Latest
Post an AI Image and Unfriend MeShe Asked How to Publish Her Bedtime Story. They Called Her a Thief.The AI Hype Cycle: Why the Crash Is Coming, and Who’s Causing ItSix Claude Prompts That Get You Unstuck, and Why the Order MattersDogpiled Over AI Art at the Renaissance FaireClaude Opus 5.5: What the New Release Means for WritersTrump’s AI Force Is a Fire Department With No Fire CodeWhat It Costs to Fix an AI-Written ManuscriptWhen Your Memoir Should Be a NovelThe Hugging Face AI Agent Attack: An Operations ReadingWhen Your Own Memoir Sounds Like BraggingWhat Belongs on a Copyright PageWhat an AI Detector Score on Your Manuscript Is WorthThe Clients Who Pay and VanishThe Quotation Marks That Get Authors SuedThe Work You Would Never Have StartedMonthly or Milestone: How Ghostwriting Gets BilledWhen a Client Thinks the Ghostwriter Used AIThe One-Hour Call Before I Quote Your BookBehind the Book: The Mysterious Island, Neb’s SideHow to Organize Decades of Memories Into a MemoirWhy Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence Says

Wizards (1977) Review

TL;DR: Wizards (1977) rates 8 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Wizards is Ralph Bakshi’s strange, rough, underfunded fantasy about twin wizards fighting for a world millions of years after a nuclear war, where the evil brother wins battles by screening old Nazi propaganda films to his mutant armies. It’s uneven and occasionally incoherent, and there’s nothing else like it.
Wizards (1977)
8 / 10

Nothing Else Like It

Wizards is one of the weirdest animated films I love. It’s uneven, underfunded and occasionally incoherent, and there’s nothing else like it. A children’s fairy tale collides with a war film and a propaganda documentary, and the collision is what the film is about. It looks like three different films stitched together by someone who ran out of time and money, and in a sense that’s exactly what happened, and the seams are where it becomes interesting.

Ralph Bakshi wrote and directed it after Fritz the Cat, Heavy Traffic and Coonskin, three adult animated films that had made him the most controversial animator in America. Twentieth Century Fox released it in February 1977, a few months before Star Wars, on a tiny budget. It made a healthy profit and became a cult film. I give it an 8.

The World After

The film opens with narration over still paintings. Millions of years after a nuclear war, the world has split in two. The elves, fairies and gentle creatures live in green, magical lands. The mutants, twisted by radiation, live in the scorched wastes of Scortch. Technology has been forgotten, and magic has returned.

The fairy queen gives birth to twin wizards. Avatar is kind, lazy and fond of his comforts. Blackwolf is cruel, ambitious and certain. When their mother dies, Blackwolf is driven out, and he goes to Scortch to build an empire. Susan Tyrrell narrates the opening in a slightly wry voice, and the picture-book paintings give it the feel of an old story being read aloud.

The Propaganda Reels

Blackwolf digs up the machinery of the old world, and his armies start winning because he’s found a projector and a stock of Nazi propaganda films. He screens the footage in the sky above the battlefield. His own mutant soldiers are whipped into a frenzy, and his enemies, faced with images they’ve never seen and can’t understand, are paralysed with terror.

It’s the boldest idea in the film. Blackwolf doesn’t need better weapons. He needs better pictures. For a cheap cartoon in 1977, it’s a sharp point about what propaganda does and why it works, and it’s the image everyone who has seen the film remembers.

Bakshi grew up in Brooklyn, the son of Jewish immigrants, and he’s said Wizards came partly from his anger about fascism. The film is simplistic, and it’s sincere, and the image of an army made fearless by old footage on a screen still lands.

For Writers

Blackwolf wins his war with pictures, not weapons. The propaganda films make his soldiers fearless and his enemies helpless. That’s more frightening than any monster.

When you write a villain, raw power is the least interesting threat, because the hero only needs more power to beat it.

Give your antagonist a weapon that works on people’s minds, belief, fear or loyalty, and make your hero find a way to fight something they can’t simply outpunch.

The Rotoscoped Battles

Bakshi ran out of money, and he turned the shortage into a style. The big battle scenes are rotoscoped: traced over live-action footage from older war and epic films, including Eisenstein’s Alexander Nevsky, and printed in harsh red and black. The Nazi newsreels Blackwolf screens are real footage.

Next to the soft, round, cartoonish main characters, the effect is jarring. That’s exactly what the film needs. It looks like history’s violence breaking into a fairy tale. It was a cheap solution to an expensive problem, and it became the film’s signature.

Bakshi would push rotoscoping much further in The Lord of the Rings the following year, and there it drew real criticism. In Wizards, used in shorter bursts and printed in stark colors, it works better, because it’s meant to look alien. The roughness is deliberate.

For Writers

Bakshi couldn’t afford to animate his battles, so he traced old war footage and printed it in red and black. The limitation became the film’s most distinctive look.

When you write under a constraint, a word count, a deadline, a missing skill, the instinct is to hide it. Sometimes the constraint is the most original thing about the work.

Name the biggest limitation on your current project, then write one scene that uses it deliberately instead of working around it. See what the constraint gives you.

The Title Change

The film was going to be called War Wizards. Star Wars was in production at the same studio, and George Lucas asked Bakshi to drop the word War so the titles wouldn’t be confused. Bakshi agreed, and in return Lucas lent him Mark Hamill, who voices a small role.

Two films about good against evil technology came out a few months apart from the same studio in 1977. One changed cinema forever. The other became a cult favorite. It’s a strange footnote in both men’s careers, and a reminder of how close together very different visions of fantasy were being made. Lucas went bright, clean and optimistic. Bakshi went grimy, political and strange, and the two films are almost perfect opposites in what they believe technology will do to us.

Bakshi has told the story many times, and without bitterness. Lucas asked politely, Bakshi agreed, and both films went out into the world. Only one became a phenomenon, but Wizards found a loyal audience of its own.

The Voices

Bob Holt plays Avatar with an obvious Peter Falk impression, so the good wizard sounds like Columbo: rumpled, unhurried and funnier than he looks. Jesse Welles plays Elinore, the fairy princess, Richard Romanus plays Peace, a former assassin robot reprogrammed by Avatar, and David Proval plays Weehawk, an elf warrior.

The voice work is uneven, like everything else in the film, but it has personality. Avatar in particular is a likeable hero, a wizard who would much rather be having a drink than saving the world, and who does it anyway. Peace, the reformed killer, gets the film’s most interesting arc, and the scenes of him learning to be something other than a machine are among its best.

Peace in particular deserves more attention than he gets. A machine built to kill, now choosing to protect, he’s the film’s quiet argument that technology isn’t evil in itself. It’s a thoughtful idea buried in a very noisy film.

The Art

The backgrounds and designs came partly from Ian Miller, whose dense, spiky pen drawings give Scortch its twisted, nightmarish look, and from Mike Ploog, a comics artist who designed many of the characters. The two styles never quite match, and the film doesn’t try to make them.

It’s a patchwork, and the patchwork is part of its charm. Every sequence looks a little different from the one before, depending on who drew it and how much money was left. The result feels less like a studio film and more like a sketchbook come to life. Miller’s work in particular, all spikes and towers and crowded detail, has influenced fantasy illustration ever since, and freezing the film on a background will show you why.

Avatar and Blackwolf

The twin brothers are the film’s real subject. The film treats their rivalry like a family quarrel that grew into a world war, and the brief flashback to their mother’s death and their first fight is one of the few moments where Bakshi lets the cartoon become sad.

Avatar’s trip toward Scortch, with Elinore, Peace and Weehawk, is a quest with a personal cost. He’s going to face his brother, and he knows it. The film never lets you forget that the war is, at bottom, two boys who hated each other as children. Every army, every propaganda reel and every ruined city grows from that old family wound, and the final confrontation is as much a sibling argument as a battle for the world.

That’s what gives the film its odd, personal weight. Bakshi made it in the shadow of the Vietnam War, and the idea that great wars start with small, private hatreds between people who should know better runs underneath all the fantasy.

The Pistol

After a whole film of magic, propaganda and battles, Avatar finally reaches Blackwolf, and the world expects a great duel between wizards. Avatar reaches into his robe, pulls out a pistol and shoots his brother dead.

It’s played as a joke, the kind of anticlimax a film makes when it wants to laugh at its own genre, and it’s also the film’s argument in miniature. Old technology has become magic, and the only answer the good wizard has is the same weapon. Whether that’s cynical or clever depends on the day you watch it. It’s certainly the most memorable ending of any animated fantasy of its era.

Animation has few endings as memorable, because it refuses the payoff the genre promises. After eighty minutes of spells and speeches, the good wizard ends the war with a gun, and the audience is left to decide what that says about him and about us.

For Writers

Avatar ends a war of wizards with a pistol. The ending undercuts every expectation the film has built, and it makes its point about technology in a single gesture.

When you write an ending, the expected climax can feel inevitable in the dull sense. A reversal can be more memorable, as long as it grows out of the story’s themes.

List what your reader expects from the final confrontation, then ask what one surprising action would express your story’s argument better. Test whether it’s earned.

Where It Went Wrong

The script is the weak point. The story lurches from jokes to battles to fairy tale, the pacing sags in the middle as the heroes wander between set pieces, and Elinore is written as little more than a cartoon pin-up. Some of the humour hasn’t aged well at all.

It’s also rated PG and shouldn’t be by modern standards. Characters are shot and blown up, the battles are brutal and the Nazi imagery is meant to disturb. It’s not a film for young children, whatever the fairy-tale opening suggests. Older children who like fantasy and don’t mind strangeness often love it, because it treats them as capable of handling something serious, but parents should watch it first.

Bakshi’s Career

Ralph Bakshi was the great outsider of American animation. His first feature, Fritz the Cat in 1972, was the first animated film to receive an X rating in the United States, and his next two, Heavy Traffic and Coonskin, were adult, angry and controversial. Coonskin in particular drew protests over its racial imagery before it was even released, and it’s still rarely shown.

Wizards was his attempt to make something younger audiences could see and enjoy. It’s still unmistakably his: rough, political, strange and personal. It was followed by his animated The Lord of the Rings in 1978, then American Pop, a history of American music told through four generations of one family, and Fire and Ice, a sword-and-sorcery film made with the fantasy artist Frank Frazetta.

His later career was uneven, and his studio-backed Cool World in 1992, mixing animation and live action, was a notorious failure. His influence has lasted far longer than his box office. A generation of animators who wanted to make films for adults, and who wanted animation to be personal, looked to Bakshi as proof that it could be done.

Wizards sits in the middle of that career, gentler than the adult films that came before it and rougher than The Lord of the Rings. It’s the one where his personal obsessions, war, propaganda, technology and the loss of innocence, come through most clearly, in a form that younger viewers could still share. It’s the purest distillation of what he cared about, made with more heart than money.

Where It Sits

It found its audience on midnight screenings and home video. It’s now a cult favorite, especially among people who grew up with it and with the fantasy art of the seventies. Its influence is felt more in underground animation and heavy metal album covers than in mainstream film.

The next year Bakshi made his animated The Lord of the Rings, using the same rotoscoping at enormous scale, for better and worse. Wizards is the rough draft, and in some ways it’s the more personal of the two, because it knows exactly what it wants to say. Watch it for the ideas and the images, and forgive the rest.

Craft Note

Craft Note

Wizards makes its villain’s weapon an idea. Blackwolf wins because he controls what his soldiers see, and a weapon made of images is more frightening than any monster.

When you write conflict, the most interesting threats attack belief instead of bodies, because the hero can’t solve them with strength or luck.

Give your antagonist control over what other characters believe, then design your climax so the hero must change minds as well as win a fight.

The Verdict on Wizards

Mostly. It’s an 8. The pacing sags, some of the humour is dated and the animation is all over the place, but the ideas and the images stay with you. Anyone interested in animation outside the Disney mould should see it, and anyone who loves Bakshi’s Lord of the Rings should see where it came from.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who made Wizards (1977)?
Ralph Bakshi wrote, directed and produced it, following his adult animated films Fritz the Cat, Heavy Traffic and Coonskin. Twentieth Century Fox released it in February 1977, a few months before Star Wars. It was made on a very small budget, and much of its distinctive look comes from Bakshi’s solutions to not having enough money to animate everything.
What is Wizards about?
Millions of years after a nuclear war, the world has split between the magical lands of the elves and the radioactive wastes of the mutants. Twin wizards, one kind and one evil, fight for control. The evil brother, Blackwolf, uses rediscovered technology, including a projector and old Nazi propaganda films, to drive his mutant armies to victory.
Why does Wizards use Nazi footage?
Partly for money and partly for meaning. Bakshi couldn’t afford to animate large battles, so he traced live-action war footage and used real Nazi newsreels. In the story, those propaganda films are Blackwolf’s secret weapon, terrifying his enemies and inflaming his own troops. Bakshi has said the film came partly from his anger about fascism.
Why was Wizards renamed?
Its working title was War Wizards. George Lucas, whose Star Wars was being made at the same studio, asked Bakshi to drop the word War to avoid confusion between the two titles. Bakshi agreed, and in exchange Lucas lent him Mark Hamill, who voices a minor character in the film.
How does Wizards end?
After the whole film builds toward a great duel between the twin wizards, Avatar confronts his brother Blackwolf, pulls a pistol from his robe and shoots him dead. It’s played partly as a joke and partly as the film’s point about technology. It’s one of the most talked-about endings in animated fantasy.
Is Wizards a children’s film?
It was Bakshi’s first attempt at a film for younger audiences, and it opens like a fairy tale, but it contains violence, war imagery and some adult humour. It’s rated PG. It would be unlikely today. It’s better suited to teenagers and adults than to young children, who may find the battle scenes disturbing.
Is Wizards related to Bakshi’s The Lord of the Rings?
Not in story, but it was a trial run for the rotoscoped battle style Bakshi used on a much larger scale in The Lord of the Rings the following year. Wizards is rougher and more personal, while The Lord of the Rings is more ambitious and more uneven. Fans of either will find the other worth watching.

This film appears on one of my film lists

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.