Latest
He Banned AI From His Writing Group. His Own Cover Got Called AI Slop.Who Writes the Fake Fan Mail Authors Get? Inside the Scam CompoundsSMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookFree BooksHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeI Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.AI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a Fee

Being There (1979)

TL;DR: Being There (1979) rates 9 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Hal Ashby’s 1979 satire with Peter Sellers as gardener mistaken for political sage. Final film of Sellers’ great period.
Being There (1979)
9 / 10

Official trailer

Being There is Hal Ashby’s 1979 American satire adapting Jerzy Kosinski’s 1971 novella. The film depicts Chance, a simple-minded gardener who has spent his entire adult life inside the Washington DC mansion of a wealthy man known only as the Old Man. When the Old Man dies, Chance is forced to leave the property for the first time.

He’s struck by the limousine of wealthy industrialist Ben Rand’s wife Eve, taken to the Rand estate for treatment, and gradually mistaken for a wise economist named Chauncey Gardiner whose simple statements about gardens Washington elites interpret as deep economic and political insights. Peter Sellers plays Chance. Shirley MacLaine plays Eve Rand. Melvyn Douglas plays Ben Rand. Jack Warden plays the President of the United States. Richard Dysart plays Dr. Robert Allenby. Richard Basehart plays the Soviet ambassador. Kosinski wrote the screenplay.

Sellers breaks my heart in this, and I didn’t expect a satire to do that. I laugh at the Washington crowd hanging on every word about gardens, and then I look at Chance’s calm, trusting face and want to protect him from all of them.

United Artists produced the film on a budget of approximately 8 million dollars, and it grossed approximately 30 million dollars worldwide.

The film is the principal late-career achievement of Peter Sellers and one of the classic American satires. Sellers had pursued the role for years and persuaded both Kosinski and Ashby that he could play Chance. The performance combines Sellers’s mimicry skills with restrained character work that his earlier comedic films hadn’t required. Melvyn Douglas won Best Supporting Actor as the dying industrialist who befriends Chance.

The film works as both political satire about how American elites mistake confidence for competence and as meditation on how television viewing has replaced education for ordinary citizens. Sellers received a Best Actor nomination and lost to Dustin Hoffman for Kramer vs. Kramer. He died less than a year after the film’s release. Being There remains his last significant performance.

Sellers as Chance

Peter Sellers plays Chance as a man whose entire knowledge of the world comes from television and gardening. He can’t recognize his own ignorance because he has no way to compare what he knows with what anyone else knows. He speaks in simple sentences about gardens. When the President asks his views on the economy, Chance describes the seasons of growth and decay, and the President hears sophisticated economic metaphor. That exchange is the funniest scene in the film to me, and Jack Warden sells the President’s awe perfectly.

Sellers played the role with real restraint. The actor was known for elaborate comedic transformations across multiple characters. Chance required the opposite approach. The performance succeeds because Sellers doesn’t signal that Chance is a fool. The character is unaware of his own simplicity. Sellers plays Chance with the dignity of someone confident he’s having normal conversations. The dignity allows the satire to work because the audience never feels superior to Chance. The audience feels superior to the elites who mistake him for an oracle.

For Writers

Restraint produces stronger comedy than elaboration. Similar logic applies to fiction. The simple character played with dignity reveals more about the surrounding fools than the elaborate fool would.

The Television Education

Chance has spent his entire life watching television. Every situation he encounters, he attempts to resolve by mimicking behavior he’s seen on television shows. He shakes hands when characters on television shake hands. He delivers lines from sitcoms when conversation requires him to speak. The film treats television viewing as Chance’s only education and asks what kind of mind such education produces.

The argument the film makes without stating it is that television has produced Americans whose whole frame of reference comes from the screen. The 1979 exaggeration has become later reality. Multiple American presidents have come from television, and shared cultural reference points now trace mostly to entertainment. I think that idea has aged better than anything else in the film, and it gets less funny and more unsettling with every year that passes.

For Writers

Educational content shapes how characters perceive every situation. The same applies to fiction. What your characters learned from determines what they can recognize and what they can’t.

The Final Shot

In the final scene, Chance walks on water across a pond at Ben Rand’s funeral.

The shot isn’t explained. The audience must decide whether Chance has walked on water through some supernatural quality the character possesses, or whether the shot is symbolic of how Chance moves through American society without its actual conditions touching him. The text supports both readings.

Ashby and Kosinski reportedly disagreed about the meaning of the final shot. The director and screenwriter never agreed on the intended interpretation. The disagreement preserved the ambiguity instead of damaging it. Audiences have continued to debate the ending for decades.

The decision to leave the central question unresolved gave the film a final image that works beyond the satirical content the rest of the runtime established. Multiple interpretations of the closing shot have been published. None is definitive.

The ending was smart to stay unsettled. Chance stepping out onto the water is the most haunting image in the film for me, and I don’t want anyone to explain it.

For Writers

Disagreement between collaborators can preserve ambiguity that consensus would have destroyed. The same applies to creative work. The argument that doesn’t resolve can produce stronger material than the argument that one side wins.

Craft Note

Hal Ashby directed several major American films during the 1970s including Harold and Maude (1971), The Last Detail (1973), Shampoo (1975), Coming Home (1978), and Being There. The run represents one of the strongest decades by an American director. Ashby’s career declined sharply in the 1980s due to substance abuse and conflicts with studios. He died in 1988, and mainstream Hollywood had largely forgotten him. His 1970s work has later received critical reassessment that’s restored his reputation.

Does Being There still hold up?

A 9, and Sellers is most of the reason.

Restraint makes him funnier here than any of his famous transformations did, the television satire has turned from a joke into a prophecy, and the walk across the water is an ending I’m grateful nobody resolved. The only thing between it and a 10 is that I wanted more time with Melvyn Douglas’s dying Ben Rand. If you only know Sellers from his elaborate comic roles, this is the one that shows what he could do.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should you read the Being There novella before watching the film?
Jerzy Kosinski’s novella is short and provides useful context. The film and novel differ in some details. Either order works.
What does the ending of Being There mean?
Audiences have debated this for decades without consensus. Walking on water could be supernatural, symbolic, or a hallucination by other characters. The film deliberately preserves the question.
How is Being There different from Peter Sellers’ other films?
Being There represents Sellers’s most restrained dramatic work. His earlier comedic films including The Pink Panther series demanded different performance style. Being There shows range his other work didn’t show.
How long is Being There?
The film runs approximately two hours ten minutes. The long runtime supports the slow accumulation of the satirical situation.
What is the cultural impact of Being There?
It has had a lasting impact on American satire, with ongoing cultural reference to confidence-mistaken-for-competence dynamics, and continued critical engagement in the years since.
How does Being There compare to Idiocracy?
Both films treat American media culture satirically. Being There works with restraint. Idiocracy works with extravagance. The two films make complementary arguments through different methods.

Sources

On my film lists

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.