This page contains affiliate links. If you buy through them I may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. I only recommend tools I actually use.

ProWritingAid

The grammar and style checker I use, and I like it a lot better than Grammarly.

PriceFree tier available. Premium recommended. Check current pricing.
What I use it forMy editing-stage checker for catching repetition, awkward sentences, and the things I stop seeing in my own drafts.
My rating4.5 / 5
CategoryWriting Tools
Share

Try ProWritingAid

Why I recommend it:

Every writer needs a second set of eyes, and most of us cannot afford a human editor for every draft. That is where a tool like this earns its place. ProWritingAid is a grammar and style checker, and I like it a lot better than Grammarly, which is the one most people reach for first.

It is good at everything you would expect a grammar checker to be good at. Spelling, grammar, punctuation, the basics it handles cleanly. Where it goes further than the average checker is the style side. It flags awkward sentences and suggests ways to rewrite them, and that part is genuinely useful. It catches the repetition you stop seeing in your own work, the overused words, the sentences that all run the same length until the page goes flat. Twenty-five reports break your writing down from a couple dozen angles, and you can run any of them on a manuscript of any length.

A fair warning about the suggestions. If you turn on every check at once, you will get more recommendations than you can possibly deal with. It is not shy. The trick is to turn on the checks you actually care about and ignore the noise. It also has opinions about commas, sometimes too many, sometimes too few, but Grammarly does the exact same thing. No automated tool has the comma fully figured out, and you should not expect this one to either. You are the writer. The tool is a checker. You make the call.

Here is the part most reviews will not tell you, and it matters more every month. When the tool rewrites an awkward sentence for you and you take the rewrite as given, that rewritten text is AI-generated. It can read as AI to one of the AI-detection checkers people are running now. That is not a knock on ProWritingAid specifically. It is true of every writing tool that suggests rewrites, Grammarly included. If you are in a situation where AI detection matters, use the suggestions as a prompt to fix the sentence yourself rather than pasting in the machine’s version word for word. Let it point at the problem, then solve it in your own voice.

On the plan, I have a lifetime license, which they used to offer and I grabbed. For most people I would recommend at least the Premium tier. The free version is limited, the way every free tier is limited, enough to see what the tool does but not enough to actually lean on it. Premium opens up the full set of reports and the integrations with Word, Google Docs, and Scrivener, which is where it becomes part of your actual workflow instead of a thing you paste text into.

Where it fits in the process matters too. This is not a first-draft tool. When you are drafting, you want to get words down without something underlining every other sentence in red, because that kills momentum. Save it for the editing pass. Once the draft exists and you are cleaning it up, run the reports, work through the flags that matter, and skip the ones that do not. Used that way it speeds up the part of writing most people hate, the line-by-line polish, without getting in the way of the part where you actually create. I treat it as an editing-stage tool, not a writing-stage one, and it serves me far better for it.

I use it, I prefer it to the better-known competitor, and it does what a grammar and style checker should do. Just remember what it is and what it is not. It will make your prose cleaner and tighter. It will not write the book for you, and you would not want it to. Use it as the second set of eyes, keep your own hand on the wheel, and it is one of the better tools a writer can have.

Pros

  • Better than Grammarly in my experience, and I have used both
  • Strong on the basics plus a real style layer: repetition, overused words, sentence variety
  • 25 reports you can run on a manuscript of any length
  • Integrates with Word, Google Docs, and Scrivener so it fits your real workflow

Cons

  • Turn on everything and you get more suggestions than you can handle
  • Like every checker, it has inconsistent opinions about commas
  • Take its sentence rewrites word for word and they can read as AI on a detector

These are the tools I use to produce books for clients. If you would rather skip the learning curve, hire me to write yours.

All Picks