Code Blue

Code Blue reunites the authors behind two of the better crime-writer references, physician Keith D. Wilson and surgeon David W. Page, this time to tackle the hospital itself as a setting. Where their other books cover wounds and death, this one is about the medical world a story might take place in, the sights, sounds, smells, routines, and personnel of a working hospital, so a writer can render that environment convincingly. As a specialized setting reference from authors who actually work in that world, it does a real and fairly unusual job.

Medical settings are everywhere in fiction, the hospital drama, the doctor protagonist, the emergency that lands a character in the ER, and they’re easy to get wrong in ways that medically literate readers, a large group, notice instantly.

The hospital as a place

The book’s distinctive contribution is sensory and procedural authenticity about the medical environment. Wilson and Page describe the hospital from a writer’s perspective: what the spaces are actually like, how staff interact and what the hierarchy is, the rhythms of shifts and rounds and emergencies, the specialized language, and the texture of detail that makes a setting feel inhabited instead of imagined from television.

Because the authors are practicing physicians, the detail carries firsthand credibility, and the focus on what a writer needs to evoke a place, instead of on medicine for its own sake, keeps it usable. For an author setting scenes in a hospital, this is grounding that’s hard to get accurately elsewhere.

Authenticity against the TV version

The book’s real usefulness, like the best crime references, is as a corrective to the secondhand version most writers absorb. Almost everyone’s mental image of a hospital comes from medical dramas, which compress, heighten, and distort how the place actually works, and a writer copying that copy produces something that rings false to anyone who knows the real thing. Wilson and Page go to the source, letting a writer replace the televised hospital with the real one, the kind of authenticity that separates a convincing medical setting from a stagey one.

What are the weaknesses of Code Blue?

The caveats are familiar from the authors’ other work. The book dates from 2000, and hospital technology, procedures, and even culture have moved since, so specific details should be checked against current practice, though the fundamental texture of a hospital ages more slowly than, say, forensic technology. It’s also a narrow setting reference, useful mainly to writers whose stories actually involve a medical environment, and it teaches setting authenticity instead of storytelling. For its specific audience it’s valuable; for everyone else it’s irrelevant, the nature of a specialized tool.

Is Code Blue worth reading?

It’s a solid, usefully specialized reference for the real and common task of setting fiction in a hospital, grounded by physician authors and aimed squarely at what a writer needs to make the place convincing. It loses a little for its 2000 vintage, which dates some specifics, and for the inherent narrowness of a single-setting guide. For a writer working in medical fiction it’s a worthwhile, hard-to-replace grounding; for anyone else it’s simply not their book. A capable specialist’s reference that does its particular job well.

Frequently Asked Questions