Latest
How to Register a Copyright for Your Book (and What Doesn’t Count)Your AI Chats Aren’t Private: Deleted ChatGPT Logs in CourtI Joined the Science Fiction Book Club 30 TimesThe Board Seat Scam: A 419 Letter in a Business SuitCitations in a Memoir: Endnotes, Footnotes and Fair UseThe Stores That Still Care: Publix, Walmart, Aldi, Best Buy and the RestThe Grocery Store Plan: Why Every Store Starts With FlowersWinnie-the-Pooh’s 100th Birthday: A Century in the Hundred Acre WoodFree With a Fill-Up: How America Stopped Giving Things AwayAI’s Black Box Is Getting a Window. Somebody Still Has to Look Through It“It Stars C. Thomas Howell. No.” Why AI Gets Stuck in a LoopShould You Query or Self-Publish Your Memoir If You’re Not Famous?Judge the Writing, Not the Tool: What the AI Pile-Ons Get WrongThiago Ferreira: Thinkers, Not DoersYana Semova: Let AI Do the AdminLisa Hamilton-Smith: Unstoppable, AI AssistedJack Kerouac Day: The Scroll and the Last AddressTell a Fairy Tale Day: The Stories Everybody EditedKurt Vonnegut Day: The Book That Took Twenty YearsSuperman Day: The $130 Contract Behind the CapeHarry Potter’s Birthday: The Book Twelve Publishers MissedHarper Lee Day: The Draft Her Editor Saw ThroughMaya Angelou Day: The Dare That Became a MemoirInternational Literacy Day: The Readers Books LoseGene Roddenberry Day: The Pilot Who Pitched the StarsInternational Translation Day: The Invisible AuthorsRoald Dahl Day: Six Pencils and a Grudge Against Grown-UpsRaymond Chandler Day: The Novelist Who Started at FiftyElmore Leonard Day: Leave Out the Part Readers SkipEncourage a Young Writer Day: The Adult Who Read the PagesBack to the Future Day: The Script Where Everything Pays OffStephen King Day: The Daily Two ThousandZora Neale Hurston Day: The Ear She TrainedFyodor Dostoevsky Day: The Novels Written Against the ClockIan Fleming Day: Two Thousand Words a MorningEmily Dickinson Day: The Poems in the DrawerRobert E. Howard Day: The Texan Who Built ConanAlice’s Day: The Story Told on a Rowing BoatNational Library Lovers Month: The Building a Town Pays ForF. Scott Fitzgerald Day: The Masterpiece That FloppedNational Podcast Day: The Interview Is the Raw MaterialJohn Steinbeck Day: The Reporter Who Wrote the NovelElmore Leonard’s 10 Rules of Writing, and Which Ones I BreakShould Your Novel Have a Prologue? When a Cold Open Earns Its Place“People Who Use AI Deserve to Be Castrated”: When the Sentence Outruns the CrimeHow Famous Memoirs Were Really Written: What the Collaborators DidLifeOpen: An AutobiographyFlorida RoadkillAmerican Soldier

Star Trek: First Contact (1996) Review

TL;DR: Star Trek: First Contact (1996) rates 7 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. First Contact is the best Star Trek film after Wrath of Khan, and that’s a significant statement given how many entries the franchise has produced. What separates it from the rest is a structural decision that most franchise filmmaking refuses to make: it takes a character’s established trauma and makes it what drives the plot instead of the backstory context for a different plot.

Official trailer

Rating7 / 10

Most franchise filmmaking would have treated Picard’s assimilation by the Borg as backstory and built a different plot on top of it. First Contact, the best Star Trek film after Wrath of Khan, refuses to do that. Picard’s assimilation isn’t something that happened before this story.

It’s this story, generating every major decision Picard makes and several that cost the people around him.

The Borg episodes are why this film exists and why it works. Without the television series establishing what the Borg are, what assimilation means, and what it cost Picard, First Contact is a competent time travel thriller with a good villain. With that context, it’s one of the more psychologically honest entries in the franchise, a film willing to show its hero making decisions driven by damage instead of principle.

To my mind this is the Trek film that comes closest to what made the Borg frightening on television, and I get a real charge out of watching Picard lose his grip. My problem is the back half, where the movie trades that for action set pieces and a Data subplot it wraps up far too fast.

The Borg and What They Mean

Of all the antagonists in the Star Trek universe, the Borg are the most frightening because they violate the franchise’s central assumptions.

Star Trek is optimistic about intelligence and consciousness, it believes that thinking beings can communicate, that difference can be understood, that conflict can be resolved through reason and mutual recognition. The Borg make none of those assumptions possible. They don’t communicate. They assimilate. They don’t recognize difference, they eliminate it.

They’re the franchise’s central nightmare: what happens when you encounter an intelligence for which the values Star Trek holds aren’t values at all but vulnerabilities to exploit.

The Best of Both Worlds, the television two-parter where Picard is assimilated and becomes Locutus, is the moment the Borg became more than a villain type. That episode made the threat personal in ways that the franchise had avoided, it took the hero and turned him into the enemy, used his knowledge and authority against the people who trusted him, and then returned him to himself without resolving what had been done to him. The trauma was real and the series kept it real in later episodes instead of resetting to normal.

First Contact is built entirely on that foundation. The Borg returning triggers something in Picard that all his command authority and philosophical discipline can’t contain, and the film is honest about watching a great man behave badly because of something that was done to him.

For Writers First Contact shows how to use series continuity for a standalone story. The film works for viewers who know the television backstory and works less well for those who don’t, but Frakes and the writers made the right call in building on the established trauma instead of creating a self-contained setup. The depth of what Picard is dealing with is available to any viewer who brings the context, and the film rewards that investment with a portrayal of how sustained trauma affects behavior instead of how it looks in a dramatic monologue. If you’re writing in an established universe, trust that your audience brings what they know and build on it instead of explaining it.

Picard Going Wrong

Patrick Stewart is exceptional in the scenes that require Picard to be wrong. This isn’t easy material. The film needs to show a character whose authority the audience has trusted across seven television seasons making decisions driven by personal damage instead of rational command judgment, and it needs to do so without either excusing the behavior or condemning the man so thoroughly that the character becomes unsympathetic.

Stewart threads this with precision. Picard refusing to evacuate the Enterprise. Picard destroying the Borg with a satisfaction that’s nothing to do with tactics.

Picard quoting Moby Dick at Lily when she challenges him, a choice that’s both intellectual and self-aware, Picard knowing he’s acting like Ahab and not caring because caring would require stepping back from something he can’t step back from. The scene where he smashes the model ships in the display case is the film’s most direct moment: a man whose damage has reached the surface, visible and undeniable.

Lily’s confrontation with him is the film’s best scene because it doesn’t let him get away with the self-awareness. Knowing you’re acting like Ahab isn’t the same as stopping. Alfre Woodard plays Lily with the directness of someone who has no reverence for Picard’s authority and no reason to soften the observation. “You broke your little ships” works because it’s both literally true and figuratively devastating, it names exactly what Picard has been doing throughout the film to everything around him.

That’s the scene I’d point to if anybody asked why I rate Stewart so highly here. “You broke your little ships” lands like a slap, and I’m delighted that Woodard gets to be the one person on screen who isn’t impressed by him.

For Writers First Contact shows how to activate backstory instead of reference it. Picard’s assimilation isn’t mentioned as context, it’s his behavior throughout the film, generating every wrong decision he makes. The difference between backstory as context and backstory as driver is the difference between a character who has a past and a character whose past is still happening to them in the present. Make your protagonist’s wound essential to the plot mechanics. If removing it doesn’t change the story, it isn’t doing its job. The wound should be the reason the plot develops the way it does.

Zefram Cochrane

James Cromwell’s Cochrane is the character I enjoy most, and the comedy comes from the gap between the mythological figure the Enterprise crew expects and the actual man. Cochrane built the warp drive because he needed money.

He’s horrified to discover that his drunken, mercenary act of engineering has become the founding event of a new civilization. The crew’s reverence nauseates him, and a historic site called “Zefram Cochrane’s Hall of the Future” visibly disturbs him. I’d watch him squirm under that hero worship all day.

This works because Cromwell plays Cochrane as a real person instead of as a comic device. His self-deprecation is real instead of performed, he doesn’t think of himself as a visionary, because he wasn’t being one when he built the warp drive. He was being practical. The gap between how he experienced the moment and how history records it’s real to him, and real to the audience watching him deal with the Enterprise crew’s expectations.

Cochrane’s eventual decision to complete the flight, to honor the significance his crew assigns to it even if he can’t share their conviction, is the film’s most moving moment. He does it for them. That’s not the same as doing it for history, but it’s something real and specific, and the film respects it as such.

The Borg Queen Problem

The film’s biggest conceptual compromise is the Borg Queen, and I don’t like what it costs.

The Borg’s horror in the television series was the absence of individual will. There was no queen with desires and plans, only a collective that eliminated individuality entirely. Adding a queen gives the collective a single villain face that makes it narratively manageable and philosophically less disturbing. A Borg with a queen is a conventional hierarchy. A collective without a center is stranger and more threatening, and I’d have kept it that way.

Alice Krige’s performance almost compensates. She plays the Queen with the sensuality of an intelligence that finds individuality interesting because she’s eliminated it in everything she encounters, Data’s emotions are novel to her, interesting in ways that make her more frightening instead of less. The scenes between the Queen and Data are the film’s most unusual and most successful: a negotiation between two kinds of non-human consciousness about the value of humanity, conducted by beings who have different relationships to what they’re discussing.

The Queen is a compromise that the film makes work better than it should. The compromise still costs something from the purity of what the Borg were.

The Second Half Problem

The 7 instead of higher reflects the film’s second half. That leans too heavily on action mechanics at the expense of the character work that makes the first half absorbing. Once Picard’s arc reaches its turning point, Lily’s confrontation, the decision to help the crew evacuate and fight the Borg his way, the film shifts into extended action sequences that are well-executed but less interesting than what preceded them.

The time travel framing keeps the second half connected to the character story through Cochrane’s arc, but the Enterprise sequences in the film’s climax are mostly conventional thriller mechanics. The Borg Queen’s plan to seduce Data into betrayal is more interesting conceptually than it is dramatically, and the resolution of that subplot is too rapid to fully honor the philosophical questions it raises.

I’d have cut some of the climax’s running and shooting and given the Queen and Data one more real scene. Their conversation is the most interesting thing in the film, and the ending treats it like a loose thread to snip on the way out.

The Film’s Best Achievement First Contact is the franchise’s most psychologically honest film about its most important character, willing to show Picard at his worst, making the damage visible instead of hidden, and trusting that the audience’s established investment in who he’s will make watching him fail carry real weight.

Is Star Trek: First Contact worth watching?

First Contact gets its 7 as a franchise film that does what most franchise films refuse to do: engages seriously with its protagonist’s trauma instead of treating it as background detail. The Borg episodes are why this film exists and why Picard’s behavior across it matters.

Stewart’s willingness to play his character wrong and damaged instead of heroic is the performance the film needed. Cochrane is a real character instead of a mythology delivery device.

The action-heavy second half, the Borg Queen compromise and the rushed Data subplot keep it from being the great film its first half promises, and that’s why I stop at a 7. I’m still very glad it exists. It’s the best of the Next Generation films and the second-best Star Trek film behind Wrath of Khan, and Stewart playing Picard damaged and wrong is worth the price of admission on its own.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need to watch the TV series to appreciate Star Trek: First Contact?
You’ll appreciate it more with the context of The Best of Both Worlds and the Borg episodes that establish what assimilation meant for Picard personally. Without that context, the film works as a time travel thriller with a psychological antagonist. With it, the film works as an examination of how sustained trauma affects even the best-prepared people under pressure. Both experiences are available; only one delivers what the film was built to deliver.
Is the Borg Queen a good villain?
Alice Krige makes her work better than the concept deserves. The concept, giving the collective a singular leader, compromises what made the Borg frightening on television. The performance recovers most of what the concept costs. Her sensuality and her real interest in individuality are characteristics that feel earned instead of generic. The scenes with Data are the film’s most intellectually interesting. She’s a good villain despite being a compromise of the franchise’s best antagonist idea.
How does Star Trek: First Contact compare to Wrath of Khan?
Wrath of Khan is the better film, tighter, more complete, more personally devastating in ways that earned instead of used character investment. First Contact is the second-best Star Trek film because it’s similarly willing to damage its protagonist and similarly honest about what that damage looks like. Both films understand that franchise characters only produce real emotional weight when the story is willing to cost them something specific instead of something generic.
What’s Star Trek: First Contact’s central achievement?
Showing Picard at his worst and making it convincing. Seven seasons of television established that he ranks among the most controlled, most principled, most philosophically equipped captains in the franchise. First Contact shows what happens when something gets past all of that: the wound the Borg left is exactly the thing his training and discipline and philosophy can’t reach. That specificity is what raises the film above typical franchise entries.

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.