6 / 10
Official trailer
Kingsman: The Golden Circle is Matthew Vaughn’s 2017 sequel to The Secret Service. The film depicts Eggsy and Merlin teaming with the American Statesman intelligence agency after villain Poppy Adams destroys the Kingsman organization. Taron Egerton returns as Eggsy.
Colin Firth returns as Harry Hart, brought back through narrative reversal. Mark Strong returns as Merlin. Julianne Moore plays Poppy. Halle Berry, Channing Tatum, Pedro Pascal, and Jeff Bridges play Statesman agents. Vaughn and Jane Goldman wrote the screenplay.
Twentieth Century Fox produced the film on a budget of approximately 104 million dollars, and it grossed approximately 410 million dollars worldwide. What made the first Kingsman work was that it was lean and a little mean, and this sequel spends its bigger budget on more of everything: more agents, a new villain and a dead man walking back in the door. That’s the problem in a sentence, and it’s why this one sits at a 6 for me.
The sequel works at a reduced level compared with the original.
The screenplay adds a lot of new material: the whole Statesman organization, Poppy’s drug empire and the resurrected Harry Hart. Together those additions ask more than the runtime can carry. Moore’s villain and Tatum’s supporting role hint at a better film than the one that got made, and bringing Firth back undoes the first film’s ending. The result is a competent commercial sequel that doesn’t match what the original achieved.
The Statesman Expansion
The screenplay introduces the entire Statesman American intelligence agency as a parallel organization to Kingsman. The expansion includes multiple new principal characters including the Tatum, Berry, Pascal, and Bridges roles. The character development demands exceed what the runtime can support while maintaining the continuing Kingsman character development.
The expansion looks like franchise planning, a broader universe set up for later films, more than anything this story needed. The Statesman characters never get enough development to carry their weight. Tatum is the sorriest casualty, and it’s the script’s fault. He’s a performer with range, and the film parks him in one note and leaves him there. I’d have cut two of the new agents and given the rest room to matter.
For Writers
Franchise expansion can compete with single-film storytelling in ways that damage both functions. Apply this to creative work broadly. Consider whether your continuation work serves immediate story or builds broader infrastructure. Both functions are legitimate but often conflict.
The Firth Resurrection
The screenplay resurrects Harry Hart through narrative reversal of the original film’s dramatic conclusion. The character had died in the original through committed dramatic situation. The sequel reverses this through medical recovery mechanism that the wider narrative doesn’t adequately justify. The resurrection produces dramatic damage that the film can’t fully overcome.
The reversal looks like a commercial decision to keep Firth in the franchise, since the original death limited how much more he could do in it.
It gets him back at the cost of the first film’s logic, and it’s the film’s worst choice. A death that meant something got traded for a cast list. I like Firth as much as anybody, and I’d still have left him buried.
For Writers
Commercial considerations can override dramatic logic that source work has established. Apply this to creative work broadly. Consider whether your continuation choices preserve source dramatic logic or substitute commercial reversal.
The Moore Villain
Julianne Moore’s performance as Poppy Adams provides one of the work’s stronger elements. The character is a 1950s-Americana-obsessed drug kingpin whose specific cheerful menace the actress establishes through accumulated behavior. Moore plays the role through sustained tonal commitment that the surrounding work doesn’t consistently match.
The casting plays against Moore’s prestige reputation, and she commits fully to a cartoon villain’s tone. She’s the best reason to bother with this film.
A drug kingpin with a 1950s Americana obsession and a hostess’s smile is a lovely, odd idea, and Moore plays it as though it were the most normal thing in the world. I wish the movie around her had matched her nerve.
For Writers
Committed casting subversion can produce dramatic content that conventional casting can’t generate. Apply this to creative work broadly. Consider whether your contributor choices subvert audience expectations or work within established tone.
Craft Note
Vaughn’s continuing collaboration with Goldman maintains the working methods that the original Kingsman production had established. The completed sequel shows how established working methods can support production without producing matching creative results. Working methods alone can’t guarantee creative achievement when the source material doesn’t support continuing development.
Is Kingsman: The Golden Circle worth watching?
Kingsman: The Golden Circle is a competent commercial sequel that doesn’t come near the original. The Statesman expansion crowds the story, the Firth resurrection trades the first film’s ending for box office, and Julianne Moore is the best thing in it. That’s why it sits at a 6 for me.
There’s enough fun here to keep a fan of the first film busy for an evening, and too much franchise bookkeeping for me to rate it any higher. The original remains the much stronger film.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Kingsman: The Golden Circle (2017), The Numbers
- Kingsman: the Golden Circle review, BFI Sight and Sound
- Kingsman: The Golden Circle (2017), IMDb
