Latest
Post an AI Image and Unfriend MeShe Asked How to Publish Her Bedtime Story. They Called Her a Thief.The AI Hype Cycle: Why the Crash Is Coming, and Who’s Causing ItSix Claude Prompts That Get You Unstuck, and Why the Order MattersDogpiled Over AI Art at the Renaissance FaireClaude Opus 5.5: What the New Release Means for WritersTrump’s AI Force Is a Fire Department With No Fire CodeWhat It Costs to Fix an AI-Written ManuscriptWhen Your Memoir Should Be a NovelThe Hugging Face AI Agent Attack: An Operations ReadingWhen Your Own Memoir Sounds Like BraggingWhat Belongs on a Copyright PageWhat an AI Detector Score on Your Manuscript Is WorthThe Clients Who Pay and VanishThe Quotation Marks That Get Authors SuedThe Work You Would Never Have StartedMonthly or Milestone: How Ghostwriting Gets BilledWhen a Client Thinks the Ghostwriter Used AIThe One-Hour Call Before I Quote Your BookBehind the Book: The Mysterious Island, Neb’s SideHow to Organize Decades of Memories Into a MemoirWhy Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence Says

The Trench (1999)

TL;DR: The Trench (1999) rates 7 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. The Trench is William Boyd’s first and only film as director. He’s better known as a novelist.
The Trench (1999)
7 / 10

The Trench is William Boyd’s first and only film as director. He’s better known as a novelist. The whole movie takes place in one British trench in the forty-eight hours before the Somme offensive on July 1, 1916. There’s no combat in it. The combat is the thing the men are waiting for and the thing the audience never sees. The film ends with the whistle.

Daniel Craig plays Sergeant Telford Winter, six years before Casino Royale and one year before anyone outside the British industry knew who he was. He’s doing the same compressed-fury performance he later brought to Bond, except in 1999 nobody had seen it yet. He’s the best thing in the film.

The Confined Setting

Boyd commits to the trench. The camera never leaves it. You don’t see the German lines. You don’t see the British staff. You see a hundred yards of duckboard and dugout. The decision was partly budgetary and partly artistic, and it works because the script doesn’t try to break out.

The trade-off is that the film feels theatrical. Boyd is a novelist directing actors in a small space. The framing is competent but rarely cinematic. If you want the trench experience as immersion, 1917 has it. If you want the trench experience as anticipation of death, The Trench is closer.

For Writers

A confined setting forces a writer to find drama in proximity and time instead of in event. The Trench has almost no plot. Men wait for an attack. They talk. They drink. They write letters. They go over the top. That’s the entire story. The dramatic engine is the count-down clock and the fact that the reader knows what the Somme actually was. If you’re writing a confined story, the external pressure must come from outside the room. Boyd uses history.

You can use a deadline, a verdict, a coming storm. The room itself isn’t enough.

The Ensemble

The squad is the standard British war-film mix. The young one. The cynical one. The religious one. The officer who’s trying. The officer who’s not. Boyd doesn’t subvert these types, and that’s both a problem and not one. A problem because the film doesn’t surprise. Not a problem because the men in these trenches actually were these types, and the script is more interested in being true than being clever.

Paul Nicholls plays Private Billy Macfarlane, the seventeen-year-old who lied about his age. Julian Rhind-Tutt plays the officer. The supporting cast is mostly British TV actors doing solid work in small parts.

For Writers

Type characters aren’t automatically bad. They become bad when the writer treats them as if they were original creations. The Trench knows its young one, its cynic, its officer-trying-to-cope are types. It doesn’t pretend they’re unique. It puts them in a real situation and watches what happens. The lesson is that you can build a true story out of recognizable types as long as you don’t try to dress them up as something they’re not.

The Ending

The whistle blows. The men climb the ladder. Cut to black. There’s no battle. There’s no postscript explaining that of the twenty thousand British soldiers who went over the top on the first day of the Somme, most were killed or wounded in the first hour. The film trusts the audience to know.

It’s the right ending and it’s the only ending the film could have. Anything else would be sentimental. Boyd doesn’t have many cinematic instincts but this one was correct.

For Writers

An ending can be earned by withholding what the reader thinks they want. The Trench doesn’t show the battle the entire film has been building toward. The withholding is the point. The reader carries the meaning of what they didn’t see. If you’ve built genuine anticipation, you can end on the moment before. Endings don’t have to land. Sometimes they have to leave.

Craft Note

William Boyd directed and wrote, his only feature as director. Daniel Craig played Sergeant Telford Winter. Paul Nicholls played Private Billy Macfarlane. Julian Rhind-Tutt in support. Set in the forty-eight hours before the Somme offensive of July 1, 1916. Entire film takes place in one trench. Released September 1999. Modest British production.

Is The Trench worth watching?

7/10. A small, claustrophobic film that does what it sets out to do. Not cinematic. Not innovative. Honest. Watch it for Craig’s early performance and for the ending. Skip if you want spectacle.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there any combat?
No. The film ends when the men climb out of the trench. The Somme attack itself isn’t shown.
Why is Daniel Craig in this?
Because he was a working British actor in 1999. Casino Royale was seven years away. This is part of his pre-Bond filmography along with Layer Cake and Munich.
Is The Trench accurate?
Reasonably. The setting, the timeline, the squad composition are correct. Some of the dialogue is modernized. The waiting is the most accurate part.
Who directed?
William Boyd, the novelist. He’s written more than a dozen books. The Trench is his only feature as a director.
How does The Trench compare to 1917?
1917 is a better film by every technical measure. The Trench is a smaller, more theatrical piece. They’re doing different things.
Is The Trench depressing?
Yes. The audience knows what’s coming. The men don’t.
Is The Trench worth watching?
If you’re working through serious WWI cinema, yes. If you want spectacle, no.

This film appears on one of my film lists

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.