Latest
It’s Not X, It’s Y: The AI Tell Shakespeare Wrote FirstWho Gets Rich From AI Data Centers? The Local, National and Global EconomyAre AI Data Centers Bad for the Environment? What’s True and What Isn’tAI Data Centers and Geopolitics: Chips, China, Spies and PowerAI Derangement Syndrome: Who Cares If the Cover Was Made With AI?How to Write a Plot Twist Readers Never See ComingBook Ads Getting Clicks but No Sales? The Problem Is the PageCan Writing a Memoir Make You Sick? The Toll Nobody Warns You AboutWhen Caregiving Ends and the Words Won’t ComeCan You Publish a Clean and a Spicy Version of the Same Book?Do You Need a Writing Buddy? What Works and What Doesn’tCan You Put Someone Who Wronged You in Your Novel?Kindle Unlimited or Wide? Where to Publish Your Debut NovelWriting Vampires: How to Build Your Own Vampire RulesWhat Software Do Novelists Use to Write a Book?What If Your Family Doesn’t Support Your Writing?ARC Reviews: Real Follow-Through Numbers, and Do Reviews Sell Books?The AI Singularity: Would a Conscious AI Even Care About Us?“Forbidden” AI Prompts: Why Viral Prompt Lists Are Mostly JunkAuthor Scam Emails: Fake Agents, Flattery and the $500 PitchWill AI Steal My Book? Turn Off Training Before You UploadThe Fear of Being Judged for Your Memoir: My Father Told Everyone to Burn MineShould You Only Use “Said” in Dialogue Tags? My Rules for Tags and AdverbsWhy a Good Book Isn’t Enough: Agents, Quiet Novels and What SellsShe Asked How to Format Her Comic for KDP. The Thread Went to War Over AI.Why Are Writing Groups So Hostile?My Ghostwriter Stopped Responding. What Do I Do?My Ghostwriter Missed the Deadline. What Are My Options?I Hate My Ghostwriter’s First Draft. Now What?Can I Get a Refund From a Ghostwriter?How Many Revisions Should a Ghostwriter Include?Can My Ghostwriter List My Book in Their Portfolio?My Family Doesn’t Want Me to Publish My Ghostwritten Memoir. Now What?Should a Ghostwriter Write a Free Sample Chapter?How Much Does a Ghostwriter Take Up Front?Can a Ghostwriter Get Me a Book Deal or a Literary Agent?Can I Work With a Ghostwriter Over Zoom or From Another Country?Ghostwriting a Tribute Book, Eulogy or Obituary for Someone You LostCan a Ghostwriter Write My Book in Spanish?Ghostwriting a Book for a Dental or Chiropractic PracticeWhy Keynote Speakers Need a Ghostwritten BookGhostwriting a Science or Research Book for General ReadersGhostwriting a Book for Teachers and EducatorsHiring a Ghostwriter for a Pilot’s or Aviation MemoirHiring a Ghostwriter for a Musician’s MemoirCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Whistleblower Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for an Immigrant’s StoryCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write About Losing Someone to Suicide?Can a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Depression or Mental Illness Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for a Special-Needs Parent’s Memoir

The Greatest Independent Films

Independent here means the money came from somewhere that didn’t require the film to be explicable in advance. That’s why seven of the entries below are debut features and why almost all of them do something a studio development process would have removed.

The pattern is that the constraint is creative and not financial. Eraserhead took five years because Lynch had no money. Following was shot at weekends on 16mm with a crew of friends. Pi cost about sixty thousand dollars. In every case the limitation produced a formal decision that became the director’s signature.

Independent film is where I go when studio product starts to feel like a committee made it, because one did. These are films somebody wanted badly enough to beg strangers for the money, and you can feel that on screen. I’ll forgive a lot of rough edges for that kind of conviction. What I won’t forgive is the modern indie that’s a studio picture in a cheaper jacket.

Every rating is the one carried by the review it links to. Ties are broken by year.

↑ All Entries

1. Blue Velvet (1986)

► Read the full review of Blue Velvet (1986)

RLR: 10 / 10

"A severed ear in a field, and the most disturbing film ever released by a major studio."

Blue Velvet is first because it’s the film that made Lynch’s method legible without compromising any of it. A young man returns to his hometown, finds a severed ear in a field, and investigates his way into something the town has agreed not to look at. The structure is the argument. The opening is white picket fences and roses in oversaturated color, and the camera then burrows into the lawn to show the insects underneath. That’s the whole film stated in ninety seconds.

Dennis Hopper’s Frank Booth is the most frightening performance in American cinema and Hopper reportedly told Lynch he had to play the part because he was Frank. It earned Lynch a Best Director nomination and established that this kind of work could reach a mainstream audience. Dennis Hopper reportedly told Lynch he had to play Frank because he was Frank, and the performance is built on a breathing apparatus the film never explains. Dean Stockwell’s Ben, miming to Roy Orbison under a work light, is the most unsettling sequence and contains no violence at all.

It earned Lynch a Best Director nomination and established that this kind of work could reach a mainstream audience without being softened.

Frank Booth scares me more than any monster Hollywood ever built. Hopper holds nothing back, and Lynch refuses to give us a reason for any of it. That refusal is what I admire most. A lesser film would have explained the breathing apparatus and killed the fear right there.

For WritersState your thesis in the first ninety seconds and spend the book proving it. The camera going into the lawn tells the reader exactly what this is about. When you have an argument, find one concrete image on the first page that enacts it. The reader keeps it in mind through the whole book and applies it themselves.

↑ All Entries

2. Miller’s Crossing (1990)

► Read the full review of Miller’s Crossing (1990)

RLR: 10 / 10

"The Coens’ best film, and it is a Hammett novel they never adapted."

Miller’s Crossing draws heavily on Red Harvest and The Glass Key without adapting either. That lets the Coens use Hammett’s structures and invent their own dialogue. Gabriel Byrne’s Tom Reagan is the most withholding protagonist the directors have written. His motives are never stated, he’s beaten in almost every scene, and the film’s central question is what he wants, which it declines to answer.

The Danny Boy sequence, in which an old man in a dressing gown machine-guns his assassins while the record plays, is the best-staged set piece in their filmography, and the film was a commercial failure on release. Tom is beaten in almost every scene. That’s unusual for a protagonist and is the film’s way of establishing that his only weapon is what he knows. The Danny Boy sequence, an old man in a dressing gown machine-gunning his assassins while the record plays, is the best-staged set piece in the Coens’ filmography. It draws on Red Harvest and The Glass Key without adapting either, which lets them use Hammett’s structures and invent their own dialogue, and it failed commercially.

For WritersBeat your protagonist in almost every scene and his only weapon becomes what he knows. Tom is physically overmatched throughout. When you write somebody clever, remove their other options. Intelligence is only interesting when it’s the sole resource, and a competent character who is also capable of winning fights has no reason to think.

↑ All Entries

3. Pulp Fiction (1994)

► Read the full review of Pulp Fiction (1994)

RLR: 10 / 10

"The most influential American film of the nineties, made for eight million dollars."

Pulp Fiction is the film that made independent cinema commercially central and not marginal. Made for around eight million dollars by Miramax, it won the Palme d’Or and grossed over two hundred and thirteen million. The non-linear structure is what everybody copied and what almost nobody understood. The chronology is scrambled so that Vincent dies in the middle and is alive at the end. That means the film closes on redemption for a character the audience knows is already doomed.

It also reorganized what dialogue could do in a crime film. Two hitmen discussing fast food on the way to a killing is now a cliché because of this, and it wasn’t one before. The film scrambles the chronology so Vincent dies in the middle and is alive at the end. That means the film closes on redemption for a character the audience knows is doomed. It was made for around eight million by Miramax, won the Palme d’Or, and grossed over two hundred and thirteen million. Two hitmen discussing fast food on the way to a killing is now a cliché because of this film, and it wasn’t one before. The imitators are what bother me about the legacy. Afterward it felt like every other crime script had two hitmen chatting about snacks, and almost none of them understood that Tarantino scrambled the chronology to give Vincent a redemption he’d already lost. The film itself I’d defend against anybody. The copies I’d happily never see again.

For WritersRearranging chronology is only worth it if the new order means something. Ending on redemption for a character the reader knows is doomed is a statement. When you break sequence, test whether the final scene gains from its position. If the answer is only novelty, the book is better told forward.

↑ All Entries

4. Mulholland Drive (2001)

► Read the full review of Mulholland Drive (2001)

RLR: 10 / 10

"A rejected television pilot rebuilt into the most demanding American film of its decade."

Mulholland Drive exists because ABC rejected it. Lynch shot it as a television pilot, the network passed, and French financiers put up money to reshoot and extend it into a feature. That’s why the first two hours feel like a series and the last forty minutes don’t.

The structure that produced is the film. Two hours of an accessible mystery about an amnesiac and an aspiring actress, followed by a reorganization in which the same actors are different people and the earlier material is revealed as something else. Lynch won Best Director at Cannes for it and has never explained it. Naomi Watts was thirty-two and effectively unknown, and the audition scene is the best single piece of acting in any film on this list.

Lynch shot it as a television pilot, ABC passed, and French financiers put up money to reshoot and extend it. That’s why the shape is unlike anything designed from scratch.

Naomi Watts was thirty-two and effectively unknown, and the audition scene, performed badly in rehearsal then devastatingly for real, is the best acting in any film here.

Lynch won Best Director at Cannes and has never explained it, and has said the film means what a viewer decides it means. Mulholland Drive is the film I’d use to shut up anybody who thinks networks know what they’re doing. ABC looked at this and said no. They were right to, because the reshaped version is stranger and sadder than any pilot could have been, and that audition scene stuns me.

For WritersA structure forced by circumstance can outperform a designed one. No writer would propose two hours of setup and forty minutes of reorganization. When a project changes shape against your intention, examine what the new shape permits. Constraints produce structures nobody would choose, and some of those are better than the plan.

↑ All Entries

5. Whiplash (2014)

► Read the full review of Whiplash (2014)

RLR: 10 / 10

"A jazz drummer and an instructor who may be creating greatness or may be destroying a boy."

Whiplash refuses to resolve its own question. That’s why it’s here. Is Fletcher producing excellence through abuse, or is he a bully who has constructed a philosophy to justify himself? The film presents overwhelming evidence for both and adjudicates neither. The final nine minutes are the most sustained tension in recent American cinema and end in triumph that’s indistinguishable from capture. Andrew wins and the winning is the trap closing. Chazelle made a short first to raise the money, shot the feature in nineteen days, and J.K. Simmons won Best Supporting Actor. The film refuses the plot mechanics a conservatory drama normally carries and is stronger for having almost no story at all.

Those final nine minutes are the most sustained tension in recent American cinema and end in a triumph indistinguishable from capture. Chazelle made a short first to raise the money and shot the feature in nineteen days, and J.K. Simmons won Best Supporting Actor. This one refuses the plot mechanics a conservatory drama normally carries and is stronger for having almost no story at all.

For WritersMake your triumph indistinguishable from capture. The final nine minutes are the most sustained tension in recent cinema and end in something nobody can call a victory. When you write ambition, refuse the verdict. Readers who can’t decide whether somebody won are still arguing about it years later.

↑ All Entries

6. First Reformed (2017)

► Read the full review of First Reformed (2017)

RLR: 10 / 10

"Schrader finally made the film he had been writing about since 1972."

First Reformed is the culmination of a career-long argument. Schrader wrote Transcendental Style in Film in 1972, about Bresson, Ozu and Dreyer, and spent forty-five years writing other people’s films before making one in that mode himself.

Ethan Hawke plays a pastor at a tourist-attraction church in upstate New York, dying and drinking and keeping a journal he’s resolved to destroy, and the film is structured on Bresson’s Diary of a Country Priest almost scene for scene.

The ending divides audiences completely and Schrader has been clear that he intended it to. It’s shot in the boxy Academy ratio, has almost no camera movement, and is the least commercial thing on this list.

Schrader wrote Transcendental Style in Film in 1972, about Bresson, Ozu and Dreyer, and spent forty-five years writing other people’s films before making one in that mode.

It’s structured on Bresson’s Diary of a Country Priest almost scene for scene, shot in the boxy Academy ratio with almost no camera movement.

Ethan Hawke plays a pastor at a tourist-attraction church, dying and drinking and keeping a journal he’s resolved to destroy.

For WritersForty-five years of theory and then a film made to it. Schrader wrote about transcendental style in 1972 and applied it in 2017. When you’ve studied a form, at some point write in it. Analysis and practice are different skills and the first one doesn’t automatically produce the second, but it does produce a precision nobody else has.

↑ All Entries

7. Hereditary (2018)

► Read the full review of Hereditary (2018)

RLR: 10 / 10

"The film that made A24 horror a category, and the first hour is a family drama."

Hereditary is the foundational document of the contemporary American indie horror revival and Ari Aster’s debut feature. The first hour is a grief drama about a family that doesn’t like each other, and the supernatural material is almost entirely withheld. The dinner table confrontation between Toni Collette and Alex Wolff is the best-written scene in any horror film of the decade and contains nothing uncanny at all. Aster has described it as a film about grief that happens to have a demon in it, and the marketing sold it as a simple horror picture. That produced a documented split between critical acclaim and audience exit polling. The dinner table confrontation between Toni Collette and Alex Wolff is the best-written scene in any horror film of the decade and contains nothing uncanny at all.

Aster has described it as a film about grief that happens to have a demon in it, and the marketing sold a simple horror picture.

That produced a documented split between critical acclaim and audience exit polling. That’s the clearest case of a campaign mismatching a film.

The marketing on Hereditary was deceptive. Somebody made a grief film with real weight and the campaign sold it like a jump-scare ride. The dinner table scene is the finest thing Aster has shot, and I’d be sorry to see anybody skip the film because the ads lied to them.

For WritersMarketing that promises the wrong genre produces a documented split between critics and audiences. Aster made a film about grief with a demon in it and the campaign sold a horror picture. When your book resists its shelf, make sure the description is honest. Readers who were promised something else review the mismatch instead of the work.

↑ All Entries

8. Eraserhead (1977)

► Read the full review of Eraserhead (1977)

RLR: 9 / 10

"Five years of weekends in a stable, and it has never been explained."

Eraserhead is Lynch’s debut and took roughly five years because he had no money and shot when he could, living partly in the sets at the American Film Institute stables. It has almost no dialogue, a soundtrack of industrial drone that’s as important as any image, and a premise about a nervous printer trying to care for a deformed infant in an industrial wasteland.

Lynch has refused to explain the baby for nearly fifty years, including how he made it. It became a midnight movie staple and is the purest expression of his method before any studio was involved.

Lynch shot over roughly five years as money allowed, living partly in the sets at the American Film Institute stables. The soundtrack of industrial drone is as important as any image and Lynch cut sound first. That’s the reverse of standard practice and audible throughout.

He’s refused to explain the baby for nearly fifty years, including how it was made, and it became a midnight movie staple.

For WritersCut sound first and the images follow. Lynch built the industrial drone before the picture. That’s the reverse of standard practice. When you have an atmosphere in mind, establish it before the events. Prose rhythm, vocabulary and sentence length are the equivalent, and deciding them first changes what scenes are possible.

↑ All Entries

9. Blood Simple (1984)

► Read the full review of Blood Simple (1984)

RLR: 9 / 10

"The Coens’ debut, financed by showing a trailer to Minnesota dentists."

The brothers funded Blood Simple by cutting a trailer for a film that didn’t exist and showing it to investors in Minnesota, raising around a million and a half dollars from people who had no reason to say yes.

The plot depends entirely on nobody knowing what anybody else knows. Four characters each act on a partial and incorrect understanding, and the tension is watching an audience that’s the full picture watch people make reasonable decisions that kill them.

The title comes from Hammett’s Red Harvest, describing the state a person gets into after a murder, and the buried-alive sequence is the most sustained thing in it.

To fund it, the brothers cut a trailer for a film that didn’t exist and showed it to investors in Minnesota, raising around a million and a half dollars.

Four characters each act on a partial and incorrect understanding, and the tension is watching an audience with the full picture watch people make reasonable decisions that kill them.

The title comes from Hammett’s Red Harvest, describing the state a person gets into after a murder, and the buried-alive sequence is the most sustained thing in it. Blood Simple is the Coen film I’d show a new crime writer before any of the famous ones. Nobody in it is stupid, and that’s what makes it so cruel. Every bad decision is the sensible one on the information available, and I spend the whole film wanting to shout at the screen.

For WritersGive every character a different incorrect understanding and the plot generates itself. Nobody here’s stupid; each is reasoning correctly from wrong information. When you need escalation, distribute partial knowledge instead of inventing obstacles. The reader with the full picture watches reasonable people destroy each other.

↑ All Entries

10. Barton Fink (1991)

► Read the full review of Barton Fink (1991)

RLR: 9 / 10

"The Coens wrote it while blocked on another script, which is what it is about."

Barton Fink was written during a block on Miller’s Crossing. It makes it the second film on this site about a writer unable to write produced by writers unable to write.

John Turturro plays a New York playwright of social conscience brought to Hollywood in 1941 and assigned a wrestling picture, staying in a hotel where the wallpaper peels and the man next door is friendly. It won the Palme d’Or, Best Director and Best Actor at Cannes. That caused the festival to change its rules to prevent one film sweeping. The final image has never been explained and the Coens have declined to.

Its script came out of a block on Miller’s Crossing. It makes it a film about a writer unable to write produced by writers unable to write. It won the Palme d’Or, Best Director and Best Actor at Cannes. That caused the festival to change its rules to prevent one film sweeping.

Nobody has explained the final image and the Coens have declined to, and John Goodman’s Charlie is the best performance in their filmography.

For WritersYou can film a block. It was written during a stall on another project. That makes it a work about writers unable to write produced by writers unable to write. When you can’t proceed, the obstruction is available as material. Nobody else has your specific version of it, and the failure is frequently more interesting than the plan.

↑ All Entries

11. Reservoir Dogs (1992)

► Read the full review of Reservoir Dogs (1992)

RLR: 9 / 10

"A heist film in which the heist is never shown."

Reservoir Dogs was Tarantino’s debut, made for around one and a half million dollars, and its central decision was financial before it was artistic. He couldn’t afford to stage the robbery, so he set the film entirely before and after it. That constraint produced the structure everybody remembers. The audience never sees the job, only a warehouse full of men accusing each other. That turns a heist picture into a chamber piece about who talked.

Its debts run heavily to Kubrick’s The Killing for its fragmented chronology and to Ringo Lam’s City on Fire for its standoff, both of which Tarantino has acknowledged.

Tarantino couldn’t afford to stage the robbery, so he set the film entirely before and after it. That turned a heist picture into a chamber piece about who talked.

Kubrick’s The Killing is a heavy influence on its fragmented chronology, and Ringo Lam’s City on Fire on its standoff, both of which he’s acknowledged.

The budget was around one and a half million dollars and Tarantino plays Mr Brown himself. That was a budget decision instead of a creative one.

For WritersA budget constraint can determine your structure for the better. Not being able to film the robbery produced a chamber piece. When you can’t afford to depict the central event, set the story around it. What people did and what they say they did is usually a better subject than the thing itself.

↑ All Entries

12. Requiem for a Dream (2000)

► Read the full review of Requiem for a Dream (2000)

RLR: 9 / 10

"Four addictions across one year, and the last twenty minutes are punishing by design."

Requiem for a Dream follows four people across summer, autumn and winter, and the seasonal structure means the audience can measure the deterioration against a calendar.

Aronofsky’s technique is relentless. Split screens, extreme close-ups of pupils and needles cut at a rate that reproduces the rhythm of use, and a Clint Mansell score that repeats until it becomes unbearable.

Ellen Burstyn’s Sara, an elderly woman addicted to prescription diet pills while waiting for a television appearance that will never come, is the performance that makes it more than an exercise, and she was nominated for Best Actress.

The seasonal structure means the audience can measure the deterioration against a calendar, with summer, autumn and winter titled on screen.

Split screens, extreme close-ups of pupils and needles cut at a rate that reproduces the rhythm of use, and Clint Mansell’s score repeats until it becomes unbearable.

Ellen Burstyn’s Sara, addicted to prescription diet pills while waiting for a television appearance that will never come, was nominated for Best Actress.

Requiem is a film I respect enormously and don’t want to sit through twice.

Aronofsky makes the rhythm of use so relentless that it wears on you physically. Burstyn is the reason it rises above a lecture. Her Sara is a lonely woman waiting for a television appearance that’ll never come, and her decline hurts far worse than anything with a needle in it.

For WritersA seasonal structure lets the reader measure deterioration against a calendar. Summer, autumn and winter are titled on screen. When you write decline, give it a external clock. Readers track the distance traveled without any character commenting, and the calendar replaces a dozen scenes of somebody noticing.

↑ All Entries

13. Punch-Drunk Love (2002)

► Read the full review of Punch-Drunk Love (2002)

RLR: 9 / 10

"Paul Thomas Anderson made an Adam Sandler film and it is the best thing either of them did."

Punch-Drunk Love takes the Adam Sandler persona, an inarticulate man with sudden violent rage, and treats it as a real psychological condition and not as a comic device.

That’s the whole insight. Sandler’s characters had been destroying furniture for laughs for a decade, and Anderson simply asked what it would be like to be that person, with seven sisters who have bullied him into inarticulacy.

It runs ninety-five minutes, which is by some distance his shortest film, and the pudding subplot is taken from a real man who bought enough Healthy Choice products to earn over a million airline miles. Sandler’s characters had been destroying furniture for laughs for a decade, and Anderson simply asked what it would be like to be that person, with seven sisters who have bullied him into inarticulacy. It runs ninety-five minutes, by some distance his shortest film, and Jon Brion’s score is built on percussion that sounds like something about to break.

The pudding subplot is taken from a real man who bought enough Healthy Choice products to earn over a million airline miles, which the film uses without comment. I’d put Punch-Drunk Love in front of anybody who’s written Sandler off. Anderson takes the rage everybody laughed at and shows the loneliness under it, and the result is the sweetest film on this list and the most anxious. It runs ninety-five minutes and doesn’t waste one of them.

For WritersAsk what it would be like to be a character other films play for laughs. Sandler had been destroying furniture for a decade and Anderson simply took it seriously. When you find a stock figure, write the real version. The comic type is a shorthand for something genuine, and nobody has usually bothered to look at what.

↑ All Entries

14. The Witch (2015)

► Read the full review of The Witch (2015)

RLR: 9 / 10

"A 1630s Puritan family banished to the treeline, with dialogue taken from period records."

The Witch is Eggers’s debut and its method is research. Eggers largely constructed the dialogue from period journals, court records and pamphlets, the production built the farmhouse using seventeenth-century techniques, and the film is lit almost entirely by daylight and candle.

That commitment is why the supernatural material works. The audience has been placed inside a belief system completely enough that the family’s interpretation of events is the only available one.

At the end it refuses to be ambiguous, which divided audiences who had assumed the witchcraft was psychological, and the goat was reportedly the most difficult member of the production. The dialogue draws largely on period journals, court records and pamphlets, and the production built the farmhouse using seventeenth-century techniques.

It’s lit almost entirely by daylight and candle. That required the production to work to the sun and cost them shooting days.

Its ending refuses ambiguity. That divided audiences who had assumed the witchcraft was psychological.

I respect The Witch for its nerve at the end.

Too many horror films lose their courage in the last reel and give the audience a psychological out. Eggers built a world that takes witchcraft as fact and then had the spine to finish on those terms. I prefer that to a safe ambiguity every time.

For WritersDialogue built from period journals and court records produces something research alone can’t. Eggers constructed the speech from documents. When you write historical voice, go to primary sources and not to other historical novels. Second-hand period language is a convention, and the actual records are stranger and more convincing than anything in circulation.

↑ All Entries

15. Hell or High Water (2016)

► Read the full review of Hell or High Water (2016)

RLR: 9 / 10

"Two brothers robbing the bank that is foreclosing on them, which is the whole argument."

Hell or High Water is a modern western in which the crime is coherent. The brothers rob branches of the bank that’s foreclosing on their mother’s ranch, to pay off that bank with its own money before the deadline. Taylor Sheridan’s screenplay lets the economics do the arguing. Every roadside billboard advertises debt relief, every small town is emptier than the last, and nobody delivers a speech about any of it.

Jeff Bridges plays a Texas Ranger weeks from a retirement he doesn’t want, and the final conversation between the two surviving men resolves nothing. That’s correct. Here the brothers rob branches of the bank foreclosing on their mother’s ranch, to pay that bank with its own money before the deadline. Every roadside billboard advertises debt relief and every small town is emptier than the last, and nobody delivers a speech about any of it.

Jeff Bridges plays a Texas Ranger weeks from a retirement he doesn’t want, and the final conversation between the two surviving men resolves nothing.

I think Hell or High Water is the most honest crime film of its decade. The billboards and the empty towns carry the whole argument, and Sheridan trusts you to read them without a speech. That kind of restraint is rare enough now that it moves me more than any monologue could.

For WritersLet the setting make the argument. Every roadside billboard advertises debt relief and nobody delivers a speech about any of it. When you have a political position, put it in the landscape. Readers absorb an environment and resist an assertion, and a background that consistently says one thing is more persuasive than any character who does. There’s more on this in my article on settings that do real work.

↑ All Entries

16. The Lighthouse (2019)

► Read the full review of The Lighthouse (2019)

RLR: 9 / 10

"Two men on a rock, shot in black and white on a square frame, and one of them may not exist."

The Lighthouse was shot on black-and-white 35mm in a 1.19:1 aspect ratio that hadn’t been used since the earliest sound films, with period lenses that produce the flaring and softness throughout.

The near-square frame is the point. Two men are trapped in it together and there’s no room for either to escape the other, so the format is doing the same work as the plot.

Eggers built a functioning lighthouse on a Nova Scotia headland and shot in brutal weather. Dafoe’s dialogue is constructed from Melville and period sailor accounts, and the curse monologue is one unbroken take.

The camera ran black-and-white 35mm in a 1.19:1 aspect ratio not used since the earliest sound films, with period lenses producing the flaring throughout. Eggers built a functioning lighthouse on a Nova Scotia headland and shot in brutal weather, with the production running long.

Dafoe’s dialogue is constructed from Melville and period sailor accounts, and the curse monologue is one unbroken take.

For WritersA format nobody has used since the earliest sound films is a decision the reader feels without identifying. The 1.19:1 frame and period lenses produce the confinement. When you choose a form, look for one with a physical consequence. Constraints that shape what can be in view do work continuously, where stylistic choices with no effect are decoration.

↑ All Entries

17. Midsommar (2019)

► Read the full review of Midsommar (2019)

RLR: 9 / 10

"A horror film with almost no darkness in it, and it is about a break-up."

Midsommar is Aster’s second feature and inverts every convention of the genre by staging the entire thing in unbroken Swedish summer daylight. There are no shadows to hide anything in and nothing is hidden. Underneath the folk horror it’s about a relationship that should have ended before the film began. Dani’s boyfriend is simply unwilling, and the commune offers her something he never will. That’s why the ending plays as release.

Aster wrote it during his own break-up and has described it as a break-up film. The opening twenty minutes, before Sweden, contain the actual tragedy. The entire film is staged in unbroken Swedish summer daylight, so there are no shadows to hide anything in and nothing is hidden.

Aster wrote it during his own break-up and has described it as a break-up film, and the opening twenty minutes contain the actual tragedy.

Dani’s boyfriend is unwilling, and the commune offers her something he never will. That’s why the ending plays as release.

For WritersUnbroken daylight removes every shadow to hide in and nothing is hidden. Aster stages the whole film in Swedish summer. When you write dread, consider removing the darkness. Horror in the open is harder to write and considerably more disturbing, because the reader can’t attribute their unease to what they can’t see.

↑ All Entries

18. The Northman (2022)

► Read the full review of The Northman (2022)

RLR: 9 / 10

"The Hamlet source material, filmed as a Norse revenge saga with no modern psychology."

The Northman adapts Amleth, the Scandinavian legend Shakespeare drew Hamlet from, and refuses to add the interiority Shakespeare supplied. Amleth isn’t indecisive; he’s a man executing an oath.

That’s the film’s difficulty and its integrity. A modern audience expects the protagonist to question the revenge and he never does, because the belief system he occupies doesn’t offer that option.

It’s the most expensive film Eggers has made, around ninety million dollars, and lost money. The Hel-gate duel in the volcano is the most committed thing in it. Eggers refuses to add the interiority Shakespeare supplied, so Amleth isn’t indecisive, he’s executing an oath.

The seeresses, the valkyrie and the tree are presented as literally occurring and not as visions, because that’s how the character understands the world. At around ninety million, it’s the most expensive film he’s made and lost money, and the Hel-gate duel is the most committed thing in it.

For WritersPresent a belief system as literally true and the reader occupies the character’s world instead of observing it. Framing the seeress as a hallucination would have made this about a deluded man. When you write a character whose beliefs you don’t share, write from inside them without hedging. Scepticism on the page is the author declining to commit.

↑ All Entries

19. Hard Eight (1996)

► Read the full review of Hard Eight (1996)

RLR: 8 / 10

"Paul Thomas Anderson’s debut, taken away from him and recut, then restored."

Hard Eight is the quietest film Anderson has made and the circumstances of its release shaped his entire later career. The financiers recut it and retitled it, and Anderson used his Sundance contacts and his own money to restore his version.

Philip Baker Hall plays an old professional gambler who takes a younger man under his instruction for reasons the film withholds until late. The teaching scenes, showing how to acquire a comped room without winning, are the best material in it. Anderson has said the experience made him insist on final cut on everything afterward. That’s why Boogie Nights exists in the form it does.

The financiers recut and retitled it, and Anderson used his Sundance contacts and his own money to restore his version. Philip Baker Hall plays an old professional gambler teaching a younger man how to acquire a comped room without winning. That’s the best material in it. Anderson has said the experience made him insist on final cut on everything afterward. That’s why Boogie Nights exists in the form it does.

I admire Hard Eight for its patience, and that same patience is why it sits below Punch-Drunk Love here. Philip Baker Hall is wonderful, and the comped room lesson is a small joy. The withheld motive sits a little too long before it pays off, though, and the quiet starts to feel thin.

For WritersLosing control of a first work can determine everything afterward. Anderson restored his own cut and insisted on final approval on everything since. When you have a bad experience with a project, identify what the actual failure was. The lesson is usually structural and not personal, and the correction is a term instead of a grievance.

↑ All Entries

20. Following (1998)

► Read the full review of Following (1998)

RLR: 8 / 10

"Nolan’s debut, shot at weekends on 16mm for about six thousand dollars."

Following was shot over a year of Saturdays with a crew of friends, on black-and-white 16mm, using available light and locations the production had access to. Nolan wrote, directed, shot and edited it. Every scene was rehearsed extensively because the film couldn’t afford more than one or two takes. That’s a constraint that produces unusual precision.

Even here the non-linear structure that would define his career is fully formed. A young writer follows strangers for material and is drawn into burglary, and the film scrambles the chronology so the audience assembles the con at the same rate he fails to notice it.

Every scene was rehearsed exhaustively because the film couldn’t afford more than one or two takes. That produces unusual precision. Nolan shot it over roughly a year of Saturdays on black-and-white 16mm with a crew of friends, and he wrote, directed, shot and edited it.

Already, the non-linear structure that would define his career is fully formed, with the chronology scrambled so the audience assembles the con as he fails to notice it.

For WritersA constraint can produce precision nobody would achieve deliberately. There was no stock to waste, so every scene was rehearsed exhaustively. When you work with limited resources, treat the limit as an editing pass performed before writing. Abundance produces drafts that need cutting; scarcity produces drafts that were cut before they existed.

↑ All Entries

21. Pi (1998)

► Read the full review of Pi (1998)

RLR: 8 / 10

"Made for sixty thousand dollars raised a hundred at a time from friends and family."

Aronofsky financed Pi by asking everybody he knew for a hundred dollars each, and shot it on high-contrast black-and-white reversal stock that produces the grainy blown-out look throughout. The subject is a mathematician convinced there’s a pattern underlying the stock market, pursued by Wall Street and by Hasidic numerologists who believe he’s found something else.

The technique Aronofsky developed here, including the head-mounted camera rig that keeps the actor fixed in frame while the world moves, became his signature and reappears in Requiem for a Dream two years later.

Aronofsky financed it by asking everybody he knew for a hundred dollars each and shot on high-contrast black-and-white reversal stock.

The head-mounted rig that keeps the actor fixed in frame while the world moves behind him became his signature and reappears in Requiem for a Dream.

The Kabbalists, the Wall Street firm and the migraines are all pressing on the same man from different directions, and none of them are wrong.

For WritersBuild a technique around your protagonist’s condition. The head-mounted rig puts the reader inside a state of mind instead of showing them one. When your character experiences the world unusually, find the formal equivalent. A reader made to feel disoriented understands something no paragraph about disorientation delivers.

↑ All Entries

22. The Card Counter (2021)

► Read the full review of The Card Counter (2021)

RLR: 8 / 10

"Schrader again, and the protagonist covers his hotel furniture in white sheets every night."

The Card Counter is a late Schrader film working the same territory as First Reformed and Taxi Driver, which he’s described openly as a single recurring character in different professions.

Oscar Isaac plays a former military interrogator who learned to count cards in prison and now moves between casinos winning small amounts deliberately. The ritual of wrapping every piece of furniture in his room is the characterization. Of the recent Schrader films, this is the least successful and the most explicit about what the earlier ones were doing. That’s the reason it sits at the bottom of a strong list.

Schrader has been open that Taxi Driver, First Reformed and this are a single recurring character in different professions.

Oscar Isaac plays a former military interrogator who learned to count cards in prison and now moves between casinos winning small amounts deliberately. I enjoy The Card Counter, and I also wish Schrader had trusted it more. Isaac is magnetic, and the white sheets over the hotel furniture tell you more about the man than any dialogue. The film spells out what Taxi Driver and First Reformed left for you to feel, and that explicitness costs it the punch of the earlier two.

The ritual of wrapping every piece of hotel furniture in white sheets is the characterization, and it’s the most explicit of the recent Schrader films about what the earlier ones were doing.

People with no money and something to prove made the films on this page, and I’d trade most of what the studios released in the same years for any one of them. When a financier can’t demand that a film make sense before it exists, you get Lynch’s lawn and Nolan’s Saturdays. It galls me that so many of these now depend on an algorithm deciding whether anybody gets to find them.

For WritersThree books about the same man in different professions is a legitimate career. Schrader has been open that Taxi Driver, First Reformed and this are one recurring figure. When you find a character you can’t finish with, write them again. Readers experience the repetition as a body of work and not as repetition, provided the circumstances differ.

↑ Back to Navigation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best independent film?
Seven share a 10. Blue Velvet is first on the year tiebreak, and it states its entire thesis in ninety seconds by burrowing the camera into a suburban lawn to show the insects underneath.
Why are so many of these debuts?
Because independent money doesn’t require a film to be explicable in advance. Eraserhead, Blood Simple, Reservoir Dogs, Following, Pi, The Witch and Hereditary are all first features, and several were financed by methods no studio would recognize.
Which was made for the least money?
Following, at roughly six thousand dollars, shot on weekends over a year with a crew of friends. Pi cost about sixty thousand, raised a hundred dollars at a time from everybody Aronofsky knew.
Is Whiplash about a good teacher or an abuser?
The film presents overwhelming evidence for both and adjudicates neither. That’s why it’s still argued about. The final nine minutes end in a triumph that’s indistinguishable from capture.
What makes Mulholland Drive so difficult?
It was a television pilot ABC rejected, reshot and extended with French money. That’s why two hours play like a series and the last forty minutes reorganize everything that preceded them.
Why does Hereditary withhold the horror?
So the supernatural arrives into a family that already hurts. The first hour is a grief drama, and the dinner table confrontation is the best-written scene in the film with nothing uncanny in it at all.
What is Punch-Drunk Love doing with Adam Sandler?
Treating the persona as a condition instead of a joke. Sandler’s characters had been destroying furniture for laughs for a decade, and Anderson asked what it would be like to be that man.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment