The Revenge Memoir: Who Shouldn’t Write One

This entry is part 8 of 8 in the series Reasons For Not Writing Your Book
TL;DR: A revenge memoir is a bad idea for the person writing it and a worse idea for the ghostwriter who helps the memoir hub. I once turned down a former mob informant who wanted to name names and settle scores, then swore he could keep my involvement secret. I asked how he expected me to believe he could keep one secret while writing a book to expose everyone else’s. Here is who should not write the revenge memoir, and why I talk most people out of it.

A guy called me once wanting a book about his days as a confidential informant. He had worked inside the mob and fed information to the FBI, and now he wanted to write the whole thing down and name names, settle old scores with people who had wronged him. He could see I was hesitating, so he made me a promise. My involvement would stay secret. He swore to God he would never tell a soul that I had written it.

I asked him one question. You want me to write a book that exposes other people’s secrets, and you are promising me you can keep one. Why would I believe that? He did not have an answer. He went away, and I was glad to see him go, because a revenge memoir is a bad idea for the person writing it and a worse idea for the ghostwriter who helps.

Why I Try to Talk Every my memoir process Client Out of It

When someone comes to me wanting to burn an ex, a former boss, a business partner, or a judge to the ground in print, I do my best to talk them down. I walk them through the legal exposure, the libel risk, the very real possibility of getting sued over what they want to say. Sometimes it works. More often the only thing I accomplish is that they decide to go hire someone else, which is fine with me. I do not want to write a revenge memoir. They are ugly to work on, and the legal danger does not stop at the author. It reaches the ghostwriter who put the words down too. A writer who helps craft a defamatory book is not automatically a bystander in the eyes of the law, which is one more reason I will not take the work no matter how good the story sounds.

This is not me being squeamish. It is me having read enough of these to know how they end. The author thinks the book will give them the vindication they have been chasing. It almost never does. The people they are writing about rarely read it, rarely care, and rarely feel the sting the author spent a year sharpening. What the book reliably delivers instead is a fresh fight, sometimes a legal one, with the exact people they were trying to leave behind. They wanted to close a wound and they have reopened it in public, with their name on the cover, for anyone to find. The revenge they imagined was private and satisfying. The revenge they get is expensive and humiliating, and it points back at them.

The Tell Is the Drumbeat

You can spot a revenge memoir from the first conversation, because it has a sound, and the sound is I am a victim, I am a victim, I am a victim. Every page is something that was done to them. This person did this. That person did that. I have proof. The judge was unfair. The divorce lawyer was in the spouse’s pocket. Everybody was biased. Everybody was against them.

What is missing is the tell. There is never a moment where the author takes responsibility for anything, never a line where they say this part was on me. A real story has the person in it making choices and living with them. A revenge memoir has a blameless narrator surrounded by villains, and that endless appeal to pity is exactly what makes it both unconvincing on the page and dangerous in a courtroom. Readers do not trust a narrator who is never wrong. We have all met the person at the party who is the perpetual victim of every story they tell, and we all learn to discount them, because life does not actually work that way and we know it. A reader does the same thing to a memoir. The minute they sense the deck is stacked, that every other character exists only to wrong the hero, they stop believing the hero too. And a court cares even less than a reader does. It does not matter how wronged you felt when you printed something false about a real person. Your feelings are not a defense.

The Legal Part, Said Plainly

I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice, but I flag the risk on memoirs constantly, because authors walk into it without seeing it. When you put a false statement of fact in print that damages a real, identifiable person’s reputation, that is defamation, and you can be sued for it. Naming names to get even is the fastest route into that exposure. Believing every word does not protect you, because belief is not proof, and in a courtroom you may have to prove it. Owning the story does not protect you either, because it stops being only your story the moment you start telling everyone else’s, and the people you name get a say you did not invite.

The move is simple and I make it every time it is warranted. Before a single word about a real person goes public, get the manuscript vetted by an actual attorney. Not me, not a friend, a lawyer who handles this kind of work and can tell you what crosses the line in your jurisdiction. That one step is the difference between a book and a lawsuit, and an hour of a lawyer’s time is cheap next to a judgment against you. Plenty of memoirs deal with real conflict and real people honestly and never get anyone sued. The ones that get sued are almost always the ones written to wound, where the goal was the damage and the truth was an afterthought.

There’s a Better Book in There

Here is what I try to redirect people toward, because it is almost always sitting right next to the revenge book they came in wanting. There is a higher version of their story. Same life, same hard people, same painful events, but told as what they lived through and what they learned, with them as a real person who made choices, instead of a hit piece aimed at one enemy.

That book does something the revenge memoir never can. It moves a reader, it earns respect, and it gives the author something better than the brief, sour satisfaction of trying to wound someone in print. It also tends to be the book that actually sells, because readers come to a memoir for the thing the author survived and grew through, not for a list of grievances against people they have never met. The revenge memoir keeps you standing in the wound, rereading the injury, inviting a lawsuit. The other book lets you finally walk out of it and bring the reader with you. my memoir process When I can get someone to see that, the book gets good, and the anger that drove them to me turns into something worth reading. When I cannot, I wish them well and let them take the revenge book somewhere else, because some lessons a person has to learn the hard way, on their own dime and their own time.

Schedule a free consultation to discuss your book project.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I write a memoir to expose someone who wronged me?
It is one of the worst reasons to write a book. A revenge memoir rarely delivers the vindication the author wants, and it reliably creates a fresh fight, often a legal one, with the people it targets. Naming a real person to settle a score is a direct route to a defamation claim. There is almost always a stronger book in the same material, told as what you lived and learned rather than as an attack.
Can you get sued over what you write in a memoir?
Yes. Putting a false statement of fact in print that damages a real, identifiable person’s reputation is defamation, and you can be sued for it. Believing it is true does not automatically protect you, and owning the story does not either. Before anything about a real person goes public, have the manuscript vetted by an attorney who handles this. This is general information, not legal advice.
How do you know a memoir is really about revenge?
The tell is the drumbeat of victimhood with no responsibility taken. Every event is something done to the author, every other person is a villain, the judge was unfair, everyone was biased, and the narrator is never once wrong. Readers do not trust a blameless narrator, and a court does not care how wronged you felt when you printed something false. A real story has the author making choices and living with them.

📝 Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are solely those of Richard Lowe and are based on personal experience and research. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional legal, financial, accounting, or business advice. Always consult with qualified professionals before making important business or legal decisions. Richard Lowe is not a lawyer, accountant, or licensed professional advisor, and this content does not establish any professional relationship.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *