Latest
How to Turn Your Expertise Into a Book People Want to Read | The Expert MethodWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 25, 2026Challenger Remembrance Day: The Engineer Who Wouldn’t SignJoel Salomon: The Truth About MoneyReddit Is Putting Up a Login Wall. Wikipedia Won’t Be Far Behind.Victoria Chemko: The Body Is the First TechnologySir Patrick Stewart: A TributeA Yale Economist Says We Won’t Be Missed. He Forgot the Bread Line.Walter Koenig: A TributeI Don’t Post Bad ARC Reviews. I Send the Author a Note.AI Has Paid Off Outside Tech. Apollo Is Reading the Wrong Scoreboard.The Little Red Book of Stuff That Works!Your Kids Are Your Own FaultGrow a PairYou’re Broke Because You Want to BeIt’s Called Work for a Reason!No Time for TactShut Up, Stop Whining, and Get a LifeWilliam Bessette: AI Enablement and Child Welfare TechnologyFree Book Planning ToolsWhat’s New at The Writing King: Week of October 18, 2026Ghostwriting by the Numbers: Timelines, Word Counts and the First CallPromising Young Woman (2020) ReviewBillions for AI, Pennies for the Plumbing: AI Companies Should Pay to Keep PHP AlivePHP2Shell: AI Found a 22-Year-Old Crack Under Your Website in Two DaysKindle Unlimited Is Now Kindle+. AI Audiobooks Just Joined the BuffetPetrov Day: The Officer Who Didn’t Believe the ComputerMo Gawdat Says the AI Dystopia Starts in 2027. Read the List, Skip the DatesWhen to Quit Writing a Book: I’ve Abandoned Dozens, and I’d Do It AgainThe Society of Authors Signed an Ethical AI Charter, Then Ran From It in Eight DaysChina Is Using Bots to Fan the Data Center Backlash. The Backlash Is Still Real.Getty Images Filed for Bankruptcy. Can You Prove You Licensed Your Book’s Images?Fluff Words: Cut Them From Your Prose, Keep Them in Your DialogueWhere Can Writers Learn Storytelling From Movies? Richard Lowe Publishes 1,226 Film and TV Reviews With Writing Craft NotesWhere Are the Independent Bookstores and Public Libraries Worth Visiting in Tampa Bay? Author Richard Lowe Profiles 44 of ThemWhat Should You Know Before Hiring a Ghostwriter? The Writing King Publishes 57 New Answers, Including What to Do When It Goes WrongWhere Can You Hear Founders and Executives Tell Their Own Stories? Richard Lowe’s Leaders and Their Stories Publishes Every Unscripted Interview With a Full TranscriptAuthor Richard Lowe Publishes Eight Volumes of Enemies of You, a Researched Series on the Forces Working Against Ordinary AmericansThe Jackal (1997) ReviewThe Day of the Jackal (2024) ReviewYour First Novel Is an Apprentice Piece: What Beta Readers and Editors Can’t FixWhen the Cloud Gets Bombed: What the AWS Data Center Strikes Teach About BackupsHuman-Written Book Labels Are Gatekeeping With a FeeThe Enshittification of Microsoft Office: Why I Switched to a Free CloneGlobal Encryption Day: The Padlock Every Writer Depends OnWriting Your Worst Moments in a Memoir: Show the Evidence, Skip the VerdictHow to Register a Copyright for Your Book (and What Doesn’t Count)Your AI Chats Aren’t Private: Deleted ChatGPT Logs in CourtThe Board Seat Scam: A 419 Letter in a Business SuitI Joined the Science Fiction Book Club 30 Times
The Writing King Your Ethical Ghostwriter. Your Story, Done Right.

Presidents Day: The Name Nobody Made Official

TL;DR: Presidents Day isn’t the legal name of the holiday. Federal law still calls it Washington’s Birthday. The popular name spread anyway, and in spreading it turned a day about one specific man into a day about a job title. That’s a small linguistic event with a real cost, and it’s the same cost you pay when you write about a category of person instead of a person.

The third Monday of February is a federal holiday whose legal name is Washington’s Birthday. It’s been that since it was established and the 1968 act that moved it to a Monday didn’t change it.

Almost nobody calls it that. Retailers started using Presidents Day, states adopted their own variations, and the popular name won completely while the legal one sat there unchanged.

So we have a holiday with an official name nobody uses and a common name that means something broader than the law intends. It’s worth pulling apart, because the mechanism is one you can watch happening to other things.

The holiday’s name is a small mess, and the complaint has nothing to do with the presidents. The law says one thing and the advertisers said another, and the advertisers won. I want the day back for the man it was named after.

What the Broader Name Does

Washington’s Birthday is about a man. Presidents Day is about an office.

Those sound similar and they’re not. A day about a person invites you to think about what he did. That means it can be argued with. He resigned his commission. He left after two terms. You can assess that. A day about an office invites nothing in particular. There’s no shared assessment available, because the holders of the office have almost nothing in common beyond having held it. Some were great. Some were dreadful. Averaging them produces no usable idea.

The broad name is easier to say and easier to sell things under. It also holds less. That’s a trade almost nobody made on purpose. That trade deserves more attention than it gets. Nobody voted to make the day mean less. It drifted there one sales flyer at a time, and I think things that drift deserve more suspicion than things that get decided.

Washington's Birthday Versus Presidents DayA comparison of the holiday's legal name and its popular name. Washington's Birthday is about one man and invites you to assess what he did, while Presidents Day is about an office and invites nothing in particular. The broad name buys durability and spends specificity.Washington's Birthday Versus Presidents DayWashington's Birthday (legal)About a manInvites you to assess what he didCan be argued withKeeps the specificityPresidents Day (popular)About an officeInvites nothing in particularEasier to say and sell underBuys durability, spends specificity
Washington's Birthday Versus Presidents DayA comparison of the holiday's legal name and its popular name. Washington's Birthday is about one man and invites you to assess what he did, while Presidents Day is about an office and invites nothing in particular. The broad name buys durability and spends specificity.Washington's Birthday VersusPresidents DayWashington's Birthday (legal)About a manInvites you to assess what he didCan be argued withKeeps the specificityPresidents Day (popular)About an officeInvites nothing in particularEasier to say and sell underBuys durability, spends specificity

Federal law still says Washington's Birthday; retailers and states made Presidents Day the common name.

The Two Men It Was Nearly About

The popular version tends to fold in Lincoln, whose birthday is 12 February, ten days before Washington’s on the 22nd. Several states observed both separately and some still mark Lincoln’s day on its own.

That folding is understandable and it costs something. Washington and Lincoln are interesting for opposite reasons, and merging them flattens both.

Washington stands out for what he declined. He handed back power twice when nobody could have made him, and the norm he created by leaving held for a hundred and fifty years on his example alone.

Lincoln stands out for what he endured and what he chose while enduring it. He held a fracturing country together through four years of war and prepared, in writing, to hand over to a successor he expected to beat him.

One story is about restraint with power. The other is about integrity under unbearable pressure. They rhyme, and they’re not the same lesson, and a day called Presidents Day teaches neither of them. Given the choice, I’d split the day back into two and let each man have his own, because both stories are good enough to deserve a whole day of attention.

The two men Presidents Day folds together
Washington Lincoln
Birthday 22 February 12 February
Stands out for What he declined What he endured and chose
The lesson Restraint with power Integrity under unbearable pressure
Ten minutes on 1783, handing in his commission 1864, writing what he’d do when he lost

Watch This Happen to Your Own Material

I’ve written 113+ books under my own name, and this exact compression is the commonest problem I see in a first draft. It frustrates me more than bad grammar ever could, because grammar is easy to fix and a flattened story takes real digging to bring back.

Somebody tells me about one manager on one Tuesday who did one thing. By the time it reaches the page it’s become a passage about leadership. The particular person has been promoted into a category and the life has gone out of it.

The general version feels safer to write. It can’t be contradicted, it offends nobody, and it sounds like the kind of thing that belongs in a book. It’s also unreadable, because there’s nothing in it for the reader to hold. Every time I find a paragraph about a category, I go looking for the person it was before somebody sanded it down.

That search is the most satisfying part of my job. The person was there all along, and the draft only needed somebody stubborn enough to ask for them back.

The Test I Use

Take any paragraph in your draft and ask whether a named human being does something in it at a specific moment.

If yes, it can stay. If no, one of two things is true. Either it’s connective tissue, which you need a little of, or it’s a specific thing that got generalized, in which case the original is better and it’s still recoverable if you ask the right question.

The right question is almost always: who, and when, and what did they say. People answer that question with detail they’ll never produce in response to a request for their leadership philosophy.

None of This Means Renaming Was Wrong

There’s an argument for the broad name.

Honoring a single figure gets harder as a country ages and reassesses. A day about the office survives changing views in a way that a day about one man doesn’t. That’s a real advantage and it’s why these shifts keep happening.

That’s a fair point and I don’t resent it. A day that survives changing views is worth something, even when I miss what it used to hold.

The point is that it’s a trade with a cost. You buy durability and you spend specificity. Knowing which one you’re spending is the whole of the skill.

How do you mark Presidents Day?

Most people mark it by not working, if they’re among the people who get the day, and by encountering a great many advertisements.

If you want the older version, take the two men it was nearly about and spend ten minutes on each. Washington in 1783, handing in his commission. Lincoln in 1864, writing down what he’d do when he lost.

Those are two decisions made by men who could have chosen otherwise with no consequence, and ten minutes with either one beats anything the mattress sale has to offer. I’d like to see the day win back its legal name, even if it happens one household at a time.

Presidents Day FAQ

Is Presidents Day the official name of the holiday?
No. Federal law still calls the third Monday of February Washington’s Birthday. Presidents Day is a popular name that spread through commercial use and state variation, and it became dominant while the legal name stayed unchanged.
Does Presidents Day honor Lincoln too?
In popular usage, generally yes, since his birthday on 12 February falls ten days before Washington’s. Some states observe Lincoln’s birthday separately. The federal holiday remains legally about Washington alone.
What is lost when a holiday is renamed more broadly?
Specificity. A day about a person invites you to assess what he did. A day about an office invites nothing in particular, because the holders share little beyond the job. The broad name is easier to use and holds less.
What made Washington and Lincoln great presidents?
Washington stands out for restraint. He handed power back twice when nobody could have made him. Lincoln stands out for integrity under pressure, holding a fracturing country together and preparing in writing to hand over to a successor he expected to lose to.
How do you keep a memoir specific?
Watch for the compression that happens in first drafts. A specific person doing a specific thing becomes a passage about leadership, and the life goes out of it. Ask who, and when, and what did they say. People answer that with detail they never produce for a question about philosophy.

Sources

0 comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Was this useful?

Leave a comment