Latest
SMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableFree BooksJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeAI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.I Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends On

Lincoln (2012)

TL;DR: Lincoln (2012) rates 10 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Steven Spielberg directed it. Tony Kushner wrote the screenplay.
Lincoln (2012)
10 / 10

Official trailer

Lincoln is a political procedural about the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment in January 1865. Steven Spielberg directed it. Tony Kushner wrote the screenplay. Daniel Day-Lewis plays Abraham Lincoln and won his third Best Actor Oscar for the performance. Sally Field plays Mary Todd Lincoln. Tommy Lee Jones plays Thaddeus Stevens, the radical Republican from Pennsylvania. David Strathairn plays William Seward. James Spader plays W. N. Bilbo, one of the lobbyists Seward hires to flip votes. Hal Holbrook plays Preston Blair. Joseph Gordon-Levitt plays Robert Todd Lincoln.

The film is adapted from Doris Kearns Goodwin’s Team of Rivals and runs two hours and thirty minutes.

Lincoln is the kind of film I wish Hollywood made every year. It’s two and a half hours of votes, deals and arguments in rooms full of congressmen, and I find it more gripping than most thrillers.

Day-Lewis disappears so completely that I stop thinking about acting at all. It’s a 10, and it’s the film I’d hand to anyone who says politics can’t make good drama.

Very little of the war makes it on screen.

It shows the political machinery of ending slavery. The audience watches Lincoln, Seward, and a small group of operatives buy, threaten, and persuade enough lame-duck House Democrats to pass the Thirteenth Amendment before the war ends and slavery becomes something the South would otherwise have to ratify. It’s the rare political film that takes its politics seriously enough to show the corruption alongside the principle.

Day-Lewis

Daniel Day-Lewis’s Lincoln is the most complete performance in modern American cinema, as far as I’m concerned. The voice is a high tenor with a Kentucky accent, which matches what historical accounts of Lincoln’s speech describe.

The body language is loose and tired. The humor is dry, frequent, and tactical. What I love is that every joke and anecdote this Lincoln tells has a political purpose, including the ones that look like avoidance.

The scene where Lincoln explains Euclid’s first axiom to two telegraph operators in the middle of the night, while waiting for word about a coming vote, is my favorite scene in any film of the 2010s. Day-Lewis takes a Lincoln story historians have documented and gives it the actual rhythm of how the man spoke. A president builds a case for human equality out of elementary geometry, and I’m spellbound by every second of it.

For Writers

A character explaining their reasoning is high-risk material. It’s easy to write expository monologue and call it a speech. Lincoln’s Euclid scene works because the monologue is the character thinking out loud, in his own rhythm, about a problem that interests him. The audience learns about Lincoln by listening to him reason. The lesson is that monologue is acceptable when it reveals how a character thinks, not when it tells the audience what they need to know.

The Political Machinery

The film’s argument is that the Thirteenth Amendment passed because Lincoln and Seward were willing to do things that look bad. They bribed lame-duck congressmen with federal jobs they had no intention of giving them. They threatened resistant Democrats with political destruction. They sent James Spader’s character around the country offering deals to specific vote-flippers, and Spader is so grubby and funny that I wanted more of him. They lied to a Confederate peace commission to keep the war going long enough for the amendment to pass.

There’s no apology for any of this. It treats the operation as the price of getting the result. Tony Kushner’s script argues that the alternative wasn’t principled defeat. The alternative was that slavery would have survived in some form after the war ended. The compromise was that Lincoln did political crimes in service of a moral achievement that couldn’t have been won by clean means.

For Writers

A protagonist who has to compromise their principles to achieve their goals is more interesting than a protagonist whose principles the plot vindicates. Lincoln does political deals that would be career-ending for a modern politician. The film shows this and doesn’t pretend anything other than the outcome justified the deals. The lesson is that morally serious fiction often requires its protagonists to make morally compromised choices. If your protagonist never has to compromise, your stakes aren’t real.

Tommy Lee Jones

Tommy Lee Jones plays Thaddeus Stevens with the disgusted patience of a man who has argued for racial equality longer than most of his political peers have been alive. The scene where Stevens compromises his abolitionist principles on the House floor, claiming the amendment is about legal equality instead of full social equality, is the most painful scene in the film for me. I think it’s Jones at his very best.

The audience watches a man whose entire career has been built on a fuller position lie about that position to get votes for a partial victory. The reveal in the final scene that Stevens lived in a long-term relationship with his Black housekeeper, played by S. Epatha Merkerson, makes the political compromise more painful and more earned. Stevens knew exactly what he was lying about. He did it anyway.

For Writers

A character’s private life can transform the meaning of their public choices when the connection is revealed at the right moment. Stevens’s relationship with Lydia Smith is held back until the final reel. The audience understands his compromise differently once they know. The lesson is that information held back from the audience is a structural resource. Time its reveal. The placement determines how the audience reinterprets everything before it.

Craft Note

Steven Spielberg directed. Tony Kushner wrote, drawing on Doris Kearns Goodwin’s Team of Rivals. Daniel Day-Lewis as Abraham Lincoln (Oscar, Best Actor). Sally Field as Mary Todd Lincoln. Tommy Lee Jones as Thaddeus Stevens. David Strathairn as William Seward. James Spader as W. N. Bilbo. Hal Holbrook as Preston Blair. Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Robert Todd Lincoln. Janusz Kamiński shot it. John Williams scored. Released November 2012. Approximately sixty-five million dollar budget. Two hundred and seventy-five million worldwide gross. Twelve Oscar nominations, two wins (Day-Lewis and Production Design).

Is Lincoln as good as people say?

10/10, and it’s an easy 10. It’s the best American political film of its decade. Day-Lewis’s performance belongs on the all-time list, Kushner’s script is dense in the best way, and Jones breaks my heart on that House floor. I can’t find a scene I’d cut. The film respects its audience enough to assume they can follow a procedural about an amendment most viewers hadn’t thought hard about since high school, and I’m grateful whenever a studio film trusts me that much. Watch it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lincoln accurate to the historical record?
Considerably. The political mechanics of the Thirteenth Amendment vote are accurate. Specific scenes are compressed or dramatized. The film is one of the more historically responsible Hollywood treatments of nineteenth-century American politics.
Did Abraham Lincoln really have a high voice?
Yes. Contemporary accounts describe Lincoln’s voice as high-pitched and Kentucky-accented. Day-Lewis chose the voice based on historical research. Some early audiences found it surprising.
Did Lincoln buy votes to pass the Thirteenth Amendment?
Considerably. The historical record supports the broad outlines of the patronage offers used to flip Democratic votes. The specific scenes are dramatized.
Why does Lincoln end with the assassination off-screen?
Because the film is about the Thirteenth Amendment. Spielberg cuts away from Ford’s Theatre to a different vantage point. The choice respects the film’s focus.
Who is Tony Kushner?
American playwright best known for Angels in America. He’s collaborated with Spielberg multiple times (Munich, Lincoln, West Side Story, The Fabelmans).
What is the best movie about Abraham Lincoln?
Lincoln (2012) is the definitive screen Lincoln. Henry Fonda’s Young Mr. Lincoln (1939) is the best earlier version. The 2012 Lincoln stands above it.
Is Lincoln (2012) worth watching?
Yes.

The Craft Behind It

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.