Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America

Cleopatra (1963) Review

Cleopatra (1963) Review

TL;DR: Cleopatra (1963) rates 6 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. It was budgeted at around two million dollars and cost forty-four, was the highest grossing film of its year and still did not break even, and Fox sold off much of its backlot to survive. Mankiewicz delivered six hours and the studio released four.
Cleopatra (1963)
6/10

Caesar arrives in Egypt, finds a young queen delivered to him in a carpet, and the film spends two hours on that and two more on what Mark Antony does with the aftermath.

The 6 is for genuine spectacle and two performances that survive everything around them. Rex Harrison’s Caesar is superb, dry and calculating and visibly amused, and Elizabeth Taylor is doing more than the reputation allows in the first half.

The film’s problems are all structural and all traceable to the production. It was conceived as two films, shot as chaos, cut from six hours to four by people fighting each other, and what reached cinemas is the compressed remains of something else.

It Was Meant to Be Two Films

Mankiewicz’s plan was Caesar and Cleopatra followed by Antony and Cleopatra, roughly three hours each, released separately.

Fox refused, because they wanted to capitalize on the Taylor and Burton affair while it was still in the newspapers and would not wait six additional months. So the two films were compressed into one release of about four hours.

That decision explains almost every complaint about the finished picture. The Caesar half is coherent and well built, and the Antony half is a summary of a film that was written but never fully assembled.

You can feel the seam. Caesar dies, and the picture restarts with a different protagonist, a different tone and a compressed timeline, as though somebody began reading you a second novel at speed.

Burton takes the damage. Antony is written as a man collapsing under a comparison he cannot win, which is a genuinely good idea for the part, and the compression leaves Burton playing the collapse without the film ever showing us the man who had something to lose.

For Writers

Two stories about the same person are not one story. Cleopatra’s relationship with Caesar and her relationship with Antony have different shapes and different endings, and joining them produces a chronicle instead of a plot.

The test is whether your midpoint is a turn or a restart. A turn changes what the protagonist is pursuing. A restart changes who she is pursuing it with, which is a new book.

When somebody compresses your two-part structure into one, the second part takes all the damage, because the first has already established the terms and cannot be shortened without confusion.

The Money Went Into the Ground

Shooting began in London in September 1960. Sets of tropical Egypt were built, the weather rotted them, palm trees died, and Taylor became seriously ill, requiring an emergency tracheotomy.

The production shut down, moved to Cinecitta in Rome, and rebuilt everything. Mamoulian resigned and Mankiewicz replaced him. Peter Finch and Stephen Boyd were replaced by Rex Harrison and Richard Burton. The project effectively restarted from nothing having already spent millions.

Mankiewicz then rewrote at night and shot during the day, which is a way of working that guarantees waste. Thousands of extras were paid to wait, and the reports of that period read as a portrait of money evaporating on a daily basis.

Taylor was paid a million dollars plus ten percent of the gross, the first actress to reach that figure, and her costumes alone reportedly ran to nearly a hundred and ninety-five thousand dollars across sixty-five outfits, one of them made from gold cloth.

That salary is the part with the longest afterlife. A million dollars for a single picture reset what a star could demand, and every negotiation that followed used it as the floor. The film that nearly destroyed a studio also permanently raised the cost of making any film at all.

What Is On Screen

The entrance into Rome is one of the great sequences in this kind of film. Thousands of performers, an enormous sphinx drawn through the forum, and Taylor at the top of it holding entirely still while everything moves around her.

It works because it is real. Those are physical extras in a physically built forum, and the shot has a weight that no rendered crowd has managed since. Whatever the money bought, some of it is on screen.

Harrison is the reason the first half plays. His Caesar is practical, funny and tired, treating an alliance with Egypt as a logistical matter and being surprised to find he cares. He was nominated and he earned it.

Taylor is better than her reputation in the Caesar material and struggles in the Antony half, and the reason is structural instead of personal. The second half asks her to play grief and political collapse in a fraction of the space, having removed the scenes that would have built to it.

Her Cleopatra is also a specific and defensible reading. This is a ruler who has calculated that her only available weapon is the men who arrive with armies, and Taylor plays the calculation openly, which is more interesting than the seductress the marketing sold and closer to what the historical record supports.

For Writers

Physical scale is one of the few things money buys that a reader or viewer can still detect sixty years later. The Rome entrance holds because nothing about it was faked.

Stillness in the middle of motion is the cheapest way to direct attention. Taylor does nothing at all while thousands of people move, and every eye goes to the one fixed point.

For prose the equivalent is a single held detail inside a chaotic scene. Describe the noise generally and one object precisely, and the reader will look where you pointed.

The Cutting Room War

Mankiewicz delivered a first cut of around six hours. Producers reduced it to roughly four. He was fired during post-production after quarreling with Darryl Zanuck, who had returned to run the studio.

Both Mankiewicz and Taylor were reportedly unhappy with what emerged, on the grounds that the release version prioritized the battles over the intention to make Cleopatra a person instead of a spectacle.

The affair did more commercial work than anybody planned. Taylor and Burton were both married to other people, the Vatican condemned the relationship publicly, and Fox timed the release to sell tickets on the coverage. A studio that had lost all control of its production had at least worked out what it still had to sell.

That complaint is visible in the finished film. The political material is thin, the character work is thin, and the sequences that survive intact are the ones with the largest number of extras in them, which is what happens when a picture is cut by people justifying its cost.

A longer version has never been fully restored, and a substantial amount of material is believed lost. What exists is a compromise that satisfied nobody who made it.

Restoration efforts have recovered some footage over the decades and never the six hour assembly. That is worth stating because the version everybody argues about is the studio’s, and the film Mankiewicz delivered has never been seen by anybody outside the room where it was screened once in 1963.

It Changed the Industry and Not for the Better

Forty-four million dollars against roughly fifty-seven in its initial release, the highest grossing film of 1963 and still short of breaking even after distribution and advertising.

Fox sold close to three hundred acres of backlot to stay solvent, production across the lot shut down, and careers ended over it, including the studio president’s. That land became Century City, and the studio spent decades looking across a road at what the picture had cost it.

The industry’s response was stricter financial control over expensive productions, which sounds sensible and had a specific cost. The era of the enormous director-driven historical epic ended here, and the caution that replaced it lasted until the late sixties collapse forced a different kind of risk-taking.

Four Academy Awards from nine nominations, including cinematography, art direction, costumes and special visual effects, with Rex Harrison nominated for Best Actor and the picture itself nominated for Best Picture. Every one of those is a craft award. Nobody gave it anything for writing, directing or performance, which is a fair summary of what survived the process.

For Writers

A failure large enough to threaten a company changes the rules for everybody who comes after, and the rules that replace it are usually about control instead of about quality.

That is the pattern across this whole page. Heaven’s Gate ended director autonomy, this ended the historical epic, and neither correction was aimed at the thing that had gone wrong.

The specific lesson is that overruns are a governance failure and get treated as an ambition failure. Nobody concluded that Fox should have refused the London shoot. They concluded that films should be smaller.

Should you watch Cleopatra?

Watch the first half. Rex Harrison and Elizabeth Taylor circling each other for two hours is a genuinely good film, and the entrance into Rome is worth the time on its own. The second half is the summary of a picture that was written, shot in fragments, and never assembled.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Cleopatra about?
The queen of Egypt allies with Julius Caesar, bears his son, and after his assassination forms an alliance and a marriage with Mark Antony that ends in defeat at Actium and both their deaths.
How much did it cost?
It was initially budgeted at around two million dollars and finished at about forty-four, which is somewhere near four hundred million in current terms. It was the most expensive film ever made at the time.
Why was the production such a disaster?
It began in London in 1960, the sets rotted in the weather, Elizabeth Taylor became seriously ill and required an emergency tracheotomy, and the whole production moved to Rome and restarted with a new director and two new leading men.
Was it meant to be two films?
Yes. Mankiewicz planned Caesar and Cleopatra followed by Antony and Cleopatra at roughly three hours each. Fox refused to wait six more months while the Taylor and Burton affair was in the newspapers, and compressed both into one four hour release.
Did it lose money?
It was the highest grossing film of 1963 at around fifty-seven million dollars and still failed to break even against a forty-four million budget plus distribution and advertising. Fox sold close to three hundred acres of backlot to stay solvent.
What is the best sequence?
Cleopatra’s entrance into Rome. Thousands of physical extras, an enormous sphinx drawn through a built forum, and Taylor holding completely still at the top of it while everything moves around her.
How many Academy Awards did it win?
Four from nine nominations, for cinematography, art direction, costumes and visual effects. Every one is a craft award, which is a fair summary of what survived the production.

This film appears on one of my film lists

🏷︎ 1960s🏷︎ Ambition🏷︎ Period Piece🏷︎ Tragedy