The two loud versions of AI adoption are both annoying. The enthusiast who name-drops models and posts about prompts. The refuser who turns every conversation into a complaint about AI. The third version, the serious version, is quiet. The professional uses the tool where it helps, ignores it where…
The replacement worry is legitimate, and the marketing answers in both directions are useless. The “you will not be replaced, you will be enhanced” talking point is comforting and partly wrong. The “everything will be automated” panic is dramatic and also partly wrong. The honest answer is that AI…
If you got through the last twenty years without learning much technology beyond email and a smartphone, the framing of AI as a tech thing made for tech people is reasonable. The framing also happens to be wrong for this specific wave, because the interface is conversational. You type a sentence in…
Many doubters stay out of AI because of the takeover narratives: superintelligence, civilizational risk, mass unemployment, machine consciousness. Those concerns deserve serious attention from people who work on them, and the people who work on them are doing real work. The conversation about using…
Many doubters refuse AI on ethical grounds: training data taken without consent, labor displacement, environmental cost, concentration of power in a few companies. Those concerns are legitimate and worth thinking carefully about. The conclusion that the right response is to refuse the technology…
The strongest doubter argument is that AI is the next NFT, crypto, web3, or metaverse, all of which were hyped and faded. The pattern recognition is real and the doubter is not stupid for noticing it. The argument fails because those technologies failed by not delivering on the underlying…
Doubters of AI are not stupid, and many of their concerns are reasonable. The hype is real, the hallucinations are real, the wasted spending on bad AI rollouts is real. None of that changes the underlying fact that the tools work for a specific set of jobs, that the work being affected includes…
Clients are not using AI to replace ghostwriters. They use it to collaborate, and they expect a writer fluent in the same tools. What the shift means for you.
If this series sparked something, let's talk about turning your expertise into a finished book.
