Latest
SMS Appointment RemindersDarrell Stern: Stop Being Invisible, Become UnmissableFree BooksJoe Rockey: Ghostwriting His BookHow to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Year in the Bank: ADHD, Face Blindness and the Freedom to Walk Out | The Impossible Puzzles Show, Episode 326A Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeAI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.I Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends On

Can You Find Reason in Insanity?

TL;DR: After every atrocity, people hunt for the reason a mass shooter or bomber did it. This essay argues the hunt is a category error: insane acts don’t have reasons a rational mind can use, and treating them as if they do gives the act more sense than it ever had.

I find it amusing, in an ironic and sad kind of way, when people try and figure out why an insane person did something. It’s insanity!

Shooting a whole bunch of school children is the act of an insane person. You can come up with all the reasons you want, but the simple fact is the act wasn’t rational, it wasn’t sane.

It’s offensive, too. Every time it happens, the newspapers and the experts line up to study the killer like a riddle, digging through his childhood for the key that will make it all make sense, while the children he murdered fade into the background of his story. I think that’s backwards, and it disgusts me.

For all we know, he thought space aliens were invading and he was doing his duty to protect us. Who knows? Who cares? It wasn’t something a rational, sane person would do, and no amount of digging through his life is going to turn it into one. Blowing up a building in Oklahoma City with a rented truck full of fertilizer, something nobody does by accident, is the act of an insane person. Whatever his reasons were, they weren’t the reasons of a rational being, and I refuse to dignify them by pretending otherwise.

What sane people do

Rational, sane beings can sit down and talk with one another. Sane people understand there are lots of options. Talk. Move. Run. Hide. Eat. Bribe. Protest. Picket. Whatever. There are many, many options to work out one’s problems.

If the home life of the kid who shot the children was so bad, he could have run off and joined the circus, or hitchhiked to another state, or some such thing. Instead, he chose to deliberately shoot children in a school.

The search for reasons

And now the newspapers are hunting for a reason, some rational cause. He didn’t like his mother, his mother was going to put him in an asylum, he didn’t like the flavor of his cookies, whatever. None of those are why he did it. He was insane. It’s that simple. Every motive a reporter serves up makes the act sound somehow “okay,” as if he had a reason, after all, however weird. Nope. He wasn’t sane. Period. Grown adults who pretend otherwise should know better.

Our legal system spends countless hours and millions, even billions, of dollars trying to prove whether someone who committed murder was sane or insane.

He murdered another human being (assuming it wasn’t an accident or self-defense). Premeditated murder isn’t the act of a sane being. Stop trying to find an excuse or a reason. Just stop it. All that money buys is a longer look at the killer.

There’s no excuse. There’s no reason. There’s no rationality to the act.

Blowing up a building in Iraq with a car bomb isn’t sane. Blowing up a building in Oklahoma isn’t rational. Shooting school kids isn’t rational. Putting on a vest with explosives and walking into a crowded mall isn’t something a sane person does.

I don’t want to know his reasons. I’ve read enough of these tidy explanations after enough of these tragedies to know they never explain anything, and I’m sick of the ritual. I’m done treating the killer like a puzzle worth solving. What he did was madness with a body count, and whatever attention I have left goes to the people he hurt.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it a mistake to look for a mass shooter’s motive?
Yes, because the act wasn’t rational, and treating it as if it followed reasons a sane mind can use gives it more sense than it ever had. You can invent explanations all day; the act remains insane.
Does rejecting a shooter’s motive mean not investigating the crime?
No. Investigate, prosecute, prevent. The objection is to the public ritual of demanding a coherent why from an incoherent act, as if the right explanation would make it make sense.
How should society respond to a mass shooting?
Accept that some acts have no usable reasons, stop amplifying the perpetrators, and put the energy into the rational things: prevention, care, and the people harmed.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment