Latest
He Banned AI From His Writing Group. His Own Cover Got Called AI Slop.Who Writes the Fake Fan Mail Authors Get? Inside the Scam CompoundsSMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookFree BooksHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeI Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.AI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a Fee

King Kong (1933)

TL;DR: King Kong (1933) rates 9 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Cooper-Schoedsack 1933 monster adventure. Willis O’Brien stop-motion.
King Kong (1933)
9 / 10

Official trailer

King Kong is Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack’s 1933 American adventure horror film. The film depicts filmmaker Carl Denham hiring out-of-work actress Ann Darrow for a mysterious expedition to Skull Island in the Indian Ocean. The crew encounters a giant gorilla worshipped by the native population, captures him through gas attack, and transports him to New York for theatrical exhibition. Kong escapes during the show, abducts Ann, and climbs the Empire State Building, where aircraft fire kills him. Fay Wray plays Ann Darrow. Robert Armstrong plays Carl Denham.

Bruce Cabot plays first mate Jack Driscoll. Frank Reicher plays Captain Englehorn.

James Ashmore Creelman and Ruth Rose wrote the screenplay. Willis O’Brien designed the visual effects using stop-motion animation. RKO Radio Pictures produced the film on a budget of approximately 670,000 dollars, and its first run turned a profit of about 650,000 dollars. The work helped save RKO from bankruptcy during the Great Depression.

I love this movie with very few reservations. Kong is an eighteen-inch model covered in rabbit fur, and I still feel worse when the planes close in on him at the top of the Empire State Building than I do at the end of most modern tragedies. The Skull Island scenes with the native villagers have dated badly and I wince at them. Nearly everything else holds up beautifully.

The film is the template for every later giant-monster film. The Willis O’Brien stop-motion animation produced images 1933 audiences had never seen, combining live-action footage with composited animated figures, miniatures, glass paintings and rear projection in ways contemporary productions couldn’t match. The Max Steiner score introduced techniques film scoring still uses, and I think it does half the work of making Kong feel alive. Fay Wray’s performance made her the original scream queen.

Later King Kong adaptations including the 1976 De Laurentiis production, the 2005 Peter Jackson production, and other treatments have all measured themselves against the 1933 original. Most have failed to match it.

The O’Brien Animation

Willis O’Brien created Kong using stop-motion animation of an articulated metal armature covered in rabbit fur.

The figure stood approximately eighteen inches tall. O’Brien moved the model frame by frame, photographing each position separately. The resulting animation gives Kong heavy expressive range including emotional response to Ann, varied combat movement, and the climactic Empire State Building sequence. This required months of patient frame-by-frame work for sequences that play out in seconds of screen time.

Stop-motion has a quality that digital animation can’t replicate.

The slight irregularities in frame-to-frame motion give Kong a physical presence that smooth digital movement loses, and the real model catches real light and real shadow. I’ll take that jittery, handmade ape over any polished computer creature. Later productions using digital monsters haven’t generally surpassed the 1933 Kong in audience emotional response, and the older technique holds its own against anything that came after.

For Writers

Older techniques produce different effects from newer alternatives. Newer methods existing doesn’t make older methods obsolete. Some aesthetic qualities require particular production approaches that other approaches can’t replicate.

The Beauty and the Beast Theme

A quoted Arab proverb opens the film, stating that beauty killed the beast.

Denham repeats variations of the line throughout the film. The theme works at multiple levels. Kong’s relationship with Ann moves from captor to protector. He defends her from threats including dinosaurs on Skull Island. His decision to climb the Empire State Building to escape from the New York gunfire while still carrying Ann allows him to be killed because he refuses to abandon her.

The romantic-tragic framing sets King Kong apart from conventional monster pictures.

The beast is sympathetic, and the civilization that kills him is morally compromised at best. Carl Denham’s exploitation of Kong for theatrical profit makes him a worse antagonist than Kong himself. The film closes with Denham saying beauty killed the beast, and I don’t buy it for a second. Civilization killed him, and Denham led the way. That ending is a big reason I rate the film this high, because the monster is the one I mourn.

For Writers

Sympathetic monsters generate feeling that pure threats can’t. The character audiences mourn produces stronger emotional response than the character audiences only fear.

The Pre-Code Content

Strict enforcement of the Production Code didn’t start until 1934, and the film predates it. The 1933 version contains material that later reissues removed. Kong peels away Ann’s clothing.

He chews and stomps multiple human victims explicitly. The native population scenes include content that later decades have found problematic for racial representation reasons. The pre-Code freedom produced material that post-1934 productions couldn’t have shown.

The 1938 reissue removed several scenes, including the more graphic violence and some of the Ann-Kong material. The cut versions circulated for decades, and the censored footage was found in 1969 and restored soon after. Later home video releases have generally used the restored version.

Watch that one. I think the restored violence makes Kong more of an animal and more tragic at the same time, and the censored cut sands off exactly what makes him frightening.

For Writers

Censorship history affects how audiences experience older works. Knowing what was cut and when allows treatment of the actual original instead of a partial version.

Craft Note

Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack had directed documentary films including Grass (1925) and Chang (1927) before King Kong. The directors brought ethnographic film techniques to fantasy material. The native population sequences reflect 1930s documentary practice that later decades have evaluated critically. Cooper later became RKO production chief and worked extensively on John Ford westerns.

Does King Kong still hold up?

King Kong is the template for every later giant-monster film, and I think it’s still the best of them. The O’Brien animation gives Kong a physical presence later digital work hasn’t surpassed, and the beauty-and-the-beast theme gives him a death that hurts.

My only knock is the dated treatment of the islanders, and that’s what keeps it at a 9. Watch it if you care about horror, about special effects history, or about where so much of modern monster filmmaking came from.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I watch the 1933 or 2005 King Kong first?
Watch the 1933 original first. Peter Jackson’s 2005 remake is well made but acts as response to the original. The 1933 version provides essential foundation.
Is King Kong (1933) racist?
The native population sequences contain 1930s representational practices that later decades have addressed critically. Modern viewers should engage the material with awareness of period limitations.
Is the 1976 King Kong remake good?
The Jessica Lange and Jeff Bridges remake updates the setting and adds environmental themes. The remake isn’t as widely respected as the 1933 original or the 2005 Jackson production.
How long is King Kong (1933)?
The film runs approximately one hour forty minutes. The compressed runtime accommodates both the Skull Island and New York sequences without padding.
What is the cultural impact of King Kong?
Foundational impact on horror, adventure, and giant-monster cinema. The Empire State Building sequence has become a constantly referenced image in twentieth-century cinema.
Is King Kong (1933) appropriate for kids?
The film contains considerable monster violence including explicit killings. Children of most ages can engage the material though sensitive viewers may find particular sequences disturbing.

Sources

Writing in This Genre

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.