Latest
Post an AI Image and Unfriend MeShe Asked How to Publish Her Bedtime Story. They Called Her a Thief.The AI Hype Cycle: Why the Crash Is Coming, and Who’s Causing ItSix Claude Prompts That Get You Unstuck, and Why the Order MattersDogpiled Over AI Art at the Renaissance FaireClaude Opus 5.5: What the New Release Means for WritersTrump’s AI Force Is a Fire Department With No Fire CodeWhat It Costs to Fix an AI-Written ManuscriptWhen Your Memoir Should Be a NovelThe Hugging Face AI Agent Attack: An Operations ReadingWhen Your Own Memoir Sounds Like BraggingWhat Belongs on a Copyright PageWhat an AI Detector Score on Your Manuscript Is WorthThe Clients Who Pay and VanishThe Quotation Marks That Get Authors SuedThe Work You Would Never Have StartedMonthly or Milestone: How Ghostwriting Gets BilledWhen a Client Thinks the Ghostwriter Used AIThe One-Hour Call Before I Quote Your BookBehind the Book: The Mysterious Island, Neb’s SideHow to Organize Decades of Memories Into a MemoirWhy Rotten Tomatoes Sucks: The Score Does Not Mean What You ThinkWhy Amazon KDP Sucks: They Terminated My Account OvernightIngramSpark: How I Publish Now and WhyWhy Fiverr Sucks for Ghostwriting: The Buyer’s SideWhy eBay Sucks Now: A Seller’s Numbers and a Buyer’s WarningThe Ghost Story TraditionThe Gothic TraditionThe Christmas Ghost Story TraditionBooks to Give a WriterResurrection as a Narrative StructureThe Beach Read ArgumentWhy It’s a Wonderful Life Failed on ReleaseWhat to Read in SpringWhat to Read in SummerWhat to Read in OctoberHow Warner Bros. Dismantled a $17 Billion Cartoon EmpireThe Imaginary Scarcity TrapThe Graph That Goes Vertical Is Usually Somebody Else’sSubstack Is Not Collapsing. The Promise Was.The Disasters That Happen to Ordinary PeopleToba: The Winter That Almost Ended UsJay Stifflemire: Nothing Ever Gets Written DownGeorgie-Ann Getton: I Forgot I Had Free WillAI Detection Cannot Be Evidence, and Publishing Is Using It That WayAI Consciousness Left Philosophy and Entered the LaboratoryThe Office Block Where the Bedrooms AreBlack Tuesday: The Web Ring War Nobody Outside It NoticedThe Web Got Fenced: What AI Search Costs Small SitesWhat the AI Visibility Industry Sells, and What the Evidence Says
The Writing King Your Ethical Ghostwriter. Your Story, Done Right.

Why Marvel Cannot Make A Good Fantastic Four (Until They Did)

TL;DR: The Fantastic Four are Marvel’s first family, the team that started the whole Marvel universe in 1961, and for thirty years Hollywood couldn’t make a decent film about them. An unreleased cheapie, two goofy mid-2000s films and a disastrous reboot. Then, in 2025, First Steps finally worked, because it stopped trying to make them modern and let them be what they are: a family in the space age.

Marvel’s First Family

The Fantastic Four came first. Stan Lee and Jack Kirby created them in 1961, before Spider-Man, the X-Men or the Avengers, and their comic’s success launched the entire Marvel universe. Reed Richards, the brilliant scientist. Sue Storm, his wife, who can turn invisible. Johnny, her hot-headed brother, the Human Torch. And Ben Grimm, Reed’s best friend, turned into a rock-skinned monster called the Thing.

On paper, they should have been the easiest team in all of comics to put on screen: a family, with a clear dynamic, iconic powers and some of the greatest villains Marvel ever created. Instead, for three decades, every attempt failed, and the property got a reputation in Hollywood as cursed.

The Film Nobody Saw

The first attempt was made in 1992 and 1993 by Roger Corman’s company, on a budget of around a million dollars. The German company that held the rights reportedly needed to start production by a deadline or lose them. The finished film was never officially released.

Whether anybody ever intended it to come out is still disputed. The cast and crew believed they were making a real movie and promoted it at conventions. Then it vanished, and it circulated for years only as a bootleg. Its effects are cheap, its costumes look homemade and it’s more curiosity than film, but it’s oddly sincere. The people in it clearly loved the characters, and you can feel it in every cheap frame.

The 2005 Film and Its Sequel

The first released version came in 2005, directed by Tim Story, with Ioan Gruffudd as Reed, Jessica Alba as Sue, Chris Evans as Johnny and Michael Chiklis as Ben. It made money, and it’s not a disaster, but it’s flat, bright and forgettable, a family comedy with superpowers and a bland Doctor Doom.

Chiklis was good as the Thing, in a heavy prosthetic suit, and Evans was fun as Johnny, years before he became Captain America. But the film never found the sense of wonder that made the comics special. It felt like a sitcom, pleasant and disposable, the kind of thing you forget on the drive home.

The 2007 sequel, Rise of the Silver Surfer, introduced the Surfer and the great planet-eater Galactus, and then turned Galactus into a giant cosmic cloud. Fans have never forgiven it. It’s the moment the series lost what little credibility it had. Fox shelved plans for a Silver Surfer spin-off and let the franchise go quiet for eight years.

The 2015 Reboot

Fox tried again in 2015, with a darker, grittier reboot directed by Josh Trank, who’d made the found-footage superhero film Chronicle. The cast was strong: Miles Teller, Kate Mara, Michael B. Jordan and Jamie Bell. The production was reportedly a mess, with reshoots, studio interference and a director and studio at war.

The result was a joyless, murky, underlit film that spent most of its running time on an origin story and then rushed through a shapeless climax. The night before release, Trank tweeted that he’d had a much better version of the film that audiences would never see. It flopped badly, critics savaged it and it’s now one of the most notorious superhero failures ever made.

Why They Kept Failing

Look at the four failures together and a pattern appears. Every version tried to make the Fantastic Four fit its own moment. The 2005 film made them a bright, jokey family comedy. The 2015 film made them brooding, damaged young people in a grim world, like every other superhero film of its era. Neither version understood what the characters are.

Gritty is wrong for the Fantastic Four, and so is sitcom. They’re a family of explorers, born out of the optimism of the early sixties, the space race and the idea that science would take humanity to the stars. Their stories are about wonder, discovery and a family that argues and loves and saves the world together, usually before dinner. Take that away and you’re left with four people with powers, and there are plenty of those already.

For Writers

Every failed Fantastic Four film tried to make the characters fit its own era. None of them understood what the characters were originally about.

Adapting any story, from a comic to an old novel to a real life, means deciding what must stay and what can change. The mistake is changing the core of the material to suit the fashions of the moment.

Before you adapt anything, write down in one sentence what the original is really about. For the Fantastic Four, it’s a family exploring a world full of wonder. Everything else can change. That sentence can’t. Every failed version broke it, and the one that worked kept it.

What First Steps Got Right

The Fantastic Four: First Steps, directed by Matt Shakman in 2025, finally got it. The biggest decision was the setting. The film takes place on an alternate Earth that looks like the sixties imagined the future: retro-futurist cities, rocket ships with big analogue dials, flying cars, midcentury furniture. The Fantastic Four are world-famous heroes in a world that still believes in progress.

That setting solves everything. It lets the film be optimistic without seeming naive. It gives the characters a world that matches their origins. And it makes the film look like nothing else in the MCU. I gave it a 7, and I’d argue it’s the most distinctive Marvel film in years.

For Writers

First Steps set the Fantastic Four in a retro-futurist sixties world that matched the optimism of the era that created them, and suddenly everything about them made sense.

Setting is more than decoration. The right world can make characters make sense, supporting their values, explaining their behavior and giving them room to be themselves. The wrong one fights them at every turn, and the reader feels the friction without knowing where it comes from.

If your characters feel off in their world, the problem may be the world. Try changing the setting before you change the people, and see whether they suddenly come alive. First Steps didn’t rewrite the family. It gave them the right world.

The Family Is the Story

The second big decision was putting the family at the center of the plot. Sue is pregnant, and Galactus, the planet-eater, arrives and offers to spare the Earth if they give him their unborn son. The whole film turns on that choice, and on a family refusing to make it.

Pedro Pascal’s Reed is clever and anxious, Vanessa Kirby’s Sue is the team’s real strength, Joseph Quinn’s Johnny is cocky and warm, and Ebon Moss-Bachrach’s Ben is gentle and wry. For the first time on screen, they feel like a family, bickering and protective and loving, and their bond drives the story.

Galactus at Last

The third decision was simple: show Galactus properly. Ralph Ineson plays him as the towering, helmeted giant Jack Kirby drew in 1966, vast enough to dwarf cities, with a deep, calm voice that makes him feel like a force of nature. After the cloud in 2007, just seeing him on screen felt like an apology.

Julia Garner plays the Silver Surfer, his herald, and Michael Giacchino’s score gives the whole film a soaring, old-fashioned sense of adventure. For once, a Fantastic Four film felt as big as the comics.

The Rights Tangle

Part of the curse was simple ownership. For years, the Fantastic Four’s film rights sat with Fox, not with Marvel. That’s why the 2005, 2007 and 2015 films were made outside the MCU. Fox had every incentive to keep making films to hold on to the rights, and less incentive to make them well.

That changed when Disney bought most of Fox in 2019, bringing the Fantastic Four home to Marvel Studios. It took six more years to get them on screen, but for the first time, the people making the film owned the whole Marvel toybox, and could give the family the world and the villains they deserved.

Doom, Still Waiting

The other long-running failure is Doctor Doom, one of the greatest villains in comics: a genius, a king and a man convinced he’s the only one who can save the world. Julian McMahon played him in 2005 as a corporate schemer, and Toby Kebbell’s 2015 version was a glowing blob in a cloak. Neither came close.

First Steps wisely kept Doom mostly off screen and saved him for later, and Marvel has cast Robert Downey Jr. in the role for the next Avengers film. It’s a bold choice, and it’ll be the true test of whether Marvel understands the Fantastic Four’s world. A great Doom would finish the job First Steps started.

The Thing

If any character has come close in every version, it’s Ben Grimm. The Thing is the soul of the Fantastic Four, a gruff, sad, funny man trapped in a body he hates, and even the weakest films found something touching in him. Michael Chiklis, sweating inside a heavy rubber suit in 2005, gave him real warmth.

Ebon Moss-Bachrach’s version in First Steps is the best yet: quiet, kind and a little melancholy, a man who’s made his peace with his rocky skin and still carries the loss of the life he had. He’s the character audiences respond to most, and the film gives him space to breathe.

A Director’s Film

First Steps also felt like it had a director. Shakman, who’d made WandaVision, gave it a distinct look, pace and tone, and the studio let him. It’s the kind of director-driven approach I argued for in Why the 2000s Superhero Films Were Better Than the MCU, and it made all the difference.

The film isn’t perfect. The pacing sags in places, the villain is more spectacle than character and it leans on the audience’s goodwill. But it understood the Fantastic Four in a way no previous version did, and after thirty years, that’s worth celebrating.

Craft Note

Craft Note

The Fantastic Four curse was never really about the characters. It was about adaptations that tried to force them into the fashions of their moment, when their appeal was always a family’s sense of wonder.

The heart of a story survives changes in costume, setting and era. What it can’t survive is a change to its heart.

When you adapt or revise, protect the one thing that makes the story what it is, and feel free to change everything else.

The Curse Is Broken

For thirty years, Hollywood failed with the Fantastic Four because it kept trying to make them something else: a sitcom, a grim reboot, a cheap rights grab. First Steps finally let them be a family of explorers in a world that believes in the future, and it worked. I gave it a 7. After a cloud for a Galactus, that feels like a miracle.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why have Fantastic Four movies failed?
Previous adaptations tried to fit the characters to the style of their era, as a light family comedy in 2005 and a dark, gritty reboot in 2015, instead of capturing their original identity as an optimistic family of explorers. Production problems, weak villains and a poorly handled Galactus added to the failures.
Was the 1994 Fantastic Four movie ever released?
No. The low-budget film produced by Roger Corman’s company was completed but never officially released. It’s widely believed it was made to hold on to the film rights, though the cast and crew thought it would be released. It has circulated for years as a bootleg.
What went wrong with Fantastic Four (2015)?
The 2015 reboot, directed by Josh Trank, suffered from a troubled production, reported studio interference and extensive reshoots. The finished film was dark, rushed and poorly received. Trank publicly suggested his original version was better, and the film became a notable box office and critical failure.
Is The Fantastic Four: First Steps good?
It’s widely considered the best Fantastic Four film. Its retro-futurist 1960s-style setting, strong focus on the family, faithful depiction of Galactus and distinctive direction by Matt Shakman set it apart from earlier versions. I rate it a 7, with some pacing issues holding it back.
Who plays the Fantastic Four in First Steps?
Pedro Pascal plays Reed Richards, Vanessa Kirby plays Sue Storm, Joseph Quinn plays Johnny Storm and Ebon Moss-Bachrach plays Ben Grimm. Ralph Ineson plays Galactus and Julia Garner plays the Silver Surfer. Matt Shakman directed the film, released in 2025.
Why did fans hate Galactus in Rise of the Silver Surfer?
In the 2007 film, Galactus appeared as a vast cosmic cloud instead of the giant armored figure from the comics. Fans felt it betrayed one of Marvel’s most famous characters. First Steps corrected this by showing Galactus as the towering, helmeted being Jack Kirby designed.
When were the Fantastic Four created?
Stan Lee and Jack Kirby created the Fantastic Four in 1961, in The Fantastic Four issue one. The team predates Spider-Man, the X-Men and the Avengers, and its success helped launch the modern Marvel Comics universe. They’re often called Marvel’s first family.

This film appears on one of my film lists

About the Author
Richard Lowe, professional ghostwriter

Richard Lowe is a professional ghostwriter and author with 113+ books authored and 54+ ghostwritten. Before writing full time he spent 33 years in enterprise technology, including 20 years as Director of Computer Operations and Technical Services at Trader Joe's. He writes nonfiction, fiction and memoir, and works with executives and experts on books that build authority.

More about Richard Lowe →

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.