Latest
Post an AI Image and Unfriend MeShe Asked How to Publish Her Bedtime Story. They Called Her a Thief.The AI Hype Cycle: Why the Crash Is Coming, and Who’s Causing ItSix Claude Prompts That Get You Unstuck, and Why the Order MattersDogpiled Over AI Art at the Renaissance FaireClaude Opus 5.5: What the New Release Means for WritersTrump’s AI Force Is a Fire Department With No Fire CodeWhat It Costs to Fix an AI-Written ManuscriptWhen Your Memoir Should Be a NovelThe Hugging Face AI Agent Attack: An Operations ReadingWhen Your Own Memoir Sounds Like BraggingWhat Belongs on a Copyright PageWhat an AI Detector Score on Your Manuscript Is WorthThe Clients Who Pay and VanishThe Quotation Marks That Get Authors SuedThe Work You Would Never Have StartedMonthly or Milestone: How Ghostwriting Gets BilledWhen a Client Thinks the Ghostwriter Used AIThe One-Hour Call Before I Quote Your BookBehind the Book: The Mysterious Island, Neb’s SideHow to Organize Decades of Memories Into a MemoirWhy Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence Says

Can You Find Reason in Insanity?

TL;DR: After every atrocity, people hunt for the reason a mass shooter or bomber did it. This essay argues the hunt is a category error: insane acts don’t have reasons a rational mind can use, and treating them as if they do gives the act more sense than it ever had.

I find it amusing, in an ironic and sad kind of way, when people try and figure out why an insane person did something. It’s insanity! Shooting a whole bunch of school children is the act of an insane person. You can come up with all the reasons you want, but the simple fact is the act wasn’t rational, it wasn’t sane.

For all we know, he thought the space aliens were invading and he was doing his duty to protect us. Who knows? Who cares? It was something a rational, sane person would do.

Blowing up a building in Oklahoma city with a rented truck full of fertilizer, not something someone does by accident, is the act of an insane person. Whatever his reasons, they’re not the reasons of a rational being.

What sane people do

Rational, sane beings can sit down and talk with one another. Sane people understand there are lots of options. Talk. Move. Run. Hide. Eat. Bribe. Protest. Picket. Whatever. There are many, many options to work out one’s problems.

If the home life of the kid who shot the children was so bad, he could have run off and joined the circus, or hitchhiked to another state, or some such thing. Instead, he chose to deliberately shoot children in a school.

The search for reasons

And now the newspapers are trying to come up with a reason, some rational cause. He didn’t like his mother, his mother was going to put him in an asylum, he didn’t like the favor of his cookies, whatever. None of those are the reason he did what he did. He was insane. He wasn’t a rational being. It’s that simple. Stop trying to form a reason. That makes it somehow “okay”. He had a reason, after all, for doing what he did, however weird that seems. Nope. He wasn’t sane. Period.

Our legal system spends countless hours and millions, or even billions, of dollars to prove whether someone who committed murder was sane or insane. He murdered another human being (assuming this isn’t an accident or self-defense). Pre-mediated murder isn’t the act of a sane being. Stop trying to find an excuse or a reason. Just stop it.

There’s no excuse. There’s no reason. There’s no rationality to the act.

Blowing up a building in Iraq with a car bomb isn’t sane. Blowing up a building in Oklahoma isn’t rational. Shooting school kids isn’t rational. Putting on a vest with explosives and walking into a crowded mall isn’t something a sane person does.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is hunting for a shooter’s motive a mistake?
Because the act wasn’t rational, and treating it as if it followed reasons a sane mind can use gives it more sense than it ever had. You can invent explanations all day; the act remains insane.
Are you saying we should not investigate these crimes?
No. Investigate, prosecute, prevent. The objection is to the public ritual of demanding a coherent why from an incoherent act, as if the right explanation would make it make sense.
What should we do instead?
Accept that some acts have no usable reasons, stop amplifying the perpetrators, and put the energy into the rational things: prevention, care, and the people harmed.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment