YouTube Sucks: 8 Alarming Issues You Should Know

YouTube sucks

In the heartland of digital content, YouTube stands as a titan. Yet, with any titan comes significant pitfalls. More and more, I find myself whispering, “YouTube sucks!” and I am not alone. Critics claim the platform is rife with issues, and their allegations range from copyright abuse, censorship, to problems with the algorithm.

The very heart of the contention lies with YouTube’s copyright policies. The platform’s “Content ID” system, designed to prevent copyright infringement, often swings like a pendulum too far in favor of claimants. Channels have been taken down without warning due to false copyright claims, leading to loss of revenue and a feeling of helplessness among creators. Remember, creators are the lifeblood of YouTube. But it seems that the platform is forgetting who keeps it alive and thriving.

My Love-Hate Relationship with YouTube

Sometimes YouTube sucks and sometimes its greatFor me, YouTube is a paradox – a platform that I simultaneously cherish and despise. My relationship with YouTube can best be described as a dance between love and hate, an intricate waltz between appreciating the availability of diverse content and feeling annoyed by the intrusive ad model.

The love aspect is undeniably strong. It’s impossible to overlook the fact that YouTube provides free hosting for videos – an enormous boon for content creators, educators, businesses, and hobbyists alike. With YouTube’s robust infrastructure, videos work flawlessly on virtually every device, from smartphones to desktops to smart TVs. Its reliability is unparalleled, seldom experiencing downtimes or major glitches.

In terms of content, YouTube’s vastness is staggering. There are channels catering to an array of interests – from cooking and travel vlogs to educational channels and movie trailers. For a content consumer, YouTube is like an all-you-can-eat buffet where there’s something palatable for everyone. This diversity and accessibility of content have me, like millions of others, coming back to YouTube time and again.

However, as much as I love the benefits of YouTube, there’s a flip side to the coin that often leaves me thinking, “YouTube sucks.” The platform’s primary revenue model, advertising, has become the bane of my viewing experience. What was once an occasional pre-roll ad has transformed into frequent interruptions. Videos are regularly punctuated with two back-to-back ads that disrupt the viewing experience and often feel invasive.

Then there’s the issue of YouTube Premium. At $13.99 per month ($139.99 for a year prepaid), it feels overpriced for the value it offers. The service provides ad-free viewing and access to exclusive content, but it’s bundled with other features that I find unrelated and unnecessary – such as YouTube Music. Considering the variety of alternative platforms and services available, it’s impossible to justify this cost solely for the privilege of an uninterrupted viewing experience.

Therefore, despite my fondness for the incredible array of content that YouTube offers, the frustration I feel with its advertising model and premium pricing makes it a bitter-sweet experience. YouTube’s user experience is like a seesaw that keeps tilting between love and hate – an unfortunate situation for what is otherwise a remarkable platform.

YouTube’s Unignorable Shortcomings

In the heartland of digital content, YouTube stands as a titan. Yet, with any titan comes significant pitfalls. More and more, I find myself whispering, “YouTube sucks!” and I am not alone. Critics claim the platform is rife with issues, and their allegations range from copyright abuse, censorship, to problems with the algorithm.

The crux of the contention lies with YouTube’s copyright policies. The platform’s “Content ID” system, designed to prevent copyright infringement, is said to lean too far in favor of claimants. Innocent channels have been taken down without warning due to false copyright claims, leading to a loss of revenue and an overwhelming feeling of helplessness among creators. As creators are the lifeblood of YouTube, these incidents cast a dark shadow over the platform’s reputation.

Additionally, the sheer enormity of YouTube’s reach has amplified these issues. As the platform boasts more than 2 billion logged-in monthly users, even a minor glitch can impact millions. This massive scale makes YouTube’s shortcomings not just a gripe of a few disgruntled users, but a global concern.

Moreover, creators have complained about the lack of communication and clarity from YouTube in handling these issues. With automated responses and elusive human support, creators often feel lost in a sea of confusion and frustration, exacerbating the sentiment that YouTube sucks.

The Tyranny of the Algorithm

Ah, the Algorithm! The mysterious and frustrating entity that decides what we watch. It feels like a dystopian sci-fi plot where a cold, impersonal AI controls our digital lives. But here we are, living it. YouTube’s algorithm often promotes content that is sensational or extreme. It can easily trap viewers into a bubble of similar content, impairing discovery of new and potentially more enlightening material.

Furthermore, this algorithmic determinism leaves creators at the mercy of an unpredictable beast. A minor tweak in the algorithm can suddenly make a channel’s views plummet, leading to a significant loss in ad revenue. The unpredictability fosters a constant state of anxiety and uncertainty among creators.

Also, the lack of transparency in how the algorithm works makes it even harder for creators to adapt. It’s like fighting an invisible enemy. You can’t strategize if you don’t know what you’re up against. This fog of war exacerbates the sentiment that YouTube sucks.

Despite these issues, the algorithm is not entirely evil. Its ability to recommend related content can lead to increased exposure for many channels. However, the question remains whether the benefits outweigh the negatives.

The Censorship Conundrum

In the guise of “Community Guidelines,” YouTube exerts significant control over what content is allowed on the platform. Some view this as necessary moderation, but others see it as outright censorship. The lack of transparency in the decision-making process is particularly frustrating. In many instances, YouTube has been accused of favoring corporate interests over independent creators, further exacerbating the sentiment that YouTube sucks.

Many creators argue that the rules are vaguely defined and inconsistently enforced. A joke that passes without issue on one channel might lead to another being penalized. This perceived favoritism fuels a feeling of distrust and resentment towards the platform.

Further, the specter of demonetization looms over creators like a guillotine. Using certain words or discussing particular topics can lead to a video being demonetized, a harsh penalty that affects creators’ livelihood. This heavy-handed approach stifles creativity and forces creators to self-censor.

Despite the challenges, many creators continue to navigate this rocky terrain, adapting and innovating in a constantly changing landscape. Their resilience is a testament to the power of creative expression and the enduring appeal of the platform.

The Rise of Alternatives

In this digital age, competition is but a click away. Platforms like Vimeo, Dailymotion, and even Facebook are offering video content services that compete with YouTube. Then there’s Twitch, primarily a live streaming platform but is increasingly being used for pre-recorded content. The growing popularity of these alternatives shows a shift in the market. It seems like many are agreeing that “YouTube sucks” and are exploring different avenues.

These alternative platforms offer varying features that attract different types of content creators and viewers. Vimeo is known for its high-quality content and creator-friendly monetization policies. Dailymotion offers a more laid-back and less restrictive platform for creators. Twitch, on the other hand, offers direct interaction with viewers, creating a more intimate viewing experience.

However, despite their growing popularity, these alternatives have not yet reached the ubiquity of YouTube. Many still view YouTube as the de facto platform for online video content. However, the shifting landscape and growing discontent may change this narrative soon.

The increasing competition also forces YouTube to innovate and address its shortcomings. In a way, the statement “YouTube sucks” could be the driving force behind future improvements on the platform.

The Potential Future of Online Video Content

Looking at the horizon, the future of online video content is promising but uncertain. With the advent of Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), and an ever-increasing demand for interactivity, the entire landscape may soon undergo a drastic transformation. Platforms like YouTube will need to adapt to these changes or risk becoming obsolete. Will YouTube rise to the challenge or continue down the path that leads many to say, “YouTube sucks?” Only time will tell.

The potential of VR and AR in transforming the way we consume video content is immense. Imagine watching a cooking video and being able to virtually ‘be’ in the kitchen with the chef or watching a travel vlog and feeling like you’re exploring a new city firsthand. These technologies could revolutionize not only how we watch videos, but also how creators make them.

However, the integration of these new technologies comes with its own set of challenges. From technical issues like video quality and streaming speeds to psychological concerns like motion sickness and desensitization, the road to a VR and AR future is paved with obstacles.

Yet, one can’t help but be excited about the possibilities. As we look forward to this brave new world of video content, it’s clear that change is the only constant. Platforms that refuse to adapt will be left behind. As for YouTube, the ball is in their court. The future is coming, and it won’t wait.

The Advertising Abyss of YouTube

For many users and creators alike, the chief complaint echoing “YouTube sucks” is directed at its advertising model. As the platform has grown, so too has the presence and frequency of advertisements. This intrusiveness disrupts the user experience and often detracts from the content itself.

Initially, YouTube advertisements were relatively unobtrusive. Pre-roll ads could be skipped after a few seconds, and mid-roll ads were infrequent. However, over time, YouTube has introduced multiple, unskippable ads at the beginning, throughout, and end of videos. The viewer’s experience has become a constant tug of war between enjoying the content and enduring the barrage of advertisements.

For content creators, this advertising model also presents a hurdle. YouTube’s ad revenue share leans heavily in favor of the platform itself. A considerable portion of ad revenue doesn’t reach the creators who are the actual driving force behind the content. This lopsided division only adds to creators’ frustrations and exacerbates the feeling of “YouTube sucks.”

Moreover, the arbitrary demonetization policies of YouTube add to the ad-related grievances. Often, videos are demonetized for reasons that are unclear or overly strict, meaning that no ads will run on them, denying creators their share of revenue. This unpredictability has been a major point of contention among creators, often feeling like a Sword of Damocles hanging over their livelihoods.

In the face of these complaints, YouTube’s response has been less than satisfactory. Updates to the advertising model often feel like a step backward rather than forward. Although YouTube introduced YouTube Premium, an ad-free subscription service, it’s seen by many as a Band-Aid solution, not addressing the underlying issues and out of reach for many viewers due to its cost.

The discontent with YouTube’s advertising model has opened the door for competing platforms, offering different monetization models, to attract both creators and viewers. It’s a clear call to YouTube that something needs to change, and fast.

10 Unsettling Facts Why YouTube Sucks

When it comes to online video content, YouTube reigns supreme. However, the platform has some flaws that make it less than perfect for some users. Here are ten unsettling facts that prove why “YouTube Sucks” isn’t just a baseless complaint:

  1. Intrusive Ads: Users are constantly bombarded with ads, many of which are irrelevant to their interests. These interruptions often occur at crucial points in a video, ruining the viewer’s experience.
  2. YouTube Premium Overpriced: At $12.99 per month, YouTube Premium is considered overpriced by many. This subscription is meant to enhance the user experience by eliminating ads, but its high cost doesn’t justify the benefits for all users.
  3. Algorithm Bias: YouTube’s recommendation algorithm often promotes popular or controversial videos over quality content. This bias can lead to a less diverse range of content being viewed.
  4. Data Privacy Issues: Like many online platforms, YouTube collects a considerable amount of user data, raising concerns about privacy.
  5. Monopolistic Behaviour: YouTube holds an overwhelming majority of the online video market share, giving it a monopolistic power that limits competition and innovation.
  6. Unreliable Copyright Claims: Content creators often face unjust copyright claims and takedowns, which can be detrimental to their channels.
  7. Inconsistent Community Guidelines Enforcement: YouTube’s community guidelines are not always consistently enforced, leading to unfair treatment of some creators and confusion about what content is allowed.
  8. Limited Support for Creators: While YouTube provides a platform for creators, the support provided to them, particularly smaller or niche creators, is often limited.
  9. Lack of Transparency: YouTube has been criticized for its lack of transparency, particularly regarding changes in policy or algorithms, which can greatly affect creators’ livelihoods.
  10. Limited Parental Controls: Although YouTube Kids exists as a safer space for children, the main platform’s parental controls are lacking. This gap can allow children to accidentally access inappropriate content.

In conclusion, despite its status as a video hosting giant, YouTube has several serious issues that detract from its user experience. From intrusive ads to algorithm bias, these ten facts make it clear why many users have a love-hate relationship with YouTube. While YouTube remains a crucial platform for content sharing and viewing, understanding these flaws can help users navigate the platform more effectively and advocate for necessary changes.

YouTube for Writers

While it might be clear why viewers have their grievances with YouTube, the platform also has a significant impact on writers and content creators. Whether you’re a novelist seeking to promote your latest book, a freelance writer looking for writing tips, or a blogger wanting to diversify your content, YouTube can be both a boon and a bane. Here’s why:

  1. A Powerful Promotional Tool: YouTube is an incredibly powerful promotional tool. You can create a book trailer, share snippets of your upcoming work, conduct author interviews, or share behind-the-scenes looks at your writing process. With a broad global reach, it can expose your work to millions of potential readers. That said, the noisy and highly competitive environment can make standing out quite challenging.
  2. An Excellent Learning Platform: YouTube is teeming with writing advice. Numerous channels are dedicated to providing tips and insights into the art and business of writing. From the specifics of crafting compelling characters to broader advice on publishing or self-publishing, there’s plenty of valuable content. However, the downside is the time it takes to sift through the mountains of videos to find high-quality, reliable information.
  3. A New Medium to Explore: For the adventurous writer, YouTube presents an opportunity to venture into video essay or video blog (vlog) writing. It’s a different way to engage with your audience, allowing you to supplement your written work with audio-visual content. However, it demands a different set of skills and a significant time investment, which not every writer can afford.
  4. Community Building: YouTube allows writers to build and engage with a community of readers and fellow writers. Channels can function as interactive platforms where viewers can leave comments, ask questions, and engage in discussions. However, managing this community interaction can be demanding and time-consuming. Plus, dealing with negative comments or trolls can be mentally taxing.
  5. Monetization Opportunities: Through ad revenue, sponsorship deals, and YouTube Premium’s revenue-sharing, YouTube offers writers a chance to earn money. However, these income streams are unpredictable and often require a large and engaged viewership to be lucrative. Plus, there’s the ever-present threat of demonetization due to often opaque and changing community guidelines.

In conclusion, YouTube can be a powerful tool for writers, providing opportunities for promotion, learning, community building, and even monetization. However, it’s not without its challenges, from the time commitment required to stand out in the crowded platform to navigating its often confusing and frustrating policies. Understanding both the advantages and disadvantages can help writers make the most of what YouTube has to offer.

Conclusion: Why YouTube Sucks

YouTube is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, its wealth of content and robust infrastructure offer a platform for free video hosting that is accessible to all, making it an invaluable resource in today’s digital age. However, the frustration stemming from frequent ad interruptions and the overpriced YouTube Premium service poses significant drawbacks. Despite its flaws, YouTube remains an important tool for content creators and viewers alike, but there is undoubtedly room for improvement.

Takeaways: Navigating the landscape of YouTube is an exercise in tolerance. While it provides a platform for endless exploration and learning, it demands patience with its ad-heavy model. If you’re considering YouTube for your content needs, bear in mind that its strengths and weaknesses are two sides of the same coin. It’s not perfect, but in the grand scheme of things, its contribution to sharing knowledge and entertainment cannot be understated.

Richard Lowe
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Youtube sucks. It is a censorship site. You can wirte comments without cursing nor using harsh language but if Youtube disagree with your opinion they block it or more likely shadow ban it. Youtube is a pile of trash that needs to be replaced.
Rumble still has some technical issues but it is much better than Youtube because it does not censor opinions.
YOUTUBE NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. Im sick of that garbage site.


“Content ID”

I received a copyright claim on the following video. The Indian Navy has its own world-class musical band and I was privileged enough to be treated to a concert on one of their flagship vessels. The naval band played “Thriller” offering a tribute to the King of Pop, Michael Jackson.

It was such a beautiful experience. But according to YouTube, the music played by a live band falls under copyright claims. This is what the copyright claim says in detail:

“The melody is the words and music of songwriters and composers. These rights are often managed by different rightsholders in each country, and are separate from the rights associated with the recording of the song.”

Indian Navy Playing “Thriller” By Michael Jackson (

I’m very angry with YouTube. How can a song tribute by a musical band fall under any kind of copyright claims? They used their own drums, saxophone, and other instruments to recreate the melody. Can’t Google’s algorithms tell the difference between an original composition, and its recreated version.

With this wrongful copyright claim, Google and YouTube have also shown extreme disrespect to my country’s Navy, and armed forces. All they were doing was give tribute to Michael Jackson, and that falls under fair use in every sense of the word. It’s not as if they were pirating “Thriller” and planning to sell the records later.

I wish Sundar Pichai reads my comment someday, and I want him to know how much he sucks.


I would have filed a complaint if I knew it was being answered by humans and not AI chatbots. Your article is so needed in this hour.

There’s no way you can talk directly to a human in the Google Support team unless you’re subscribed to “Google One.”