Latest
Anthropic Bans Cruelty Toward Claude: What It Means for WritersWork-for-Hire Contracts: What the Asimov’s Cover Fight Teaches FreelancersGenre Fiction vs Literary Fiction: Don’t Confuse Taste With SkillFlorida Hurricane Prep Rituals: The Grocery Run, the Water Pallet and the Generator in the BoxThe Most Insulting Line of Dialogue Ever Written for the ScreenLoki Through the Ages: From Norse Myth to Marvel, The Mask and Dogma“You Are Utterly Disgusting”: A Book Festival, an AI Cover Ban and a Pile-OnWho Rewrote the Sligachan Legend: AI or the Tour Buses?Why I Don’t Like Reedsy for Ghostwriting: The NDA ProblemLayers: How I Ride Out Florida Power Outages in My ApartmentThe Enshittification of AmazonPublishers Cancel Books Over AI While Using It in SecretI Was Getting 100 Spam Emails a Day. $4.50 a Month Fixed It.World Mental Health Day: Nothing Was Wrong With MeKessler Syndrome: How Space Debris Could Close Earth’s OrbitAmazon Is Blocking Real Readers From Book ReviewsShould a Novella Get a Paperback, or Go Ebook Only?BookFunnel Download Problems: Fixes, Scams and AlternativesSir Sean Connery: A TributeHow to Find Plot Holes in Your Novel (Most Are Character Holes)Reshoring: The Factory Is the Easy PartMost of the Books I Was Forced to Read in High School Were CrapPlot Armor: Signs Your Hero Is Too Safe, and How to Fix ItShould You Sell Lifetime Rights to Your Self-Published Book for a Modest Advance?Shame Doesn’t Stop Artists From Using AI. It Stops Them From Telling You.AI Labels on TikTok and Meta Are Flagging Human WorkAuthor Richard Lowe Completes Peacekeeper, a Four-Book Science Fiction Series He Started at Age 14Sir Sam Neill: A TributeFan Art Copied by AI: Glass Houses, Copyright and the Pile-OnReal Names in a Book: Who Gets Sued, the Author, the Publisher or the Ghostwriter?When Characters Take Over the Plot, Let ThemDoes Human Writing Have a Soul?“You’re Not a Real Author”: The Pile-On Over AI-Assisted BooksDoes AI Have a Soul? Wrong QuestionHumor in Book Marketing: Getting Attention Without BeggingHow Long Should a Chapter Be? Manuscript Habits That Save You LaterThe Business Novel and the Companion Workbook: Two Formats Business Authors OverlookThe Back of the Book: Index, About the Author, Acknowledgments and Back Cover CopyI Build My Own Software Tools With Claude, and Some of Them Bit MeWhat Years of Buying From IT Vendors Taught MeI Write Books for a Living. I Barely Read Them Anymore.Three Management Habits That Waste Good PeopleThe Coach and the Webinar That Sold Me NothingThe Work I’d Cringe At Now, and Why I’m Glad I DoWho Is Your Book For? Build a Reader Avatar Before Chapter OnePreface, Prologue, Foreword or Introduction: What Goes WhereWhy I Won’t Build a Ghostwriting Business That ScalesHow I Hire a Virtual Assistant: Do It, Script It, Hand It OffThe Mail Carrier Who Thought Flipping Houses Was EasyWhat Wedding Photography Taught Me About Pricing Creative Work

Don’t Feed the Trolls

TL;DR: A troll posts inflammatory, off-topic bait for one reason: the emotional response. In an era where people share their politics, religion, and personal lives online, trolls have endless material. This essay covers how to recognize them and why the only winning move is refusing to feed them.

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chatroom, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. — Wikipedia

In these days of social media, many people share everything: their politics, religion, sexual preferences and acts, and plenty of other tidbits that are often better left unsaid. These things deserve real caution in a public forum, and I’m constantly amazed at how freely people hand them out to total strangers.

The problems with having online discussions and posting about extremely personal beliefs, conditions and thoughts are (among other things):

There was a man I knew, let’s call him Tim, who delighted in replying to posts all over the place with both covertly and overtly negative responses. He was the perfect example of a troll.

You’d post a paragraph about Obama, for example, and Tim would reply with a covert response, something that begs for an answer, but isn’t exactly negative.

This is the hook to get you (or others in the thread) to reply. You reply, perfectly logically to explain your position or respond to Tim’s question or whatever. He’d reply, a little more negative this time, and this pattern would go on and on until you’re ready to explode, and Tim is rubbing his hands in glee.

Watching Tim work was infuriating. He never said anything you could point to as outright nasty, so every time someone called him on it, he got to play the wounded innocent while the thread burned down around him.

How a skilled troll works

If the troll really knows what he’s doing, he’ll make it appear he’s innocent because he’ll stir up so much negativity in the conversation that no one knows who began it all. His comments may appear totally innocent on first glance, but if you follow things back and read carefully, you’ll find Tim covertly egging on the responses so that the argument feeds upon itself until there’s so much negativity and anger that the thread is deleted or the conversation dies in frustration.

A less skilled troll simply posts negative responses or pointed questions designed to enrage the members of the conversation.

Feeding the trolls

Responding to a troll in any way at all is called “feeding the trolls,” and it’s exactly what they want. Every reply, every patient explanation, every angry comeback is another meal. I wish more people understood that, because the urge to answer is the very thing the troll is counting on.

It’s important to understand you can in no way win in any conversation online with trolls. They don’t care about you or the conversation. Their goal is simply to upset anyone they can upset, to enrage people and to destroy communication.

Now, if you ask them outright, they’ll plead innocence.

They’ll tell you they’re just trying to educate you, or keep you from harm, or some other mindless justification. Don’t be lulled into complacency by their lies. They exist to make anyone and everyone they can wrong, upset, unhappy and depressed, and I don’t have any patience left for the innocent act.

The only winning move

The best thing to do is ignore them, and if you can, delete them from the conversation or, better still, ban them entirely. On platforms such as Facebook, I’ve found the best solution is to block them permanently. I don’t warn them, I don’t argue with them, and I don’t lose a minute of sleep over it.

I know it sounds cruel, and I know it sounds like censorship.

But there are people in this world, and the internet makes them far bolder than normal, who exist only to sow discord and destroy any attempt at reasonable communication. I’ll block one of them without a second thought. Your conversations will be better without them, and your sanity will be better for removing them from the scene.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly is a troll?
A person who posts inflammatory, off-topic bait for one purpose: the emotional reaction. Skilled ones make it look like sincere disagreement; unskilled ones just post venom. Either way, the reaction is the reward.
Why does ignoring trolls work?
Because attention is the entire payoff. A troll who gets no response is a performer with no audience, and they move on. You can’t win an argument with someone whose goal is the argument itself.
Is refusing to engage a form of censorship?
No. Nobody owes a provocateur their attention. Blocking bait is a boundary, and boundaries are how online discussion stays worth having.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment