Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America
The Writing King Your Ethical Ghostwriter. Your Story, Done Right.

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969) Review

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969) Review

TL;DR: Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969) rates 9 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. William Goldman sold the screenplay for four hundred thousand dollars and the film is a comedy about two men becoming obsolete. The freeze frame at the end is the most imitated ending in American cinema.
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969)
9/10

Two robbers hold up the same train twice. The second time the railroad has put a special car on it containing six men and horses, and those men do not stop following them.

The 9 is for a film that is genuinely funny for ninety minutes and is about extinction the whole time. Everything these two are good at has stopped working, and neither of them will say so directly, so the picture says it through a posse that will not go away.

What holds it to a 9 is the bicycle sequence, which is charming and stops the film dead, and a Bolivia stretch that runs slightly long before the ending rescues it.

Who Are Those Guys

The central act is a chase that lasts nearly forty minutes and is almost entirely about not being able to escape.

The posse is never identified, never speaks, and is never seen closer than a distant line of riders with a white hat at the front. They do not gain ground dramatically. They simply do not stop.

That is a far better antagonist than a named villain would be. A person can be outwitted, and the film’s two protagonists are extremely good at outwitting people, and none of it works.

Butch keeps asking who they are and the film never answers. The repetition turns a question into the film’s real subject, which is that something has arrived that their skills do not address.

Redford was largely unknown and Steve McQueen was attached for a period before a billing dispute ended it, which is one of the more consequential casting arguments in the history of the business. The film made Redford a star and eventually named his festival.

For Writers

An unidentified, unstoppable pursuer is more frightening than a named villain because the reader cannot evaluate it. There is nothing to outthink. The requirement is that it must never accelerate. Steady, unchanging pressure is what produces dread, and a pursuer who dramatically closes in becomes a conventional threat again.

Use repetition to convert a line into a theme. The same question asked six times, never answered, becomes the thing the story is about.

Withhold the face. The moment the reader sees who is chasing, they start assessing, and assessment is the opposite of dread.

Goldman Wrote Friendship, Not Plot

Almost every scene is two men talking while something else is happening. They argue about knife fighting rules while a man challenges Butch for leadership. They argue about swimming while a posse closes in.

That is the screenplay’s method throughout and it is why the film has lasted. The plot is a decline and the texture is a conversation, and the conversation is genuinely funny in a way that does not date.

Goldman spent years researching before writing it and said afterward that the thing he could not get over was that the two men ran. Everything in American mythology says a gunman stands his ground, and these two got on a boat to South America.

That single detail is what the screenplay is built around, and it is why the film is a comedy for most of its length. Men who run from something they cannot beat are funny right up until the moment they stop running, and this film stops them exactly once, in a courtyard, at the very end.

Goldman also refuses the usual structure. There is no arc, no lesson, and no moment where either of them changes. They are the same two people at the end as at the start, and the world around them has moved.

Newman and Redford are doing something specific that is easy to miss. Butch talks constantly and does almost nothing. Sundance says very little and does everything. Neither remarks on the arrangement.

The cliff is where the division pays off. Butch proposes jumping into a river, Sundance refuses, and the reason is that he cannot swim, which he admits furiously after being pressed. The man who does everything has one limitation and has been carrying it in silence for the entire film.

Etta Is the Third Character

Katharine Ross plays a schoolteacher who joins them, is treated as an equal, and leaves before the ending because she says she will not watch them die.

The film gives her the only clear statement of what is happening. She says plainly that she will do anything they ask except that, and it is the moment somebody finally names the ending the two men will not discuss.

The relationship between the three is handled without a triangle, which for 1969 is unusual. The film simply declines to make it a source of conflict and lets the three be comfortable.

What she is not given is much to do, and the film knows it. She teaches them Spanish in a sequence that is largely comic, and then she goes, and the picture is honest that she has more sense than either of them.

The Bolivian robberies are the comic high point and the saddest stretch in the film. Two professionals reduced to reading a hold-up from a card in a language they cannot speak, being laughed at by the people they are robbing, and still doing it because it is the only trade they have.

For Writers

Give one character permission to name what everybody else is avoiding, and then remove them. Etta says the true thing and leaves, which means the two men have to spend the last act knowing it without being able to discuss it. The departure is what makes the naming land.

Refusing an obvious conflict is a real choice. A triangle would have been conventional and would have converted a film about obsolescence into a film about jealousy.

Be honest about an underwritten character. This film gives Etta the best line and not enough scenes, and the writing acknowledges instead of disguises it.

The Bicycle and the Sepia

The film opens in sepia with a silent-film pastiche and closes on a freeze frame that drains to sepia, and the bracketing is doing something specific.

These two are being converted into photographs in front of the audience. The film starts as an old picture, becomes color for the living part, and turns back into an image at the end.

The bicycle sequence sits in the middle of that and is the most divisive thing in it. Newman rides around a farmyard to a Burt Bacharach song for several minutes while nothing happens.

It is charming and it stops the film, and it is also thematically exact. A man is delighted by a machine that is about to make his horse obsolete, and the song playing over it is about the future arriving whether you want it or not.

The song won the Academy Award and became a number one record, and Conrad Hall won for the photography, and the screenplay won as well. Four awards from seven nominations for a Western released into a year when the genre was supposed to be finished.

The Freeze Frame

They are surrounded by the Bolivian army, wounded, out of ammunition, and planning where to go next. Butch suggests Australia. They run out into the courtyard and the image freezes.

The most imitated ending in American film and almost nobody copying it understands why it works. It is not a stylish way of avoiding the violence. It is a refusal to let these two become corpses.

The film has spent two hours establishing that they cannot say what is happening to them, and the freeze is the picture extending them the same courtesy one last time.

It also completes the sepia bracket. They start as an old photograph and end as one, which means the last image of them is the form they will survive in, which is the only survival available.

The historical record is uncertain about what happened to the real men, with accounts placing them dead in Bolivia in 1908 and other accounts placing them back in the United States for decades afterward. A film that freezes before the outcome is being accurate as well as merciful.

For Writers

An ending that stops before the consequence lets the reader keep the characters. Show the bodies and you have given them a fate. Stop and you have given them a last action. The technique only works if the outcome is certain. Ambiguity about whether they die would make it a cheat.

Bracket your work with the same device at both ends and the change in between becomes the argument. Sepia, color, sepia, and the reader understands what happened without a word.

Beware of imitating a famous ending. Almost every freeze frame since has been a stylistic flourish, because the copy takes the image and not the reason.

Should you watch Butch Cassidy?

Yes, and notice how funny it is right up until it is not. Two men who are extremely good at a thing the world has stopped needing, pursued by people they never see, ending as the photograph they began as.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid about?
Two train robbers rob the same railroad twice, are pursued by a posse they cannot shake or identify, and flee to Bolivia where the same problem catches up with them.
Who are the guys chasing them?
The film never says. They are never identified, never speak and are never seen closer than a distant line of riders, and Butch asks who they are repeatedly without an answer.
Why is the ending famous?
The image freezes as they run out into a courtyard against the Bolivian army, then drains to sepia. It is a refusal to let them become corpses instead of a stylish way of avoiding the violence.
What about the bicycle scene?
Newman rides around a farmyard to a Burt Bacharach song for several minutes while nothing happens. It stops the film and it is thematically exact, since a machine that will make his horse obsolete is delighting him.
Is Etta underwritten?
Yes, and the film knows it. She is given the best line, that she will do anything except watch them die, and not enough scenes, and she is plainly the only one of the three with any sense.
How much did the screenplay sell for?
Four hundred thousand dollars, which was a record at the time. William Goldman wrote friendship instead of plot, and almost every scene is two men talking while something else happens.
Do the characters change?
No, and that is deliberate. They are the same two people at the end as at the start, and what has changed is the world around them, which no longer has any use for what they are good at.

This film appears on one of my film lists

🏷︎ 1960s🏷︎ American Decay🏷︎ Male Friendship🏷︎ Tragedy