Latest
It’s Not X, It’s Y: The AI Tell Shakespeare Wrote FirstWho Gets Rich From AI Data Centers? The Local, National and Global EconomyAre AI Data Centers Bad for the Environment? What’s True and What Isn’tAI Data Centers and Geopolitics: Chips, China, Spies and PowerAI Derangement Syndrome: Who Cares If the Cover Was Made With AI?How to Write a Plot Twist Readers Never See ComingBook Ads Getting Clicks but No Sales? The Problem Is the PageCan Writing a Memoir Make You Sick? The Toll Nobody Warns You AboutWhen Caregiving Ends and the Words Won’t ComeCan You Publish a Clean and a Spicy Version of the Same Book?Do You Need a Writing Buddy? What Works and What Doesn’tCan You Put Someone Who Wronged You in Your Novel?Kindle Unlimited or Wide? Where to Publish Your Debut NovelWriting Vampires: How to Build Your Own Vampire RulesWhat Software Do Novelists Use to Write a Book?What If Your Family Doesn’t Support Your Writing?ARC Reviews: Real Follow-Through Numbers, and Do Reviews Sell Books?The AI Singularity: Would a Conscious AI Even Care About Us?“Forbidden” AI Prompts: Why Viral Prompt Lists Are Mostly JunkAuthor Scam Emails: Fake Agents, Flattery and the $500 PitchWill AI Steal My Book? Turn Off Training Before You UploadThe Fear of Being Judged for Your Memoir: My Father Told Everyone to Burn MineShould You Only Use “Said” in Dialogue Tags? My Rules for Tags and AdverbsWhy a Good Book Isn’t Enough: Agents, Quiet Novels and What SellsShe Asked How to Format Her Comic for KDP. The Thread Went to War Over AI.Why Are Writing Groups So Hostile?My Ghostwriter Stopped Responding. What Do I Do?My Ghostwriter Missed the Deadline. What Are My Options?I Hate My Ghostwriter’s First Draft. Now What?Can I Get a Refund From a Ghostwriter?How Many Revisions Should a Ghostwriter Include?Can My Ghostwriter List My Book in Their Portfolio?My Family Doesn’t Want Me to Publish My Ghostwritten Memoir. Now What?Should a Ghostwriter Write a Free Sample Chapter?How Much Does a Ghostwriter Take Up Front?Can a Ghostwriter Get Me a Book Deal or a Literary Agent?Can I Work With a Ghostwriter Over Zoom or From Another Country?Ghostwriting a Tribute Book, Eulogy or Obituary for Someone You LostCan a Ghostwriter Write My Book in Spanish?Ghostwriting a Book for a Dental or Chiropractic PracticeWhy Keynote Speakers Need a Ghostwritten BookGhostwriting a Science or Research Book for General ReadersGhostwriting a Book for Teachers and EducatorsHiring a Ghostwriter for a Pilot’s or Aviation MemoirHiring a Ghostwriter for a Musician’s MemoirCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Whistleblower Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for an Immigrant’s StoryCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write About Losing Someone to Suicide?Can a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Depression or Mental Illness Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for a Special-Needs Parent’s Memoir

Ms. Marvel (2022) Review

Ms. Marvel (2022) Review

TL;DR: Ms. Marvel (2022) rates 1 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. The family material and the Partition episode belong to a good show, and they’re surrounded by a superhero origin whose purpose is to place a character in a film released fifteen months later.
Ms. Marvel (2022)
1/10

A teenager in Jersey City who writes fan fiction about the Avengers finds a bangle in her grandmother’s things, puts it on, and discovers she can produce solid light. The 1 is about function instead of craft. Nothing here’s incompetently made. The direction is lively, the visual style is the most distinctive of any Phase 4 series, and the lead is likeable. What the 1 registers is what happens when you strip the introduction obligation away and ask what the story is about. The answer is a young woman getting powers so that a later film has somebody to put in it.

What frustrates me about Ms. Marvel is how good the buried show is. There’s a lovely series about a Jersey City family in here, and every episode the studio shoves it aside to deliver a character to a film. A lousy show failing on its own terms would annoy me less than this does, and that’s why the number sits so low.

The Visual Grammar Works

Text messages appear on buildings. Doodles animate across walls. A daydream becomes a full illustrated sequence and then collapses back into a bedroom.

It’s the most distinctive-looking project of the phase and the technique is doing something instead of decorating. The animation externalizes an interior life, so the audience is inside the head of somebody who narrates her own existence.

The directing teams, including Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah, bring real energy to the Jersey City material, and the first episode has more visual invention in it than most of the films that year.

Iman Vellani is the other thing that works. She plays enthusiasm without becoming grating, which is harder than it sounds, and her fandom is written as specific instead of as a character trait announced once. Vellani was a fan of the comics before she was cast, had no professional credits, and the casting is the kind of decision that usually goes wrong and didn’t. Her enthusiasm reads as belonging to the person instead of to the performance. That isn’t a thing that can be directed into somebody.

Vellani is the best argument for the series, and I’d gladly watch her carry something with a real story. It irks me to see that much charm spent explaining a bangle.

For Writers

Externalizing interiority is legitimate and underused. A character whose imagination appears on the world around her tells the reader what she’s like continuously, without a line of introspection. The requirement is that the device track a state instead of run constantly. The animation here appears when she’s inventing and stops when she’s frightened. That’s how the audience learns to read it.

For prose the equivalent is a narrator whose figurative language belongs to her instead of to you. What she compares things to is characterization, and most writers spend those comparisons on themselves.

The Family Is the Good Show

Mohan Kapur and Zenobia Shroff play parents who are strict, loving, embarrassing and entirely specific, and every scene in that house is better than the plot around it.

The wedding episode is the series at its best. An extended family, a ceremony, competing opinions, an aunt with an agenda and a teenager who wants to leave, all of it handled with the density of people who have known each other too long.

The wedding episode is the one I’d keep. That aunt with an agenda entertained me more than any villain in the phase, and I resent how quickly the show hurries back to its plot afterward.

Matt Lintz’s Bruno and Yasmeen Fletcher’s Nakia are written with the same care. A friend who’s in love and won’t say it, and a friend running for a mosque board on a platform about the women’s entrance, both given wants unrelated to the superhero plot. The mosque material is the most detailed thing in the phase. A congregation, a leaky roof, a board election and an argument about who the building serves, treated as ordinary life instead of as an establishing shot.

Sheikh Abdullah is the smallest and best example. A religious figure written as a reasonable man with a sense of humor, giving practical advice, who’s neither an obstacle nor a source of wisdom delivered on cue. Almost no American television manages that with any clergy at all.

The Partition Episode

The fifth episode goes to 1947, to a railway station during the partition of India, and follows a family being separated in a crowd. It’s good television and it belongs to a different show. Filmed with weight, specificity and no fantasy business for long stretches, and the sequence of a child being lost and found is the only time the series generates real feeling.

The problem is what it’s attached to. The historical material is framed as the explanation of a bangle, so a real catastrophe that displaced millions becomes backstory for a piece of jewelry. That instrumentalizing is the series’ central failure in its clearest form, and it’s cruel to the history. When the best material exists to explain a plot device, the show has told you what it values. Partition deserved better than to serve as a receipt for a piece of jewelry.

For Writers

Historical material used as backstory for a fantasy object will always feel like a use. If you’re going to put a real catastrophe in your work, give it a section of its own and let it be the subject there.

The test is whether the scene would survive removing the fantasy element. This one nearly does. That’s why it’s the best thing in the series and also why the framing around it grates.

Ask what your reader will remember. If it’s the historical sequence and not the plot it serves, you’ve written the wrong book and the good version is visible inside it.

The Plot Is an Arrangement

The antagonists are a group of displaced beings who want to return home, whose motivation changes twice across six episodes, and who are replaced midway by a government agency pursuing the protagonist.

Neither threat accumulates. The Clandestines arrive, state a goal, become hostile, and are dispatched. The agency arrives and escalates, and a community rallying at a school resolves it.

Najma is the clearest waste. A woman who has been separated from her home for seventy-five years, played with real conviction, whose motivation the series restates three times in different terms because it hasn’t decided whether she’s desperate or malevolent. A displaced person who can’t go back is a subject, and the show uses her as an obstacle.

The powers were changed from the source, where the character stretches and reshapes, to hard light constructs. The stated reasons were practical, and the dramatic result is that her ability has no relationship to who she is, where the original had an obvious one about a person trying to fit different shapes. The finale is a school under siege, a speech, and a new name, followed by a scene in which somebody arrives to recruit her. That scene is the purpose, and the six episodes before it are the arrangement around it.

Kamran gets the worst of it, and he’s where I run out of patience. He’s introduced as a romantic possibility, revealed as connected to the antagonists, handed powers he didn’t ask for and then dropped by the plot in the last twenty minutes. That’s what happens when a character exists to move a bangle story forward.

What the Score Measures

A 1 next to a series with this much visible craft in it needs explaining, and the explanation is about why it exists.

Take the introduction obligation away. Remove the requirement that this character appear in a film in November 2023, and ask what story remains. A teenager with a supportive and frustrating family, a crush, a mosque election and a grandmother in Karachi with a history.

That show would be worth watching and this isn’t that show, because every episode has to also deliver a power, a threat, an escalation and an eventual costume. The good material is the residue of a different project running underneath.

The reception made the point in its own way. People widely praised the series for exactly the elements that have nothing to do with the franchise, the family, the neighborhood and the humor, and it had the lowest viewership of any Marvel series to that point. The part people liked wasn’t the part Marvel commissioned it to deliver, and the part Marvel commissioned it to deliver is the only reason that any of the rest of it was ever written, cast, or put in front of a single camera anywhere.

The clearest evidence is the ending. A series that had been about family, faith and a neighborhood concludes with a stranger arriving to say that the protagonist is now part of something larger. That’s an advertisement in the shape of a final scene.

For Writers

A character who exists to be available later has no reason to be interesting now, and audiences detect the difference between a person and a placement almost immediately.

The test is whether the story would still need telling if nothing followed it. If the answer is no, you’ve written an advertisement with a plot attached. The fix isn’t removing the connection. Give the character a want that would exist even if the wider project were canceled, so the introduction becomes a side effect of a story instead of its purpose.

Should you watch Ms. Marvel?

Watch the wedding and the Partition episode, and let the rest go. It’s a 1 from me because a series with this much good material in it was built to hand somebody off to a film, and I can’t get past the waste. The family, the mosque and Vellani deserved a show of their own.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ms. Marvel about?
A teenager in Jersey City who writes Avengers fan fiction finds a bangle among her grandmother’s things and gains the ability to produce solid light, while a group of displaced beings and a government agency pursue her.
Is Ms. Marvel badly made?
No, and the score isn’t about craft. The visual style is the most distinctive of any Phase 4 series, the direction is lively and the lead is likeable. The 1 is about why the series exists.
What is the best part in Ms. Marvel?
The family and the mosque material. A congregation with a leaky roof and a board election treated as ordinary life, and a wedding episode with the density of people who have known each other too long.
Is the Partition episode good?
Yes, and it belongs to a different show. It’s filmed with real weight and it’s framed as the explanation of a bangle, so a catastrophe that displaced millions becomes backstory for a piece of jewelry.
Why were the powers changed?
The source character stretches and reshapes and the series gives her hard light constructs. The stated reasons were practical, and the result is an ability with no relationship to who she is, where the original had an obvious one.
What is wrong with the plot?
Nothing accumulates. One set of antagonists states a goal, becomes hostile and is dispatched, then an agency takes over and is resolved by a community rallying at a school.
Do I need to watch Ms. Marvel?
For the film it sets up, yes. That’s the complaint. On its own merits, watch the wedding episode and the Partition episode and you’ll have seen what’s alive in it.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.