Mindhunter – “Episode 1” (S1E1, 2017) Review

A man in his underwear on a street in Pennsylvania, holding his wife hostage, shouting that he has become invisible. An FBI negotiator talks to him for a long time, carefully, correctly, and it does not work.

The 9 is for an hour that establishes an entire series by refusing to do any of the things a pilot normally does. There is no case of the week, no antagonist, no chase, and the protagonist ends the episode having achieved nothing except an idea.

It is also drawn from a real program. The FBI Behavioral Science Unit conducted these interviews in the late 1970s, the resulting classifications are still in use, and the book the series takes its title from was written afterward by one of the agents who was there.

What it is about is language. A man realizes that the categories available to him for describing why people do things are insufficient, and spends an hour looking for better ones.

The Opening Fails

The hostage negotiation is the episode’s inciting incident and Holden Ford does everything correctly. He establishes rapport, he keeps talking, he identifies what the man needs, and the man kills himself anyway.

That is an unusual way to open a series. A pilot almost always demonstrates competence, because the audience needs to believe the protagonist is worth following, and this one demonstrates the limits of competence instead.

The detail that matters is what Holden says afterward. He does not conclude that he failed, he concludes that the framework was wrong, because nothing he was taught accounts for a man who says he has become invisible.

Everything in the next two seasons follows from that scene. The character’s entire project is a response to a vocabulary problem he encountered in an hour of television that is mostly two men talking across a street.

The man on the street is also given a genuine complaint. He says his wife has left, that nobody can see him, that he has become invisible, and the episode does not treat any of that as delusion. It treats it as a description Holden has no category for.

Two Men Talking in Cars

A very large proportion of this episode is conversations in vehicles, bars and classrooms, shot with two people and a static or slowly moving camera.

Fincher’s approach is entirely restrained. Long takes, symmetrical framing, dialogue that runs at real conversational length, and almost no music outside the transitions. The pace is deliberate enough to be off-putting for anybody expecting a crime series, and it establishes immediately that this show is about discussion.

The road school sequences are the best of it. Holden and Tench teaching hostage negotiation to bored local police in small towns, badly, to rooms of men who do not want to be there. That is where the series finds its actual texture, which is institutional resistance to a new idea.

The dialogue is also unusually good at a specific thing, which is people being slightly wrong in interesting ways. Nobody in this episode has the correct answer and everybody has a partial one.

Holt McCallany is the reason the road school works. Tench is older, has no interest in theory, has been doing the job for twenty years, and is the one who notices that Holden is onto something before Holden can articulate it.

Debbie

Hannah Gross plays a graduate student Holden meets in a bar, and the relationship is the episode’s second engine.

What she supplies is the language he is missing. She is studying sociology, uses terms he has not encountered, and introduces him to the idea that deviance is a social category instead of a fixed property. The conversation where she explains this is doing exposition and it does not read as exposition, because she is flirting and correcting him at the same time.

That is a difficult trick and worth studying. A character who delivers necessary information while pursuing something else is invisible as a device, and the audience registers the pursuit instead of the information.

The relationship also establishes what Holden is like, which is somebody who absorbs frameworks rapidly and does not fully understand the people supplying them.

Jonathan Groff plays that quality exactly right. Holden is eager, slightly prim, visibly delighted by a new idea, and consistently the least self-aware person in any room he is in, which is a difficult thing to make watchable for nineteen hours.

No Killer Appears

The episode contains no murderer, no crime scene, no body and no case. Kemper does not arrive until the second episode.

That restraint is the most confident decision in the hour. A series about interviewing serial killers spends its first episode entirely on the question of why anybody would want to, which means the interviews arrive with a reason attached.

Compare what almost every other pilot on this page does. Dexter opens with a kill. Hannibal opens with a crime scene reconstruction. True Detective opens with a body in a field. All three are effective and all three establish a register before establishing a person.

Kemper is also the correct first interview and the series knows it. He is articulate, cooperative, enormous, and entirely willing to explain himself, which means the vocabulary problem is solved by somebody who has already done the work of describing himself.

What this earns is that when Kemper does appear, the audience already knows what is at stake in the conversation, which is whether the vocabulary Holden has been looking for exists at all.

Fincher and the Series

Fincher directed four episodes of the first season including this one, produced the whole thing, and the visual discipline holds across the run even under other directors.

The look is consistent and specific. Muted color, hard sources, faces lit from one side, almost no handheld, and an insistence on symmetry that makes the interview scenes feel like arrangements instead of encounters.

The sound design is doing the same work quietly. Rooms have air, fluorescent lights buzz, tape recorders are audible, and the series is precise about the fact that these conversations are being recorded on equipment that makes noise.

The series was never formally cancelled and never continued, which is its own small tragedy. Two seasons exist, the second ends on a case that does not resolve, and the whole thing sits unfinished on a platform.

That fact colors a rewatch of this episode. Everything Holden begins here goes somewhere for nineteen hours and then stops, which is an unusual condition for a work this good to be in.

Anna Torv arrives later as the academic who supplies the methodology, and the series is unusual in making the research itself the plot. Funding, sample size, transcription, institutional approval and interview protocol are all load-bearing across two seasons.

Should you watch Mindhunter S1E1?

Yes, and start here instead of with the interviews everybody talks about. An hour where a negotiation fails, two men drive between small towns teaching bored police officers, and somebody works out that the words available to him do not describe what he has seen.

Frequently Asked Questions