Latest
How Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidStranger in a Strange LandProfiles in CourageDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirFlorida RoadkillTeam of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex WorldMy Share of the Task: A MemoirWe Were Soldiers Once… and Young: Ia Drang, the Battle That Changed the War in VietnamThe Columbia Restaurant: Celebrating a Century of History, Culture, and CuisineA Tiger among Us: A Story of Valor in Vietnam’s A Shau ValleyTop Sergeant: The Life and Times of Sergeant Major of the Army William G. BainbridgeSailing True North: Ten Admirals and the Voyage of CharacterPodkayne of MarsMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the WorldSam Walton: Made in America: My StoryI, RobotOpen: An AutobiographyShattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of MidwayA World at Arms: A Global History of World War IIL.L. Bean: The Making of an American IconA Higher Standard: Leadership Strategies from America’s First Female Four-Star GeneralLife21 Days to Success Through Networking: The Life and Times of Gnik RowtenCampus BattlefieldThe Bell JarRight Wing RevolutionThe Sage of SagittariusTime for a Turning PointDesigning Casinos to Dominate the CompetitionLove’s Executioner and Other Tales of PsychotherapyBeneath a Scarlet SkyThe Library BookThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsTrump: The Art of the DealThe MAGA DoctrineThe College ScamSea Stories: My Life in Special OperationsPa’anNetworking Your Way to SuccessMasters of NetworkingRadioSoldier for Life: Leader Lessons from the 12th Sergeant Major of the ArmyThe Melting Point: High Command and War in the 21st CenturyAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroStop, in the Name of GodDoes Explicit Sex Sell Books? An Answer to The Absolute Degeneracy of Modern WritingThe Mary Sue: How a 1973 Star Trek Parody Became a Writing TermWhat the AI Writing Survey Says About Jobs, Freelancers and Fiction AuthorsHow Long Does Google Take? Crawling, Indexing and Recovery Times

E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982)

TL;DR: E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982) rates 10 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Spielberg’s 1982 alien-and-boy fable. Bicycle moon, glowing finger, phone home.
E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982)
10 / 10

Official trailer

E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial is Steven Spielberg’s 1982 American science fiction family film. The film depicts ten-year-old Elliott discovering an alien creature accidentally stranded in suburban California after his ship leaves without him. Elliott hides the creature in his bedroom, gradually introduces him to his older brother Michael and younger sister Gertie, and helps him construct a communicator to call his ship for rescue.

Government agents pursue the alien while Elliott attempts to protect him until the rescue can occur. Henry Thomas plays Elliott. Drew Barrymore plays Gertie.

Robert MacNaughton plays Michael. Dee Wallace plays the mother Mary. Peter Coyote plays the lead government scientist known as Keys. Pat Welsh, an elderly Marin County woman whose smoking-damaged voice produced the particular quality the character required, provided the voice of E.T. Melissa Mathison wrote the screenplay. Universal Pictures produced the film on a budget of approximately 10.5 million dollars, and it grossed approximately 800 million dollars worldwide.

E.T. can make a grown man cry and grin in the same ten minutes, and I’m the grown man. I think Spielberg never made anything purer. It’s a story about a lonely kid with a missing father who finds a friend, told with total sincerity and no winking at the adults in the room. I wouldn’t change a frame of it.

E.T. held the record for highest-grossing film of all time for eleven years until Jurassic Park (1993) surpassed it.

Few films achieve the cultural penetration E.T. delivered in 1982. The film became the highest-grossing American production of its decade and held the record for over a decade afterward. The combination of Spielberg’s direction, Mathison’s screenplay, John Williams’s score, and the central performances by Henry Thomas and Drew Barrymore produced material that crossed every demographic and cultural boundary. Adults wept at screenings. Children memorized the dialogue. The film was nominated for nine Academy Awards including Best Picture. It won four including Best Original Score for John Williams.

The phone home line, the bicycle moon shot, and E.T.’s glowing finger have acquired cultural reference standing that few films can match. The work represents Spielberg at peak commercial and artistic achievement.

The Children’s Performances

Henry Thomas was ten years old during production. Drew Barrymore was six. Robert MacNaughton was fifteen. The three children carried the dramatic content of the film alongside the puppet E.T. Spielberg’s working method with the young performers depended on shooting in chronological order so the children could develop their relationships with the puppet character in real time. It produced real emotional response that conventional production scheduling would have prevented.

Thomas’s audition for the role has become legendary. Spielberg asked the boy to remember a painful memory. Thomas thought about his recently deceased dog. The audition recording shows him crying real tears. Spielberg told him on the spot that he had the role. The performance maintained this emotional intensity throughout production. Drew Barrymore was reportedly told E.T. was a real alien instead of a puppet to maintain her real responses. The children’s belief in the situation produced the central emotional content that the surrounding adult production couldn’t have generated through technique alone.

Henry Thomas is the heart of this film for me. I believe every tear that kid cries, and Drew Barrymore’s Gertie steals every scene she’s in. Child performances usually make me wince. These three feel like real siblings, squabbling one minute and closing ranks the next.

For Writers

Real emotional response can’t be produced through technique alone. The conditions that allow real emotion to emerge often require production decisions about how performers experience their work.

The Suburban Setting

Spielberg set the film in an ordinary Southern California subdivision instead of anywhere exotic. The cul-de-sac, the tract houses, the school halls and the 1980s living rooms are where the alien turns up.

Putting something so strange against such ordinary backgrounds made the film instantly familiar, and audiences recognized their own neighborhoods. I think that’s the whole magic trick: the alien hides in a kid’s bedroom in a tract house, and the fantasy feels like a wish you could have made yourself.

The suburban setting also enabled Spielberg’s autobiographical attention to his own divorced parents’ suburban California upbringing. Elliott’s family is broken in ways the children don’t fully understand.

The mother manages alone after the father has left for Mexico with a girlfriend named Sally. The absent father drives Elliott’s connection to E.T. partly. Both Elliott and the alien need rescue from situations that their families can’t resolve. The personal content gives the film weight that pure science fiction wouldn’t have produced.

The absent father is what lifts this above every other alien movie for me. Elliott is a lonely kid in a broken house, E.T. is lonely and stranded too, and I think that shared ache is why the film hits as hard as it does.

For Writers

Personal content embedded within genre material strengthens both tones. The autobiographical investment can make the speculative scenario feel grounded instead of escapist.

The Phone Home Sequence

The communicator construction sequence shows the children gathering household materials to build a device that will signal E.T.’s ship. The combination includes a Speak and Spell, an umbrella, kitchen items, and electronics components from Elliott’s room. The sequence shows child invention treated as serious problem solving instead of as cute play. The technical challenge has weight that conventional family film treatment of similar material would have lacked.

When E.T. says phone home for the first time, the line acquires meaning that later decades have maintained. The line acts as expression of longing that audiences of any age can recognize. The combination of alien linguistic limitation, child translator, and broken family in suburban California produces particular emotional content that the line concentrates.

Few film lines have achieved comparable cultural penetration. Phone home has entered general American vocabulary as expression of homesickness across multiple contexts.

I think “phone home” works because it’s so small. Two words from a creature who can barely talk, and suddenly the whole film is about wanting to go back where you belong. Trusting two words to carry that much takes a kind of confidence I wish more screenwriters had.

For Writers

Specific lines can carry emotional weight beyond their literal content when placed correctly within established context. The right phrase at the right moment communicates more than extensive dialogue would have.

Craft Note

Melissa Mathison wrote the screenplay during the period she was working with director Carroll Ballard on The Black Stallion (1979). She later married Harrison Ford and continued working in film while raising their children. Her screenplay credits include The Black Stallion, The Escape Artist (1982), E.T., and Kundun (1997). The relatively limited filmography reflects her choice to prioritize family work over career production. The Mathison-Spielberg collaboration on E.T. produced one of the classic American family films of the twentieth century.

Does E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial still hold up?

My 10 comes easy. The kids feel real, the suburb looks like a place people live, John Williams’s score does half the crying for you, and Spielberg tells the story with a sincerity he’s never bettered. My one small complaint is that the government agents are more menace than character for most of the film. It’s the rare blockbuster whose huge success did nothing to dull it, and I’d put it in front of anybody of any age.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I watch the original or 2002 anniversary edition?
The original 1982 cut. The 2002 anniversary edition added CGI modifications and replaced government agent guns with walkie-talkies that diminished the film. Steven Spielberg has stated he regrets the modifications. Later releases have restored the original.
How does E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial fit Spielberg’s broader filmography?
E.T. represents Spielberg’s most personal early work. The autobiographical content related to his own parents’ divorce gives the film particular weight that his later directors handled differently.
Is E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial right for very young children?
Generally yes. The film contains some scary moments including the government raid on Elliott’s home that may concern very young viewers. The PG rating reflects mild content. Children of most ages can engage the material.
How long is E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial?
The film runs approximately one hour fifty-five minutes. The runtime accommodates the emotional development without padding.
What is the cultural impact of E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial?
Real sustained impact through family cinema, John Williams score recognition, and ongoing cultural reference to particular scenes and lines. Few films have achieved comparable cultural penetration.
Should I read the novelization?
William Kotzwinkle wrote a novelization of the screenplay that includes additional content. The novelization isn’t essential but provides alternative perspective on the same material for interested readers.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.