Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America

True Grit (1969) Review

True Grit (1969) Review

TL;DR: True Grit (1969) rates 8 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. John Wayne finally won an Oscar for playing a fat, drunk, one-eyed marshal who shoots men in the back, and the performance works because he is willing to be ridiculous for two hours before he is allowed to be magnificent for four minutes.
True Grit (1969)
8/10

A fourteen-year-old girl arrives in Fort Smith to collect her murdered father’s body and his possessions. She negotiates the return of his horses, hires the meanest marshal available, and refuses to be left behind.

The 8 is for a film carried by two performances and a piece of casting that could easily have gone wrong. Kim Darby was twenty-one playing fourteen and plays Mattie as somebody with no interest in being liked, which is exactly right.

The deductions are for the middle, which meanders, and for Glen Campbell, who was cast for the soundtrack and is visibly out of his depth alongside two people doing serious work. The title song is pleasant and belongs to a different and considerably softer film than the one it has ended up being attached to at the front and back of this one.

Mattie Ross Is the Protagonist

The film belongs to a fourteen-year-old and the genre almost never permits that. She negotiates, litigates, threatens lawsuits, quotes scripture and out-argues every adult she encounters.

The horse trading scene is the best writing in it and lasts about five minutes. She recovers money her father is owed from a man who did nothing wrong, purely by being more relentless than he is prepared to be, and the film plays it as a fight she wins.

Charles Portis wrote the novel in her voice as an old woman remembering, and the formal register survives into the film. Nobody uses contractions, everybody speaks in complete sentences, and it should sound stilted and instead sounds like a specific place and time.

Kim Darby plays her without a trace of charm. Mattie is humorless, correct, unimpressed and physically unafraid, and the performance refuses every opportunity to make her adorable, which is what makes the ending land.

The river crossing is where the character is settled. Refused passage on the ferry, she puts her horse into the water and swims it across in front of two men who have just told her she cannot come, and neither of them says anything about it afterward. She does not argue her way in, she simply arrives.

For Writers

A young protagonist works when the story refuses to make them endearing. Competence and stubbornness carry a reader further than charm, and charm in a child character reads as an author asking for affection. Give them a specific goal and let them pursue it without apology.

The formal dialogue is doing real work. A consistent speech register that nobody in the reader’s world uses establishes a place more efficiently than any amount of description.

Let her win an argument early. The horse trading scene tells the audience exactly how difficult this person is, which means every subsequent refusal to send her home is believable.

Wayne Is Willing to Be Ridiculous

Rooster Cogburn is overweight, drunk by midday, living in the back of a store with a cat, and giving court testimony that establishes he has killed twenty-three men and is vague about several of them.

The courtroom sequence is where the performance is made. He is cross-examined about whether the men he shot were facing him, contradicts himself, gets irritated, and the film lets him look like a liar in front of a judge.

Wayne at sixty-two had spent forty years being the most authoritative man in every frame and this is him consenting to be laughed at. The falling off a horse, the eye patch business, the arguing with a child about a dead man’s boots.

That is why the last sequence works. When he puts the reins in his teeth and rides at four men across a meadow, the audience has spent two hours watching somebody who should not be able to do it.

Robert Duvall and Dennis Hopper are both in it early in their careers and both are better than the material requires. Duvall’s Ned Pepper is the only man in the film who frightens Rooster, and the exchange between them before the charge is two professionals acknowledging each other before one of them has to die.

The Meadow

Four men on one side, one man on the other, a wide open space, and a short exchange before it starts. It is the most quoted moment Wayne ever filmed and it is about ninety seconds long.

The staging is simple and unfussy. Henry Hathaway shoots it in wide masters with the geography absolutely clear, no cutting for excitement, and the distance between the two sides visible throughout.

What makes it land is the arithmetic. He is outnumbered four to one, he is old and drunk, and he charges anyway with both hands occupied, which is either courage or a man who has decided he does not much mind either way.

The film then undercuts it immediately, which is the correct instinct. He is unhorsed, pinned, and saved by the person he has spent the film dismissing, and the heroism does not go unpunished.

The exchange before it is what makes the charge possible. Ned Pepper tells him he is a one-eyed fat man, Rooster tells him to fill his hand, and the insult is accurate and the reply is not a denial. He agrees with the assessment, out loud, in front of everybody, and comes across the meadow anyway.

For Writers

Establish incapacity for two hours and a single competent act becomes enormous. The charge works because the audience has watched him fall off things. The reverse never works. A character established as capable performing a capable act is an event with no meaning attached.

Undercut the heroism immediately afterward. Letting the gesture be partly a failure keeps it human and stops the story from tipping into a pose.

Shoot it plainly. Clear geography and no cutting tricks make an audience believe an action that fast editing would make them doubt.

What the Coens Did Differently

The 2010 version is closer to the book, colder, and considerably better looking, and the comparison is worth making because they are genuinely different films from the same material.

This one is warmer and more sentimental, with a score that tells you how to feel and an ending that softens the novel’s considerably harder conclusion. It is also funnier and more comfortable to spend two hours inside.

Portis wrote an old woman looking back with no self-pity and a missing arm, and the 1969 film removes almost all of that. What it keeps is the relationship, and the relationship is the reason the film has lasted.

Neither version is definitive. This one has Wayne consenting to be undignified and a fourteen-year-old who refuses to be charming, and those two things together are enough.

The 2010 film also has the better final ten minutes and this one has the better middle. Hathaway lets scenes run at the speed of people travelling together, and the Coens are more interested in the language, which produces two films that are strongest at opposite ends.

The Ending It Chose

Mattie shows Rooster a plot in her family cemetery and tells him there is room for him in it. He accepts, complains, and jumps a fence on a horse to prove he still can.

It is sentimental and it is earned, which are not the same thing. The film has spent two hours establishing that neither of these people has anybody, and the offer of a burial plot is the least romantic possible way to say so.

The novel’s ending is harder and better and this one is defensible. What the film wants is for the audience to leave believing these two saw each other again, and Portis is explicit that they did not.

Wayne won the Academy Award for it, forty years into a career, for a performance built on being willing to look bad. He said afterward that he should have put an eye patch on thirty-five years earlier.

The ride to the doctor is the sequence that earns the burial plot. He rides a horse to death getting her to help, then takes another at gunpoint, carrying a child who has been bitten, and none of it is filmed as heroism. It is filmed as a man refusing to arrive too late twice in one lifetime.

For Writers

Sentiment is earned by withholding, not by arriving. Two hours of two people insulting each other makes a burial plot offer land harder than any declaration would. The test is whether the warm moment costs the characters something to say.

Choose your ending knowing what it forecloses. A reunion promised is comfortable, and the harder version, where neither sees the other again, is what the reader will remember.

Note that the actor is rewarded for the same thing the character is. Wayne consented to be undignified, Rooster consents to be ridiculous, and both are given a moment of grace for it.

Should you watch True Grit?

Yes, and then watch the 2010 one. This is the warmer version, with a fourteen-year-old who refuses to be charming, an old man who consents to be laughed at for two hours, and ninety seconds in a meadow that justify the whole enterprise.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is True Grit about?
A fourteen-year-old girl hires a drunk, one-eyed US marshal to hunt the man who murdered her father, and insists on riding with him into Indian Territory against his objections.
Why did Wayne win the Oscar for this?
Because he consented to look bad. Rooster is overweight, drunk by midday, contradicts himself under cross-examination and falls off a horse, and Wayne had spent forty years being the most authoritative man in every frame.
Is Kim Darby good as Mattie?
She plays her without a trace of charm. Mattie is humorless, correct, unimpressed and physically unafraid, and the performance refuses every opportunity to make a child character adorable.
What is the meadow scene?
Rooster charges four armed men across open ground with the reins in his teeth and a weapon in each hand. It is about ninety seconds, shot in wide masters with clear geography, and the film unhorses him immediately afterward.
How does it compare to the 2010 version?
The Coen film is closer to the novel, colder and better looking. This one is warmer, funnier and softens the book’s harder ending. Neither is definitive and they are genuinely different films from the same material.
Why does the dialogue sound like that?
Charles Portis wrote the novel in Mattie’s voice as an old woman remembering. Nobody uses contractions and everybody speaks in complete sentences, which should sound stilted and instead establishes a specific place and time.
What is the weakest element?
Glen Campbell, cast for the soundtrack, visibly out of his depth alongside two people doing serious work, and a middle stretch that meanders before the final act.

This film appears on one of my film lists

🏷︎ 1960s🏷︎ Coming of Age🏷︎ Male Friendship🏷︎ Revenge