Latest
Why Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence SaysBlack Tuesday: The Original ring-master.net Page, 2000Behind the Book: Peacekeeper, The Dissolution WarsBehind the Book: Publish Your BookBehind the Book: Real World SurvivalBehind the Book: ReincarnationBehind the Book: Sell Your BooksBehind the Book: Selling on eBayBehind the Book: Show Don’t TellBehind the Book: Street-Smart Management WisdomBehind the Book: Stuck in the MiddleBehind the Book: The ADHD MarketerBehind the Book: Suddenly UnemployedBehind the Book: The Blonde With a Violin TattooBehind the Book: The Blog-to-Book BlueprintBehind the Book: The Day Your Website DiedBehind the Book: The Death of ThinkingBehind the Book: The Emasculation of AmericaBehind the Book: The Ethical WorkplaceBehind the Book: The Ghostwriting AdvantageBehind the Book: The Gig EconomyBehind the Book: The Villainization of America
The Writing King Your Ethical Ghostwriter. Your Story, Done Right.

Killing Eve – “Nice Face” (S1E1, 2018) Review

Killing Eve – “Nice Face” (S1E1, 2018) Review

TL;DR: Killing Eve’s pilot rates 8 out of 10 on the rewatch scale. Phoebe Waller-Bridge adapted a set of novellas into an hour that is genuinely funny about an assassin and genuinely serious about a bored woman who has been waiting for something like this without knowing it.
Killing Eve – “Nice Face” (S1E1, 2018)
8/10

A young woman in a Vienna ice cream parlour smiles at a child across the room, holds the smile, and then tips the child’s dessert into her lap on the way out. Ninety seconds later she kills somebody and the episode has told you exactly what it is.

The 8 is for an hour that finds a tone nobody else on this page attempts. The violence is real and the register is comic, and the comedy is never at the expense of the violence, which is a considerably harder balance than either alone.

What it also does is put two women at the center of a category that has been men watching men for forty years, and the difference is not presentational. It changes what the pursuit is about.

The Opening Ninety Seconds

Villanelle in an ice cream parlour, being charming to a child, and then deliberately ruining her afternoon on the way out for no reason at all.

That is the most efficient character introduction on this page. It establishes that she is capable of warmth, that the warmth is available on demand, that she uses it, and that she does cruel things for amusement instead of for purpose.

The Vienna killing that follows is staged with the same economy. A crowded street, a man on a bicycle, a knife, and the episode declines to linger on any part of it, because everything the audience needed to know was already established a minute or so earlier using nothing more than a bowl of ice cream and a smile.

No violence occurs in it. The episode teaches the audience who this person is using a dessert, and every killing afterward is read against a scene about ice cream.

Compare what Dexter needs to establish the same thing. A kill, a code, a voiceover and ten minutes, where this uses a smile and a wrist.

For Writers

Introduce your character through a small cruelty with no purpose. Purposeful harm tells the reader about a plan and pointless harm tells them about a person. The smaller the act, the more it says. A ruined dessert is more informative than a murder.

Establish the capacity for charm before the capacity for violence. The audience then reads every pleasant moment afterward as a choice.

Efficiency in an opening is not speed. This scene is slow and it is doing four things at once.

Eve Is Bored

Sandra Oh plays a desk-bound MI5 security officer who is competent, unremarkable in her own estimation, and has an interest in female assassins that her colleagues find odd.

The pilot establishes her domestic life as pleasant and insufficient. A husband who is kind, a flat, a job that involves paperwork, and a birthday in which she is entirely present and visibly elsewhere. That is the engine. Eve is not unhappy and she is not satisfied, and the distinction is what the whole series runs on.

Her competence is established by being ignored. She works out what has happened, states it in a meeting, is dismissed, and is proved right in a way that gets her fired instead of promoted.

The detail the episode uses to make the point is a hospital witness. Eve identifies that the only person who saw anything is a woman nobody has interviewed properly, goes to her, and is correct, and the correctness is what costs her the job.

Oh plays the whole thing with an enthusiasm the character keeps having to suppress. When she talks about the killings she becomes animated in a way that embarrasses everybody present including herself.

Sandra Oh was reportedly sent the scripts and assumed she was being considered for the assassin, because the idea that she would be the lead in a British spy thriller had not occurred to her. That is worth knowing and it is also visible in how little the performance behaves like a lead.

Comer

Jodie Comer was largely unknown and the performance made her, and the reason is a specific technical range instead of the flamboyance the part could have invited.

Villanelle moves between accents, registers and apparent ages continuously, and the episode shows her doing it deliberately as a working method. She is Russian, then French, then something else, and the switching is visible as effort in a way that makes her competence legible.

Comer is from Liverpool and none of the accents in the series are hers, which is the kind of fact that only becomes interesting because the character is also performing every time she speaks.

What she does not play is enjoyment of killing. The kills are efficient and unremarkable to her, and the enjoyment is reserved for clothes, food, attention and provoking people, which is a considerably stranger construction.

The psychiatrist scene is the best material in the hour. She answers assessment questions correctly, knows exactly what the correct answers are, and is bored by having to supply them, and the sequence is funny and cold at once.

For Writers

Separate what your character does from what they enjoy. A killer who enjoys killing is a type, and one who is indifferent to it and delighted by shoes is a person. The gap between occupation and pleasure is where character lives.

Show the performance being performed. A character switching accents on purpose, visibly, tells the reader about skill and about the absence of a stable self at the same time.

Let them answer the assessment correctly. Somebody who knows what the right answers are and finds supplying them tedious is more unsettling than somebody who fails the test.

The Tone Holds

The series is funny and the killings are not played for laughs, which is a distinction a great many works get wrong in this category.

The method is that the comedy comes from character and the violence comes from situation. Villanelle is funny about clothes, about her handler, about a bad hotel. She is not funny while killing somebody, and the episode never scores a death as a joke.

That is the same principle Shaun of the Dead operates on from the other direction. The genre material is played straight and the people are funny, and neither undercuts the other.

The costume and production design support it. Villanelle’s clothes are the most discussed element of the series and they are doing character work, because a person who dresses like that is telling you what she wants to be looked at for.

Eve’s clothes are doing the opposite job with the same precision. Cardigans, sensible coats, hair pinned up because it is easier, and a woman who has stopped thinking about how she appears to anybody, which is why what happens to her hair later matters.

The Pursuit Is Mutual

The structural idea that separates this from everything else on the page is that both women want the other to exist.

Eve is looking for Villanelle and does not want to stop looking. Villanelle discovers that somebody is looking and is delighted instead of threatened. Neither of them wants the pursuit to end, which means the usual engine of the form has been inverted.

The hospital scene at the end of the episode is where it lands. The two women are in the same room, neither knows who the other is, and the exchange is about hair. That line is the series in miniature. An observation about somebody’s appearance, delivered kindly, by a person who has come to kill somebody else.

What the arrangement produces is a series about attention instead of about capture. Both women have been unseen in different ways and have found somebody who is looking, and everything that follows is about what that is worth to each of them.

Fiona Shaw and Kim Bodnia are the two handlers and both are better than the roles require. Carolyn is unreadable in a way that is played entirely as administrative politeness, and Konstantin is a man managing an asset he is quietly fond of.

For Writers

Invert the engine. If your pursuit’s participants both want it to continue, every scene changes meaning, because capture becomes a loss for the pursuer as well. The requirement is that both must have a reason. Eve is bored and Villanelle is unseen, and neither reason is about the other’s profession.

A first meeting where neither party knows the other is a gift and it can only be used once. Spend it on something trivial.

Ask what your two leads want from each other instead of what they want to do to each other. The second is a plot and the first is a series.

Should you watch Killing Eve S1E1?

Yes, and stop after the first season. An assassin introduced through a ruined ice cream, a bored woman who is animated by the wrong subject, a tone that is funny about everything except the killing, and a pursuit neither participant wants to end.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens in the Killing Eve pilot?
An MI5 security officer with an interest in female assassins works out that a series of European killings are connected, is dismissed and then fired for it, and is recruited to an off-books investigation.
What is the opening scene?
Villanelle smiles at a child in a Vienna ice cream parlour and then tips the child’s dessert into her lap on the way out. No violence occurs and it establishes everything about her.
Is Jodie Comer good in it?
The performance made her career. Villanelle switches accents and registers continuously as a working method, and Comer plays the switching as visible effort, which makes the competence legible.
Does she enjoy killing?
No, and that is the construction. The kills are efficient and unremarkable to her, and the enjoyment is reserved for clothes, food, attention and provoking people.
How does it balance comedy and violence?
The comedy comes from character and the violence comes from situation. Villanelle is funny about clothes and her handler, and the episode never scores a death as a joke.
What makes the pursuit different?
Both women want it to continue. Eve does not want to stop looking and Villanelle is delighted to be looked for, which inverts the usual engine of the form.
Is the whole series worth watching?
The first season is the one that works. The later seasons struggle with the same problem every pursuit narrative has, which is that the arrangement cannot be sustained indefinitely without resolution.

This film appears on 2 of my film lists

🏷︎ 2010s🏷︎ Dark Comedy🏷︎ Espionage🏷︎ Television