Latest
Post an AI Image and Unfriend MeShe Asked How to Publish Her Bedtime Story. They Called Her a Thief.The AI Hype Cycle: Why the Crash Is Coming, and Who’s Causing ItSix Claude Prompts That Get You Unstuck, and Why the Order MattersDogpiled Over AI Art at the Renaissance FaireClaude Opus 5.5: What the New Release Means for WritersTrump’s AI Force Is a Fire Department With No Fire CodeWhat It Costs to Fix an AI-Written ManuscriptWhen Your Memoir Should Be a NovelThe Hugging Face AI Agent Attack: An Operations ReadingWhen Your Own Memoir Sounds Like BraggingWhat Belongs on a Copyright PageWhat an AI Detector Score on Your Manuscript Is WorthThe Clients Who Pay and VanishThe Quotation Marks That Get Authors SuedThe Work You Would Never Have StartedMonthly or Milestone: How Ghostwriting Gets BilledWhen a Client Thinks the Ghostwriter Used AIThe One-Hour Call Before I Quote Your BookBehind the Book: The Mysterious Island, Neb’s SideHow to Organize Decades of Memories Into a MemoirWhy Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence Says

Pi (1998)

TL;DR: Pi (1998) rates 8 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. A reclusive mathematician in New York’s Chinatown believes the stock market, the Torah and nature itself can be described by a single hidden pattern, and his search for it drives him to the edge of sanity. Darren Aronofsky’s first film was made for about sixty thousand dollars in grainy black and white, and it’s a feverish, relentless and original thriller about obsession. It’s an 8.
Pi (1998)
8 / 10

A Debut Like No Other

Pi is one of the most striking debut films of the nineties. Darren Aronofsky made it for about sixty thousand dollars, much of it raised by asking friends and family for a hundred dollars each, and shot it in grainy, high-contrast black and white on the streets of New York’s Chinatown. It’s rough, loud, claustrophobic and completely unlike anything else of its time, and it announced a major new director.

It won the directing award at the Sundance Film Festival in 1998 and became a cult hit. Aronofsky went on to make Requiem for a Dream, The Wrestler and Black Swan, and all of them have their roots here: the obsessive heroes, the pounding editing, the electronic music and the sense of a mind coming apart. I give it an 8. It’s intense and uneven, and it’s unforgettable.

It’s also a remarkable example of how much a film can do with how little. There are no stars, no special effects and almost no locations beyond a few apartments, streets and subway cars. Everything the film achieves comes from its ideas, its style and its sheer nervous energy. That’s exactly why it still feels fresh.

Max Cohen

Max Cohen is a brilliant, reclusive mathematician who lives alone in a cramped Chinatown apartment filled with computers he built himself. He suffers from crippling migraines and pops pills to control them, and he has devoted his life to a single belief. He’s convinced that mathematics is the language of nature, that everything around us can be represented by numbers and that if you graph those numbers, patterns emerge.

He believes there’s a pattern everywhere in nature, and he’s trying to find the one behind the stock market. His homemade computer, Euclid, crunches the numbers day and night. Max narrates his own life in a flat, precise voice, repeating his assumptions and recording his migraines like a scientist, and the film puts us so tightly inside his head that we share his paranoia.

Sean Gullette, who co-wrote the story with Aronofsky, plays Max with a twitchy, haunted intensity that carries the film. He’s in almost every scene, and his growing fear and exhaustion are completely convincing. He shaved his head for the role, and his gaunt, sweating face, lit harshly in the black and white, becomes one of the film’s most memorable images.

For Writers

Max narrates his own life like a lab notebook, repeating his assumptions and recording his symptoms. The voice tells us who he’s before anything happens.

When you write an obsessive character, letting them describe the world in their own terms can make the reader see it as they do, and feel their obsession from inside.

Try writing a scene in your character’s own voice, using only the language of their obsession. Let the reader feel how narrow their world has become.

The Number

One day Euclid, after crashing, prints out a string of stock predictions and a 216-digit number, and then fails. Max throws the printout away in disgust. The next day, he discovers the predictions were correct. The number, whatever it is, seems to be the key to the pattern he’s been looking for.

From there, everyone wants it. A ruthless Wall Street firm, led by a woman called Marcy Dawson, wants to use Max’s work to predict the market and has been watching him. A group of Hasidic Jews, led by a man called Lenny Meyer whom Max meets in a coffee shop, believes the number may be the true name of God, hidden in the Torah, and wants it for religious reasons.

Max is pursued by both, and he begins to believe that the number is more than a mathematical discovery. It may be the key to everything, and it may be driving him mad. His migraines grow worse, his paranoia deepens, and he begins to see the number and its patterns everywhere, from the stock pages to the faces of strangers on the subway.

Sol

Max’s only real friend is his old mentor, Sol Robeson, a retired mathematician who spent years searching for patterns in pi before suffering a stroke. Mark Margolis plays him with a gentle, tired wisdom. The two men play Go together, and Sol uses the ancient Chinese board game to teach Max about complexity: simple rules that produce endless, unpredictable possibilities.

Sol warns Max that he’s heading down the same path that ruined his own health. He had found patterns everywhere too, he says, and they led nowhere. Some patterns are just what the mind creates when it looks too hard. Max doesn’t listen. He’s convinced he’s closer than Sol ever was.

Their relationship is the film’s emotional heart, and its tragedy. Sol has already seen what the search does to a person, and he can’t stop his student from making the same mistake. When Sol himself returns to the search, and it destroys him, Max loses the one person who understood him.

For Writers

Sol has already been where Max is going, and he can’t stop his student. The mentor’s warning becomes a prophecy the hero ignores.

Give your obsessive hero a mentor or friend who once chased the same thing and lost. Let their warning be ignored, and let the reader know it’s right.

When you write a story about obsession, a character who has already paid its price can show the reader the stakes without anyone having to state them.

Mathematics and Mysticism

The film is full of real mathematical ideas, and it uses them with surprising seriousness for a thriller. There’s the golden ratio, the Fibonacci sequence and the spiral that appears in nautilus shells, sunflowers and galaxies, and Max traces it everywhere he looks, from the swirl of milk in his coffee to the patterns of smoke.

It also draws on the Kabbalah and gematria, the Jewish mystical tradition of assigning numbers to Hebrew letters and searching the Torah for hidden meanings. Lenny shows Max how words can be converted into numbers and linked to each other, and Max sees the same patterns emerging in religion as in mathematics.

The film doesn’t claim any of this is true. It’s interested in what happens to a mind that believes it could be, and in the thin line between genius and madness, discovery and delusion. Pi is about the hunger for meaning, and about what that hunger can do. Max’s search is part science, part faith and part illness, and the film refuses to separate the three.

The Migraines

Max’s migraines are the film’s most harrowing element. They come on without warning, and Aronofsky films them as sensory assaults: flashing light, pounding sound, distorted faces and the camera shaking with pain. Max collapses, shakes and hallucinates, and each attack is worse than the last. They’re some of the most viscerally uncomfortable sequences in nineties cinema, and anyone who suffers from migraines will recognize the terrible accuracy of the flashing light and the pressure behind the eyes.

As the film goes on, the migraines and the hallucinations merge, and neither Max nor the audience can tell what’s real. He sees a brain on a subway platform and follows a trail of blood. He finds ants swarming over his computer, and he starts to believe the number is burning a hole in his mind. The film never tells us how much of it is really happening.

This uncertainty is the film’s greatest strength. By the final act, we’re so deep inside Max’s perspective that we have no way to judge his discoveries objectively. We’re as trapped as he is, and just as desperate for the pattern to mean something.

The Style

Aronofsky and his cinematographer, Matthew Libatique, shot the film on black and white reversal stock. That gives it an extremely grainy, high-contrast look, the whites burning out and the blacks swallowing everything. It looks like a nightmare photocopied too many times, and it suits the story perfectly. It also turns the budget into a virtue. There’s no money for sets or lighting, so the film embraces the raw texture of the city and the cramped rooms, and it looks far more distinctive than most expensive films of its time.

The editing is fast and jagged, with rapid montages of pills, fingers, locks and eyes, repeated every time Max takes his medication. The camera is often attached to Max’s body, so it moves with him, and the world stays still around him. The sound design is aggressive and relentless. These techniques would become Aronofsky’s signature, and they’re at their rawest here.

For Writers

Aronofsky repeats the same rapid montage every time Max takes his pills. The repetition creates a rhythm that makes the audience feel the routine and the dependency.

Choose one ritual your character performs, and describe it in exactly the same few words each time it appears. Change a single word near the end to signal a break.

When you write about a compulsion or routine, repeating the same short description every time it happens can make the reader feel the grip of the habit.

The Score

Clint Mansell, a former member of the British band Pop Will Eat Itself, wrote the score, a relentless electronic pulse that drives the film forward like a racing heartbeat. It’s joined by tracks from electronic artists including Aphex Twin, Massive Attack, Orbital and Autechre, and the soundtrack became a landmark of late-nineties electronic music.

It was the start of a long partnership between Mansell and Aronofsky. Mansell went on to write the famous score for Requiem for a Dream and many of Aronofsky’s other films. In Pi, the music is as important as the images in creating the film’s feeling of mounting pressure. Try watching a scene with the sound off, and it loses half its force.

The Ending

The final act is feverish and disturbing. Max, pursued by the Wall Street firm and the Hasidim, overwhelmed by migraines and convinced that the number is destroying him, finally takes a drastic, violent step to rid himself of his own mathematical gift. The film doesn’t show it in detail, and it doesn’t need to.

The epilogue is quiet and surprising. Max sits on a park bench, calm and unburdened, and a little girl who has often asked him to do mental arithmetic asks him a sum. He can’t do it anymore, and he smiles. He’s lost his genius, and with it his torment. Whether that’s a tragedy or a release is left to the audience.

Where Pi Falls Short

It’s rough in places. Some of the performances are stiff, the pacing is relentless enough to exhaust, and the plot, with its rival Wall Street and religious factions, is closer to a thriller than to the philosophical story it wants to be. The low budget shows, and some viewers will find the whole experience too aggressive to enjoy.

On the other side, it’s startlingly original, and it achieves a great deal with almost nothing. The style is bold, the ideas are fascinating, and the portrait of a mind consumed by obsession is frightening. It earns an 8, and few debuts of its decade are as impressive. Only someone with nothing to lose could have made it, and it has the energy of that freedom in every frame.

Craft Note

Craft Note

Pi puts the audience inside Max’s head so completely that we can’t tell his discoveries from his hallucinations. The film’s power comes from sharing his uncertainty about what’s real.

When you write a character losing their grip, describing their breakdown from the outside keeps the reader safe. Writing it from inside makes the reader unsure what to trust.

Write your character’s crisis in close point of view, and describe their hallucinations in exactly the same way as real events. Let the reader discover the difference only later.

The Verdict on Pi

Yes. It’s an 8, a feverish, original thriller about obsession, made on almost no money by a director who went on to great things. It’s intense and exhausting, and it’s worth watching for anyone interested in Aronofsky, in low-budget filmmaking or in films that dare to take ideas seriously.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Pi (1998) about?
Max Cohen, a reclusive mathematician in New York, believes that everything in nature, including the stock market, follows mathematical patterns. When his homemade computer produces a mysterious 216-digit number that seems to predict the market, he’s pursued by a Wall Street firm and a group of Hasidic Jews who believe the number is the hidden name of God, while his migraines and paranoia worsen.
Who directed Pi?
Darren Aronofsky, in his feature debut. He co-wrote the story with the film’s star, Sean Gullette, and made it for about sixty thousand dollars, partly raised from friends and family. It won the directing award at the 1998 Sundance Film Festival. Aronofsky went on to direct Requiem for a Dream, The Wrestler, Black Swan and The Whale.
Why is Pi in black and white?
Aronofsky and cinematographer Matthew Libatique shot it on black and white reversal film. It produces an extremely grainy, high-contrast image. The choice was partly practical, given the tiny budget, and partly artistic. The harsh, burned-out look reflects Max’s increasingly unstable mental state and gives the film its distinctive, nightmarish atmosphere.
What is the 216-digit number in Pi?
That’s a number produced by Max’s computer shortly before it crashes. It seems to be linked to accurate stock market predictions. Different characters interpret it differently: the Wall Street firm sees it as a key to predicting the market, while a group of Kabbalists believe it may be the true name of God. The film never confirms what it means.
Who composed the music for Pi?
Clint Mansell, formerly of the band Pop Will Eat Itself, composed the score, beginning a long collaboration with Aronofsky that included Requiem for a Dream. The soundtrack also features tracks by electronic artists including Aphex Twin, Massive Attack, Orbital and Autechre, and it became a notable album of late-nineties electronic music.
What does the ending of Pi mean?
After a violent act intended to rid himself of his obsession, Max is shown calm and at peace on a park bench, unable to do the mental arithmetic he once found easy. The ending suggests he has sacrificed his genius to escape the torment it caused. The film leaves open whether this is a tragedy or a liberation.
Is Pi worth watching?
Yes, for viewers who enjoy intense, unconventional films. This is a striking low-budget debut with bold visual style, a powerful electronic score and fascinating ideas about mathematics, religion and obsession. It’s also claustrophobic, loud and exhausting, and some viewers find it too aggressive. It’s essential viewing for fans of Darren Aronofsky’s later work.

This film appears on 2 of my film lists

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.