Latest
How Much AI Is Too Much in Writing? 83 Writers Drew the Same LinePost an AI Image and Unfriend MeShe Asked How to Publish Her Bedtime Story. They Called Her a Thief.The AI Hype Cycle: Why the Crash Is Coming, and Who’s Causing ItSix Claude Prompts That Get You Unstuck, and Why the Order MattersDogpiled Over AI Art at the Renaissance FaireClaude Opus 5.5: What the New Release Means for WritersTrump’s AI Force Is a Fire Department With No Fire CodeMonthly or Milestone: How Ghostwriting Gets BilledThe Hugging Face AI Agent Attack: An Operations ReadingWhat It Costs to Fix an AI-Written ManuscriptWhen Your Memoir Should Be a NovelWhat Belongs on a Copyright PageThe Clients Who Pay and VanishWhat an AI Detector Score on Your Manuscript Is WorthThe Quotation Marks That Get Authors SuedThe One-Hour Call Before I Quote Your BookWhen Your Own Memoir Sounds Like BraggingThe Work You Would Never Have StartedWhen a Client Thinks the Ghostwriter Used AIBehind the Book: The Mysterious Island, Neb’s SideHow to Organize Decades of Memories Into a MemoirWhy Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small Sites

Come and See (1985)

TL;DR: Come and See (1985) rates 10 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Come and See follows a Belarusian boy who joins the partisans in 1943 and walks straight into the Nazi campaign of extermination that burned hundreds of villages with their people inside. Elem Klimov made it for the fortieth anniversary of the war’s end, and it’s the most devastating war film ever made. I rate it a 10, and it’s a film most people watch once.
Come and See (1985)
10 / 10

The War Film That Leaves a Mark

Come and See is the most devastating war film ever made. I rate it a 10, and it’s a film most people can only bring themselves to watch once. Both of those things are true for the same reason. It doesn’t show war as an adventure, a tragedy with heroes or a lesson with a comforting moral. It shows a boy walking into the machinery of extermination and coming out the other side with the face of an old man.

Elem Klimov directed it, and it came out in 1985, for the fortieth anniversary of the end of the Second World War. He had fought for years with Soviet censors to make it, and after it was released he never directed another film. He said he felt he had done everything he could do in cinema. After watching it, you understand why.

This isn’t a review in the usual sense. It’s an attempt to say what the film does and why it matters, without describing its worst moments in more detail than they need. Anyone who wants to know exactly what happens can watch it.

Flyora

The film opens in 1943, in German-occupied Belarus. Two boys dig in the sand of a battlefield, looking for a rifle, so that they can join the Soviet partisans fighting in the forests. One of them, Flyora, finds one, and he’s delighted. His mother begs him not to go. He goes anyway, cheerful and proud, with the rifle over his shoulder.

Aleksei Kravchenko was fourteen when he played Flyora, and he had never acted before. At the start of the film he’s a round-faced, grinning boy who sees war as an adventure and a chance to be a man. The whole film is the story of what happens to that face.

The partisans take him in, and then leave him behind when they move out, because he’s too young and too inexperienced. It’s his first humiliation, and it saves his life, for a while. He cries with frustration as he watches them march away, and the audience, who know what’s coming, feel something closer to relief.

Glasha and the Forest

Left alone at the partisan camp, Flyora meets Glasha, a teenage girl who has been living with the partisans. Olga Mironova plays her with a strange, fey quality, laughing, dancing in the rain, talking about love and the future. For a short, strange stretch, the film becomes almost lyrical: two young people in a forest, in the middle of a war, trying to be children.

Then the camp is bombed. The attack is terrifying, shot from ground level with trees splintering and earth erupting, and Flyora is left partly deaf. The soundtrack, from this point on, is often muffled, ringing and distorted, and we hear the world the way he does. It’s one of the most effective uses of sound in any film, and it puts the audience inside his body for the rest of the story.

Flyora and Glasha make their way back to his village, and find it empty. Flyora insists his family must be hiding. Glasha looks back and sees what he refuses to see, and they run. Klimov never shows us directly. He shows us her face, and the brief glimpse she gets over her shoulder is enough.

For Writers

After the bombing, the soundtrack becomes muffled and ringing, and the audience hears the world as Flyora does. One technical choice puts the viewer inside his body.

When you write a character’s trauma, telling the reader how they feel is weaker than changing how the world is described to match what they can perceive.

After a shocking event in your story, alter your prose to reflect the character’s state: shorter sentences, missing sounds, details that won’t tone. Let the reader feel the change.

The Bog

The two of them, desperate to reach safety, wade through a bog to an island where the surviving villagers have taken refuge. Few sequences in any film are as exhausting: the two young people sinking, struggling, crying and dragging themselves through the mud, for what feels like an eternity.

Klimov doesn’t cut away. He makes us wade with them. By the time they reach the island, Flyora has broken, and he has begun to understand what has happened to his mother and sisters. His face has started to change. The grin of the opening scene has gone, and it won’t come back. Klimov keeps his camera close, and every scene from here on is partly a study of that face.

On the island, the villagers tell him the truth, and he turns on them in rage and grief, and then collapses. It’s the moment his childhood ends. Everything that follows is seen through the eyes of someone who has already lost everything, and the film never lets him, or us, recover.

The Hunt for Food

The partisans send Flyora with a small group to find food for the starving villagers, and the group walks into a minefield and is killed one by one. Flyora survives and, with another man, steals a cow from a farm. They’re caught in the open by German fire, and the cow is killed, and Flyora hides behind its body, sobbing.

These sequences are harrowing in a quieter way than the rest of the film. There are no great battles, no heroism, only hunger, fear and the random death of anyone who happens to be standing in the wrong place. Flyora has stopped being a soldier. He’s a boy trying to survive. The rifle he dug up so proudly at the start has become a burden, and the war he wanted to join has turned out to be nothing like the stories.

The Village

Flyora ends up in a village called Perekhody at the moment a German unit arrives to destroy it. He’s swept up with the villagers, who are herded into a wooden barn. What happens next is the center of the film, and it’s the reason Come and See is unlike any other war film.

I won’t describe it in detail. The Germans and their collaborators make a show of the destruction, playing music, laughing, taking photographs. The barn is set on fire. Flyora is pulled out, forced to pose for a photograph with a gun to his head, and then abandoned. He watches the village burn.

Klimov films it in long, unbroken takes, and he refuses to look away. The film isn’t interested in suspense or spectacle. It wants the audience to witness what happened, and to feel what Flyora feels, and it makes that impossible to escape. It’s the hardest sequence I’ve ever sat through in a film, and I don’t think it could have been made any other way.

For Writers

Klimov refuses to cut away from the village. The long takes deny the audience the relief of editing, and they have to witness everything Flyora does.

When you write a scene of atrocity or grief, the instinct is often to summarize and move on quickly. Sometimes the story’s moral weight depends on not looking away.

Identify the scene your story most needs the reader to witness. Slow it down, stay in it and resist every urge to summarize. Trust the reader to bear it.

The History

This isn’t invention. During the German occupation of Belarus, hundreds of villages were destroyed in exactly this way, often with their populations inside, as part of a deliberate campaign against partisans and civilians. The most famous is Khatyn, whose memorial stands today. A caption at the end of the film says 628 Belarusian villages were burned, along with all their inhabitants.

The screenplay was co-written by Ales Adamovich, a Belarusian writer who had fought with the partisans as a teenager and who had collected survivors’ testimony about the burned villages. His books, and the testimony in them, are the foundation of the film. Klimov and Adamovich wanted the audience to understand that this happened and to remember the dead.

That’s where the title comes from. It’s taken from the Book of Revelation, where each of the four horsemen is introduced with the words come and see. The film is an invitation to witness. It asks the audience to look at what happened and not turn away. It’s exactly what the survivors asked of Adamovich when they told him their stories.

The Face

Aleksei Kravchenko’s face is the film’s most famous image. By the end, the round, grinning boy of the opening is haggard, grey, lined and hollow-eyed, like an old man. No makeup could achieve it entirely. Klimov shot the film in chronological order, and Kravchenko’s exhaustion and distress were real.

There are many stories about the filming, some of them probably exaggerated: that live ammunition was used in some scenes, that Kravchenko was hypnotised to protect him from the trauma, that his hair turned grey. What’s clear is that the young actor was put through a terrible ordeal. His performance ranks with the finest ever given by a child.

Kravchenko went on to a long acting career in Russia. He has said that the experience of making the film stayed with him for the rest of his life. He understood only later what Klimov had been asking of him. Watching his eyes in the final scenes, it’s hard to believe he was acting at all.

The Ending

After the village, the partisans catch the unit responsible and hold a makeshift trial in a field. The collaborators beg and blame each other. The German officer explains, calmly, why whole peoples must be destroyed. The partisans execute them. It’s played without triumph. Nothing that happens in that field can undo the barn, and everyone there knows it.

Then Flyora, alone, finds a framed portrait of Hitler in a puddle and begins to shoot it. As he fires, the film cuts to newsreel footage running backwards: the war undoing itself, the rallies reversing, the armies retreating, and Hitler growing younger and younger until he’s a baby in his mother’s arms. Flyora stops. He can’t shoot the baby.

It’s the most extraordinary ending I know. After everything the film has shown, it asks whether the evil could have been stopped at its source, and Flyora’s answer, even now, is that he won’t kill a child. Then he runs to rejoin the partisans, and the camera follows them into the forest as Mozart’s Requiem plays.

For Writers

After everything, Flyora can’t shoot a baby, even the baby Hitler. The film ends on a refusal, not a victory.

When you write an ending, the most powerful choice can be one your character refuses to make, especially when the reader half wants them to make it.

Offer your character, at the end, a chance for a final act of revenge or violence, and let them decline. Make the refusal cost something and reveal who they’ve become.

What Come and See Gets Right

Because it does what almost no war film has the courage to do: it refuses to make war exciting. There’s no heroic charge and no glorious sacrifice. There’s a boy, a rifle, a forest and a village, and the unimaginable cruelty of an occupying army toward people who couldn’t defend themselves. The film makes the audience feel that cruelty as something that was done to real people, in real places, within living memory.

It’s also a masterpiece of filmmaking: the sound, the long takes, the direct looks into the camera, the use of real locations and non-professional actors, the color drained almost to nothing. Every technique is used to put the audience inside Flyora’s experience and hold them there. It’s not a film to enjoy. It’s a film to endure and remember, and it deserves to be seen, once, by everyone who wants to understand what that war was.

Craft Note

Craft Note

Come and See follows one boy’s face across a single campaign of atrocity, and lets the change in that face carry the film’s argument. It never needs a speech to explain what war does to people.

When you write about something vast, statistics and overviews numb the reader. A single person’s experience, followed closely, makes the scale bearable and real.

Choose one character to carry the weight of your story’s largest event. Show the event only as they experience it, and let the change in them measure the cost.

The Verdict on Come and See

Yes, once, with full attention and knowing what you’re going into. It’s a 10. It’s the most important war film ever made. It’s also extremely distressing. It’s not a film to watch casually or with young people. Watch it to understand, not to be entertained.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Come and See (1985) about?
A teenage boy named Flyora joins the Soviet partisans in German-occupied Belarus in 1943. Over the course of the film, he witnesses the Nazi campaign of extermination against the Belarusian countryside, including the destruction of a village and its people. The film follows the physical and psychological transformation of the boy as he experiences these atrocities.
Who directed Come and See?
Elem Klimov, a Soviet director who spent years fighting censors to make the film. It was released in 1985 for the fortieth anniversary of the end of the Second World War. Klimov co-wrote it with Ales Adamovich, a Belarusian writer and former partisan. Klimov never directed another feature, saying he felt he had done all he could in cinema.
Is Come and See based on true events?
Yes. It draws on the real destruction of hundreds of Belarusian villages during the German occupation, often with their inhabitants inside, as part of an anti-partisan campaign. The screenplay is based on survivors’ testimony collected by Ales Adamovich. The film ends with a caption stating that 628 Belarusian villages were burned with all their inhabitants.
What does the title Come and See mean?
It comes from the Book of Revelation, chapter six, in which each of the four horsemen of the apocalypse is introduced with the words come and see. The title presents the film as an invitation to witness catastrophe. Klimov and Adamovich wanted audiences to see what happened in Belarus and remember the dead.
How old was the lead actor in Come and See?
Aleksei Kravchenko was fourteen when he played Flyora, and he had no previous acting experience. His transformation over the course of the film, from a cheerful boy into a haggard, aged figure, is astonishing for an actor so young. He went on to a long acting career in Russia.
Why is Come and See considered one of the greatest war films?
Because it refuses to glorify war or offer comfort. It uses sound, long takes and direct looks into the camera to place the viewer inside a boy’s experience of atrocity. It avoids heroism and spectacle and presents the destruction of civilians as it happened. Many critics consider it the most powerful anti-war film ever made.
Is Come and See too disturbing to watch?
It’s extremely distressing, and viewers should know that before watching. It depicts the mass killing of civilians, including children, in long, unflinching scenes, though much of the worst violence is implied, not shown in graphic detail. It’s not suitable for children. Many viewers say they’re glad they watched it once and never want to see it again.

This film appears on one of my film lists

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.