Punctuation Plain and Simple

Punctuation is where a great deal of otherwise competent writing falls apart, and it’s a subject many writers find confusing. Punctuation Plain and Simple by Edgar C. Alward and Jean A. Alward sets out to fix that with exactly the approach its title promises: a clear, understandable, no-nonsense method for learning the basics of punctuation, going chapter by chapter through the marks and their correct use. As a focused, accessible reference on a narrow but essential mechanical skill, it does a useful job for the writer who needs to shore up this particular weakness.

The pitch is clarity and accessibility, demystifying a set of rules that intimidate many writers, and for its target reader that simple approach is exactly right.

Clear instruction on a confusing subject

The value is a methodical, accessible treatment of punctuation. It takes each mark in turn (the comma, the semicolon, the colon, the dash, the apostrophe, and the rest) and explains its correct use in detail and in plain language. Some writers guess at commas, misuse semicolons, or can’t quite pin down the apostrophe. For them this kind of clear, focused instruction helps, replacing uncertainty with understandable rules.

Punctuation is a learnable mechanical skill, and a book that teaches it plainly serves a real need. Punctuation errors undermine a reader’s confidence in a writer, whatever the quality of the ideas.

Mechanics as credibility

The deeper reason this matters is that correct punctuation is part of a writer’s credibility. Errors in the mechanics, misplaced commas, comma splices, apostrophe mistakes, signal carelessness to readers, editors, and agents, and can undermine otherwise strong writing before its content is even judged. For a writer pursuing publication or professional work, mastering this unglamorous skill isn’t optional, and a clear reference that builds real understanding instead of rote rule-following helps a writer punctuate correctly and confidently across everything they write. The mechanics are the foundation the rest of the craft sits on.

What are the weaknesses of Punctuation Plain and Simple?

The caveats are about scope and competition. It’s a narrow reference on one mechanical aspect of writing. That makes it a supplement to craft instruction instead of a guide to writing well. It’s valuable for fixing this weakness and nothing beyond it.

The fundamentals of punctuation are also highly stable, which is good for the book’s lasting accuracy but means its content overlaps heavily with the punctuation sections of any full style guide and with abundant free online resources, so a writer must decide whether they want a dedicated volume or whether a broader reference will serve them. And punctuation instruction, however clear, is inherently dry. These are minor limits on a competent, focused tool.

Is Punctuation Plain and Simple worth reading?

It’s a clear, accessible, useful reference on punctuation, valuable for the writer who needs to shore up this credibility-critical weakness with plain-language instruction that builds real understanding. It gets a solid-but-modest rating because of its narrow scope: it’s a focused supplement on one mechanical skill, its stable content overlaps with full style guides and free online resources, and the subject is unavoidably dry.

For a writer confused by punctuation who wants dedicated, understandable help, it does its job well; for one who has a good style guide or is comfortable with the basics, it may be redundant. A competent specialist reference on an essential skill.

Frequently Asked Questions