Code Blue

Code Blue reunites the authors behind two of the better crime-writer references, physician Keith D. Wilson and surgeon David W. Page, this time to tackle the hospital itself as a setting. Where their other books cover wounds and death, this one is about the medical world a story might take place in, the sights, sounds, smells, routines, and personnel of a working hospital, so a writer can render that environment convincingly. Two working doctors explaining to novelists what a hospital smells and sounds like is a damn useful idea, and almost nobody else has bothered to do it.

Medical settings are everywhere in fiction, the hospital drama, the doctor protagonist, the emergency that puts a character in the ER. Writers get them wrong constantly, and medically literate readers, a large group, notice instantly. That kind of fakery is inexcusable, because the fix is a little research.

The hospital as a place

The book’s distinctive contribution is sensory and procedural authenticity about the medical environment. Wilson and Page describe the hospital from a writer’s perspective: what the spaces are like, how staff interact and what the hierarchy is, the rhythms of shifts and rounds and emergencies, the specialized language, and the kind of detail that makes a setting feel inhabited instead of imagined from television.

Because the authors are practicing physicians, the detail carries firsthand credibility, and the focus on what a writer needs to evoke a place, instead of on medicine for its own sake, keeps it usable. For an author setting scenes in a hospital, this is grounding that’s hard to get accurately elsewhere.

Authenticity against the TV version

The book’s usefulness, like the best crime references, is as a corrective to the secondhand version most writers absorb. Almost everyone’s mental image of a hospital comes from medical dramas, which compress, heighten, and distort how the place works, and a writer copying that copy produces something that rings false to anyone who knows the real thing. Wilson and Page go to the source, letting a writer replace the televised hospital with the real one, the kind of authenticity that separates a convincing medical setting from a stagey one.

What are the weaknesses of Code Blue?

The caveats are familiar from the authors’ other work.

The book dates from 2000, and hospital technology, procedures, and even culture have moved since, so details should be checked against current practice, though the basic feel of a hospital ages more slowly than, say, forensic technology. It’s also a narrow setting reference, useful mainly to writers whose stories involve a medical environment, and it teaches setting authenticity instead of storytelling. For its audience it’s valuable; for everyone else it’s irrelevant, the nature of a specialized tool.

Is Code Blue worth reading?

It’s a solid, usefully specialized reference for the real and common task of setting fiction in a hospital, grounded by physician authors and aimed squarely at what a writer needs to make the place convincing.

It loses a little for its 2000 vintage, which dates some specifics, and for the inherent narrowness of a single-setting guide. For a writer working in medical fiction it’s a worthwhile, hard-to-replace grounding; for anyone else it’s simply not their book. As research, I’d take it over a whole season of medical dramas. It’s a narrow tool, and it does its narrow job well.

Frequently Asked Questions