Latest
AI’s Black Box Is Getting a Window. Somebody Still Has to Look Through It“It Stars C. Thomas Howell. No.” Why AI Gets Stuck in a LoopShould You Query or Self-Publish Your Memoir If You’re Not Famous?Judge the Writing, Not the Tool: What the AI Pile-Ons Get WrongThiago Ferreira: Thinkers, Not DoersYana Semova: Let AI Do the AdminLisa Hamilton-Smith: Unstoppable, AI AssistedSuperman Day: The $130 Contract Behind the CapeRaymond Chandler Day: The Novelist Who Started at FiftyJohn Steinbeck Day: The Reporter Who Wrote the NovelInternational Translation Day: The Invisible AuthorsMaya Angelou Day: The Dare That Became a MemoirNational Podcast Day: The Interview Is the Raw MaterialKurt Vonnegut Day: The Book That Took Twenty YearsTell a Fairy Tale Day: The Stories Everybody EditedHarry Potter’s Birthday: The Book Twelve Publishers MissedHarper Lee Day: The Draft Her Editor Saw ThroughGene Roddenberry Day: The Pilot Who Pitched the StarsRoald Dahl Day: Six Pencils and a Grudge Against Grown-UpsInternational Literacy Day: The Readers Books LoseJack Kerouac Day: The Scroll and the Last AddressElmore Leonard Day: Leave Out the Part Readers SkipEncourage a Young Writer Day: The Adult Who Read the PagesBack to the Future Day: The Script Where Everything Pays OffNational Library Lovers Month: The Building a Town Pays ForAlice’s Day: The Story Told on a Rowing BoatRobert E. Howard Day: The Texan Who Built ConanStephen King Day: The Daily Two ThousandEmily Dickinson Day: The Poems in the DrawerIan Fleming Day: Two Thousand Words a MorningFyodor Dostoevsky Day: The Novels Written Against the ClockZora Neale Hurston Day: The Ear She TrainedF. Scott Fitzgerald Day: The Masterpiece That FloppedElmore Leonard’s 10 Rules of Writing, and Which Ones I BreakShould Your Novel Have a Prologue? When a Cold Open Earns Its Place“People Who Use AI Deserve to Be Castrated”: When the Sentence Outruns the CrimeHow Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidThe Bell JarOpen: An AutobiographyBeneath a Scarlet SkyFlorida RoadkillCampus BattlefieldLifeThe Phone Book: The Curious History of the Book That Everyone Uses But No One ReadsThe Sage of SagittariusDid I Ever Tell You This?: A MemoirPa’anAmerican SoldierIt Doesn’t Take a HeroMake Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the World

Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019) Review

TL;DR: Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019) rates 6 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Jake Gyllenhaal’s Mysterio, the European tour, the basketball court Blip gag that confirmed the franchise wouldn’t engage with its own catastrophe. The 6 is for a competent Phase Three closing film that’s the franchise’s first major post-Endgame production and as the entry that most explicitly showed the MCU’s refusal to engage with the Snap-and-Blip catastrophe.
Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019)
6 / 10

Official trailer

The 6 is for a competent Phase Three closing film, the franchise’s first major post-Endgame production and the entry that most explicitly showed the MCU’s refusal to engage with the Snap-and-Blip catastrophe.

Spider-Man has never been a character I care about, so my interest here is in the choices. Tom Holland continues his established Peter Parker work. Jake Gyllenhaal delivers a considerably better Mysterio than the role required, and Jon Watts directs with suitable professional commitment.

The film also works through the comedic treatment of mass casualties that defined the franchise’s failure to honor what its own central event had described. The 6 reflects the film’s individual achievements against the wider franchise problems it exemplified.

Mixed is the word for how I feel about it. Gyllenhaal is the reason the number isn’t lower, since a villain who fakes the whole crisis is a sharper idea than this franchise usually manages. The Blip jokes are the reason it isn’t higher.

The Setup

Shortly after Endgame’s events, the story opens. Peter Parker has been mourning Tony Stark’s death and struggling to manage his life as the world’s most prominent young Avenger.

He plans a European summer tour with his Midtown High School class as opportunity to escape the Spider-Man responsibilities and pursue his romantic interest in MJ. Nick Fury intercepts him during the trip and forces him into involvement with elemental creatures threatening the European cities his school is visiting.

Quentin Beck / Mysterio appears as a hero from an alternate universe (Earth-833) who has been fighting these elemental creatures. The middle act involves Parker and Mysterio working together while Parker gradually develops doubts about whether Mysterio is what he claims to be. The third act reveals that Mysterio is a former Stark Industries engineer whom Tony Stark had fired, and he has been using advanced illusion technology and drone fleets to manufacture the elemental threat.

Mysterio’s goal is to establish himself as the world’s new central superhero through the manufactured crisis. The climactic confrontation involves Parker defeating Mysterio’s illusions through his “Peter tingle” sixth sense and recovering the stolen Stark technology.

The Basketball Court Gag

The film’s most discussed single sequence is the “Blip” basketball gag from the opening act.

Several students in Peter Parker’s high school had been “blipped” during the Infinity War Snap and returned during the Endgame restoration. The sequence depicts these returning students suddenly reappearing in the middle of an active basketball game, with one student appearing in mid-air falling toward the court before another student catches them. The film stages the visual for comedy with specific physical-prop blocking.

The gag is one of the franchise’s clearest single examples of the Snap-and-Blip treatment problem analyzed in The Snap, The Blip, And The Catastrophe The MCU Refused To Show.

The Snap as described in Infinity War would have produced civilizationally catastrophic consequences. The Blip restoration five years later would have generated comparable consequences through the return of three and a half billion people whose lives, homes, jobs, and relationships had been redistributed during their absence. The actual depiction in Far From Home treats both events as comedy material for high school setting.

The gag is the franchise’s most explicit single statement that it wouldn’t engage with what the Snap meant. The basketball court reappearance is funny because the consequences of mass disappearance and mass return aren’t real to the production. The students are physical bodies that vanished and returned. The five-year gap in their lives is treated as logistical detail instead of as the civilizational disruption the wider script’s premise required. The audience receives the comedic framing while the catastrophic implications go entirely unaddressed.

This is the scene that sours me on the film. Half the planet came back after five years gone, and the best idea anyone had was a kid dropping onto a basketball court. It’s a good sight gag, and I resent it anyway, because it tells me the people running this franchise never believed in their own catastrophe.

Later MCU productions have continued this pattern. The Falcon and the Winter Soldier attempted to engage with the Blip’s social consequences but worked within the comedic structure Far From Home had established. The result is that the franchise has treated the most significant single event in MCU history as background detail and incidental comedy across multiple productions. The franchise that described the catastrophe has refused to depict it.

For Writers

The basketball court gag in Far From Home shows the cost of treating catastrophic events as comedic material. The Snap and Blip together represent the most significant event in MCU history at the scale of planetary near-extinction and mass restoration. The Far From Home treatment positions these events as setup for high school comedy. The disconnect between described scale and depicted treatment is one of the franchise’s clearest structural failures. The lesson for writers in serialized fiction is that tonal commitment to your premise matters across all later productions.

If your premise describes catastrophic events, later productions can’t treat those events as comedy material without undermining the original premise.

Far From Home’s basketball court gag is funny as isolated comedic moment. Far From Home’s basketball court gag is structurally damaging to the wider franchise’s credibility when the franchise is asking audiences to invest in later cosmic-scale threats. The audience reads the disconnect even when individual scenes work as comedy. The trade between immediate comedic engagement and long-term franchise credibility falls firmly on the credibility side.

Far From Home spent the franchise’s credibility for one film’s comic relief moment.

Jake Gyllenhaal As Mysterio

Jake Gyllenhaal plays Quentin Beck / Mysterio with real commitment and the performance is one of the better Phase Three antagonist turns. Gyllenhaal brings specific charismatic intelligence to the role’s initial heroic framing and real menace to the eventual antagonist reveal. The performance is professionally executed at higher level than the surrounding role required.

The character work succeeds especially in the third-act illusion sequences.

After Parker has discovered Beck’s deception, Mysterio attempts to kill him through manipulated reality designed to disorient the protagonist. The illusion sequences feature kaleidoscopic visual approaches that draw on Beck’s specific drone-and-projection technology. Gyllenhaal performs the manipulation with conviction that gives the character real menace. The sequences are some of the franchise’s more inventive visual setpieces.

The illusion sequences are where I’d point anyone who asks what the film does right. I’m a sucker for a villain whose weapon is the frame itself, and Gyllenhaal plays the con with enough glee that the tricks feel like his personality.

The character’s motivation is structurally sound. Beck is a former Stark Industries engineer whose work Tony Stark dismissed. His resentment combined with his technological capability produces the antagonist that the film deploys.

The motivation works inside coherent psychological structure instead of as generic villain ambition. The character has more interior life than most MCU antagonists receive.

The performance also benefits from Gyllenhaal’s broader career history.

Audiences arriving at Far From Home with familiarity from Gyllenhaal’s prior dramatic work (Nightcrawler, Prisoners, Brokeback Mountain) brought expectations about how the character would work. The casting honors those expectations while applying them to the Mysterio situation. The combination produces one of the franchise’s stronger villain performances.

The European Tour Setting

The film’s European tour setting provides visual variety that the Spider-Man franchise hadn’t previously deployed. Venice, Prague, Berlin, and London sequences feature serious location work that gives the film distinct identity from previous Spider-Man entries. The Venice elemental water creature sequence is kinetic introduction to Mysterio. The Prague sequences feature illusion-based combat. The London climax provides aerial action over Tower Bridge.

The setting also creates structural problems. Spider-Man’s powers and equipment are tied to his New York context. The European cities provide visual variety but don’t give Parker the same operational specificity his New York environment provides. The web-swinging that Holland’s Spider-Man performs in Homecoming through real urban geography becomes generic action choreography across multiple European locations. The setting decision favors visual novelty over an environment built for the character.

I’d have kept him in New York. Spider-Man over a Venice canal is a postcard, and the film trades the one setting where his powers make physical sense for a run of pretty backdrops.

The high school class context for the European tour also creates pacing problems.

The script must balance Parker’s superhero responsibilities with his class trip activities throughout the runtime. The transitions between the two contexts are frequent and sometimes awkward. The Romance subplot with MJ develops through specific class-trip situations that feel artificially staged instead of organically integrated. The European setting provides visual benefits while generating structural costs that the production handles with mixed success.

Zendaya As MJ

Zendaya plays MJ (Michelle Jones) with distinctive character work that distinguishes the role from Homecoming’s lighter introduction. The film commits more considerable screen time to the Parker-MJ relationship and develops it through scenes including the rooftop confession sequence and the tour-bus interactions. Zendaya brings particular sardonic intelligence to the role that gives MJ a character identity beyond romantic-interest function.

The performance level is professionally committed and the chemistry with Holland is genuine.

The character development is right for the romantic subplot’s importance within the wider film. MJ is an actual character instead of a decorative addition to Parker’s story. The Far From Home development of the relationship establishes the foundation that No Way Home (2021) would build on through the relationship’s more dramatic consequences.

Zendaya’s MJ is the piece of this I’d keep. She’s drier and quicker than Peter, and she plays the romance like somebody who’d hate to be caught caring, which is about the only way a teen romance holds my interest.

The Post-Stark Anchor Problem

Spider-Man’s situation after Tony Stark’s death is the problem the film must deal with. The franchise has positioned Parker as Stark’s heir apparent, with Stark technology and Stark institutional resources that the film opens with him inheriting. The structural problem is that Parker is sixteen years old and Stark’s broader Avengers structure requires adult judgment that Parker hasn’t yet developed.

Its approach to this problem runs through Parker’s specific reluctance to assume Stark’s institutional position. He attempts to give the Stark technology to Mysterio, who he believes deserves it more than himself. The decision generates the third-act antagonist conflict. The Mysterio reveal forces Parker to accept the responsibility he was attempting to refuse.

The structural engagement is reasonable within the film’s runtime. The wider Spider-Man character couldn’t function as Tony Stark’s full institutional heir given the age difference and the Avengers structure requirements. The film acknowledges this without resolving it. Parker ends Far From Home having recovered Stark’s technology and having defeated Mysterio’s manipulation, but the wider Stark legacy question remains unaddressed. Later productions would attempt resolutions with mixed results.

Craft: The Post-Endgame Transition Film

Craft Note

Spider-Man: Far From Home is the Phase Three closing film and the franchise’s first major post-Endgame production. The film is transition between the Infinity Saga’s conclusion and the Multiverse Saga’s initiation. The transition function generates specific structural responsibilities that Far From Home handles with mixed success.

It’s also the franchise’s first sustained treatment of the post-Snap-and-Blip world.

The basketball court gag and the wider high school treatment of the Blip established the comedic structure that would dominate later productions’ engagement with the catastrophic event. The franchise made the decision to treat planetary-scale catastrophe as comedy material with this film and has compounded it across later appearances. The decision is one of the franchise’s most consequential single creative choices and is one of the wider structural problems analyzed in the Snap-and-Blip essay.

Jake Gyllenhaal’s Mysterio represents one of the better Phase Three antagonist performances. Tom Holland’s continued Spider-Man work maintains baseline quality. Zendaya’s MJ development establishes the relationship foundation. Jon Watts’s direction continues with suitable professional commitment. The Mysterio illusion sequences are some of the franchise’s more inventive visual setpieces.

The 6 rating reflects the film’s competent individual achievements against the wider franchise problems it exemplified. Far From Home isn’t a bad film. Far From Home is a competent Spider-Man entry that participated in the franchise’s broader refusal to honor its own central catastrophe. The individual quality and the franchise damage coexist in the same production. The 6 holds both: competent execution, structural failure.

For analysis of the Snap-and-Blip catastrophe treatment problem this film exemplifies, see The Snap, The Blip, And The Catastrophe The MCU Refused To Show.

Is Spider-Man: Far From Home worth watching?

A 6. Spider-Man: Far From Home is a competent Phase Three closing film that’s the franchise’s first major post-Endgame production and as the entry that most explicitly showed the MCU’s refusal to engage with the Snap-and-Blip catastrophe. Tom Holland continues his established Peter Parker work. Jake Gyllenhaal delivers a considerably better Mysterio performance than the role required. The European tour setting provides visual variety while creating structural costs. The basketball court Blip gag represents one of the franchise’s clearest single examples of comedic treatment of mass casualties.

Zendaya’s MJ receives specific character development. The film handles the post-Stark anchor problem within its runtime limits.

The 6 stands. I can’t get past the basketball court, and I can’t dismiss Gyllenhaal either, so the film sits in the middle for me: a competent Spider-Man picture with a villain better than it deserves and a joke about mass death that did the franchise real damage. People who care about Peter and MJ may rate it higher, and I understand why.

Frequently Asked Questions

How problematic is the basketball court gag?
Structurally significant. The Snap and Blip together represent the most significant event in MCU history. The film treats students reappearing from a five-year absence as comedy material. The audience receives the comedic framing while the catastrophic implications go entirely unaddressed. The gag is funny in isolation and structurally damaging to the wider franchise’s credibility. The basketball court sequence has been widely cited in later analysis of how the MCU refused to engage with its own central catastrophe.
Is Jake Gyllenhaal’s Mysterio worth seeking out?
Yes. Gyllenhaal delivers one of the better Phase Three antagonist performances. The character has real commitment, coherent psychological motivation, and theatrical menace during the illusion sequences. The third-act illusion sequences feature kaleidoscopic visual approaches that draw on Mysterio-specific drone technology. The performance is professionally executed at higher level than the surrounding role required.
Do I need to watch Spider-Man: Far From Home to follow the MCU?
Yes. The film provides essential post-Endgame context including Spider-Man’s situation after Tony Stark’s death, the Blip’s initial treatment as comedy material, the introduction of Mysterio, and the foundation for No Way Home’s multiverse plot. It also establishes Peter Parker’s public identity as Spider-Man through the mid-credits scene that drives the No Way Home plot. The film is essential franchise context regardless of broader rating evaluation.
How does this compare to Homecoming?
Homecoming (rated 7) is structurally more focused on Spider-Man’s specific story. Far From Home (rated 6) works with major post-Endgame integration that diluted the standalone focus. Both films share quality strengths through Tom Holland’s continued performance and Jon Watts’s direction. Homecoming’s higher rating reflects its tighter standalone focus and Michael Keaton’s superior Vulture performance. Both films are professional MCU entries with specific virtues.
Is the European setting beneficial?
Mixed. The Venice, Prague, Berlin, and London sequences provide visual variety that the Spider-Man franchise hadn’t previously deployed. The setting also creates structural problems because Spider-Man’s specific powers and equipment are tied to his New York context. The European cities provide visual novelty while generating character-specific environment costs. The trade is partially successful.
Does the Stark legacy material work?
Partially. The film acknowledges that Parker can’t fully inherit Stark’s broader institutional position given his age and inexperience. Parker’s attempt to give Stark technology to Mysterio is character beat that the script handles reasonably. The wider Stark legacy question remains unaddressed at the film’s conclusion. Later productions would attempt resolutions with mixed results.
How does Zendaya’s MJ compare to previous MJ characters?
Different character with similar function. The Far From Home MJ isn’t Mary Jane Watson from previous Spider-Man adaptations. The character has different name (Michelle), different personality (sardonic and intellectual instead of warm and theatrical), and different relationship dynamics with Parker. Zendaya’s specific character work establishes MJ as her own character instead of as Mary Jane Watson variant. The trade between source-material fidelity and new character development falls firmly on the new character development side.
What is the mid-credits scene?
The mid-credits scene reveals that Mysterio’s death had been recorded with footage edited to identify Peter Parker as Spider-Man and to blame him for Mysterio’s death and the European destruction. The reveal sets up No Way Home (2021) by establishing Parker’s public identity disclosure and his legal complications. The scene is one of the franchise’s more consequential mid-credits sequences and provides essential setup for the later film.
How does Spider-Man: Far From Home fit into MCU Phase Three?
Far From Home is the closing film of Phase Three. The phase concluded with the film positioned as transition between the Infinity Saga and the Multiverse Saga. The film’s specific structural responsibilities (post-Endgame world building, Stark legacy management, Blip treatment establishment) reflected its closing-film role. The 6 rating positions Far From Home in the lower middle of the phase. The film completed Phase Three with mixed creative achievement that anticipated the Phase Four problems to come.

Writing in This Genre

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.