Latest
What’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeAI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.I Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.The Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainGetty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends OnWriting Your Worst Moments in a Memoir: Show the Evidence, Skip the VerdictHow to Register a Copyright for Your Book (and What Doesn’t Count)Your AI Chats Aren’t Private: Deleted ChatGPT Logs in CourtThe Board Seat Scam: A 419 Letter in a Business SuitI Joined the Science Fiction Book Club 30 TimesCitations in a Memoir: Endnotes, Footnotes and Fair Use

National Grammar Day

TL;DR: Grammar matters because it gets you understood. Good grammar communicates clearly and bad grammar gets in the way, but the grammar snobs miss that once you know the rules cold, you earn the right to break them on purpose. National Grammar Day is March 4, a good day to learn the rules well enough to keep your own writing clean without going broke on editors.

Grammar Is About Being Understood, Not Being Correct

Grammar is about being understood, and being correct is beside the point. Good grammar communicates. Bad grammar gets in the way. That’s the entire reason it matters.
Share on X

I’ve always believed grammar matters, and the reason is practical. Grammar and spelling are how we communicate. Good grammar communicates clearly. Bad grammar muddies the message and makes the reader work to figure out what you meant. That’s the whole case for it.

So over the years I worked to make my grammar as clean as I could, not to impress anyone, but because clean writing conveys meaning better than messy writing. When the mechanics are solid, the reader stops noticing them and starts absorbing what you’re saying. That’s the goal. The grammar disappears and the message gets through.

National Grammar Day falls on March 4, and despite the reputation grammar has for being fussy and joyless, the day is really about something useful: writing in a way that other people can understand.

Watch: 7 Most Common English Grammar Mistakes + TEST - Do you make these mistakes?, AccurateEnglish

Master the Rules, Then Break Them on Purpose

You can’t break a rule effectively until you know it cold. Bad grammar by accident is a mistake. Bad grammar on purpose is a tool.
Share on X

I part ways with the grammar police because they want the rules obeyed every time. I want to know them well enough to break them deliberately.

I break grammar rules in my own books on purpose. I use modern language.

I use swear words when they fit, in my own work and in client work when the client wants them. Sometimes I deliberately use a construction that’s technically wrong, for shock value or to drive a point home harder than a correct sentence could. A fragment can hit. A run-on can race. A rule broken with intent does work that a clean sentence cannot.

But that only works if you know the rule you’re breaking. Bad grammar by accident is a mistake that confuses the reader. Bad grammar on purpose is a tool that controls them. The difference is mastery.

Breaking Grammar: Mistake or Tool?A comparison of bad grammar by accident and bad grammar on purpose, as Richard describes them. The first confuses the reader because the writer is guessing. The second controls the reader because the writer knows the rule being broken.Breaking Grammar: Mistake or Tool?Bad grammar by accidentA mistakeConfuses the readerWriter is guessingWriting by accidentBad grammar on purposeA toolControls the readerWriter knows the rule coldWriting with intention
Breaking Grammar: Mistake or Tool?A comparison of bad grammar by accident and bad grammar on purpose, as Richard describes them. The first confuses the reader because the writer is guessing. The second controls the reader because the writer knows the rule being broken.Breaking Grammar: Mistake or Tool?Bad grammar by accidentA mistakeConfuses the readerWriter is guessingWriting by accidentBad grammar on purposeA toolControls the readerWriter knows the rule coldWriting with intention

The difference between a mistake and a tool is mastery of the rule.

You have to understand the rules fluently before you can break them on purpose, and that’s why I wrote an entire book about deliberately terrible writing, the Awful Writing Handbook. You can’t weaponize bad writing until you understand good writing cold.

Every Author Should Know Their Own Language

This isn’t negotiable for me. Any author should understand the grammar and spelling rules of their own language fluently.

A sentence will be wrong if you don’t, but the bigger reason is that fluency is what gives you choices. If you don’t know the rule, you can’t decide whether to follow it. You’re just guessing, and the reader can tell.

A writer who knows the rules writes with intention. A writer who doesn’t writes by accident and hopes it works out.

You don’t need to memorize every obscure point of usage. You need to know your language well enough that the basics are automatic and the choices are yours. (See also Barron's Essentials of English) That fluency is the foundation everything else sits on.

How to Keep Your Writing Clean Without Going Broke

Knowing grammar and catching every error in a long manuscript are two different skills. Even strong writers miss their own mistakes, because the brain reads what it meant to write. So here’s the practical part.

If you’re a ghostwriter, run client work through an editor. That’s not optional. A client is paying for professional work, and a human editor is part of professional work. For your own personal books, a full editor on every title can get expensive fast, especially if you write quickly and produce a lot.

That’s where tools fill the gap. ProWritingAid and similar tools catch the errors your eye skates past, and they’re far cheaper than a human editor for personal projects.

AI is also useful here. Ask it to find grammar errors and suggest corrections, and it’ll catch a lot. None of these replace a real editor for work that matters most, but for keeping your own books clean on a budget, they pay for themselves. Use the human for the high-stakes work and the tools for everything else.

Keeping your writing clean
Situation What to use
Ghostwritten client work A human editor, not optional
Your own personal books ProWritingAid and similar tools
Quick error sweep Ask AI to find errors and suggest corrections
Work that matters most A real human editor
Everyday habit Read your work aloud

How do you mark National Grammar Day?

Notice your own writing for a day. Read back an email or a page of something you wrote and ask whether the grammar is helping the reader or getting in the way. That’s the only question that matters, and most writing fails it in small, fixable ways.

If you want to sharpen up, pick one thing you’re unsure about, the difference you always have to look up, the rule you fake, and learn it. One rule mastered is one more choice you get to make on purpose.

And if you write seriously, build a cleanup habit. Run your work through a tool, read it aloud, and for anything important, get a human editor on it. Grammar is there to make sure the person on the other end gets exactly what you meant. Master it, then bend it when bending serves the reader. That’s what good writers do with the rules.

National Grammar Day FAQ

When is National Grammar Day?
March 4. The date is a small joke in itself, since “March 4” reads like “march forth.” It celebrates clear writing and the grammar that makes communication work. (See also The Little Red Writing Book)
Why does grammar matter?
Because grammar is how meaning travels from writer to reader. Good grammar communicates clearly and disappears into the message. Bad grammar makes the reader work to understand you and often distorts what you meant.
Is it ever okay to break grammar rules?
Yes, when you do it on purpose and know exactly what rule you’re breaking and why. A deliberate fragment or run-on can create an effect a correct sentence cannot. The difference between a mistake and a tool is intention and mastery.
Do I need an editor, or can I use tools?
For client work and high-stakes projects, use a human editor. For personal books on a budget, tools like ProWritingAid and AI grammar checks catch most errors at a fraction of the cost. The smart approach uses humans for what matters most and tools for everything else.
How well do I need to know grammar to write well?
Well enough that the basics are automatic and the choices are yours. You don’t need every obscure rule memorized, but fluency in your own language is what lets you write with intention instead of guessing.

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment