Latest
It’s Not X, It’s Y: The AI Tell Shakespeare Wrote FirstWho Gets Rich From AI Data Centers? The Local, National and Global EconomyAre AI Data Centers Bad for the Environment? What’s True and What Isn’tAI Data Centers and Geopolitics: Chips, China, Spies and PowerAI Derangement Syndrome: Who Cares If the Cover Was Made With AI?How to Write a Plot Twist Readers Never See ComingBook Ads Getting Clicks but No Sales? The Problem Is the PageCan Writing a Memoir Make You Sick? The Toll Nobody Warns You AboutWhen Caregiving Ends and the Words Won’t ComeCan You Publish a Clean and a Spicy Version of the Same Book?Do You Need a Writing Buddy? What Works and What Doesn’tCan You Put Someone Who Wronged You in Your Novel?Kindle Unlimited or Wide? Where to Publish Your Debut NovelWriting Vampires: How to Build Your Own Vampire RulesWhat Software Do Novelists Use to Write a Book?What If Your Family Doesn’t Support Your Writing?ARC Reviews: Real Follow-Through Numbers, and Do Reviews Sell Books?The AI Singularity: Would a Conscious AI Even Care About Us?“Forbidden” AI Prompts: Why Viral Prompt Lists Are Mostly JunkAuthor Scam Emails: Fake Agents, Flattery and the $500 PitchWill AI Steal My Book? Turn Off Training Before You UploadThe Fear of Being Judged for Your Memoir: My Father Told Everyone to Burn MineShould You Only Use “Said” in Dialogue Tags? My Rules for Tags and AdverbsWhy a Good Book Isn’t Enough: Agents, Quiet Novels and What SellsShe Asked How to Format Her Comic for KDP. The Thread Went to War Over AI.Why Are Writing Groups So Hostile?My Ghostwriter Stopped Responding. What Do I Do?My Ghostwriter Missed the Deadline. What Are My Options?I Hate My Ghostwriter’s First Draft. Now What?Can I Get a Refund From a Ghostwriter?How Many Revisions Should a Ghostwriter Include?Can My Ghostwriter List My Book in Their Portfolio?My Family Doesn’t Want Me to Publish My Ghostwritten Memoir. Now What?Should a Ghostwriter Write a Free Sample Chapter?How Much Does a Ghostwriter Take Up Front?Can a Ghostwriter Get Me a Book Deal or a Literary Agent?Can I Work With a Ghostwriter Over Zoom or From Another Country?Ghostwriting a Tribute Book, Eulogy or Obituary for Someone You LostCan a Ghostwriter Write My Book in Spanish?Ghostwriting a Book for a Dental or Chiropractic PracticeWhy Keynote Speakers Need a Ghostwritten BookGhostwriting a Science or Research Book for General ReadersGhostwriting a Book for Teachers and EducatorsHiring a Ghostwriter for a Pilot’s or Aviation MemoirHiring a Ghostwriter for a Musician’s MemoirCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Whistleblower Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for an Immigrant’s StoryCan a Ghostwriter Help Me Write About Losing Someone to Suicide?Can a Ghostwriter Help Me Write a Depression or Mental Illness Memoir?Hiring a Ghostwriter for a Special-Needs Parent’s Memoir

The Greatest Ray Harryhausen Films

Harryhausen is the only technician on this site with his own page, and the reason is that the films are his instead of the directors’. He developed the sequences, animated them alone, and productions were built around what he intended to make. The method was stop motion combined with rear projection, which he branded Dynamation, allowing a model to appear behind and in front of live-action elements in the same shot. One man in a room positioned every frame by hand, twenty-four a second.

Harryhausen is the reason I still get giddy about practical effects.

Picture one man in a room nudging a model a fraction of an inch, twenty-four times for every second of film, for months on end. You can feel the hand in every shot. Computer creatures can be flawless and not move me at all, and his skeletons, stiff joints and all, delight me.

Spielberg, Lucas, Cameron, Jackson, Burton and Del Toro have all named him directly. Every rating below is the one carried by the review it links to, with ties broken by year.

↑ All Entries

1. Jason and the Argonauts (1963)

► Read the full review of Jason and the Argonauts (1963)

RLR: 10 / 10

"The skeleton fight took four and a half months to animate and has never been surpassed."

Jason and the Argonauts is Harryhausen’s masterpiece and the skeleton sequence is the reason. Seven skeletons fight three men, each skeleton independently animated, with the live actors having rehearsed the choreography against nothing and held it precisely enough to match.

It took four and a half months to produce about three minutes of screen time. The actors had shot their scenes first, fighting empty air to a count, and Harryhausen had to position every skeleton frame by frame to connect with movements already committed to film.

The rest is nearly as strong. Talos the bronze giant turning his head with an audible metal groan, the harpies, and Hydra. Tom Hanks has called it the greatest film ever made. That’s an exaggeration the reviewer here’s closer to than to the people correcting him.

The actors had shot their scenes first, fighting empty air to a count, and Harryhausen had to position every skeleton frame by frame to connect with movements already committed to film.

Talos turning his head with an audible metal groan is the other sequence people remember, and the sound of the joints is doing as much work as the animation.

Tom Hanks has called it the greatest film ever made. That’s an exaggeration this page is closer to than to the people correcting him.

The skeleton fight is my favorite three minutes of effects work on film, and the four and a half months behind it only make me fonder of it. The actors swung at empty air to a count and he matched every blow. Hanks overstates the case, but not by as much as his critics like to think.

For WritersPerformers filmed first, to a count, against empty air, and every skeleton positioned frame by frame to connect with movements already committed. The discipline is the achievement. When you plan something technically demanding, work out the order of operations before you start. Sequencing decides what’s possible, and most projects fail because somebody committed to the easy half first.

↑ All Entries

2. The 7th Voyage of Sinbad (1958)

► Read the full review of The 7th Voyage of Sinbad (1958)

RLR: 9 / 10

"The film where Harryhausen invented the modern fantasy adventure."

The 7th Voyage of Sinbad is the first feature presented in Dynamation as an advertised process. That means it’s the point where the technique became a selling proposition instead of an effect. The creature roster established the template every fantasy adventure has used since: a cyclops, a dragon, a two-headed roc and a skeleton swordsman, encountered in sequence on a voyage.

The skeleton duel here’s the prototype for the seven in Jason five years later, and Bernard Herrmann’s score is the first of four he wrote for Harryhausen and the best of them.

The creature roster established the template every fantasy adventure has used since: a cyclops, a dragon, a two-headed roc and a skeleton swordsman, encountered in sequence on a voyage.

Bernard Herrmann’s score is the first of four he wrote for Harryhausen and the best of them, with the cyclops theme built on low brass that sounds like weight.

It’s the first feature presented in Dynamation as an advertised process. That made the technique a selling proposition instead of an effect. 7th Voyage is pure pleasure for me, the cyclops above all. Herrmann’s low brass gives that creature a weight the model alone couldn’t, and the voyage-of-monsters shape still feels fresh even though every fantasy adventure since has borrowed it. My one small complaint is that Sinbad himself is the least interesting thing on the ship.

For WritersA voyage structure lets you introduce one new thing per stop and never repeat yourself. Cyclops, dragon, roc and skeleton arrive in sequence with no connective plotting required. When you need variety without complication, use a journey. Each destination is a fresh situation and the reader accepts arriving somewhere new far more readily than they accept a new complication at home.

↑ All Entries

3. Mysterious Island (1961)

► Read the full review of Mysterious Island (1961)

RLR: 9 / 10

"Verne adapted with giant animals and a retired Captain Nemo behind all of it."

Mysterious Island adapts Verne’s 1874 novel with heavy liberty, and the liberty is the reason it works. Escaped Civil War prisoners land by balloon on an island populated by oversized creatures. The revelation is that the giants are Nemo’s work. He’s retired to the island after the events of Twenty Thousand Leagues and is enlarging animals to solve world hunger. That’s a interesting motive for a monster movie. The giant crab was made from a real crab shell Harryhausen obtained from a museum, and the sequence in which it’s cooked in a geyser is the most memorable thing in it. Herrmann scored this one as well.

The giant crab was made from a real crab shell Harryhausen obtained from a museum, and the sequence where it’s cooked in a geyser is the most memorable thing in the film. The revelation that Nemo is enlarging animals to solve world hunger is a interesting motive for a monster movie and one almost nothing else has used.

Herrmann scored this one as well, and the balloon escape that opens the film is achieved with miniatures and matte work that still reads.

For WritersGive your monster maker a defensible motive and the creature film becomes something else. Nemo is enlarging animals to solve world hunger, which almost nothing in the genre attempts. When you write somebody producing a threat, look for a reason readers would endorse. A well-intentioned catastrophe is harder to resolve than a malicious one, because nobody in the book can simply be stopped.

↑ All Entries

4. Clash of the Titans (1981)

► Read the full review of Clash of the Titans (1981)

RLR: 9 / 10

"His final film, and a farewell to a medium he helped invent."

Clash of the Titans was Harryhausen’s last film and he retired immediately afterward, at sixty-one, having watched the industry move toward the techniques that would replace him. Medusa is the best thing he ever animated. The sequence is lit almost entirely by firelight, she moves with a rattlesnake tail he studied from life, and the scene is frightening in a way none of his earlier creatures attempted. It made around forty-one million on a fifteen million budget, his most commercially successful production, and the cast included Laurence Olivier, Maggie Smith and Ursula Andress, none of whom the effects needed.

Almost entirely firelit, Medusa moves with a rattlesnake tail Harryhausen studied from life, and is the only one of his creations that’s frightening.

It made around forty-one million on a fifteen million budget, his most commercially successful production, and he retired immediately afterward at sixty-one.

The cast included Laurence Olivier, Maggie Smith and Ursula Andress, none of whom the effects needed, and Bubo the mechanical owl is the one element everybody objects to. I’d show the Medusa scene to anybody who claims stop motion can’t frighten. Harryhausen lit her with firelight and moved her like a real snake, and she’s more unnerving than most digital monsters made since. My only gripe is Bubo the owl, and I’d cut him without a second thought.

For WritersStudy a real animal and the imaginary one becomes credible. Medusa moves with a rattlesnake tail Harryhausen took from life. That’s why she’s the only one of his creations that frightens. When you invent a creature, base its movement on something observable. Readers accept any appearance and reject impossible behavior, and behavior is what research can supply.

↑ All Entries

5. Mighty Joe Young (1949)

► Read the full review of Mighty Joe Young (1949)

RLR: 8 / 10

"His first major credit, working under the man who animated King Kong."

Mighty Joe Young is where Harryhausen’s career begins properly. He worked under Willis O’Brien, who had animated King Kong in 1933 and was effectively his teacher, and did the majority of the animation himself.

The film won the Academy Award for special effects and O’Brien collected it. That’s a fair reflection of the credit structure and not of the work. The burning orphanage finale is the sequence that matters, and Joe is animated with more personality than Kong was. That’s the direction Harryhausen would take for the next thirty years. Harryhausen worked under Willis O’Brien, who had animated King Kong sixteen years earlier and was effectively his teacher, and did the majority of the animation himself.

The film won the Academy Award for special effects and O’Brien collected it. That reflects the credit structure instead of the work.

The Oscar going to O’Brien was unjust. Harryhausen did most of the animation, and the credit system of the day kept his name off the statue. I enjoy the film for Joe’s personality, though outside the orphanage fire it runs a bit too sweet for my taste.

Joe is animated with more personality than Kong was. That’s the direction Harryhausen would take for the next thirty years.

For WritersPersonality is the achievement instead of the technique. Joe is animated with more interiority than Kong was. That’s the direction Harryhausen pursued for thirty years. When you build something non-human, decide what it wants before you decide what it looks like. Readers form attachments to intention, and the most detailed creature with no inner life remains an obstacle.

↑ All Entries

6. The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms (1953)

► Read the full review of The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms (1953)

RLR: 8 / 10

"His first solo feature, and it started the atomic monster cycle."

The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms is Harryhausen’s first film as sole animator and it launched an entire subgenre. A nuclear test in the Arctic wakes a dinosaur. That swims south and destroys New York. It was released a year before Godzilla and the Japanese production has acknowledged the influence. The atomic monster cycle of the 1950s begins here. The Coney Island finale, with the creature destroying a rollercoaster while a marksman climbs it with a radioactive isotope, is the film in one image, and it was made for around two hundred thousand dollars.

It was released a year before Godzilla and the Japanese production has acknowledged the influence. That makes this the origin of the atomic monster film in both hemispheres.

The Coney Island finale has the creature destroying a rollercoaster while a marksman climbs it carrying a radioactive isotope. That’s the film in one image.

It cost around two hundred thousand dollars to make and is Harryhausen’s first film as sole animator.

I’m fond of the Beast because it started so much on so little. Two hundred thousand dollars and a rollercoaster, and the atomic monster cycle was off and running. The human scenes around the creature are stiff, and I’d skip most of them to get back to Coney Island.

For WritersOne image can carry a whole picture. A creature destroying a rollercoaster while a marksman climbs it with a radioactive isotope is the film in a single frame. When you plan a climax, look for a situation that states everything at once. A finale the reader could describe in one sentence has a shape, and shapeless climaxes are the commonest failure in adventure writing.

↑ All Entries

7. 20 Million Miles to Earth (1957)

► Read the full review of 20 Million Miles to Earth (1957)

RLR: 8 / 10

"A creature from Venus grows uncontrollably and dies on the Colosseum."

20 Million Miles to Earth is the most sympathetic creature Harryhausen animated. The Ymir arrives from Venus as a specimen, grows continuously in Earth’s atmosphere, and is hunted through Rome having done nothing except exist.

Harryhausen shot the Rome locations so the finale could take place on the Colosseum, and the sequence in which the creature fights an elephant in a city street is his best use of the process for its own sake.

He regarded the Ymir as among his favorite creations, and the film is the last of his black-and-white productions. The Ymir arrives as a specimen, grows continuously in Earth’s atmosphere, and is hunted through Rome having done nothing except exist. Harryhausen shot the Rome locations so the finale could take place on the Colosseum, and the elephant fight in a city street is the best use of the process for its own sake.

He regarded the Ymir as among his favorite creations, and it’s the last of his black-and-white productions. The Ymir saddens me a little. It never asked to come here, and Rome hunts it anyway. My reservation is the humans doing the hunting, who are so much duller than the thing they’re chasing that I end up on the monster’s side by the halfway mark.

For WritersA creature that has done nothing wrong is more affecting than a malevolent one. The Ymir arrives as a specimen, grows because of the atmosphere, and is hunted through Rome having harmed nobody deliberately. When you write a monster, consider removing its intent. Sympathy and threat can coexist, and an audience that wants the creature to escape is considerably more invested than one waiting for it to die. If you want to go further, read Writing Monsters.

↑ All Entries

8. The Golden Voyage of Sinbad (1973)

► Read the full review of The Golden Voyage of Sinbad (1973)

RLR: 8 / 10

"The six-armed Kali fight, which is the most technically demanding thing he attempted."

The Golden Voyage of Sinbad is the second of the three Sinbad films and the most technically ambitious. The animated statue of Kali fights with six arms at the same time, each independently choreographed against live actors.

That’s the hardest thing on this page after the skeletons, and it’s more difficult because six limbs on one body must remain anatomically coherent while fighting. Tom Baker plays the villain the year before he became Doctor Who, and the film’s ship’s figurehead sequence is the other piece worth the entry. It’s minor Harryhausen and minor Harryhausen is still better than most of what replaced it. The Kali statue fights with six arms at the same time, each independently choreographed against live actors. That’s harder than separate figures because one body must stay coherent.

Tom Baker plays the villain the year before he became Doctor Who, and the ship’s figurehead sequence is the other piece worth the entry.

It’s minor Harryhausen and minor Harryhausen is still better than most of what replaced it.

Every film on this page leaves me grateful and a little sore. The industry swapped the craftsman’s hand for faster, cheaper methods, and plenty of what came after has no weight at all. Kali’s six arms, choreographed frame by frame against live actors, should embarrass half the monsters being rendered today.

For WritersA single body with six independently choreographed arms is harder than six separate figures, because one thing must stay coherent. When you attempt something technically ambitious, understand which version is difficult. Writers routinely choose the impressive-sounding problem over the hard one, and readers can tell which you solved when the result holds together or does not.

↑ Back to Navigation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best Harryhausen film?
Jason and the Argonauts, at a 10. The skeleton fight took four and a half months to animate for about three minutes of screen time, with seven skeletons matched to actors who had rehearsed against empty air.
What was Dynamation?
Harryhausen’s branded combination of stop motion and rear projection. That let a model appear both behind and in front of live-action elements in the same shot. Every frame was positioned by hand, twenty-four to a second.
Which directors has Ray Harryhausen influenced?
Spielberg, Lucas, Cameron, Jackson, Burton and Del Toro have all named him directly. The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms also predates Godzilla by a year and the Japanese production acknowledged it.
What was Ray Harryhausen’s hardest sequence?
The seven skeletons in Jason, then the six-armed Kali in The Golden Voyage of Sinbad. It’s harder because six limbs on one body must stay anatomically coherent while fighting.
Why did Ray Harryhausen stop making films?
Clash of the Titans in 1981 was his last film and he retired at sixty-one and not compete with the techniques that were replacing stop motion. The body of work is finished instead of trailing off.
Where should I start with Ray Harryhausen films?
The 7th Voyage of Sinbad, because it established the template every fantasy adventure has used since, then Jason and the Argonauts for the skeletons.
Which is Ray Harryhausen’s best creature?
Medusa in Clash of the Titans, lit almost entirely by firelight with a rattlesnake tail studied from life, and the only one of his creations that’s frightening and not wondrous.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment