. Birds of Prey’s Cassandra Cain handling positioned the film as progressive while throwing away the comics’ actual progressive character. The lesson is that diversity claims have to survive contact with the source material. If your “diverse” adaptation removes the diversity that already existed, the audience reads the inconsistency. The marketing fights the work.

The Title Tax

The original title (Birds of Prey and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) is the film’s most-discussed pre-release miscalculation. The title tried to communicate that this was both a Harley Quinn solo film and a Birds of Prey team-up. The result was a title audiences couldn’t remember accurately and couldn’t search for easily. The post-release retitling to Harley Quinn: Birds of Prey was the studio admitting the original title hadn’t worked.

The title problem is diagnostic of the larger script problem.

The film can’t decide between a Harley Quinn solo movie and a Birds of Prey team-up. Black Canary, Huntress, Montoya and Cassandra Cain are introduced one at a time and only converge in the third act, and each of them could carry her own film. I’d have cut the scattered backstories and let the team meet by the midpoint. As it stands, Harley’s story and the team’s story fight over the runtime and both lose.

For Writers

A title that has to explain what kind of film it is signals a film unclear about what kind of film it is. Birds of Prey’s marketing struggled because the production struggled. The lesson is that titles report the work’s confidence. Confident work has titles that work. Confused work has titles that hedge. If you can’t title your film without a parenthetical, the parenthetical is information about the film you haven’t yet finished making.

Ewan McGregor

McGregor is the reason I’d sit through this again.

He plays Sionis as a wealthy mob boss whose theatrical insecurity drives his violence, and he’s more committed than the script deserves. The scenes where his temper flips from charm to cruelty mid-sentence are the strangest and best things in the picture. The funhouse fight in the third act, choreographed by Chad Stahelski’s 87Eleven team, is the other clear high.

McGregor’s commitment also exposes the script’s queer-coded villainy. The script wants Sionis to be threatening and the script wants him to be queer-coded. The combination produces a character whose villainy and effeminacy are presented as the same thing. McGregor is doing strong work inside material that uses his character’s coded queerness as a marker of his evil.

The film is otherwise positioning itself as a progressive feminist work. The contradiction is visible. The film’s defenders have written about it for six years.

For Writers

A film that codes its villain through traits the film at the same time claims to celebrate has structured an internal contradiction. Birds of Prey codes Roman Sionis as queer to mark his villainy while positioning itself as progressive on queer issues. The lesson is that coded characterization should be consistent with the work’s stated values. Audiences read coding. If your villain’s bad qualities are also the qualities your work claims to embrace, the work is making an argument it doesn’t realize it’s making.

Craft Note

The funhouse third-act fight choreographed by 87Eleven Action Design is the film’s craft peak and one of the strongest individual fight sequences in 2020s superhero cinema. The choreography uses sustained takes that let the audience follow the spatial geography of the fight. Margot Robbie does serious physical work. The funhouse mirrors and shifting platforms are used as actual choreographic elements instead of as visual decoration. Chad Stahelski’s team had given the production its strongest material.

The fight’s craft level exceeds the surrounding script’s by a significant margin. The funhouse sequence is what Birds of Prey could have been if the film around its action had matched the action’s commitment.

Is Birds of Prey worth watching?

5/10. Birds of Prey has a committed villain, a funhouse fight that deserves a damn sight better film, and a script that keeps tripping over its own framing and its muddled character coding. McGregor and that fight are why it isn’t lower.

Cassandra Cain is why it isn’t higher, along with a story that never picks a lead. It sits dead center, and dead center is a frustrating place for a movie with this much talent in it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Margot Robbie good as Harley Quinn?
Yes. Her Harley across Suicide Squad, this film, and The Suicide Squad is one of the more committed comic-book performances of the period.
Is Ewan McGregor good in Birds of Prey?
Excellent. His Roman Sionis is the film’s strongest individual element.
Why was Cassandra Cain changed in Birds of Prey?
The comic character is Asian-American and a martial arts prodigy. The film recast and rewrote the character as a generic Latina street kid. Comic readers consider this one of the property’s worst adaptation choices.
Why was Birds of Prey renamed?
The original title was unworkable in marketing and search. The retitling to Harley Quinn: Birds of Prey was a post-release commercial repair.
How does Birds of Prey relate to Suicide Squad?
Direct continuation. Harley has broken up with the Joker between films.
Is the Birds of Prey funhouse fight good?
Yes. The 87Eleven choreography is exceptional.
Is Birds of Prey worth watching?
For the funhouse fight and McGregor’s performance, yes. As a complete film, lower priority.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.