Latest
What an AI Detector Score on Your Manuscript Is WorthThe One-Hour Call Before I Quote Your BookWhen a Client Thinks the Ghostwriter Used AIMonthly or Milestone: How Ghostwriting Gets BilledWhen Your Memoir Should Be a NovelWhat It Costs to Fix an AI-Written ManuscriptThe Clients Who Pay and VanishThe Quotation Marks That Get Authors SuedThe Work You Would Never Have StartedWhen Your Own Memoir Sounds Like BraggingWhat Belongs on a Copyright PageThe Hugging Face AI Agent Attack: An Operations ReadingBehind the Book: The Mysterious Island, Neb’s SideHow to Organize Decades of Memories Into a MemoirWhy Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionResurrection as a Narrative StructureBooks to Give a WriterThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Show Don’t Tell
The Writing King Your Ethical Ghostwriter. Your Story, Done Right.

AI and Writing: What It Actually Does Well and Where It Will Wreck Your Book

This entry is part 13 of 54 in the series Artificial Intelligence for Writers
TL;DR: I use AI every day. I have published 113+ books and completed 54+ ghostwriting projects, and AI is part of my process for research, brainstorming, outlining, and analysis. Here’s how I use AI on books. I have written a whole series of handbooks on AI-assisted fiction. That means hundreds of hours testing what it does well and documenting where it fails. AI will not replace writers and will not make you better by itself. Here is what it actually does, and where it will wreck your book.

I use AI every day. I’ve published 113+ books and completed 54+ ghostwriting projects, and AI is part of my process for research, brainstorming, outlining, and analysis. I have also written an entire series of handbooks on AI-assisted fiction writing. That means hundreds of hours testing what AI does well and documenting where it fails.

AI won’t replace writers and won’t make you better on its own. Used carelessly it will make your writing worse in ways you won’t notice until a reader does, and by then it’s printed.

Here is what I have learned.

What Does AI Writing Do Well?

AI will not replace writers and will not make you better by itself.
Share on X

AI is good at pattern recognition, analysis, and generating raw material you can shape. Brainstorming. Outlining. Finding structural problems in a manuscript. Checking consistency across hundreds of pages. Analyzing voice patterns. It delivers real value in all of them.

When I start a ghostwriting project, AI helps me organize research, build initial outlines, and find gaps in the structure. When I coach fiction writers, it generates examples we can pull apart and improve together. When I’m writing my own fiction, it helps me brainstorm plot alternatives when I’m stuck, check consistency across a complex series, and catch problems I’ve gone blind to after living with a manuscript too long. For more, see the AI skills that will actually matter in five years.

The key distinction: AI is useful for analysis and raw material. It’s not useful for final prose, voice, or creative decisions. Those remain human work. For more, see AI writing tools.

The Confidence Problem

AI delivers wrong information with the same confidence it delivers correct information. There’s no difference in tone, certainty, or presentation between an accurate statement and a hallucination. Your brain reads confidence as a credibility signal. Thousands of years of evolution trained you to trust confident speakers, and AI exploits that without meaning to.

I have caught AI being confidently wrong about historical dates, scientific processes, legal procedures, publishing industry standards, and the plots of novels. Each time, the delivery was indistinguishable from the times it was correct.

Ask AI for academic citations and it’ll hand you author names, journal titles, publication dates, volume numbers, and page ranges that don’t exist. The format looks perfect. The citation is invented. I tested this extensively. About a third of the time the citations led nowhere. The authors hadn’t written those papers. The journals hadn’t published those issues.

The rule is simple. Verify anything factual that matters. Treat every factual claim as a starting point for verification instead of an answer. If a fact matters to your story or your reputation, check it against sources that can be wrong in ways they’d acknowledge.

Voice Flattening

This is the problem that will damage your writing most if you don’t watch for it.

AI runs to a default voice: helpful, thorough, balanced, slightly formal. That default bleeds into everything it generates. Characters who should sound distinct start sounding alike. Narrators who should have personality get smoothed into generic competence. The prose comes out technically correct and completely dead.

AI vocabulary has tells. Delve, tapestry, testament, nuanced, landscape, journey, realm, myriad, complex, resonate, convincing, deep. They appear at rates no human writer produces naturally. If those words cluster in your manuscript, AI has flattened your voice.

Fiction runs on surprise, freshness, and unexpected word choices. AI delivers predictability dressed in formal vocabulary. AI doesn’t produce a sentence like “The Miami sky was the color of a headache.” That sentence is specific, and slightly wrong in a way that feels exactly right. Human voice lives in those small wrongnesses, and AI smooths every one of them away.

The fix. Never use AI prose as final text. Use it as raw material and rewrite it in your own voice. Then search your manuscript for the tell words, and if you’re using them at AI rates, replace them.

POV Drift

AI shifts point of view mid-scene constantly. You’re writing from one character’s perspective. You ask AI to help develop the next few paragraphs. Back comes prose that includes another character’s internal thoughts, or describes something the viewpoint character cannot see, or slides into omniscient overview for no reason.

AI doesn’t hold POV discipline, because it doesn’t experience point of view the way a reader does. It generates plausible text, and plausible text includes perspective shifts that feel natural in isolation and violate the POV you established. Without constant correction, a carefully maintained viewpoint degrades into head-hopping.

I deal with this in my own fiction. My novel Peacekeeper is a complex series with multiple POV characters shifting between first person and third limited. For more on using AI to amplify your voice, see Richard’s interview with Diana Lee. AI assistance requires explicitly stating POV constraints in every prompt and reviewing every AI-touched scene specifically for perspective violations.

The fix. State the POV constraint explicitly every time you work with AI. Then review every AI-assisted scene against three questions: “Can my viewpoint character perceive this? Know this? Interpret it this way?” Flag every violation and fix it before it contaminates your own sense of the character’s perspective.

The Hallucination Compounding Problem

Hallucinations compound when you build on them. You ask AI for information. It invents a detail. You accept the detail and ask a follow-up question. It builds on the invention, generating more content that assumes the false thing is true. By the end of the conversation you have an elaborate structure standing on a foundation that doesn’t exist.

This happens especially in research sessions where one question leads to another. The first hallucination contaminates everything that follows.

I’ve watched AI generate fictional backstories for real historical figures that fit the era perfectly. Plausible details, specific events, coherent narrative. None of it happened. The general knowledge was right and the specifics were invented. AI filled the gap between what it knew and what I asked for with probable-sounding content that wasn’t true.

What Can AI Writing Not Do?

AI cannot capture someone else’s voice. Ghostwriting is listening to another person, learning how they think and speak, and translating that into prose that sounds like them. Every one of my 54+ ghostwriting projects starts with long interviews where I learn how the client says it as well as what they want to say. AI has no capacity for that kind of understanding.

AI cannot make creative decisions that serve a specific story. It can generate options, but choosing which option serves your narrative requires understanding what your story is about at a level AI doesn’t reach. When I coach fiction writers through plot problems, the solution usually comes from understanding the character’s psychology, the thematic intent, and the reader experience the writer is building. AI can generate twenty alternative plot directions. A human has to know which one is right for this story.

AI cannot replace the emotional authenticity that makes readers care. Content that moves people comes from genuine human experience, specific detail, and the vulnerability of putting something real on the page. AI can imitate the structure of emotional writing without ever producing the substance.

How Do You Use AI Without Wrecking Your Writing?

Use AI for analysis, research, brainstorming, and consistency checking. Don’t use it for final prose. Verify every fact that matters. Watch for voice flattening. Maintain POV discipline manually. Treat AI output as raw material, never as finished work.

I’ve written three books specifically about these issues. Using AI for Writing covers how to integrate AI into your writing process effectively. AI Shortcomings documents every failure mode I’ve encountered and how to defend against them. Both are free. The AI-Enhanced Awful Writing Handbook covers how to identify and fix the specific problems AI introduces into prose, including the vocabulary tells, voice flattening, and structural patterns that mark AI-damaged writing.

My full collection of AI-enhanced writing handbooks covers every aspect of fiction craft with AI-assisted techniques, from character development to world-building to dialogue to point of view.

For ghostwriting or book coaching, start with a conversation.

AI and Writing FAQ

Will AI replace human writers?
No, and I don’t think it ever will. AI generates plausible text, but it doesn’t understand story, character, voice, or the emotional experience of reading. I use it every day for analysis, research, and raw material, and it handles those tasks well. The creative decisions, the voice, and the emotional authenticity that make writing matter remain human work. In my own ghostwriting and fiction, the parts readers respond to are always the parts I write and rewrite myself. Writers who use AI carelessly produce content readers can tell wasn’t written by a person.
How do I know if AI has damaged my writing voice?
Search your manuscript for AI vocabulary tells: delve, tapestry, testament, nuanced, landscape, journey (used metaphorically), realm, myriad, complex, resonate, strong, and deep. If these words cluster at rates higher than your natural writing produces, AI has flattened your voice. Also check whether your characters sound distinct from each other. AI tends to homogenize character voices into the same competent, slightly formal tone.
Can I trust AI for research?
As a starting point, not as an authoritative source. AI hallucinates citations, fabricates biographical details for real people, and delivers wrong information with the same confidence as correct information. About a third of the academic citations I’ve tested AI on led to sources that didn’t exist. Use AI to identify research directions, then verify everything through authoritative sources before including it in your work.
How should I use AI for fiction writing?
Use AI for brainstorming, outlining, consistency checking, and analyzing craft elements like POV and voice patterns. Don’t use it for final prose. State POV and voice constraints explicitly in every prompt. Review every AI-assisted passage for perspective violations, voice flattening, and hallucinated details. Treat AI output as raw material you rewrite in your own voice, never as finished text ready for publication.

📝 Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment