Show, don’t tell is the most repeated instruction in fiction writing. Writing teachers hammer it. Books repeat it. Critique groups recite it.
It used to be the advice I disliked most, because it meant nothing to me. I ignored it, since it was three words with no instruction inside them.
You are telling too much was something I heard constantly in critique groups, never once with an explanation of what that was or what to do instead.
And I had an objection. It is obviously easier to write that Sally felt angry than to describe her so that a reader concludes it. Does the showing version not take considerably more words for the same information?
That objection deserves an answer, not a repetition of the rule, and this book is the answer. Telling pushes readers away. Showing pulls them in. Showing lets a reader imagine the story, and telling does the imagining for them.
What does show, don’t tell look like?
Side by side, which is the only way the difference becomes usable.
Telling says Mark was nervous about the job interview. Showing gives you damp prints left on his resume as he shuffles the pages for the third time, the receptionist’s smile landing like a spotlight, and his hand going to his tie knot again.
Telling says the house was old and creepy. Showing has paint peeling from the shutters like dried scabs, a porch sagging under rotting boards, and a door creaking somewhere inside on every gust.
The book is built on pairs like that, chapter after chapter, because an abstract principle a writer cannot apply on a Tuesday is not advice. It is a slogan.
The book on this: Show Don’t Tell explains the most repeated instruction in fiction writing instead of repeating it, including where showing fails and how to find telling in your own draft.
Is showing always better than telling?
No, and a whole chapter exists to say so.
Overdone, misdirected or applied mechanically, showing produces its own failures. The most common is over-describing. A beginning writer reads show, don’t tell as describe every movement, and you get a character reaching for a door handle with his right hand, grasping the cold metal between thumb and forefinger, and twisting it counterclockwise.
Nothing in that sentence needed showing. Only the significant actions do.
A book that teaches a technique and never teaches its failure modes is producing writers who will overapply it, which is how the advice earned its reputation in the first place.
What is purple prose?
Writing so ornamental that the reader becomes aware of reading.
It is not simply overwriting. It is a specific failure where the language announces itself and you can feel the writer reaching for an effect. The term comes from Horace, who compared out-of-place ornate passages to purple cloth sewn onto plain fabric, a patch that draws the eye for all the wrong reasons.
The distinction that matters is the one writers get wrong. Purple prose is not the same as vivid writing. Vivid writing uses precise, specific detail to put a reader inside a scene. Purple prose uses elaborate language to draw attention to itself.
That difference is why the chapter sits next to the one on showing going wrong. Both are what happens when a writer applies a good principle without a stopping condition.
What is interiority?
The inside of a character, and the hardest territory in the book.
Every story exists in two places. The world outside the character and the world within. Actions, dialogue and sensory detail handle the outside, and the inside is where readers fall in love with somebody.
Interiority is thoughts, feelings, realisations, memories, and the running commentary a person keeps in their own head. It is also the most misunderstood ground in fiction, because it sits exactly on the border between showing and telling and crossing to the wrong side is easy.
That is the chapter where the rule gets difficult, and it is the reason a whole book on three words is justified.
How do you find telling in your own draft?
Systematically, because telling leaves tracks.
The revision chapter runs a series of passes instead of asking you to reread and sense it. The first is an emotion word hunt. Search the manuscript for words that name a feeling. Angry, sad, happy, afraid, excited, nervous, relieved, ashamed, proud, confused, devastated.
Each one is a place where a state was announced instead of produced, and not all of them need changing. What matters is that you can now see them.
That is the practical half of the book, and it is why there is an annotated scene in the appendix. Reading about showing and knowing what to do when you open your own file are different skills.
What is an info dump and why does it matter here?
Data thrown at a reader because the writer decided it was necessary.
The author believes the information has to be there and, instead of weaving it into the story, delivers it all at once. Every film that opens with narration is doing it. The scrolling text at the start of Star Wars is an information dump, before the film has begun.
That is not storytelling. It is front-loading exposition, and it is the largest scale version of telling there is.
The temptation is always backstory. Something happened before the story starts and the reader needs to know, so it gets delivered in a block. The chapter is about the alternatives, all of which are slower to write and considerably better to read.
Why does the book use strong verbs as a technique?
Because a weak verb propped up by an adverb is telling in miniature.
Most telling at sentence level is a general verb doing no work while a modifier explains what the verb should have conveyed. Replace the verb and the modifier becomes redundant, which is the test the chapter gives you. Cut or replace the five weakest and see what happens to the paragraph.
That is showing operating below the level people usually discuss it. The advice is normally given about scenes, and a great deal of the problem lives in individual sentences where nobody is looking.
Where does dialogue fit?
On both sides, which surprises people.
There is a chapter on telling in dialogue and a separate one on showing through it. Dialogue feels like showing by default, because characters are speaking, not a narrator explaining, and that assumption is exactly why so much telling hides there.
A character who announces what they feel, or explains the situation to somebody who already knows it, is telling with quotation marks around it. The reader notices, even when they cannot say what is wrong.
Splitting that into two chapters was deliberate. Finding telling in your dialogue is a different skill from using dialogue to show.
Does show, don’t tell work the same in every genre?
The principle does. The application does not.
In thrillers and mysteries everything a reader notices has to feel like potential evidence. The job is showing enough that the reader builds theories and not so much that the answer becomes obvious, which makes every detail a calibration problem, not a description.
Other genres have their own traps and their own priorities about what a reader most needs to experience. The chapter works through five of them.
Handing a writer one universal rule and no genre guidance is another version of the problem this book exists to fix.
The Guides That Get Your Book Written, Published, and Sold
Four short, practical guides on writing, publishing, and selling your book, plus the occasional note when there's something worth your time. No fluff, no daily inbox clutter. Drop your email and they're yours.
We use MailerLite to manage our list and send these emails. Your address is used only to send you what you signed up for. We will not sell it, share it, or use it for anything else, and you can unsubscribe anytime.