TL;DR
5/10. A slim booklet listing a thousand vigorous verbs for self-editing. The principle is sound, strong verbs tighten prose, but a thesaurus does the same job free and better, and a flat list can tempt a writer toward overwrought, attention-seeking verbs. A usable but largely redundant tool with a sound idea.
1,000 Strong Verbs for Fiction Writers by Valerie Howard is exactly what its title says and nothing more: a list of a thousand vigorous verbs, packaged as a slim booklet, meant to help a writer replace weak, flabby verbs during self-editing. It is a tool, not a book in any real sense, and it has to be judged as a tool, by whether it does its narrow job and whether that job is worth a purchase.
The underlying principle is sound and is the best thing about the product. Strong, specific verbs are one of the fastest ways to improve prose; replacing a weak verb propped up by an adverb with a single precise verb tightens a sentence and sharpens an image. Howard is right about the problem this booklet addresses.
What it is
The content is a categorized list of a thousand verbs, organized to help a writer find a stronger alternative to a tired choice. There is minimal instruction; the value proposition is the list itself, a quick-reference brainstorming aid for the editing stage. Open it when you have written walked or looked or said for the tenth time and want a jolt toward something more vivid. As a cure for verb monotony in a self-editing pass, it can do that small job.
Keep reading
Strong verbs do the work so adverbs don’t have to — the principle behind this booklet, with the craft context the list itself omits.
The honest problem
Here is the catch that keeps it near the bottom of the scale. A thesaurus does the same job for free, and does it better, because it offers alternatives in context with shades of meaning rather than a flat list. More importantly, the right strong verb is almost always the precise one for the specific action, not the most colorful one grabbed from a list, and a list like this can actively tempt a writer toward overwrought, attention-seeking verbs, the same mistake as reaching for fancy dialogue tags. A character who strode and lunged and barreled through every scene is as monotonous as one who only walked, and arguably worse, because the strain shows. The booklet addresses a real problem with a tool that can worsen it in unskilled hands.
Keep reading
Stop these 76 bad writing habits to improve your skills — weak verbs are one habit; overwrought verbs are another. The balanced view.
How to use a list like this without being used by it
If a writer does reach for a verb list, there is a right and a wrong way to do it, and the distinction is the most useful craft point around the whole product. The wrong way is to draft a sentence, decide the verb is dull, and shop the list for the most exciting replacement. That is how you end up with prose that strains, every character lunging and seizing and hurtling when they are merely crossing a room. The right way is to use the list as a memory jog toward the precise verb you already half-know, the one that captures the exact motion or intention, which may itself be a quiet, ordinary word. A strong verb is not a loud verb; it is an accurate one. Trudged is stronger than walked not because it is flashier but because it carries information, weariness, effort, reluctance, that walked omits. A list can point you toward that precision or toward mere noise, and which one you get depends entirely on whether you are reaching for accuracy or for decoration.
Keep reading
Showing and telling: why “show don’t tell” is bad advice — a precise verb shows; a flashy one tells. The craft of choosing the accurate word.
Verdict
Explore the hub
The Writing Hub — prose, verbs, and the rest of the craft, gathered in one place.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is 1,000 Strong Verbs for Fiction Writers?
A slim booklet by Valerie Howard containing a categorized list of a thousand vigorous verbs, meant to help writers replace weak verbs during self-editing. It is a quick-reference tool rather than an instructional book.
Does it teach how to use strong verbs?
Minimally. The value is the list itself, not instruction. The underlying principle, that strong specific verbs tighten prose, is sound, but the booklet largely leaves application to the reader.
Is it better than a thesaurus?
No. A thesaurus does the same job free and better, offering alternatives in context with shades of meaning rather than a flat list. That redundancy is the booklet’s main weakness.
Can it hurt my writing?
It can in unskilled hands. A list of colorful verbs can tempt a writer toward overwrought, attention-seeking choices, which is as monotonous as weak verbs. The right verb is the precise one, not the flashiest.
Who might find it useful?
A beginner wanting a small vocabulary jolt in one quick-reference spot during editing, though a thesaurus serves the same purpose for free.