Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America

Researching a Family History in Tampa Bay

This entry is part 6 of 47 in the series Writing in Tampa Bay
TL;DR: One of the largest genealogy collections in the southeastern United States sits on the fourth floor of a library in downtown Tampa, free, open to anyone, no library card required. Alongside it are an obituary index covering 1855 to 1990, a history publications index covering 1925 to 1999, twenty thousand photographs of the region, and staff whose job is helping you use all of it. Most people never find out.

Most family history research stalls in the same place. Somebody gets three or four generations back from what relatives remember, hits a wall, pays for a subscription site, finds a few more names, and stops.

The wall is usually not a lack of records. It is not knowing that the records are forty minutes away in a public building, or that a person is paid to help you read them.

The fourth floor in Tampa

The Florida History and Genealogy Library occupies the fourth floor of the John F. Germany Public Library at 900 North Ashley Drive in downtown Tampa.

Its genealogy collection is one of the largest in the southeastern United States. The geographic emphasis runs to Florida, the wider southeast, the original thirteen colonies, and every state bordering the Mississippi, which between them covers where most American families came through.

Holdings include print, microform and electronic resources, extensive federal census and Soundex material, magazines and journals, and government documents going back to 1967.

Two things about access. It is open to the general public during regular hours and no library card is required, which means a Pinellas resident can use it as freely as a Hillsborough one. And materials are for in-library use only. Nothing circulates and nothing can be borrowed through interlibrary loan, so plan a working session instead of a collection trip.

Staff are on the floor specifically to help with research problems. That is the part people skip and it is the part that saves months.

The two indexes

These are the tools nobody knows exist and they solve the two hardest problems in local research.

The Tampa Bay Obituary Index covers newspapers from 1855 to 1990. An obituary is the single densest document about a person’s life: dates, parents, spouse, children, employer, church, military service, and the names of survivors, which give you the next generation to chase. An index across 135 years of newspapers turns an impossible search into a lookup.

The library also accepts obituary research requests, which means you can ask remotely.

The Tampa Bay History Publications Index covers articles relating to Florida and Tampa Bay history from 1925 to 1999. Local history journals are where the specific material lives, and almost none of it is searchable any other way.

The photographs

On the same floor sits the Burgert Brothers Photographic Collection, more than twenty thousand images documenting this region from roughly 1850 to 1963.

For family history that is a different kind of evidence. If you know a relative worked at the port, lived in Ybor, attended a particular church or went to the State Fair in 1936, there is a reasonable chance of a photograph showing the place, and occasionally the person.

Over fifteen thousand are digitised and searchable online, which makes them worth checking before you drive over.

Start with the people, not the records

Almost everybody does this backwards. They open a subscription site, build a tree of names and dates, and only years later think to ask the living relatives what they remember.

Records will wait indefinitely. The 1940 census is not going anywhere. The person who remembers why the family left, what the first apartment looked like, and which argument everybody still refuses to discuss is on a different timeline entirely.

So the first move in any family history is a conversation, and it should happen before the research instead of after it.

Record it. Phone audio is fine. The point is not archival quality, it is that you stop taking notes and start listening, and that a voice survives in a way a transcript does not.

Ask about objects and rooms instead of dates. Nobody remembers what year they moved, and everybody remembers the kitchen. What did the house smell like. What was on the walls. What did your mother keep in that drawer. Specific sensory questions unlock narrative memory in a way that chronological questions never do.

Ask what they were told as well as what they saw. Family stories are evidence even when they are wrong, because the shape of the wrong version usually tells you what somebody was protecting.

Ask the uncomfortable questions late, gently, and once. And accept a refusal without pushing, because a refusal is information too.

Do it more than once. The second conversation is always better than the first, because the first one has been rattling around in their head since you left.

What the documents can and cannot do

Once you have the stories, the records do a specific job: they anchor, they correct, and they fill gaps that memory cannot reach.

Census records place a household in a place in a year, with ages, occupations and who else was under that roof. They are the skeleton, and they are often wrong in the details. Somebody told a stranger at a door and the stranger wrote it down.

Obituaries are the densest single documents in family history. That is why the Tampa Bay Obituary Index, covering 1855 to 1990, matters so much. An obituary gives you dates, parents, spouse, children, employer, church, military service and survivors, and the survivors give you the next generation to chase.

Land and property records are the ones nobody thinks of and they are often decisive. In periods when vital records were poorly kept, a land transaction may be the only surviving document naming family members together.

Newspapers beyond obituaries carry the incidental: a name in a court report, a school prize, a business opening, a ship arriving. Searchable archives make these findable in a way they simply were not twenty years ago.

What documents cannot do is tell you why. No record will explain a decision. That gap is why the conversations come first.

The Pinellas side

You do not have to cross the bay for everything.

Pinellas libraries carry the subscription genealogy databases, which is worth knowing because those are expensive at home and free at a branch. A card gets you into them, and the card does considerably more besides.

Mirror Lake in St. Petersburg is a 1915 Carnegie building and a contributing property of the downtown historic district, so for anybody researching St. Petersburg it is both a resource and a period document. Reference staff across the county will help with a research question, and that service is under-used at every branch.

Seminole has free private study rooms if you want to spread out with papers for two hours, and it opens at eight in the morning.

What to bring and what to do first

Write down what you already know before you go, including the parts you are unsure about, and mark which came from a document and which from somebody’s memory. Memory is usually right about relationships and unreliable about dates.

Bring names, approximate dates, and places. Place matters more than people expect, because records are organised geographically.

Then ask at the desk. Say what you are trying to find and where you have got stuck. A reference librarian who does this daily will know in ninety seconds which index to reach for, and that conversation is the single highest-value thing in the building.

Photograph documents instead of transcribing them, and record where each one came from as you go. The commonest regret in this work is a fact with no source attached.

Keeping track of what you find

The commonest regret in this work is a fact with no source attached, and it arrives about eighteen months in.

You will have a date, and you will be certain it is right, and you will have no idea whether it came from a census, a gravestone, a cousin, or something you inferred at midnight and then forgot you inferred.

So record where each thing came from as you go. Not perfectly, not in any particular system, just consistently. A line saying which record, which year, which repository is enough, and it costs ten seconds at the time and a weekend to reconstruct later.

Photograph documents instead of transcribing them. Transcription introduces errors and loses everything in the margins, and a photograph of the page preserves the handwriting, the form layout and whatever somebody scribbled at the bottom.

Separate what you know from what you were told from what you worked out. Those three categories look identical in a set of notes six months later and they are not remotely equivalent.

And write down the dead ends, including what you searched and did not find. Otherwise you will search it again, twice.

Brick walls, and what usually breaks them

Nearly every family history stalls in the same few places, and the fixes are more mechanical than people expect.

Spelling is the first one. Names were recorded by whoever was holding the pen, and immigrant surnames in particular were written phonetically by clerks who had never seen them. Search by sound, not by spelling, which is exactly what Soundex was built for and why the census and Soundex holdings at the Tampa collection matter.

Geography is the second. Records are organised by place, and county lines moved. A family that never went anywhere can appear to vanish because the county they lived in was subdivided.

Women are the third and the most persistent. Names change at marriage, and a woman can disappear from the record entirely between one document and the next. Marriage records, obituaries of her children, and land transactions where she appears as a spouse are the usual ways back in.

And the fourth is simply asking for help. A reference librarian at a specialist collection will recognise a category of problem in ninety seconds that you have been circling for a month, and that service is free.

DNA, and what it does not do

Most people arriving at family history now have a test result first and a question second, which reverses the useful order.

A test tells you who you share DNA with and roughly in what proportion. It does not tell you how you are related, and it does not tell you anything about the people themselves. A match is a lead, and a lead is worth exactly as much as the documentary work you do after it.

The ethnicity estimates are the part that generates the most excitement and the least information. They are statistical comparisons against reference populations, the reference populations get revised, and the percentages move when they do. Treat them as interesting, not as a finding.

Where testing genuinely earns its place is breaking a documentary wall. If the paper record stops and a close match appears whose tree runs through the same county, that is a real lead worth chasing through records.

It also, occasionally, surfaces something the family did not know and may not want to know. That happens more often than the advertising suggests, and it is worth thinking about before you test instead of after.

Two cautions worth having early

The first is that online trees are not evidence. A tree somebody else built, copied from a tree somebody else built, propagates errors at speed and with total confidence. A name appearing in forty trees means forty people copied it, and it can all trace back to one guess made in 2004.

Use other people’s trees as leads. Verify against a record before you write anything down as fact.

The second is that you will find something difficult. Not might. Will. Families are made of people, and people did things that got left out of the version you were told. An early death that nobody explained, a marriage that was not one, a name that changes, a gap of several years that nobody accounts for.

Decide early what you intend to do with that when it appears, and whether the living have a say. A family history written for descendants is a different document from one written for the person who did the research, and the difference is mostly about what gets included and how.

Neither caution is a reason not to do it. They are reasons to do it deliberately.

Where this ends up

Research is not the hard part. Deciding what the research is for is the hard part.

A family tree is a diagram. It tells you who married whom and when they died. It moves nobody. The people who read a family history read it for the stories: why somebody left, what the crossing was like, what the first years here cost them, which decision the whole family has been living with ever since.

Those things are not in the census. They are in the people still alive who remember, and in the shape you put around the documents afterwards.

I have written about that gap in the piece on retiring here with a life behind you, which is about the specific Florida version of this problem. A county full of people who did something substantial somewhere else, and whose children mostly do not know the details.

The archive is free and it is open Monday to Saturday. (See also the county’s own museum archives, which hold what libraries do not) The people who remember are not open indefinitely.

The Guides That Get Your Book Written, Published, and Sold

Four short, practical guides on writing, publishing, and selling your book, plus the occasional note when there's something worth your time. No fluff, no daily inbox clutter. Drop your email and they're yours.

We use MailerLite to manage our list and send these emails. Your address is used only to send you what you signed up for. We will not sell it, share it, or use it for anything else, and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where is the best genealogy library near Tampa Bay?
The Florida History and Genealogy Library on the fourth floor of the John F. Germany Public Library in downtown Tampa, which holds one of the largest genealogy collections in the southeastern United States.
Do I need a library card to use the genealogy collection?
No. It is open to the general public during regular library hours with no card required, so Pinellas residents can use it as freely as Hillsborough ones. Materials are for in-library use only and do not circulate.
Is there an obituary index for Tampa Bay?
Yes, the Tampa Bay Obituary Index covers newspapers from 1855 to 1990. The library also accepts obituary research requests, so you can ask remotely instead of visiting in person.
What records does the collection cover?
Print, microform and electronic resources with geographic emphasis on Florida, the southeast, the original thirteen colonies and states bordering the Mississippi, including extensive federal census and Soundex holdings, journals, and government documents back to 1967.
Can I do family history research from Pinellas without crossing the bay?
Partly. Pinellas libraries carry subscription genealogy databases that are free with a card and expensive at home, and reference staff at any branch will help with a research question. For the deepest holdings and the photographic archive you need the Tampa building.
Are there photographs of the region I can search?
Yes. The Burgert Brothers Photographic Collection on the same fourth floor holds more than twenty thousand images of Tampa Bay from about 1850 to 1963, with over fifteen thousand digitised and searchable online before you visit.
What should I bring to a research session?
Names, approximate dates and places, plus a written note of what you already know and whether each fact came from a document or somebody’s memory. Place matters most, because records are organised geographically. Photograph documents instead of transcribing them, and record the source as you go.

📁︎ Book Marketing📁︎ Writing Craft

🏷︎ Reading Life🏷︎ research🏷︎ writing life

📝 Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment