Latest
How Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidStranger in a Strange LandProfiles in CourageDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirFlorida RoadkillTeam of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex WorldMy Share of the Task: A MemoirWe Were Soldiers Once… and Young: Ia Drang, the Battle That Changed the War in VietnamThe Columbia Restaurant: Celebrating a Century of History, Culture, and CuisineA Tiger among Us: A Story of Valor in Vietnam’s A Shau ValleyTop Sergeant: The Life and Times of Sergeant Major of the Army William G. BainbridgeSailing True North: Ten Admirals and the Voyage of CharacterPodkayne of MarsMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the WorldSam Walton: Made in America: My StoryI, RobotOpen: An AutobiographyShattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of MidwayA World at Arms: A Global History of World War IIL.L. Bean: The Making of an American IconA Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from America’s First Female Four-Star GeneralLife21 Days to Success Through Networking: The Life and Times of Gnik RowtenCampus BattlefieldThe Bell JarRight Wing RevolutionThe Sage of SagittariusTime for a Turning PointDesigning Casinos to Dominate the CompetitionLove’s Executioner and Other Tales of PsychotherapyBeneath a Scarlet SkyThe Library BookThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsTrump: The Art of the DealThe MAGA DoctrineThe College ScamSea Stories: My Life in Special OperationsPa’anNetworking Your Way to SuccessMasters of NetworkingRadioSoldier for Life: Leader Lessons from the 12th Sergeant Major of the ArmyThe Melting Point: High Command and War in the 21st CenturyAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroStop, in the Name of GodDoes Explicit Sex Sell Books? An Answer to The Absolute Degeneracy of Modern WritingThe Mary Sue: How a 1973 Star Trek Parody Became a Writing TermWhat the AI Writing Survey Says About Jobs, Freelancers and Fiction AuthorsHow Long Does Google Take? Crawling, Indexing and Recovery Times

The Greatest Sports Films

The sport is never the point. The person playing it is

The sports film is about what sports reveal about people: the competitor’s relationship to failure, to age, to pride, to the gap between what they once were and what they’re now. The game is the pressure cooker. The character is what gets cooked. Every great sports film uses its sport as the lens through which one person’s essential quality becomes visible, and the sport is always the right lens for that particular person.

The list covers boxing, baseball, basketball, football, racing, golf, wrestling, bowling, track, and music, because Whiplash is a sports film about drumming, and anyone who disagrees is wrong.

A sports movie that thinks the final score is the story bores me. The films I care about use the game to strip a person down until you can see what’s holding them up, and that’s why a bowling comedy belongs on the same page as Raging Bull. Whiplash belongs here too, and its drumming scenes are as physical and as punishing as any fight on this list.

↑ All Films

1. Raging Bull (1980)

► Read the full review of Raging Bull (1980)

Sport: Boxing · Theme: Self-Destruction as Self-Portrait
Dir: Martin Scorsese · Robert De Niro / Joe Pesci / Cathy Moriarty
⭐ 8.2/10

“I’ve done a lot of bad things, Joey. Maybe it’s coming back to me.”

Scorsese’s film is about a man who uses boxing as the only available outlet for a psychology that can’t exist in normal life, a man whose rage is both his instrument and his disease, whose capacity for violence in the ring is inseparable from his capacity for violence outside it. Jake LaMotta is a problem that boxing temporarily channels into something productive. When the boxing ends, the problem has nowhere to go.

Michael Chapman’s black-and-white cinematography (the ring sequences filmed as expressionist violence, the home sequences filmed as domestic noir) is the most formally intelligent decision in the sports film genre. The sport and the life have different visual grammars because they’re different experiences of the same man, and the transition between them is always the transition between the arena where Jake makes sense and the world where he doesn’t.

Raging Bull is hard to watch, and I still think it’s the best film on this page. LaMotta is a man I’d cross the street to avoid, and Scorsese makes me watch him anyway without once asking me to like him. That refusal to flatter its subject is what most biopics lack, and it’s why this one sits alone at the top.

For WritersScorsese makes the sport and the character’s pathology the same thing. LaMotta’s boxing skill and his destructive psychology aren’t separate qualities but expressions of the same underlying energy. When you write athlete characters, identify the connection between the quality that makes them exceptional at their sport and the quality that makes them difficult or destructive everywhere else. The great athlete is often great because of something that would be a problem without the sport to absorb it.

↑ All Films

2. Rocky (1976)

► Read the full review of Rocky (1976)

Sport: Boxing · Theme: Going the Distance as Its Own Victory
Dir: John G. Avildsen · Sylvester Stallone / Talia Shire / Burgess Meredith
⭐ 8.1/10

“Yo, Adrian!”

Rocky is the sports film’s most honest statement of what competition means to most people who compete: not winning, but showing to yourself that you’re worth something. Rocky doesn’t beat Apollo Creed. He goes fifteen rounds when nobody thought he could last five. The victory is the proof that he’s not a bum, and he needed to prove that to himself before any of the other things in his life could be real.

Stallone’s screenplay is a better piece of writing than its reputation suggests: the romance between Rocky and Adrian, two shy people finding each other, is as well observed as anything in the film’s boxing sequences. The training montage established a genre convention. The film that preceded it established why the convention works: the training is the visible form of a man deciding to believe in himself.

For WritersStallone redefines victory as proof of worth, not as winning. That makes Rocky’s loss at the end at the same time a defeat and a complete success. When you write underdog sports stories, identify what your protagonist needs to prove and to whom, and consider whether the scoreboard result is the most honest measure of whether they proved it. Rocky wins something real while losing the fight. The film is honest about both.

↑ All Films

3. Bull Durham (1988)

► Read the full review of Bull Durham (1988)

Sport: Minor League Baseball · Theme: The Almost-Great and What They Do With It
Dir/Writer: Ron Shelton · Kevin Costner / Susan Sarandon / Tim Robbins
⭐ 7.1/10

“This is a simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball.”

Ron Shelton’s baseball film (the best sports comedy ever made) is built on the most honest premise in the genre: the minor leaguer who’s good enough to know how good the great ones are and not quite good enough to be one of them. Crash Davis has had a cup of coffee in The Show. He’ll spend the rest of his career in the minors, teaching the next generation of pitchers how to talk to the press and think about baseball, and finding this more meaningful than he expected.

The film’s intelligence is in what Crash knows (about baseball, about people, about a talent that almost makes it) and how he holds that knowledge without bitterness. Susan Sarandon’s Annie is the film’s equal intelligence on the other side: a woman who has organized her summer life around the ritual of choosing one minor leaguer per season as her project. The three-way dynamic between Crash, Annie, and Nuke LaLoosh is what the film is about, and baseball is the arena where it plays out.

For WritersShelton builds the film’s emotional center not around winning but around what the almost-great do with their almost-greatness: the dignity available to the man who is very good but not quite great, who knows the difference, and finds a way to be useful anyway. When you write athlete characters past their peak or below the top tier, the most interesting question is how they relate to their own limitations. The graceful acknowledgment of what you are and aren’t is rarer and more interesting than either triumph or bitterness.

↑ All Films

4. Hoosiers (1986)

► Read the full review of Hoosiers (1986)

Sport: High School Basketball · Theme: Redemption Through Coaching / The Second Chance
Dir: David Anspaugh · Gene Hackman / Dennis Hopper / Barbara Hershey
⭐ 7.5/10

“I love you guys.”

The genre’s definitive small-town-team-against-the-world story, based on the actual 1954 Milan High School Indiana state championship, is the sports film as dual redemption narrative: Coach Norman Dale finding his second chance at the same time his team finds theirs, each enabling the other’s. Hackman’s Dale is the most complete coaching performance in cinema: a man whose authority isn’t performed but earned, whose specific quality of demanding exactly what the players can give and no more is the film’s argument about what good coaching is.

Dennis Hopper’s Shooter (the town drunk who’s also the most knowledgeable basketball mind in Hickory) is the film’s subplot about the relationship between brilliance and dysfunction, and about the grace available to someone whose community gives them one more chance. The film justifies both resolutions completely.

Hoosiers is the coaching movie I’d hand to anybody who’s ever had to lead people. Dale doesn’t coddle those boys and he doesn’t break them, and Hackman makes that balance look easy when it’s the hardest thing a leader does. If I’m picking, Shooter’s story moves me more than the championship. A town giving its drunk one more chance is rarer than a small school winning a title.

For WritersAnspaugh and writer Angelo Pizzo build dual redemption arcs that are structurally dependent on each other. Dale needs the team to validate his second chance, the team needs Dale’s belief to find theirs, and each arc’s resolution enables the other’s. When you write dual protagonist stories organized around a shared goal, ensure each protagonist’s arc requires the other’s to complete. The interdependence is what makes both resolutions feel earned. For more, see my article on character arcs.

↑ All Films

5. Moneyball (2011)

► Read the full review of Moneyball (2011)

Sport: Baseball / Statistical Revolution · Theme: Changing the Game by Changing the Structure
Dir: Bennett Miller · Brad Pitt / Jonah Hill / Philip Seymour Hoffman
⭐ 7.6/10

“The first guy through the wall always gets bloody.”

Bennett Miller’s film about Billy Beane’s statistical revolution in baseball is the sports film as intellectual thriller. The drama is entirely in ideas, in the clash between received wisdom and analytical evidence, in the resistance of an institution to the data that would change it. The Oakland A’s 2002 season becomes the vehicle for an argument about how entrenched thinking defeats itself and how a system rarely rewards the person who changes it.

Aaron Sorkin and Steven Zaillian’s screenplay is a masterwork of exposition. Technical baseball analytics made completely accessible through Beane’s frustration and Peter Brand’s nervous conviction. The film’s ending (Beane refusing the Boston contract, the Grady Sizemore YouTube clip) is the sports film’s most intellectually honest ending: the man who changed everything is still searching for the thing that will make it feel like enough.

Moneyball stays with me longer than any other film here. Beane has the evidence in his hand and the whole institution fights him anyway, and anyone who’s tried to change how an old organization works will feel that in their teeth. My one small gripe is that the middle drifts a little, and I’d have trimmed ten minutes from it.

For WritersMiller and Sorkin make the statistical argument the dramatic action. The numbers are the story instead of the background for a story about people. When you write films about ideas, the idea must be the source of dramatic conflict instead of the context for conventional dramatic conflict. Moneyball’s tension is entirely intellectual (will the data be believed, will the system change, will the experiment work) and that intellectual tension is entirely sufficient. Ideas can be dramatic. Give them the chance.
CTAWriting athletes and competitors who feel alive on the page requires understanding what the sport reveals about them. The Deep Character Handbook covers how to build characters defined by their relationship to competition and failure.

↑ All Films

6. Ali (2001)

Sport: Boxing · Theme: The Champion as Political Figure / Identity as Resistance
Dir: Michael Mann · Will Smith / Jamie Foxx / Jon Voight
⭐ 6.8/10

“I don’t have to be what you want me to be.”

Michael Mann’s Ali is the sports biopic that most honestly grapples with the subject’s political dimension. Muhammad Ali wasn’t simply a boxer who happened to have political opinions, he was a political figure who expressed his politics through boxing and whose boxing was inseparable from his identity as a Black man in America. Will Smith’s performance captures Ali’s absolute certainty in his own rightness, his charisma, and the courage of a man who refused induction into the Vietnam draft and lost three years of his prime for refusing to compromise.

The Rumble in the Jungle sequence (the rope-a-dope, the tactical genius of letting Foreman exhaust himself) is the sports film’s most complete rendering of athletic intelligence: not power but patient, counterintuitive thinking under maximum pressure. Ali understood something about Foreman that Foreman didn’t understand about himself. The fight is the proof.

For WritersMann refuses to separate Ali’s boxing from his politics. The film treats both as expressions of the same identity, not as separate chapters of a biography. When you write athlete biopics, the temptation is to treat the sport and the life as parallel tracks. The most honest approach is to show how they’re the same track, how the qualities that make the person exceptional in competition are the same qualities that define their life outside it.

↑ All Films

7. Rush (2013)

Sport: Formula One Racing · Theme: Two Ways of Being Great – Neither Is Wrong
Dir: Ron Howard · Chris Hemsworth / Daniel Brühl
⭐ 8.1/10

“A wise man gets more from his enemies than a fool from his friends.”

Ron Howard’s film about the 1976 Formula One season and the Hunt-Lauda rivalry is the sports film’s most complete portrait of two completely opposed approaches to competition that each produce greatness. James Hunt’s risk-taking, charismatic, living-in-the-moment approach and Niki Lauda’s calculating, disciplined, probability-maximizing approach are presented as equal. Neither is right, neither is wrong, each produces a world champion at different moments.

Daniel Brühl’s Lauda is the film’s achievement: a man whose personality is almost entirely unlikable and whose intelligence and self-discipline are presented as admirable without softening his edges. The scenes of Lauda returning to racing six weeks after his near-fatal crash (his face reconstructed, his lungs damaged, choosing to get back in the car because the mathematics of the championship still favor it) are the film’s argument about a kind of courage that’s not romantic and isn’t less real for that.

For WritersHoward refuses to choose between Hunt and Lauda, the film presents both approaches to competition as valid and productive, and that’s more honest than the conventional sports film’s single protagonist with a single correct approach. When you write competitor pairs, consider whether each competitor’s method has real merit instead of setting up one as right and one as wrong. The rivalry that produces two valid approaches to the same goal is more interesting than the rivalry between correct and incorrect.

↑ All Films

8. Chariots of Fire (1981)

► Read the full review of Chariots of Fire (1981)

Sport: Track / 1924 Olympics · Theme: Running for God vs. Running for Pride – Both Are Running
Dir: Hugh Hudson · Ben Cross / Ian Charleson
⭐ 7.1/10

“I believe God made me for a purpose. But He also made me fast, and when I run, I feel His pleasure.”

Colin Welland’s screenplay and Hugh Hudson’s direction build the film around a dual protagonist structure in which two runners (Harold Abrahams running to prove his worth against British anti-Semitism, Eric Liddell running as an act of worship) use the same physical activity for completely different purposes, and both purposes are honored as genuine. The film refuses to choose between secular achievement and religious devotion, presenting both as legitimate responses to the experience of exceptional physical ability.

The Vangelis score, among the most recognizable in cinema, does something unusual in sports film music: it makes running feel transcendent. The slow-motion beach running that opens the film communicates something about physical joy in motion that the rest of the film then grounds in the human contexts of two men with different reasons for needing to be the fastest.

Chariots of Fire moves me, and the Vangelis score does a lot of that work. My reservation is the pace. Between races the film turns stiff and a little too pleased with its own dignity, and I get restless in those stretches. When those two men run, none of that matters to me anymore.

For WritersWelland’s dual protagonist structure works because both characters’ motivations are equally valid and equally specific. Abrahams’s need to prove himself and Liddell’s religious conviction are both forms of the same underlying drive toward excellence, expressed through different structures. When you write dual protagonist stories, give each protagonist a motivation that’s different in kind from the other, not simply different in degree. Two people running for the same essential reason produce less interesting drama than two people running for different ones.

↑ All Films

9. Field of Dreams (1989)

Sport: Baseball · Theme: The Thing You Never Got to Say to Your Father
Dir/Writer: Phil Alden Robinson · Kevin Costner / James Earl Jones / Ray Liotta
⭐ 7.5/10

“Is this heaven?” “No, it’s Iowa.”

Sports film as pure sentiment, unapologetically, beautifully sentimental about the way that baseball works as a shared language between fathers and sons, and about the grief of the conversation you didn’t have before someone was gone. Ray Kinsella builds a baseball diamond in his cornfield because a voice told him to, and the voice was right, and the reason it was right is that his father is buried under something he never said and the baseball diamond is the way to say it.

The film justifies its sentiment through absolute sincerity, it commits to its premise with complete conviction and never winks at the audience about how implausible it is. The ending, “Hey, Dad? Wanna have a catch?”, is cinema’s most perfectly placed question mark, arriving at the exact moment the film has built toward, and producing its effect on almost everyone who sees it regardless of their relationship to baseball or to their fathers.

The ending of Field of Dreams is shameless, and I wouldn’t change a frame of it. Cynics roll their eyes at a man building a ballfield because a voice told him to, and they’re missing what the film is about. It’s about an unfinished conversation, and that last question will move anybody carrying one of those.

For WritersRobinson justifies the sentimental ending by making the baseball field a specific metaphor for a specific unresolved grief instead of a general symbol of America or nostalgia. When you write stories that build to emotional catharsis, the catharsis must be for something specific: a specific relationship, a specific missed opportunity, a specific unsaid thing. Generic sentiment produces generic response. The specific father and the specific catch produce the grief that the audience carries into the theater. My article on character deaths that matter goes further.

↑ All Films

10. The Natural (1984)

► Read the full review of The Natural (1984)

Sport: Baseball · Theme: The Hero’s Journey as Baseball Myth – Arthurian Legend in Flannels
Dir: Barry Levinson · Robert Redford / Robert Duvall / Glenn Close
⭐ 7.5/10

“I coulda been better. I coulda broke every record in the book.”

Barry Levinson’s film, departing significantly from Bernard Malamud’s darker novel, is the sports film as American myth: the natural talent delayed by fate, the second chance taken in middle age, the final home run that lights up the stadium in an explosion of light. The film’s visual language is deliberately mythological (the golden light, the slow-motion climax, Randy Newman’s swelling score) because Roy Hobbs is the archetype of the gifted person whose gift arrives late and spends itself in a single extraordinary moment.

It’s better than its reputation allows (it was received as sentimental at a moment when irony was the critical preference) and its unashamed mythological grandeur has aged better than most of the ironic sports films that surrounded it. Sometimes the grand gesture is the right gesture.

For WritersLevinson commits to the mythological tone completely (the film doesn’t qualify its grandeur with irony or acknowledge the gap between the myth and the reality) and the commitment is what makes the myth work. When you write in an unashamedly elevated tone, the tone must be sustained completely. The mythological sports film that occasionally winks at its own grandiosity destroys the myth. Commit or do something else.

↑ All Films

11. Miracle (2004)

Sport: Ice Hockey / 1980 Olympics · Theme: Team Identity Over Individual Talent
Dir: Gavin O’Connor · Kurt Russell as Herb Brooks
⭐ 7.5/10

“Great moments are born from great opportunities.”

Gavin O’Connor’s film about the 1980 US Olympic hockey team’s defeat of the Soviet Union is the sports film’s most complete examination of team identity as a coaching achievement, Herb Brooks’s specific method of forging a group of rivals and strangers into a unit that believed in something larger than any of them.

Kurt Russell’s Brooks is the genre’s second-best coaching performance after Hackman’s in Hoosiers: a man whose specific quality of controlled distance from his players isn’t coldness but strategy, a man who understood that being liked would prevent him from making the players hard enough.

The game itself (which everyone knows the outcome of before they sit down) is one of cinema’s most effectively built sporting climaxes. O’Connor makes the outcome feel uncertain despite the audience’s knowledge because he’s built sufficient emotional investment in the team and the moment that the knowledge of the outcome can’t prevent the feeling of not knowing.

For WritersO’Connor builds emotional investment in a known outcome by making the experience of the moment (the specific players, the specific ice, the specific crowd) feel immediate and unrepeatable. When you write climactic events whose outcomes are historically known, the audience’s knowledge doesn’t prevent emotional investment if the immediate experience is specific enough. Make the moment specific. The specificity is what makes the known outcome feel like it is happening for the first time.

↑ All Films

12. Tin Cup (1996)

Sport: Golf · Theme: Going for It – The Shot That Defines You Over the Shot That Wins
Dir: Ron Shelton · Kevin Costner / Rene Russo / Don Johnson
⭐ 6.7/10

“When a defining moment comes along, you define the moment, or the moment defines you.”

Ron Shelton’s second entry on this list (and the companion piece to Bull Durham as the sports film about the man who’s almost great) is built around the most honest sporting choice in the genre: Roy McAvoy repeatedly attempting the impossible shot on 18 instead of laying up for second place, hitting it into the water five times, and making it on the sixth attempt to finish last. He defines the moment. He loses the tournament. The film presents this as the correct choice.

The film’s argument (that there are things more important than winning, that the shot you take says more about you than the score you post) is the sports film’s most romantic and most defensible position. Roy knows it’ll probably go in the water. He goes for it anyway because not going for it is the one outcome he can’t live with. The distinction between strategic caution and self-betrayal is the film’s subject.

Part of me is furious with Roy on that eighteenth hole, and part of me is cheering him into the water. The film makes both reactions fair, and I end up on the side of the stubborn fool. The smart play was to lay up. It also would’ve been a small betrayal of who he is, and I’d take five balls in the water over that.

For WritersShelton builds the climactic shot around the question of what defines the character, the prudent choice that wins or the true choice that might lose, and resolves it in favor of the true choice regardless of the outcome. When you write sporting climaxes that are also character revelations, consider whether winning is the most interesting resolution. The character who loses on the shot they had to take has defined themselves more completely than the character who wins on the shot they were supposed to take.

↑ All Films

13. Whiplash (2014)

► Read the full review of Whiplash (2014)

Sport: Competitive Drumming · Theme: The Cost of Greatness / The Antagonist Who Is Right
Dir/Writer: Damien Chazelle · Miles Teller / J.K. Simmons
⭐ 8.5/10

“There are no two words in the English language more harmful than ‘good job.'”

Whiplash is a sports film about jazz drumming (the competitive intensity, the physical demand, the pursuit of the performance that defines everything) and the only sports film on this list in which the antagonist is right. Fletcher’s methods are abusive and his means are indefensible and his result, Andrew Neiman’s final performance, is exactly what he said it would be. The film refuses to resolve the question of whether the result justifies the means, and that’s the most honest thing it does.

J.K. Simmons’s Fletcher is the sports film’s greatest villain and greatest mentor, a man whose complete conviction in the value of excellence produces both the abuse and the achievement, and whose specific quality of knowing exactly how hard to push without breaking is either the most precise form of teaching or the most precise form of cruelty, and possibly both. The final drum sequence is ten minutes of cinema that completely earns everything that preceded it.

Whiplash scares me more than anything else on this page. Fletcher is a monster. I also can’t dismiss what he gets out of Andrew, and that tension stays with me long after the drums stop. Anyone who reads it as only an abuse story, or only a story about greatness, throws away half of what Chazelle built.

For WritersChazelle refuses to resolve whether the result justifies Fletcher’s methods. The film ends on Andrew’s triumphant performance without answering whether the triumph justifies the damage. When you write mentor-student relationships involving extreme methods, the most honest formal choice is to let both the achievement and the cost stand without adjudication. The reader who must decide whether it was worth it is more engaged than the reader you give the answer to.

↑ All Films

14. Million Dollar Baby (2004)

► Read the full review of Million Dollar Baby (2004)

Sport: Women’s Boxing · Theme: The Cost of Winning Everything and Then Losing It
Dir: Clint Eastwood · Hilary Swank / Clint Eastwood / Morgan Freeman
⭐ 8.1/10

“Mo cuishle. It means my darling, my blood.”

Eastwood’s film is the sports film’s most devastating entry because it takes the genre’s standard arc (the underdog who earns everything through sacrifice) and delivers its promised triumph, then destroys it in a single moment that the film has been building toward without announcing it. Maggie Fitzgerald wins the title and is sucker-punched by a dirty fighter and breaks her neck on the stool. The film about a woman who achieved everything then becomes a film about what achieving everything costs when everything is taken away immediately after.

The final act, Frankie Dunn’s impossible choice, is the sports film’s most morally demanding sequence, presented without the comfort of a clear right answer. The film justified this demand through 90 minutes of building a relationship between Frankie and Maggie that the audience feels completely. That means the final choice hits with the full weight of what is being sacrificed.

Million Dollar Baby devastated me, and I admire how Eastwood hid the trap. If I’ve got a complaint, it’s the dirty fighter. The film makes her so purely villainous that she’s close to a cartoon in a film where everybody else feels real.

For WritersEastwood delivers the genre’s promised triumph and then immediately takes it away (the victory is real, the injury is real, the later demand is real) and that makes the film’s final question agonizing. When you build toward a sporting climax and then subvert it, the subversion lands only if the triumph was earned. The defeat of something the reader didn’t fully receive isn’t tragedy. Losing something they fully possessed, briefly, is.

↑ All Films

15. Remember the Titans (2000)

Sport: High School Football · Theme: Integration / Sport as the Mechanism of Social Change
Dir: Boaz Yakin · Denzel Washington / Will Patton
⭐ 7.8/10

“Attitude reflects leadership, Captain.”

Boaz Yakin’s film uses high school football integration in 1971 Virginia as the vehicle for the plainest statement in the sports film genre: the team that learns to play together learns to live together, and the sport that forces shared purpose across racial lines shows the possibility of something the surrounding community believes is impossible. The film isn’t subtle about this argument because the argument doesn’t require subtlety. It requires the detail of these people in this town finding their way to each other through practices and games.

Denzel Washington’s Coach Boone and Will Patton’s Coach Yoast are the film’s dual coaching achievement, two men who begin as adversaries and become partners, each teaching the other something about what leadership requires. The film’s best scene isn’t on the field but at Gettysburg, where Boone tells his team what the field they’re standing on means and what it requires of them.

For WritersYakin uses the sport as the mechanism through which the social change becomes possible. Football’s demand for interdependence and trust is the condition under which racial integration can happen in this community at this time. When you write stories about social change, identify the mechanism through which the change becomes possible in your story’s world. The change that simply happens because people decide to be better is less interesting than the change that’s forced by circumstances that make the old way impossible.
CTAThe sports film’s central craft challenge, making competition feel high-stakes on the page, is covered in the Conflict and Tension Handbook.

↑ All Films

16. Invictus (2009)

Sport: Rugby / 1995 World Cup · Theme: The Sport as National Reconciliation
Dir: Clint Eastwood · Morgan Freeman / Matt Damon
⭐ 7.3/10

“Forgiveness liberates the soul. It removes fear. That is why it is such a powerful weapon.”

Eastwood’s second sports film on this list is the most politically ambitious entry in the genre, using the 1995 Rugby World Cup as the vehicle for Nelson Mandela’s specific project of national reconciliation in post-apartheid South Africa. The sport here’s not the lens for an individual’s story but for an entire nation’s, and the film’s argument (that a sporting triumph at the right moment can change a country’s understanding of itself) is both romantic and historically grounded.

Morgan Freeman’s Mandela is the film’s achievement: a performance that shows a man who has organized his entire psychology around the strategic deployment of grace, who understands exactly what he’s doing with the Springboks and why it’ll work, and who finds in Pienaar’s team a vehicle for a national message. The film asks you to believe that rugby saved South Africa. For 134 minutes, it makes the case.

For WritersEastwood uses the sport as the mechanism for national psychological change, not individual psychological change, the victory transforms a nation’s self-image instead of a protagonist’s. When you write sports stories with political or social dimensions, identify how the sporting result changes the collective, not simply celebrating individual achievement. The game that matters beyond the game is the game worth writing about.

↑ All Films

17. The Blind Side (2009)

► Read the full review of The Blind Side (2009) Review

Sport: Football · Theme: The Family That Sees What Nobody Else Could See
Dir: John Lee Hancock · Sandra Bullock / Quinton Aaron
⭐ 7.6/10

“Michael, you’re changing that boy’s life.” “No. He’s changing mine.”

Family story as sports film, Michael Oher’s rise from homeless teenager to first-round NFL draft pick is the vehicle for a film primarily about the Tuohy family finding an unexpected fourth member, and about a woman who decides that the correct response to seeing someone who needs something is to provide it without making a project of it. Sandra Bullock’s Leigh Anne Tuohy is the film’s achievement: a character whose toughness and warmth are the same thing.

Critics have faulted its perspective, the story told from the white family’s viewpoint, not Michael’s, and the criticism has merit. The film it chose to be isn’t the film that most honestly accounts for Michael Oher’s experience. It’s a moving film about one kind of human generosity, and both things can be true.

The Blind Side has moments that move me, and Bullock deserves her praise. I still gave it a 4, because the film is so busy admiring the family’s generosity that Michael ends up a passenger in his own story. A football movie where the football player barely gets a point of view is a weak movie, whatever else it gets right, and this one left me frustrated.

For WritersHancock builds the emotional center of the film in the relationship. The football is the context, the family is the subject. When you write sports biopics, identify whether the sport or the surrounding human relationships is the film’s actual subject. The film that’s honest about what it’s about, a family story that happens to involve football, is more coherent than the film that tries to be both and serves neither completely.

↑ All Films

18. Slap Shot (1977)

► Read the full review of Slap Shot (1977)

Sport: Minor League Hockey · Theme: Violence as Entertainment / The Hanson Brothers
Dir: George Roy Hill · Paul Newman / The Hanson Brothers
⭐ 7.3/10

“I’m listening to the fucking song!”

The funniest sports film ever made and the most honest account of minor league professional sports, the indignity of playing in front of small crowds in dying mill towns for a franchise that’s about to be sold, the camaraderie of men who are too old or not quite good enough for the big leagues, and the discovery that the crowd will come to watch violence when it won’t come to watch hockey.

The Hanson Brothers (the three goons who are brought in to brawl and inadvertently save the franchise) are the film’s immortal creation.

Nancy Dowd’s screenplay is the most profane and most accurate piece of sports writing in cinema: the language of the locker room, Reggie Dunlop’s player-coach manipulation, the ethics of a man who understands that winning the wrong way is still winning. The film loves its characters too much to be cynical about them and is too honest to sentimentalize them.

Slap Shot is the most fun on this whole list, and the Hanson Brothers are a big reason why. My reservation is that the violence jokes sometimes stop being satire and turn into the thing they’re mocking, and the film doesn’t always seem to notice. It’s a small price for a comedy this sharp about dying mill towns and the men who play in them.

For WritersDowd writes from inside the minor league world (the humiliations, the pleasures, the codes) with the accuracy of someone who spent time in it. When you write sports worlds, the unglamorous details are the ones that make it real: the bus trips, the bad motels, the crowd of 200 in a rink that seats 3,000. The glamour of sport is available everywhere. The underbelly is what makes a sports story feel true.

↑ All Films

19. Vision Quest (1985)

Sport: High School Wrestling · Theme: The Self-Chosen Impossible Standard
Dir: Harold Becker · Matthew Modine / Linda Fiorentino / Madonna
⭐ 6.7/10

“It’s what you do in the dark that puts you in the light.”

Vision Quest is the underseen entry on this list: a high school wrestling film in which Louden Swain decides, without any external pressure or encouragement, to drop two weight classes and wrestle the state’s best competitor.

Nobody asked him to do this. Nobody is sure it’s a good idea. He does it because he needs to prove something to himself about what he’s capable of, and that self-imposed standard is the film’s subject.

What it captures is the experience of making your body do something it doesn’t want to do for reasons that are entirely internal: the cutting of weight, the training at the edge of what the body permits, the discipline of an eighteen-year-old who has decided that his comfort is less important than his standard. It’s the most accurate depiction of the athlete’s internal experience in the sports film genre.

For WritersBecker builds the stakes entirely from internal motivation (Louden’s goal has no external validation, no coach demanding it, no external prize attached) which makes the film’s emotional investment entirely dependent on the audience accepting that internal standards are real stakes. When you write characters pursuing self-imposed goals, the goal must feel as real and as consequential as any externally imposed one. The reader must understand what the standard means to the character and why meeting it matters to them.

↑ All Films

20. Kingpin (1996)

Sport: Professional Bowling · Theme: The Washed-Up Champion’s Last Shot at Redemption
Dir: Farrelly Brothers · Woody Harrelson / Randy Quaid / Bill Murray
⭐ 6.9/10

“When you’re good at something, you’ll tell everyone. When you’re great at something, they’ll tell you.”

The Farrelly Brothers’ bowling comedy is the sports film as pure guilty pleasure: Woody Harrelson’s Roy Munson (one-handed, broken, a former champion now hustling small-town bowling alleys) discovering an Amish prodigy and concocting a scheme to reach the Reno bowling championship. The film is deeply stupid in the way only the Farrellys can manage, and Bill Murray’s Ernie McCracken (the villain, the champion who ruined Roy’s hand, the most cheerfully amoral person in the sports film genre) is one of cinema’s great comedy performances.

Kingpin wins its place by being funny about the world of professional bowling (the culture, the status, a sport that’s both serious and impossible to take seriously) and by having the emotional core of every other film on this list beneath the comedy. Roy wants redemption. The sport just happens to be bowling.

Kingpin is dumb as a sack of bowling pins, and I laugh anyway. Murray plays a jerk with such cheerful commitment that I find myself rooting for the scenes he’s in while I root against the man. Plenty of prestige films have less heart than this one.

For WritersThe Farrellys build real emotional stakes (Roy’s redemption, Ishmael’s chance) underneath the comedy, not instead of it. When you write sports comedies, the comedy can’t replace the emotional investment that makes sports films work; it must be the tone in which the investment is expressed. The sports comedy that’s only funny isn’t a sports film. One that’s funny and has real stakes is both funnier and more affecting than it would be if it chose one tone. I’ve gone into this further in my piece on humor in writing.

What the Sports Film Is Always About

The sport is only the pressure cooker. Remove the boxing ring from Raging Bull and you have a film about a man who destroys everything he loves because he can’t stop. Remove the drumming from Whiplash and you have a film about the cost of demanding greatness. Remove the baseball from Field of Dreams and you have a film about the things sons never say to their fathers before it’s too late.

The great sports film identifies what the sport uniquely reveals about its protagonist that no other context could reveal as efficiently, and builds its story around that revelation. Every sport has its own demands (boxing’s solitary violence, baseball’s failure rate, golf’s merciless honesty about where the ball went) and the great sports film matches the sport to the person for whom that sport is the right lens. When Chazelle chose drumming for Whiplash, he chose correctly.

The discipline and the obsession and the way a drum kit responds to force are exactly right for the story he was telling.

I don’t like sports movies that think a last-second win is enough. They cue the music and expect me to cheer because the scoreboard says so. Every film on this page asks for more than that, and I’d take one scene of Crash Davis coaching a kid pitcher on how to handle the press over a dozen trophy-hoisting finales.

What sports film is missing from this list?

The Wrestler. Cinderella Man. Friday Night Lights. Any Given Sunday. Drop your nominations in the comments, especially any sport not represented here.

↑ Back to Film Navigation

Honorable Mentions

3 more reviewed on this site and worth your time, ranked by the same scale as the list above.

21. The Wrestler (2008)

RLR: 9 / 10

Mickey Rourke playing a version of his own career collapse, and the film is about a man whose body is the only thing he has and is failing.

► Read the full review

22. Eight Men Out (1988)

RLR: 8 / 10

The 1919 Black Sox scandal told from the players’ position, with John Sayles arguing that underpaid men were the ones punished while the owners were not.

► Read the full review

23. The Color of Money (1986)

RLR: 8 / 10

Scorsese’s sequel to The Hustler twenty-five years later, with Newman returning to the role and winning the Academy Award he should have had the first time.

► Read the full review

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes a sports film good when the outcome is obvious?
Using the sport as a lens instead of a subject. Raging Bull is about a man who can’t stop punishing himself and boxing is where it becomes visible. Bull Durham is about ageing out of something you love. The result of the game is rarely the point.
Why does the underdog structure keep working?
Because it makes effort legible. Training is the most filmable form of self-improvement, and the audience gets to watch the change instead of be told about it. Rocky's power is that we see the price.
What is the genre's most common failure?
Assuming the sport will supply the drama. A well-shot game isn’t a story, and a film that reaches the final match without having built anything discovers that the score doesn’t matter to anybody.
What can a writer learn from sports films?
How to build a climax the reader already knows the shape of and still make it work. The tension comes from cost and character instead of from uncertainty, and that’s the harder and more useful skill.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment