Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America

O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000) Review

O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000) Review

TL;DR: O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000) rates 8 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. The Coens claimed to be adapting the Odyssey without having read it, which is either a joke or the most useful thing anybody has said about adaptation. The soundtrack outsold the film by a considerable margin.
O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000)
8/10

Three convicts escape a Mississippi chain gang in 1937 chained together at the ankle. Everett has told them there is treasure. There is no treasure. His wife is about to marry somebody else and he needs to get home before the valley is flooded.

The 8 is for a comedy with an unusual amount of structure underneath it. Every episode is a set piece with its own logic, the songs are diegetic and drive the plot, and the whole thing is held together by a man who cannot stop talking.

What keeps it from higher is that the episodic construction occasionally shows. A few sequences exist because the source structure requires an equivalent, and those are the ones where the film feels like it is completing a list.

The Adaptation Nobody Read

The credits state it is based on Homer. The Coens said repeatedly that they had not read the Odyssey, and whether that is true matters less than what it produced.

What the film takes is the shape instead of the content. A man trying to get home, delayed by episodes, a wife with suitors, a blind prophet, sirens, a one-eyed man, and a journey that is really about the delay.

That looseness is the reason it works. An adaptation faithful to the text would have to carry the text’s priorities, and this one carries only the structure, which leaves the Depression South free to supply everything else.

The Delmar baptism scene is the method in one sequence. Two convicts watch a congregation walk into a river singing, one of them joins on impulse, and comes back believing he has been absolved of a crime he definitely committed.

Everett’s response is the joke that makes it. He explains that the state of Mississippi is unlikely to accept a river as a defense, and Delmar is entirely untroubled, because the two men are operating in entirely different systems and neither of them is ever going to persuade the other of anything, which is where the joke lives. Delmar is not stupid and Everett is not right, and the film declines to adjudicate between them.

For Writers

Taking the structure of an old story and none of its content is the most productive form of adaptation available. The shape supplies momentum and the new setting supplies everything the reader will really notice.

The failure mode is reverence. An adaptation that preserves the source’s specifics inherits its priorities, and those priorities belonged to a different audience with different assumptions.

Test it by asking what a reader who does not know the source would experience. Here they would experience a comedy about three escaped convicts, which is the correct answer.

The Music Is the Plot

They record a song for money at a rural radio station under a made-up name, and the record becomes a hit across the state while they are on the run and unaware of it.

That is a genuinely elegant piece of construction. The thing they did casually for eight dollars each is the thing that saves them at the end, and it is planted an hour before it pays.

T Bone Burnett assembled the music and most of it is period or period-derived, recorded live where possible, and none of it is scored over the action. Every song is somebody singing in the world of the film.

The soundtrack sold in the millions, won the Grammy for Album of the Year, and started a commercial revival of old-time American music that outlasted the film’s own reputation by a decade.

The sirens by the river are the best single use of it. Three women washing clothes and singing, filmed as a seduction with no menace in the sound at all, and the sequence works because the song is genuinely beautiful and the men are genuinely stupid.

Clooney Is Doing Comedy Properly

Everett McGill is vain, verbose, dishonest and entirely convinced of his own leadership, and Clooney plays him without a single wink at the audience.

The vocabulary is the joke. He speaks in an elaborate register nobody around him uses, deploys words he has clearly acquired from reading, and is constantly correcting people who are not listening.

The pomade is the running gag and it is doing character work. A man on the run from a chain gang who will not use a different brand of hair product, and who checks his hair in a window while being pursued, has been established completely.

Turturro and Nelson play the other two as genuinely simple instead of as comic idiots, which keeps the trio from becoming a routine. Delmar believes things, Pete resents things, and neither of them is stupid in the same way.

Holly Hunter gets four scenes as the wife and uses them to establish somebody considerably more formidable than her husband. She has invented a story about his death, is engaged to a man with prospects, and is entirely unmoved by the return of a person she describes as a suitor.

For Writers

A verbose character is funny when nobody around him understands the register and the story never acknowledges the gap. The moment another character remarks on his vocabulary, the joke becomes shared and stops working.

Give the vanity a physical object. The pomade converts a character trait into a running action with plot consequences, which is more useful than any number of lines about vanity.

Differentiate your comic ensemble by what they believe instead of by how stupid they are. Three fools who are foolish in the same direction are one character with three bodies.

It Looks Like Nothing Else

Roger Deakins shot it and the film was one of the first features to have its color digitally graded throughout, pulling the green out of Mississippi summer to produce a dry, sepia-toned landscape.

The reason was that the location was verdant and the Depression South of the imagination is not. Instead of waiting for a season that would never come, they shot it and changed it afterward.

That decision has aged into a whole visual grammar. A great deal of what color grading became in the following two decades is downstream of this film, and most of it is worse.

What makes it work here is that the palette is doing something specific. It is not a mood, it is a period photograph, and the film looks like the documentary images of the era it is set in.

Deakins has said the process took months and was the first time a feature had been graded this way end to end. What it bought is a film where the sky, the dust and the cotton all belong to the same photograph, which is difficult to achieve on location and impossible to fake in a laboratory.

The Comedy Has a Floor

The film is broad and it contains a Klan rally staged as a Busby Berkeley musical number, a lynching interrupted, and a politician whose entire campaign is a performance.

The Klan sequence is the film’s riskiest and it works because the target is precise. The ceremony is choreographed, pompous, and full of men following a routine, and the comedy is about how seriously they take the pageantry.

Tommy Johnson, the guitarist they pick up at a crossroads, is the character the danger attaches to, and the film is clear that he is the one who will be killed if this goes wrong. The joke is never at his expense.

The flood at the end is the other tonal risk. A valley is drowned for a dam, which is presented as progress by the man who ordered it, and the film lets the ending be both a rescue and the erasure of everywhere they have been.

The blind man on the railcar bookends it. He tells them at the start that they will find a fortune, though not the one they seek, and the film delivers exactly that. A prophecy that comes true in a way nobody wanted is the oldest structure there is and it still works.

For Writers

Broad comedy can carry serious material if the target is precise. The rally is funny because the ritual is absurd, the threat inside it is never treated as a joke, and the rule is that the person in danger is never the one being laughed at.

A comic world still needs a floor. If nothing can go badly wrong, the jokes have no weight, and this film keeps a real lynching about four feet below the surface of a musical number.

Endings that are simultaneously a resolution and a loss are worth reaching for. The flood saves them and destroys everything, and the film refuses to pick one.

Should you watch O Brother, Where Art Thou??

Yes, and listen to it as much as watch it. A comedy built on a structure the writers claim not to have read, carried by a man who will not change his hair product, with a soundtrack that became more famous than the film it came from.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is O Brother, Where Art Thou? about?
Three convicts escape a Mississippi chain gang in 1937 chained together, pursuing treasure that does not exist, because one of them needs to get home before his wife remarries and the valley is flooded.
Is it really based on the Odyssey?
The credits say so and the Coens said repeatedly they had not read it. The film takes the shape, a man delayed on his way home by episodes, and none of the content.
Why did the soundtrack do so well?
It sold in the millions and won the Grammy for Album of the Year. T Bone Burnett assembled period and period-derived music recorded live, and every song is somebody singing inside the film instead of score over the action.
What makes the music structural?
They record a song for eight dollars each under a made-up name, and it becomes a hit across the state while they are on the run and unaware. The thing they did casually is what saves them an hour later.
Why does it look like that?
Roger Deakins shot it and it was one of the first features graded digitally throughout, pulling the green out of a verdant Mississippi summer to match the documentary photographs of the era.
Is the Klan sequence defensible?
It works because the target is precise. The ritual is choreographed and pompous and the men are following a routine, and the person in actual danger is never the one being laughed at.
What is the pomade about?
A man on the run who will not use a different brand of hair product and checks his reflection while being pursued. It converts vanity into a running action with plot consequences.

This film appears on one of my film lists

🏷︎ 1930s🏷︎ 2000s🏷︎ Male Friendship🏷︎ Period Piece